Paper ID #32535Welcoming and Building Community for Graduate Students Through Re-moteTech EnvironmentsDr. Marianna Savoca, Stony Brook University Marianna Savoca is both an administrator and faculty member. She teaches career development, leader- ship, and external relations, collaborates with faculty on research and programmatic initiatives, as well as oversees internships and practicum experiences for graduate and undergraduate students. She leads campus-wide efforts to scale career development and access to high-impact experiential education for students in all majors and degree levels. She is Co-PI on two NSF-funded
mathematics and science in California and Oklahoma. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 A Framework for Examining Engineering Doctoral Student Role IdentityAbstract This paper presents the Role Identities of Doctoral Engineering Doctoral Students(RIDES) framework for the examination of engineering doctoral students’ role identities.Identity of engineering students at the undergraduate level has been widely explored, butcomparably few studies have explored identity at the doctoral level [1]. Identity development isfundamental to becoming part of the community of practice of graduate school and academia(e.g., [2]); thus
, 174undergraduate and graduate multidisciplinary engineering students completed this course in thenew online format during the summer and 131 students took the course in the fall semester of2020. In this paper, we will begin by discussing the face-to-face version of the course with theworkaround online option for a handful of students each semester. We then discuss informalstakeholder interviews that in addition to the aforementioned literature helped to develop therequirements of the online course. The goal of the transition was to develop an online version ofthe course that provided an educational equivalence to the in-person version of the course, whilecontinuing to encourage the community element present in the face-to-face version.2. Course
, likes, and dislikes towards various aspects of STEM [7]. Persistenceis defined as a passion for persevering through long-term goals [24] [25]. The process of conceptmapping that was used in the development of the tool involved a participatory framework,whereby participation was by consultation, including functional and interactive participation[26]. The STEM stakeholders worked collaboratively as part of a community as they developedmeasures based on their experiences and knowledge from working in the field of STEM andSTEM education. Their professional identities and experiences validate their role, whileproviding representation for their voices on an instrument that was developed in this uniquemanner.FIGURE 1: Conceptual framework for the APT
results of innovative learning strategies and art-relatedpartnerships and developments across campus. A Qualtrics survey of faculty and academic staffconducted in 2021 rounds out the snapshot of STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts,and Mathematics) at our institution.The paper concludes with potential future directions for implementing changes in curriculum andbringing art more fully into our campus life. A focus on art as something communallyexperienced in public places and legitimately connected to engineering coursework serves tohighlight its importance as an intrinsic, exciting part of engineering design. Integration of art inengineering education fosters critical and creative thinking, allowing students to conceivealternative
engineering.Consequently, many first-year programs aim to address one or more of these issues.The TRANSCEnD program at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas seeks to improveundergraduate civil engineering and construction management education, as well as increaseretention and graduation by specifically focusing on students and curriculum in the first twoyears of the civil & environmental engineering and construction management (CEEC/CM)programs. Retention and graduation rates are on the lower side of national averages; therefore,faculty at the institution are taking the lead and making changes within the department. Oneaspect of the program is community cohesion building (CCB), i.e., a learning community, wherefirst-year students create connections, engage in
Visualizing Arguments to Scaffold Graduate Writing in Engineering EducationAbstractMany graduate students come to engineering education research with technical backgrounds inengineering. This can present a challenge for them in learning to write social science research,with new expectations around the structure of academic arguments for the field of engineeringeducation research. Existing research suggests that even graduate students familiar with writingstrategies struggle when entering new communities of practice and disciplines. Although somescholarship has focused on writing, minimal strategies for encouraging argumentation through arhetorical approach have been developed for graduate students. Unlike a focus on writtenproduct
