Paper ID #33000Exploring the Mentoring Needs of Engineering Postdoctoral Scholars ofColor: Is Systematic Change Required in the Postdoctoral TrainingEnvironment? (Research)Dr. Sylvia L. Mendez, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs Dr. Sylvia Mendez is a Professor and Chair of the Department of Leadership, Research, and Foundations at the University of Colorado Colorado Springs. She earned a PhD in Educational Leadership and Policy Studies from the University of Kansas, a MS in Student Affairs in Higher Education from Colorado State University, and a BA in Economics from Washington State University. Dr. Mendez’s research
Paper ID #33182Investigating Student Retention of Surveying Course Material fromSophomore Year to Senior Year Using Pre- and Post-TestsDr. Kweku Brown P.E., The Citadel Dr. Kweku Brown is an Associate Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at The Citadel. He received his Civil Engineering Master’s degree from the University of Connecticut and his Doctoral degree at Clemson University. He is active in the transportation engineering communities including the South Carolina Department of Transportation, Institute of Transportation Engineers, and Transportation Research Board. His research focuses on transportation
as it related to studyingengineering in general, and not relating to anything the women in engineering program isspecifically doing or not doing. According to Generation Z researchers Seemiller & Grace,among the top issues on the minds of Generation Z students are “education, employment, andracial equality” [6]. Not surprisingly, today’s prospective students are most likely to citepreparation for a job as the number one reason they are considering a college education[3].Coming of age during the economic recession of 2008, Generation Z is pragmatic and seeksvalue in a degree that they see as critical to landing a job down the road. A real concern for thesestudents is the ability to afford a college degree, which is not surprising given
Paper ID #34624Allies, Advocates, and Accomplices: A Critical Look at the RelationshipsBetween white and Black women in Engineering EducationDr. Kristen Moore, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Kristen R. Moore is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at University at Buffalo. Her research focuses primarily on technical communication and issues of equity, inclusion, and social justice. She is the author of Technical Communication After the Social Justice Turn: Building Coalitions for Action (2019), in addition to a range of articles. She has received a number of awards for
what I can do. Itpushed me along the way.” With regard to what they thought they got out of facilitating in the Fall 2020 focusgroups, facilitators remarked on “the organic and honest conversations,” “learning to be moreempathetic and open-minded,” and appreciated the opportunity to connect with other studentsand get a sense of how they are dealing with the pandemic and other issues. Two facilitatorsfurther commented that the experience helped them to feel less alone or recognize that anydifficulties they may have experienced were similar to those of others: “I was able to see that myexperience in the college of engineering was not necessarily unique; others felt as though theydidn’t fit in and I wasn’t alone in that. The conversations
Paper ID #32905Evaluation of an EPIC Student Experience to Broaden Participation inEngineering Programs (Work in Progress)Dr. Fethiye Ozis P.E., Northern Arizona University Dr. Fethiye ”Faith” Ozis is a senior lecturer in the civil and environmental engineering department at Northern Arizona University. Dr. Ozis holds a B.S. in environmental engineering from the Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey and a Ph.D. from the University of Southern California, Los Ange- les. She is a licensed Professional Engineer, Environmental, in Arizona. Dr. Ozis enjoys every dimension of being an engineering educator. She conducts
Paper ID #33616Poster: Methods for Investigating Teacher Professional Identities ofElementary Teachers of EngineeringMeg E. West, The Ohio State University Meg West is an engineering education graduate student at The Ohio State University. She is a graduate research associate for the Department of Engineering Education. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021COLLEGE OF ENGINEERINGMethods for Investigating Teacher Professional Identities ofElementary Teachers of EngineeringMeg E. West, Advised by Dr. Rachel L. KajfezINTRODUCTION
careers andpathways. Phase I and II were done in collaboration with teachers participating in the teacher PDsessions, while Phase III entailed specific breakout sessions just for counselors. Participantsattended at least one synchronous session (approximately three hours) per week, including anintroductory kickoff meeting with the project team and collaborative sessions with teachers.Counselors were given opportunities in these sessions to undertake activities in teams.Discussions were held to share experiences and reflect on their learning of engineering.Asynchronous sessions afforded counselors with opportunities to work on engineering projectsindividually, read relevant literature, and construct mind maps demonstrating their understandingof
