women of color in engineering. In Proceedings–American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (ASEE), Columbus, OH. June 24-28, 2017.Cross, K. J., & Paretti, M. C. (2012, January). Identification with academics and multiple identities: Combining theoretical frameworks to better understand the experiences of minority engineering students. In 119th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. American Society for Engineering Education.Cross, K. J., & Paretti, M. C. (2020). African-American Males’ Team Experiences. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 26(4).Duran, A., & Jones, S. R. (2019
] M. Cousins and M. K. Markey, “Graduate Internship/Externship Experiences in NIBIB Funded Graduate Training Programs.,” Proc. ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., pp. 1–16, Jan. 2014.[24] M. Fifolt and L. Searby, “Mentoring in Cooperative Education and Internships: Preparing Protégés for STEM Professions.,” J. STEM Educ. Innov. Res., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 17–26, Jan. 2010.[25] A. Boni, J. J. Sastre, and C. Calabuig, “Educating Engineers for the Public Good Through International Internships: Evidence from a Case Study at Universitat Politècnica de València.,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1799–1815, Dec. 2019.[26] L. Bayerlein and D. Jeske, “The potential of computer-mediated internships for higher education,” Int. J. Educ. Manag
rides and devices. F2291-20.7. ASTM. (2019). Standard practice for measuring the dynamic characteristics of amusement rides and devices. F2137-19.8. ASTM (2018). Standard practice for quality, manufacture, and construction of amusement rides and devices. F1193-18a.9. Hibbeler, R. C. (2013). Engineering mechanics: Dynamics. Pearson Prentice Hall. Cambridge.10. ASEE strength of materials project paper – omitted for blind review11. University reference link – omitted for blind review12. Anette Kolmos, Erik De Graaff. (2015). Problem-based and project-based learning in engineering education: Merging models. Chapter 11, Cambridge Handbook on Engineering Education Research. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139013451.012 AppendicesA
, M. M., & Faber, J. M., & Grzech, L. G., & Becker, K. H. (2019, June), FactorsInfluencing the Interest Levels of Male versus Female Students going into STEM Fields(Evaluation) Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida.10.18260/1-2--32835[9] M. W. Kier, M. R. Blanchard, J. W. Osborne, and J. L. Albert, “The Development of theSTEM Career Interest Survey (STEM-CIS),” Research in Science Education, vol. 44, no. 3, pp.461–481, 2013.[10] E. L. Talton and R. D. Simpson, “Relationships of attitudes toward self, family, and schoolwith attitude toward science among adolescents,” Science Education, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 365–374,1986.[11] T. A. Franz-Odendaal, K. Blotnicky, F. French, and P. Joy
the area of Public Health and Psychosocial Behavior have performedstudies on the mental health level of immigrants. Filion et al. (2018) carried out a quantitativeanalysis using the National Health Interview Survey on “the Strength and DifficultiesQuestionnaire.” Comparing the responses from foreign-born non-citizens and U.S.-born citizens,they found that immigrant adolescents experience relatively more long-term emotional difficultieswhen compared to U.S.-born citizens (Shekunov 2016). Eskenazi et al. (2019) found a strongrelationship between the perceived immigration policy vulnerability on the mental and physicalhealth of U.S.-born Latino adolescents. Alegría et al. (2018) devoted a review study to examinethe role of social resilience in
articulated.Peer Evaluation: Two times during the quarter (week 4 and 9), students evaluated theirteammates using the CATME peer evaluation tool. In this online peer evaluation tool, studentsrated their peers (1 to 5) in each of the following areas: Contributing to team, Interactions withteam, Keeping team on track, Expecting quality, and Having knowledge, skills and assets.Quantitative individual team member scores from the second peer evaluation were compared toaggregated scores from the four previous course offerings (2016-2019).Figure 1. Timeline of asset-based activities within context of quarter long team-based designproject. Weekly class sessions in which activities were completed were 3-hour TA-led virtualdiscussion sections. *CATME Peer
decades ago, however italone no longer closes the gap in knowledge that civil engineers must attain and maintain,through education, mentored experience, and self-development for responsible charge – asdocumented in the current edition of the CEBOK.In 2019, ASCE completed work on the third edition of the CEBOK [1]. This CEBOKdemonstrates that the gap continues to expand at the pace of change – and civil engineers need topursue post-graduate education along with structured mentorship, self-development, and life-long learning to first attain and then maintain the competencies required for responsible charge.Hence the need for a certification program and credential to attest to a civil engineer’s fulfillmentof the CEBOK. Like certification programs