] hasbeen used as the basis to develop a construct for engineering identity development within theengineering education community. The science identity model advances that science identitydevelops intersectional and over time. Research on engineering identity emerged from variousacademic strands, including psychology and sociology. The definition of identity in this study isviewed through the social lens. Identity is defined as "being recognized as a certain 'kind ofperson' in a given context" [16, p.99]. The given context focuses on individual socialperformances rather than their uniqueness as a person. Our context is this study is specific toengineering and how students self-described and are seen within the context of engineering
with the WFU Program for Leadership and Character and many colleagues across the university. With inclusion being a core value, she is proud that the WFU Engineering team represents 60% female engineering faculty and 40% female students, plus 20% of students from ethnic minority groups. Her areas of expertise include engineering identity, complex problem solving across cognitive and non-cognitive domains, recruitment and retention, PBL, engineering design, learning through ser- vice, character education in engineering contexts, etc. She also conducts research in cardiovascular fluid mechanics and sustainable energy technologies. Prior to joining Wake Forest University, Olga served as a Program Director at the
and seeing their shared visions come to life.Mr. Ali Karji American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Community-Engaged Learning in Construction Education: A Case Study Saeed Rokooei 1, Michelle Garraway 2, Ali Karji 3 1&2 Mississippi State University, 3 Pennsylvania State UniversityAbstract Community-Engaged Learning (CEL) integrates academic education with the application of institutional resources to manage challenges facing communities through engagement so that societal needs identified by a community will be addressed. CEL provides opportunities to
Education department. He has graduated with a bachelors degree in mechanical engineering from Rowan University. Josh is very passionate about education as well as the social issues in both the engineering and education systems. He hopes to further his understanding in both of these fields. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Let’s Play! Gamifying Engineering Ethics Education Through the Development of Competitive and Collaborative Activities Through both success and failure, many engineering projects have a profound impact onindividuals and society. Thus, ensuring future engineers consider these impacts and reflect on theethical
AbstractIn this research paper, we explore student responses to Utility Value Interventions in staticscourses. Introductory engineering mechanics courses (e.g., statics, dynamics) are critical pointswithin a curriculum, and student performance in these courses can have a strong influence onfuture success. And while these courses are often thought of as “weed out” courses, the ubiquityof these courses for engineers is what makes them an important place for students to develop themotivation to persist through their engineering education. One particularly promising tool for thisdevelopment has been Utility Value Interventions (UVIs) in which students are given opportunitiesto reflect on how their coursework aligns with their lives through short writing
four tenets (community,identity, practice, and meaning) are well distributed in graduate education. For example,coursework most easily fits into the “practice” category but incorporates aspects of “community”(potentially working with others in class), and “meaning” as courses apply theoretical material topractical relevant engineering applications. A research component of a graduate program, too,spans multiple sectors, falling mainly into the “meaning” category, earning depth and expertisethrough a research experience, but also promotes development of “identity,” “community” withlabmates, and “practice” in the application of coursework principles to real research problems.Layered on top of CoP theory is a more specialized theory, that of
” enables womento develop stronger implicit STEM identities through exposure to positive cues in theirsurroundings. The current study suggests that this valuable work within STEM may be valuablysupplemented by students’ experience in other disciplines. The WGS framework and scholarshipgave the students in our study a different, wider-lens view of engineering itself, and enhancedtheir sense of STEM identity.Pawley [42] argues that “feminist science studies are particularly relevant to engineering andengineering education, namely, for scrutinizing what ‘counts’ as engineering content and why.”Our participants felt strongly that all students should be exposed to the theory and methods ofWGS. They identified ways in which this knowledge was helpful to
can be challenged by threats to an imagined future, and animagined future self can also serve as a motivational resource, as a goal to keep striving towards[32].While the concept of liminal identity has been explored in conjunction with examining identitydevelopment in K-12, higher education and adults [31], discussions of liminal identity are rarewithin the engineering education literature [33]. As such, this paper marks a foray intoinvestigating the connection between liminal identity development and engineering identitydevelopment. We use liminal identity as an organizing concept and analytical tool to highlighthow the identities of engineering students are in transition, informed by their perceptions offuture selves but expressed through
