first sub-team focuses on the frontend design and user experience, and theother focuses on the backend development. Students are welcome to work with eithersub-team, and can switch between them if they desire. The students meet with their sub-team each week to discuss progress and assign new work. There is also an active Slackchannel used by the team throughout the week. Students give a presentation in week 5 ofthe semester outlining their goals for the semester, and in the final weeks of the semesterthey give a second presentation to demonstrate their progress and start planning for thenext semester. In addition to the weekly sub-team meetings, leaders from each groupalso meet regular with the team advisor to discuss any issues that come up
engineering students. Dr. Watson is also interested in understanding and assessing students’ cognitive processes, especially development of cognitive flexibility and interactions with cognitive load. Dr. Watson is the proud recipient of seven teaching awards and six best paper awards. She was previously named the Young Civil Engineer of the Year by the South Carolina Section of ASCE and currently serves as a Senior Associate Editor for the Journal of Civil Engineering Education.Dr. Elise Barrella P.E., Wake Forest University Dr. Elise Barrella is the founder and CEO of DfX Consulting LLC which offers engineering education and design research, planning and consulting services. She is a registered Professional Engineer and was a
easy for the player. Theoverarching analog is the idea that managing a map of space traffic is similar to managing a map of cartraffic on earth. Each car and spacecraft has the probability for a random event to occur, meant to simulatethe spontaneity of road and space travel. Moreover, players must plan the timing of each movement theymake with careful precision. The movements of each car and spacecraft are closely coupled with eachother. All of the aforementioned serve as an introduction to dynamics and controls, an important elementof aerospace engineering, which addresses problems relating to modeling, simulation, and control ofaerospace systems. Analogs are made even more apparent by the use of pop-ups, most of which serve asdirect
participating in the study. We divided the students into six groups (2-4 students for eachgroup–these were the students' regular table seats) where every group had one set of the robotmouse game. They were encouraged to work together as a team in the coding activity with therobot mouse game. Each group had around 60 minutes to work, and they were initially told tobuild the map using the pieces provided and follow the map given to them. Then, the studentscreated their algorithm to help the robot mouse reach the cheese overcoming obstacles on theway. They used the map they built for this activity and other materials such as coding cards thathelped them make a coding plan before actually pushing the buttons on the robot mouse.Every time they achieved the
struc- tural engineering and project management. Dr. Mosier has received regional and international teaching awards through the Associated Schools of Construction. Research interests include the cost of sustainable construction to owners and engineering education.Dr. Sandeep Langar, The University of Texas at San Antonio Dr. Sandeep Langar is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Construction Science in College of Architecture, Construction, and Planning at The University of Texas at San Antonio. He received his Ph.D. in Environmental Design and Planning from the College of Architecture and Urban Studies at Virginia Tech. He is also a licensed architect in India. Dr. Langar has authored multiple publications
of ergonomics in the industry has become significantly important nowadays, especiallyfor designing a workstation. The purpose of ergonomics application in industry is to make the workplacebest fit for the workers to ensure their comfort and safety. It impacts the workers’ satisfaction, reduces thenumber of injuries and production rate. To maximize the safety and productivity of a workingenvironment, an ergonomic approach must evaluate every aspect of the workplace and appropriatelyimplement rules, guidelines, and plans. This paper addressed an injury risk in the manufacturing industryand proposed multiple solutions to resolve injury and musculoskeletal disorder (MSD) risk. The injuryrisks include bare skin exposure to sparks while grinding
addition to thestudents in the program, family members were invited to participate in the activities so that itbecame more of a family affair than simply a student-only program. Twelve students participatedin the program that was remotely delivered over a period of two months. A pre-program survey ofthe participants was performed before the start of the program and a post-program survey wasconducted after the program. Additional details of the program, the surveys, and the measuredlearning outcomes will be presented in this paper along with plans for program expansion.IntroductionPhiladelphia has the highest poverty rate among the largest 10 cities in the country[1]. Reflectiveof the high poverty rate, Philadelphia residents are more likely than