, University of Detroit Mercy Nassif Rayess is Professor and Chair of Mechanical Engineering at University of Detroit Mercy. He was part of the efforts to introduce entrepreneurially minded learning to the University as part of the KEEN Network and Engineering Unleashed. He is also directly involved in the curricular elements of the co- op program at the University, and teaches the professional development courses that bookends the co-op semesters. He received his Ph.D. from Wayne State University and joined Detroit Mercy in 2001. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Creating data-driven undergraduate student engineering typologies to shape
] Tonetto, L. M., and P. Tamminen. "Understanding the role of intuition in decision-making when designing for experiences: contributions from cognitive psychology." Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 16.6 (2015): 631-642.[ 17] Daly, Shanna R., Robin S. Adams, and George M. Bodner. "What does it mean to design? A qualitative investigation of design professionals' experiences." Journal of Engineering Education 101.2 (2012): 187-219.[ 18] Ling, T., Y. G. Xiao, and P. G. Badke-Schaub. "HOW INTUITION AFFECTS DESIGNERS’DECISION MAKING: AN INTERVIEW STUDY." DS 77: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2014 13th International Design Conference. 2014.[ 19] Martin, Roger L. “The opposable mind: How successful leaders win
. Dr. Peppler’s studies have been published in leading journals in the fields of education, technology and the arts, including Science Education; Computers & Human Behavior; Mind, Culture & Activity; British Journal of Educational Technology; Journal of Science and Educational Technology; Review of Research in Education; and Learning, Media & Technology, among others. Dr. Peppler currently sits on the Editorial Boards for the International Journal for Computer Supported Collaborative Learning and Computer Science Education. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021
University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic), and the BSc degree in Computer Engineering from Qazvin Azad University. He has over 11 years of experience in manufacturing industry. He has worked as a Process Quality Manager, Planning & Quality Systems Manager, Production Planning & Control Manager, and Material Control Supervisor at MAPNA and NeyrePerse industrial groups. His research interests include Intelligent Mechatronic Sys- tems, Medical Robotics, Companion Robots, Brain-Controlled Robots, Computer Vision, 3D Scene Re- construction, and Machine Vision. His current research is focused on designing and implementation of the gesture and mind-controlled robotic systems. His research has been published in peer
mental health concerns. This raises the question as to whether experiences likeheightened stress or anxiety have become normalized in engineering disciplines such thatstudents are less likely to seek help from a mental health professional.The 2018-2019 Healthy Minds Study (HMS), from which the present study is based, involved asurvey of 60,000 U.S. college students from diverse backgrounds and majors. Comparativeanalyses across undergraduate majors revealed that only 32% of undergraduate engineers with 3significant anxiety or depression symptoms had sought professional help in the last year,compared to 45% of their non-engineering peers [2]. Among
invite diverse practices into the work in acollaborative and distributed process of imagining solutions for all.Taken together, these ideas suggest that learning engineering requires acquiring more than thetechnical knowledge (and we argue that it requires a distributed process), and that practicingjustice-centered engineering design requires incorporation of both technical and broader socialconsideration in all aspects of the work.Conceptual frameworkSociocultural theories of learning from the learning sciencesWhat is learning? If we look at popular media, we see that learning is portrayed as a faculty ofthe human mind divorced from interaction with other factors [11]. However, scholarship in thelearning sciences understands learning as a
contribute to developingnuanced intellectual tools appropriate to a trend of ASEE scholarship identified by Neeley et al.in which engineering educators engage STS for projects related to “embedded sociotechnicalsystems thinking” undertaken by educators and scholars with diverse training [7].We hope thatour work in this paper will help us and other educators and scholars articulate goals for ourclassrooms and identify thoughtful strategies to achieve them.Many engineering educators may already be engaged in working through concepts that weoutline here, but they may not often reflect explicitly on how it includes and exceeds the scope ofwhat we might understand as “sociotechnical engineering”. With this in mind, this paper is notso much a critique of