Paper ID #32745How are Engineering Ethics Integrated into High School STEM Education inColorado? (Fundamental)Jake Walker Lewis, Graduate of the University of Colorado Boulder with a bachelor’s degree in environmental engineering and a master’s degree in civil engineering. Was involved with undergraduate research regarding ethics in engineering education, presented work in the form of a poster at the 2018 Zone IV ASEE Conference. Defended and published master’s thesis examining if/how ethics are being introduced in K12 STEM education in November 2019. Co-authored paper entitled ”Educating Civil Engineering Students about
2019. Second co-author of the paper ”Educating Civil Engineering Students about Ethics and Societal Impacts via Cocurricular Activities”, published in the Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Ed- ucation and Practice and recognized as an Editor’s Choice. Currently involved with research regarding ethics in engineering education with Dr. Angela Bielefeldt. Preparing to submit three papers regarding ethics in education for the 2020 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.Dr. Madeline Polmear, University of Florida Madeline Polmear is a postdoctoral researcher in the Department of Civil and Coastal Engineering at the University of Florida. She completed her B.S. in environmental engineering, M.S. in civil
Paper ID #34532Hands on STEM Learning at Home with 3D-Printed ManipulativesEric Davishahl, Whatcom Community College Eric Davishahl holds an MS degree in mechanical engineering and serves as associate professor and engineering program coordinator at Whatcom Community College. His teaching and research interests include developing, implementing and assessing active learning instructional strategies and auto-graded online homework. Eric has been a member of ASEE since 2001. He currently serves as awards chair for the Pacific Northwest Section and was the recipient of the 2008 Section Outstanding Teaching Award.Dr. Lee
thatthey acquire through their senses, while intuitive people dwell on abstract theory and intuition.Thinking people make decisions based on logical and often impersonal facts, while feeling peopletend to be subjective and value-based. Finally, judging people prefer orderly, structured, task-oriented lives, while perceiving people prefer flexibility and openness.A 1980 study by the ASEE-MBTI Engineering Consortium of eight universities showed that GenX engineering students are dominated by thinking and judging personality types and are moreoften introverted; there was little difference between sensing and intuitive types [1]. Thesefindings are supported by other researchers [2-7].Course Description and SurveyStudents in the first-year course
quantitatively investigate gender and ethnic persistent in aerospace engineeringprograms specifically. Their study utilized data from the MIDFIELD database and included 6of the 20 largest aerospaceengineeringdegreegranting institutions in the U.S., but the insti Figure 1: Matriculation method, first major declared in the engineering college, and degree received for students who entered the engineering college between Fall 2011 and Fall 2017 and ever declared a major in aerospace engineering.tution under study in this paper was not included in their data. Bir and Ahn’s 2019 study included an exploration of the effects of various identity factors, such as gender, ethnicminoritystatus, and selfreported financial confidence
. Batouli, M.B., Burke, Rebekah D.; Wood, Timothy. Gamification of Student Advising: Helping Students Decide Between Civil and Construction Engineering. in ASEE- Southeastern Section Conference. 2019. Raleigh, NC.Appendix A CONSTRUCTION GAME ACTIVITY MASTER DOCUMENTSequence Activity Duration Timestamp Instruction 3 min. :05 Pitch Preparation 5 min. :08 Design Pitches (x2) (1 min. +0.5min) x2 :15 Construction Pitches (x2) (1 min. +0.5min) x2 :20
which you do not agree, without letting the disagreement taking interfere with one's reasoning. Understanding Consider the integration of gender, nationality, beliefs of diversity and experience. Ethics Be able to face ethical dilemmas in the professional field.Collaboration Setup and TimelineWith the theoretical framework of Education 4.0 in mind, collaboration between bothinstitutions was initiated in March 2019 to establish a common ideas and interests framework.The ASEE 2019 conference presented the ideal opportunity to meet in-person for drafting ofmore detailed definitions for suitable projects with
important to understand how students conceptualizesocial issues we are asking them to address.MethodologyContext of the StudyIn order to understand undergraduate engineering students’ perceptions of homelessness, weincorporated an engineering design project focused on homelessness into a User-CenteredDesign course at our university. This paper focuses on the projects assigned in the fall semesterof 2019 and the spring semester of 2020. These two projects were both centered aroundhomelessness, but differed in their scope due to the COVID-19 pandemic during the 2020spring semester. During the Fall 2019 semester, students enrolled in the course were asked todesign a solar water heater for a mobile shower unit intended to provide services to