more diverse/reliable educational system.The movement to online teaching has taken on many different forms. Some institutions haveadopted a fully online instructional approach, while others provide a blended learning type, usingsupportive systems and implementing tools such as Moodle, Blackboard, Atutor, and CanvasLMS,among others. Effective online class is important for achieving institutional goals of both teachingand learning in higher education. Previous research on e-learning was mainly conducted with anin-depth focus on certain e-learning dimensions such as technology, faculty, support, pedagogy,readiness, management, ethics, evaluation, planning, and institution [3]. This paper investigatesZoom’s breakout room application and its effect
communication and interaction to achieve year 1 projectgoals. COVID-19 prevented only two planned activities: (1) physical tours to local and regionalindustry and governmental employers (who are currently working remotely) and (2) the outreachactivities associated with the Summer Coding & Cyber camps (which were cancelled for summer2020). As the public health situation improves in 2021 and beyond, these activities are expectedto be completed in person. If the COVID-19 restrictions continue, opportunities for virtual toursto industry and governmental employers will be explored.7.0 Conclusion and Future WorkDespite the challenges presented by the COVID-19 pandemic and its related restrictions, in year1 of the ACCESS program, the project team
, likely have implications forengineering students’ interest in continuing in engineering and professionals’ plans to stay intheir engineering jobs. Indeed, persons with disabilities are equally likely to enter engineeringmajors, but graduate with engineering degrees at lower rates. Similarly, only 65% of personswith disabilities who have an engineering or science degree are employed in STEM, versus 85%of persons without disabilities [9]. I thus examine students’ and professionals’ intentions to stayin engineering in the future.MethodsEngineering Students: ASEE Diversity & Inclusion SurveyThe ASEE Diversity and Inclusion Survey (ASEE-DIS) includes 1,729 students enrolled in anengineering program in one of eight US colleges or universities. 4 A
programstructure, activities, and timeline, and report on our preliminary findings (gained from surveys andinterviews), successes, and challenges from running the program in the hopes of making this modelaccessible to others interested in exploring it.ISMP Structure, Activities, and TimelineCohort 2 of the ISMP is running from Summer, 2020 through Spring, 2021. We planned to startwith the second cohort of ISMP in Fall of 2020, however we ultimately launched the programearly, in June of 2020, to buffer student disappointment of sweeping, COVID-19 pandemic-relatedsummer internship cancellations.We are facilitating the program using USD’s Torero Employer and Alumni Mentors (TEAM)networking platform, which is run by PeopleGrove (https://www.peoplegrove.com
specific research questions for the overall project are 1. How doesparticipation in the program influence students’ social capital related to pursuing anundergraduate engineering degree and career opportunities? and 2. In what ways do students ondifferent pathways to engineering baccalaureate success gain awareness of, access to, andactively pursue social capital in making decisions to persist in engineering studies and formingcareer plans?This work in progress paper explores a subset of data, specifically those students who wereinvolved in and have complete data available from the first two years of the program. This papermainly speaks to the first research question posed by the project, exploring the question: Howhave students’ engineering
2020, 28 withdraw from the course in lieu oftheir poor performance. Due to the impact of COVID in Spring 2020, the withdrawal deadline forour institution was pushed back significantly and also students planned to utilize the alreadyadvertised pass/fail policy. These reasons could seem to explain the low withdrawal rate and highfailure rate. In Fall 2020, students were offered to take the pass/fail policy on any two courses, butthis was announced much later in the semester. By then most students had already withdrawn fromthe course. Figure 5 shows the pass/fail/withdraw grade break down for FED101 for all threesemesters. A significant number of students (more than half of the class) failed the class duringSpring 2020. Fall semesters overall
(e.g., low-income, gap in the backgroundknowledge…) to come up with inclusive solutions.Moreover, special attention needs to be directed towards understanding students’ motivation. Forthat, educators should define what students are willing to achieve through the program, what theirdreams are, and how they plan to achieve their goals.For the institution context:In this category, we define three elements to take into account, namely, the organization resources,the learning objectives, and the constraints. Indeed, education designers seeking implementablesolutions must tap into the available resources of the institution and know the local conditions. Forthis category, we identified four themes that could be considered: the workspace and
team placed great emphasis on contactingcampus and industry professionals who possessed experience with similar products. Duringinterviews, project team members were asked why they hadn’t contacted environmentalorganizations or homeowners associations that often address the algae problem upon which theirwas based, which may have helped them locate a source of algae, which had posed a problemfor them. Team members indicated they hadn’t thought in terms of approaching such resourcesbecause they were focusing more on their business plan. This failure to identify resourcesdemonstrates narrowness of perception regarding stakeholder engagement that is guided bystudent experience rather than project purpose. The primacy given to successfully