students noted the importance of collaboration, connecting collaboration to a successfullearning environment and for their future as an engineer. Some student quotes in this areaincluded "I think that the concepts we were taught in the growth mindset are good for making mea better person and teammate, which is important in the collaborative environment ofengineering.” and "At a macro level, I understand now the power of teams, collaboration, andfeedback in creating a successful learning environment."Overall, these reflection results illustrate that having assignments related to teamwork keeps theteamwork topic on students’ minds as they progress through their coursework. Althoughteamwork was not specifically requested as a target of this
Paper ID #34699Self-Efficacy, Mathematical Mindset, and Self-Direction in First-YearEngineering StudentsDr. Matthew Cavalli, Western Michigan University Dr. Cavalli is Professor of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering and Associate Dean in the College of Engineering and Applied Sciences. His technical research interests include materials behavior and solid mechanics. His educational interests include distance education and first-year student success. He has previously served as the Chair of the Materials Division of ASEE.Ms. Anetra Grice, Western Michigan University Anetra Grice is has served as the STEP Program Director for
Paper ID #32427Is it Rocket Science or Brain Science? Developing an Approach to MeasureEngineering IntuitionDr. Elif Miskioglu, Bucknell University Dr. Elif Miskio˘glu is an early-career engineering education scholar and educator. She holds a B.S. in Chemical Engineering (with Genetics minor) from Iowa State University, and an M.S. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from Ohio State University. Her early Ph.D. work focused on the development of bacterial biosensors capable of screening pesticides for specifically targeting the malaria vector mosquito, Anopheles gambiae. As a result, her diverse background also includes
[8] [see appendix A for the program translated into C++].Who Was Ada Lovelace?Ada Lovelace, daughter of the famed poet Lord Byron and known as Ada Byron, first metCharles Babbage at a party in 1833 when she was 17 and he was 41. Lovelace was fascinatedwith Babbage’s Difference Engine. With her analytical mind she could understand how itworked as few people could since she had been extensively tutored in mathematics throughouther childhood. Her mother had decided that a solid grounding in mathematics would ward offthe wild and romantic flair that possessed Lovelace’s estranged father. After meeting in 1833,Lovelace and Babbage remained a part of the same social circle and wrote to each otherfrequently [9].Ada Byron married William King in
literature.Hsi, Linn, and Bell state in their paper The Role of Spatial Reasoning in Engineering and theDesign of Spatial Instruction, "…the social context of spatial strategy instruction oftenencourages anxiety and frustration rather than learning" [33]. Engineering educators can providelearning environments that foster positive social interaction in the classroom in addition tocontent knowledge and procedural knowledge. This work contributes to enabling engineeringeducators to be mindful of spatial abilities and anxiety related to spatial information inengineering.ConclusionWe reviewed the literature on information processing theory, spatial abilities, anxiety, and theirrelationships. Spatial ability includes visualization, organizing information
TriMetrix® DNA in acombination of descriptive and multivariate methods and techniques that quantifiedspecific behavioral attributes and professional competencies found in entrepreneuriallyminded engineers [16]. The doctoral dissertation research of Dietrich (2012) was able toquantitatively distinguish between engineers and entrepreneurially minded engineers inboth behavior and mastery of professional skills in the workplace [17]. Research byPistrui et al. used the TTI TriMetrix® DNA assessment suite to define and establish ameasurement model of undergraduate engineering education learning outcomesassociated with professional competencies (soft skills) development [18].The authors used the TTI TriMetrix DNA assessment framework to analyze
Paper ID #33004Preparing the Next Generation Advanced Manufacturing Workforce UsingCollaborative Robots and Experiential Learning (Work in Progress)Mr. Kenechukwu Churchill Mbanisi, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Kenechukwu C. Mbanisi received the B.Eng. degree in electrical and electronic engineering from Covenant University, Nigeria, in 2013, and the M.S. degree in robotics engineering from Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI), MA, USA in 2018. He is currently working towards the Ph.D. degree in robotics engi- neering from WPI, USA. His research interests include shared autonomy, haptic feedback, human motion modeling
Paper ID #34771Utilizing an Engineering Design-Based Research Approach to Study andStrengthen a Teacher Preparation Program in STEM at the Secondary Level(Work in Progress)Dr. Katherine C. Chen, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Dr. Katherine C. Chen is the Executive Director of the STEM Education Center at Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI). Her degrees in Materials Science and Engineering are from Michigan State University and MIT. Her research interests include pre-college engineering education, teacher education, and equity in education.Shari Weaver, Worcester Polytechnic InstituteDr. Gretchen Fougere, STEM Leadership