thetraining of their students, it has received almost no attention in engineering education to date.Although VTS might be perceived as too far removed from engineering for relevance, we havedeployed it as a core innovative pedagogical method along with several other artful methods inan experimental graduate course with promising results. The purposes of this paper are to (1)explore how VTS contributes to the development of reflective thinking skills in graduateengineering education, and (2) share insights of interest to educators considering adopting VTSin their courses and curricula.The course in which we have experimented is a 3-credit elective offered through the departmentof civil and environmental engineering. It is led by two co-instructors
for MMW was informed by a number of institutional educational initiativesand programs at BC, including BC’s identity as a Jesuit, Catholic institution, its Renewed CoreProgram, and its development of a new Human-Centered Engineering Department.First, as a Jesuit, Catholic university, BC is committed to educating the “whole person” andembraces courses that advance aspects of social justice. Particularly in the Fall of 2020, whenlayered crises of COVID, racial injustice, climate disruption, and the presidential election placedhigh burdens on universities to respond, we were encouraged by the university administration toembrace these challenging topics in class. We emphasized the humanity of the engineeringdesign process and profession
] ratherthan their intergenerational wealth [19] and privilege [20]. Students learn these cultural cueseither through overt or implicit messages passed onto them by faculty, the curriculum,institutional cues, or other forms of professional identity socialization [21].Engineering education reinforces the dualism between the social and technical dimensions ofengineering. The social dimensions, partly required by ABET accreditation through engineeringethics, remain segregated from 'real' engineering [22]. In many of these standalone ethicsmodules or courses, students internalize their 'dis(integration)' from engineering and have ratedethics as "the least interesting, the least useful, and the most trivial" part of their engineeringcurriculum [7], [23. p
Research Assistants. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 How well can Makerspaces build an Entrepreneurial Mindset?1. IntroductionIn this paper, we explore if makerspaces can contribute to student development of anentrepreneurial mindset. Makerspaces take prior implementations of hands-on engineering, suchas machine and wood shops, and push a step further to have complete digital tools available toassist with the common goal of creating a final product or solving problems. Often integratedthrough coursework, students usually have access to tools and a maker community both in andout of the classroom. They also allows students to unleash creative potential and
personaldevelopment through collaboration, knowledge sharing, and analysis. I will briefly introduceexamples of learning communities developed within Colleges of Engineering—including that ofNew Mexico Tech and the École de Technologie Supérieure in Montreal, Canada—that havereported both success and challenges.STEM FellowsSimpson et al. (2015) sought to address the lack of graduate level-writing support of engineeringstudents at their institution, New Mexico Tech, a university who has strong specialized programsin areas such as mechanical engineering, atmospheric and astrophysics, earth sciences, andpetroleum engineering. Simpson and colleagues developed a graduate STEM CommunicationFellows program aimed at “creating opportunities to develop organic
Paper ID #33673Educational Opportunities for Technical Writing in Engineering EducationDr. Susan J. Ely, University of Southern Indiana Dr. Ely began her academic career at the community college level, after having worked as an engineer in areas of manufacturing, distribution, logistics and supply chain. Her research interests in Supply Chain Management include optimization through resiliency, lean supply chain practices and effective instruction in supply chain for career development, professional development of educators and online practices.Mr. Jotam E. Chen, University of Southern Indiana Jotam Chen is currently
during their primary and secondary education—especially students who are traditionally underrepresented in technology fields or come from underserved communities. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Engaging High School Students in Computer Science Through Music Remixing: An EarSketch-based Pilot Competition & EvaluationAbstract:There is a strong demand for diverse computer scientists in the United States. In order to buildinterest and excitement around computing, there is a need for free, accessible computingexperiences for K-12 students. As part of broader efforts to build a pipeline into computerscience, scholars at Georgia Institute of
Engineering Education, 2021Systems Thinking Tools in a Graduate Biological Engineering Class - A Work in Progress Author and AffiliationsAbstractWhen technological challenges involve complex systems that include interactions with othercomponents or agents, the system can exhibit unexpected and counterintuitive behavior. Systemsthinking is useful in such cases but is rarely taught in engineering courses that do not explicitlyinclude ‘systems’ or ‘systems dynamics’ in the syllabus. This work-in-progress describes anapplication of systems thinking concepts in an undergraduate and a graduate course inAgricultural Waste Management at North Carolina State University. Two specific systemsthinking tools were introduced to help