within Eng. Disciplines", in Women in Eng. Division: Proc. of the 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conf., Virtual Online, June 22-26, 2020. Available: https://peer.asee.org/work-in-progress-a-qualitative- exploration-of-female-undergraduate-decisions-to-specialize-within-engineering-disciplines.[2] Panorama de la educación: Indicadores de la OCDE 2019, Informe Español, 2019. Available: https://www.educacionyfp.gob.es/dam/jcr:b8f3deec-3fda-4622-befb- 386a4681b299/panorama%20de%20la%20educaci%C3%B3n%202019.pdf. [Accessed: 07- Jan- 2020][3] N. I. Abu-lail, F. A. Phang, A. Ater Kranov, K. Mohd-Yusof, R. G. Olsen, R. L. Williams, and A. Zainal Abidin, “Persistent Gender Inequity in U.S. Undergraduate Eng.: Looking to Jordan
and pedagogical responses," Journal of Education for Teaching, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 507-516, 2020.[9] A. Dallal and R. M. Clark, "Progressive Use of Active Learning in Electrical Engineering Courses," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[10] A. Dallal, A. Dukes, and R. M. Clark, "Student performance in partially flipped ECE laboratory classes," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2020.[11] T. D. Hobbs and L. Hawkins, "The results are in for remote learning: It didn’t work," Wall Street Journal, vol. 5, 2020.
forBiomedicine, BioScience, Volume 65, Issue 2, February 2015, Pages 183–188.[11] Beigpourian, B., & Ohland, M. W. (2019, June), A Systematized Review: Gender and Racein Teamwork in Undergraduate Engineering Classrooms Paper presented at 2019 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2--32011[12] Ruha Benjamin, Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code, SocialForces, Volume 98, Issue 4, June 2020, Pages 1–3.[13] Accreditation Criteria and Support Documents,http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditationcriteria/ Accessed on March 4, 2021[14] National Society of Professional Engineers. 2013. NSPE Engineering Body of Knowledge.http://www.nspe.org/sites/default/files/resources/nspe-body-of-knowledge.pdf
graduate students discouraged by the tone of U.S. policies and rhetoric,” ASEE Prism, pp. 24–29, Mar. 2019.[2] E. Redden, “International student numbers decline,” Inside Higher Ed, Nov. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2020/11/16/ survey-new-international-enrollments-drop-43-percent-fall[3] R. M. Lehman and S. C. Conceic¸a˜ o, Motivating and Retaining Online Students: Research- Based Strategies That Work. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, A Wiley Brand, 2014, ch. Concerns and Opportunities for Online Student Retention.[4] P. Bawa, “Retention in online courses: Exploring issues and solutions—a literature review,” SAGE Open, vol. 6, no. 1, Jan. 2016.[5] T. Wolf, C. V. Hollot, R
engineering content or methods (Perkins Coppola, 2019).All these aspects of pre-college engineering education including teacher training, curricularalignment with state standards, and policy decisions are not simplified when you add thechallenges that remain regarding socio-cultural perceptions of engineering. One program,Engineering for Us All (e4usa) funded by the National Science Foundation aims to address someof these issues.The e4usa project, led by five US universities, began in 2018 with the goal of creating an all-inclusive high school level engineering curriculum. An introductory course was designed anddeveloped to introduce engineering to high school students with an eye toward providing studentswith college credit for completing the course
institutions.References[1] I. E. Allen and J. Seaman, "Online Report Card Tracking Online Education in the United States," Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group, LLC., 2016.[2] The University of Texas at Dallas, “Educational Technology Services (ETS) Annual Report,” Page 4, 2018-2019, https://dox.utdallas.edu/report31038[3] Fadda, D. and Rios, O., 2019, “Online Computer Aided Design Class,” 126th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 15 - 19, 2019, Tampa, Florida, USA[4] Fadda, D. and Vinay, R., 2019, “Teaching Computer Aided Design Online,” Proceedings of the ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference, The University of Texas at Tyler, March 10-12, Tyler, Texas, USA.[5] A. Venna, “Instructing face-to-face: Professors cite
ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE, pp. 585-591, Feb 22, 2019.[11] J.M. Allen, F. Vahid, K. Downey, and A. Edgcomb, “Weekly Programs in a CS1 Class: Experiences with Auto-graded Many-small Programs (MSP),” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun 23, 2018.[12] K.W. Bowyer and L.O. Hall, “Experience using MOSS to detect cheating on programming assignments,” in FIE'99 Frontiers in Education. 29th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Designing the Future of Science and Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings, vol. 3, pp. 13B3-18, 1999.