years to promote computer science skills in the initialschool years. Nowadays, computational thinking has been widely recognized as a fundamentalskill to be used by everyone in the world by the middle of the 21st Century. Computationalthinking is also considered crucial for developing engineering habits of minds and solvingengineering problems [2]. When students work on coding, they can learn how to design acomputer program while developing their computational thinking skills [3]. Computationalthinking (CT) includes the thought processes involved in formulating problems, solvingproblems, building systems, and human behavior through the lens of computer science concepts[4]. However, little is known about how and to what extent children acquire
developing their skills and interest in the STEM fields to ensuretheir success at the post-secondary level and beyond. The fundamental principles of E-CADEMY are based on a combination of best practices from research including: a project-basedlearning (PBL) curriculum, high dosage model, cohort of like-minded peers, engagement withSTEM professionals, and family engagement [4]-[8]. This paper provides an overview of theprogram’s component, student feedback and program model future considerations.II. Program Overview Project SYNCERE has provided equitable hands-on engineering experiences for morethan 20,000 underrepresented students in grades three through twelve since 2011. The goal of theorganization’s work is to create pathways for
Paper ID #33565Supporting Teachers to Implement Engineering Design Challenges usingSensor Technologies in a Remote Classroom EnvironmentDr. Alexandra Gendreau Chakarov, University of Colorado Boulder Dr. Gendreau Chakarov received her Ph.D. in Computer Science and Cognitive Science from the Univer- sity of Colorado Boulder where she examined how to integrate computational thinking into middle school science curriculum using programmable sensor technologies as part of the SchoolWide Labs project. She continues this work on the SchoolWide Labs Project as a research associate where she serves as the com- puter science and
Paper ID #34587The Disconnect Between Engineering Students’ Desire to Discuss RacialInjustice in the Classroom and Faculty AnxietiesDr. Tracy Anne Hammond, Texas A&M University Dr. Hammond is Director of the Texas A&M University Institute for Engineering Education & Innovation and also the chair of the Engineering Education Faculty. She is also Director of the Sketch Recognition Lab and Professor in the Department of Computer Science & Engineering. She is a member of the Center for Population and Aging, the Center for Remote Health Technologies & Systems as well as the Institute for Data Science
forprofessional shame to occur. [9-10]. With this in mind, we have organized this study around thefollowing research questions:RQ1: How do students psychologically experience shame in the context of engineeringeducation?RQ2: How are these experiences located and socially constructed within the institutional culturesof engineering programs?RQ3: In the context of engineering education, how do individual, psychological experiences ofshame interact with perceived cultural expectations?To answer these research questions, we organized the study in two phases. In this paper, we willfocus on Phase 2 of this study which examines the experience of shame as an individual student(RQ1) within the context of engineering education as a student minoritized in
solution that conveys understanding. Asking ‘why’ instead of ‘how’ has resulted in a better understanding of the reasoning behind things, as well as an increased awareness of the methodology.” ● “Contextual understanding is the greatest strength a senior engineering studies (EGRS) major possesses and while other Engineers are trained to problem solve with their design goals in mind, EGRS majors are taught to go beyond the straight-forward analysis and consider other, non-technical factors. EGRS [majors] look towards social, economic, and political factors (among others) to fully comprehend the problem at hand. In doing so, EGRS majors are
with respect to learning and career, and their self-reflection related to theirlearning and professional development” [3].As noted in Paulson’s definition, the self-reflection or ‘annotation’ is an essential piece of astudent’s e-portfolio because it provides students with an opportunity to reflect on theirexperiences and how it ties into their engineering identity and career pathway. Turns et al.describe several generalized attributes of an effective, professional e-portfolio [4]. Thecharacteristics include connecting an artifact to the future, providing details to add credibility,and presenting information with the audience in mind. These characteristics can be beneficial inan e-portfolio/micro-badging platform that aims to aid students in