desire increased guidance on how their graduateprograms were structured and a greater understanding of how to develop and maintain functionalcommunication with their advisors. These findings will allow the engineering education researchand practice communities to understand better how students conceptualize graduate school andprovide adequate guidance and support. This study will contribute to the small body of literatureconcerning graduate engineering attrition and holds implications for the future of engineeringgraduate programs and departments in their ongoing efforts to promote their students' well-beingamid the growing crisis relating to student well-being.Introduction and Literature ReviewWhen observing the statistics for attrition from
, D.H., and Jetten, J. (2015). Bridging and bonding interactions in higher education: social capital and students’ academic and professional identity formation. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00126Kraska, M. (Fall 2008). Retention of graduate students through learning communities. Retrieved March 4, 2021, from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JITE/v452/kraska.html.Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge university press.Lin, N. (1999). Building a network theory of social capital. Connections 22:28-51.Mayring, P. (2010). Qualitative content analysis. In U. Flick, E. von Kardoff, & I. Steinke (Eds.), A Companion to
the USA,women represent only 19.7% of engineering graduates and 18.7% of computer sciencegraduates, lagging behind the 35.5% of women in all STEM fields [2]. The goal of this projectwas to understand student thinking about diversity and inclusion with the long-term aim ofimproving culture for females and under-represented groups. The engineering workforce andengineered products, infrastructure, and services can certainly benefit from designs created bydiverse teams. Prior researchers have linked diversity to increased creativity in teams andwork-groups [3, 4].Building an inclusive culture is challenging but very important. A negative campus climate canaffect students’ self-efficacy. A campus with a lack of diverse students can create a
School. He earned a B.S. in Materials Science Engineering from Alfred Univer- sity, and received his M.S. and Ph.D., both from Tufts University, in Chemistry and Engineering Education respectively. His research investigates the development of new classroom innovations, assessment tech- niques, and identifying new ways to empirically understand how engineering students and educators learn. He currently serves as the Graduate Program Chair for the Engineering Education Systems and Design Ph.D. program. He is also the immediate past chair of the Research in Engineering Education Network (REEN) and an associate editor for the Journal of Engineering Education (JEE). Prior to joining ASU he was a graduate student research
helpengineers and their communities meet their needs, and clarifies that engineering does notinherently require technocratic solutions to communal problems and needs.PositionalityThe primary and secondary authors are both engineers, labor organizers with the AmericanFederation of Teachers (AFT) local GEO-3550, and children of union members fromworking-class backgrounds. Both were participants in the 2020 GEO-3550 abolitionist strike fora safe and just campus for all [29]. The first author was also taking graduate coursework inintroducing the concepts of engineering education research during the writing of this paper,which provided a critical reflective space for learning and grappling with theoretical frameworksand their applications. We reached out to
with the help of Oculus Rift headsets in a controlled environment. This research propelsthe learner into an immersive environment to learn about building systems through VR instead ofusing two-dimensional construction drawings. The subjects’ understanding of the materials isgauged using an online pre- post quiz. With a design-based research approach, we assess theimpact of VR tools on construction student knowledge, how students respond to this hybrid modelof instruction, and whether it holds any value compared to other traditional methods of instruction.Incorporating such educational tools and practices can increase the prevalence of more focusededucational knowledge transfer while protecting the students’ health by reducing personal
education improvement.Dr. Faye R. Jones, Florida State University Faye R. Jones is a Senior Research Associate at Florida State University’s College of Communication & Information. Her research interests include STEM student outcomes and the exploration of student pathways through institutional research. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Assessing Educational Pathways for Manufacturing in Rural Communities: Research Findings and Implications from an Investigation of New and Existing Programs in Northwest FloridaAbstractIn northwest Florida, advanced manufacturing (AM) job outstrip the number of middle