lecture notes, textbooks,and in-class research review discussions to build their portfolios.Course Project was a semester-long assignment in which students conducted a usability study ona product of their choice. Students developed a full usability testing plan, a detailed design ofexperiments, a research methodology, then they recruited human subjects to test the usability oftheir chosen product. Students presented their project to the class and submitted a written reportto document their work.Two exams were administered throughout the semester. Exam questions included multiple-choice, true or false, fill in the blanks, and short answer questions. Exam questions covered allthe topics discussed in the classroom with a focus on how knowledge can
research focuses on areas of automated rea- soning in Artificial Intelligence; specifically, automated planning, search and knowledge representation. He is also interested in the development of teaching approaches and systems that promote the wellbeing of students.Miss Constanza Melian, Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chilev Constanza Melian is Assessment and Evaluation Coordinator for Division of Engineering Education at Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile. Constanza is sociologist, interested in issues of education, social inequality, poverty and gender gaps. Methodologically his interests and work is in survey design, construction of quantitative instruments, statistical data analysis and evaluation
innovations; and diversity in the STEM fields, particularly for women.Dr. Craig J. Scott, Morgan State University Dr. Craig J. Scott received his Ph.D. and B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Howard University and a M.S. in Electrical Engineering from Cornell University. He is currently serving as professor and chairper- son of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at one of the nation’s preeminent public urban research institutions, Morgan State University. His career spans over twenty-eight years of progres- sive scholarly experience in such areas as research administration/ implementation, pedagogical inno- vation, international collaboration, strategic planning, promoting community engagement and
as Project Lead the Way [3]. Project Lead theWay is a well-established program providing an engineering-specific curriculum and training tohigh school educators.This program can also be seen as a school-university partnership; however, most partnershipsfocus on teacher professional development. Brady describes that some of these partnershipsinclude supervision and mentoring, collaborative teaching initiatives, action research, jointprofessional development, shared planning, and school enrichment and support [4]. This programis a partnership focused on students.Ultimately, this program is innovative, as it is a university offering a high school class. The courseis unique to the university’s community. The course material is essentially the
Information Modeling (BIM). The following isthe catalog description of the Introduction to Graphics course: Introduction to architectural and construction graphics using hand drawing/drafting and Computer Aided Drafting (CAD). Hand drawing/drafting topics include: lettering, technical sketching, use of drafting instruments, the fundamentals of orthographic projection, plan, section, elevation development and pictorial drawings to develop the student’s abilities to visualize and describe objects graphically. CAD topics include software commands and drawing strategies for 2-D and 3-D CAD work, plans, sections, elevations, and details, information management, assembly of drawings and scales. Note: This
using game-based learning will demonstrate higher mathematicsGPA than the control group of students in the construction science and management program.For the second test, the study will divide students into adequate numbers of control andexperimental sample size groups.The research team plans to add more modules to the PCLG. The additional modules will bebased on the game leveling concept. The PCLG will use the student’s level of Pre-Calculusknowledge as a way of measuring the average statistics of their character – making questionseasier or harder to compensate their learning. To motivate student learning, the game willaddress the psychology of getting the rewards of leveling up.As a pilot study, the research team plans to include this game
-PBH students.Inspired from the first round of PBH implementation in Dynamics, the authors plan to refine thePBH implementation process in future offerings of this course. Specifically, the authors plan toconduct a multiple semester based study. In the second round of implementation, the PBHassignments will be kept optional in the first semester. The students who do not opt to completethe PBH assignments will serve as the control group of students for data comparison for the PBHstudents. The incoming grades of all students will be looked at by obtaining student grades fromthe previous “Statics” course in sequence through the University IKM (institutional knowledgemanagement) database to gauge the type of student and their interest. The