. Kamali’s work is supported by funding from National Science Foundation and local/international companies. He is a member of IEEE and ASEE. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Improving Retention in Entry Level Engineering Education by Adding Hands-on Courses of Clinics of Engineering in The First Year of StudyIntroductionThe four-year BS degree in Electrical Engineering (EE) program is well established at manyuniversities. Since most of the EE programs were successful in previous decades, there were lesschanges in the lower-division courses and students are taking very few or not any courses fromtheir major in the first two years of the program. But in recent
universities and companies.Dr. Rajendran Swamidurai, Alabama State University Dr. Rajendran Swamidurai is an Professor of Computer Science at Alabama State University. He received his BE in 1992 and ME in 1998 from the University of Madras, and PhD in Computer Science and Software Engineering from Auburn University in 2009. He is an IEEE senior Member and ASEE Member. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Integrating Cybersecurity Concepts Across Undergraduate Computer Science andInformation System CurriculumAbstractThe global Cybersecurity skill gap in 2020 is about 3.1 million and the Cybersecurity staffshortage is about 69%. Universities are waking up to
Stein, University of California, San Diego Works as the Project Development and Outreach Coordinator for the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at UC San Diego.Prof. Truong Nguyen, University of California, San Diego Truong Nguyen is a Distinguished Professor at UCSD. His current research interests are video processing and machine learning algorithms with applications in health monitoring/diagnosis and 3D modeling. He received the IEEE Signal Processing Paper Award for the paper he co-wrote with Prof. P. P. Vaidyanathan on linear-phase perfect-reconstruction filter banks (1992). He received the NSF Career Award in 1995. While serving as department Chair (2014-2019), Prof. Nguyen and several faculty and
like the one we discusshere, in which students pose questions in response to a given prompt, the questioning context iswell-defined, and therefore we chose a simple uniaxial scale for assessing questions, with thebelief that it could capture the range of expected responses.Table 1. The original question classification taxonomy used in pilot data collection in Fall 2019. Example Questions and Question Question Description Question Stems Type Question is unspecific. What is going on? 1 How do I solve the problem? 2 Question is about
Scholarships inSTEM (S-STEM) project. Our purpose in sharing our current situation is to gain feedback fromcolleagues experienced with projects of this size and type on how to effectively make midstreamcorrections to design-based methods in ways that maintain research and project fidelity. Duringthe 2019-20 academic year, the first year of the project, we created tools and procedures for datacollection and analysis that we piloted in Spring 2020 with the first cohort of students toparticipate in the S-STEM program. With regard to supporting undergraduate students, the planfor this multi-year, grant-funded project is to scale each year, along with increasing the size ofparticipant cohorts, through the fifth and final year of the project. As a two
to Engineers without Borders and Critical Global Engagement at Cal Poly.Dr. Jane L. Lehr, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Jane Lehr is a Professor in Ethnic Studies and Women’s & Gender Studies and Director of Student Re- search at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. She is affiliated faculty in Computer Science and Software Engineering and Science, Technology and Society. She is also the 2019-20 Inclu- sive STEM Initiatives Fellow in the Colleges of Engineering, Science and Mathematics, and Liberal Arts and Faculty Director of the California State University (CSU) Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Partici- pation (LSAMP) in STEM Program at Cal Poly. She previously
University in Erie, PA. His research interests include Global Software Engineering, Affective Domain Learning, Engineering Education Research, as well as Philos- ophy of Engineering and Engineering Education. He is regularly involved in supporting the regional entrepreneurial ecosystem, as well as projects that serve the regional community. He is an active member and volunteer for both the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE) Computer Society and the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). He has published numerous conference papers and journal articles on innovations in Software Engineering curriculum development and Philosophy of Engineering & Computing
-achieving underserved computing students on the basis of gender, field, and year in school,” in 2018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity Conference. Crystal City, Virginia: ASEE Conferences, April 2018, https://peer.asee.org/29535.[16] “NSF scholarships in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics program (S-STEM),” https://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm summ.jsp?pims id=5257, accessed: 2020-11-16.[17] K. Spiel, O. L. Haimson, and D. Lottridge, “How to do better with gender on surveys: A guide for HCI researchers,” Interactions, vol. 26, no. 4, p. 62–65, Jun. 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3338283[18] J. Mahadeo, Z. Hazari, and G. Potvin, “Developing a computing