statements of support of a similar nature were not recorded from the virtual event.Given that students indicated a preference for an in-person event, whether they be a student or analumnus, our plan is that Senior Design Day should return to being an in-person event but withimproved and expanded digital content. We plan to continue to probe our research questions andtake steps to increase the number of responses we receive.References[1] Wilder, Laura Ingalls, 1867-1957. Little House on the Prairie. New York, N.Y.:HarperCollins, 1963.[2] Talley, A., and Compeau, C., “Senior Design Day – Multi-discipline and Multi-departmentCapstone Presentation Event,” 2018 American Society for Engineering Education AnnualConference, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2018.[3
through both formal andinformal interactions or experienced individuals [10]. This expertise becomes a resource forcollaborative reflection and planning in communities of inquiry [11]. We posit that active forms oflearning, enacted by teachers, when deliberately related to students’ personal experiences andgrounded in deeper learning strategies are vital for achieving transformation in practice.In this paper, we describe how a group of eighth teachers at a STEAM-focused middle schoolunderstood and elicited students’ funds of knowledge in an effort to bring an asset-basedapproach to the classroom. This research contributes to the ongoing efforts to establish a moreculturally responsive educational environment for students that have been negatively
&M University. He is also the Assistant Lab Director at the Sketch Recognition Lab.Dr. Shawna Thomas, Texas A&M University Dr. Thomas is an Instructional Assistant Professor in the Department of Computer Science and Engineer- ing at Texas A&M University. She is a member of the Engineering Education Faculty in the Institute for Engineering Education & Innovation at Texas A&M. She enjoys project-based learning and incorporat- ing active learning techniques in all her courses. She received her Ph.D. from Texas A&M University in 2010, focusing on developing robotic motion planning algorithms and applying them to computational biology problems including protein folding. She continued this work as
me. It allowed me to live on campus for my freshman and sophomore year. Living on campus is an amazing experience, for me, because I can always go to events and spend more time with my friends. It also allowed me more time in my studies because I did not have to dedicate my time each day to a commute from home to school, which was really helpful to me. This program also supported me in my career development. It encouraged me to go to career fairs and talk to recruiters, and it taught me how to promote myself. It also helped me in my time management skills, too, with respect to the time management workshop, I learned how to manage my time better and to plan out my week ahead of schedule, I
Engineering Certification Board (SECB) – a partnership of the ASCE Structural Engineering Institute (SEI), the National Council of Structural Engineering Associations (NCSEA), and the Structural Engineering Licensure Coalition (SELC) offers board certification in structural engineering. The American Academy of Environmental Engineers and Scientists (AAEES) offers certifications in environmental engineering. The Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) offers certifications in transportation planning and design. A handful of states offer a structural engineer (SE) license – some states require a PE license first, but some states do not. California also offers a geotechnical engineer (GE) license
psychologically realisttheories of ethics, concerned with how people actually think about matters of right and wrongrather than merely how they should [48], [49]. For example, as a pluralist theory of ethicalreasoning, MFT helps to explain how different, competing goods can conflict, resulting in thekinds of conflicts of interests that are central to engineering ethics and other forms ofprofessional ethics [1]–[3].Planned analyses and hypothesesIn this study, MFQ and ESIT scores were treated as outcome variables, and education anddemographic information – such as gender, age, and field of study – were treated as inputvariables. Since relatively few studies have used the ESIT [17], [32], [50] – and only one hasused the ESIT in conjunction with the MFQ [33
mentorship programs.IntroductionWithin graduate education, there is a lack of proper mentorship and mentoring programs atinstitutional and college levels [1]. Mentorship is so highly correlated to student success andprogram satisfaction [2], as such, there is a critical need to establish and improve mentorshipprograms at these institutions. The National Academy of Sciences suggests that with improvedmentoring, “students' educational experience, morale, career planning and placement, andprofessional competence” [3, p. 65] will be enhanced. However, for this mentoring relationshipto flourish and be satisfactory, it requires effort by both parties which would ultimately create a‘mutually beneficial’ partnership between the faculty mentor and the
mentors are now required to create a SMART (Specific, Measurable,Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound) goal [15] for each mentee and develop a plan to implementthat goal in the academic year. The SMART goal and plan should be completed by the end ofOctober. Project PIs now meet with mentors to discuss the goals for their mentees to make sure itis reasonable. In addition, we survey mentors monthly to document their activities and meet withmentors once a month to gather feedback, identify potential problems, and share successfulstories or tips. Based on the monthly report from peer mentors during the 2020-2021 academicyear, we have observed positive changes between mentors and mentees.4.2 Research ExperienceUndergraduate research is one of the thirteen