students’ “career and professional development, communication andleadership development, intellectual development, personal and social development, academicand social engagement, intercultural competence, satisfaction with college experiences, andcollege belonging and persistence in major and college.” [3] Working on a competition team alsocontributes to the development of students’ design and build skills, as well as students’ non-technical skills, skills that may or may not be a part of their technical coursework. [4], [5], [6] Todate, very little research has been done to evaluate the impact of the competition team experienceon the achievement of academic outcomes or the acquisition of an entrepreneurial mindset, butthe competition context is
90% of my students (N=87) strongly agreedthat sharing my teaching philosophy is critical. Additionally, underrepresented students wereempowered and archived more than half the “A”s in my courses. In conclusion, since equal is notalways fair, instructors must make their expectations exceptionally clear to ensure that anystudent can succeed and earn an “A.” I believe it is time for educators to polish their teachingphilosophy, create appealing visual models, and share them with their students.IntroductionDeveloping a Teaching Philosophy Statement (TPS) is central in any academic career [1]. TPSdeclares the educator’s approach to teaching and learning. Creating a teaching philosophyengages educators in metacognitive reflection on what they
is currently engaged in multiple research projects that involve multidisciplinary collaborations in the field of engineering, medicine, and education, as well as research on teacher preparation and the conducting of evidence-based interventions in school environments.Dr. Stacy S. Klein-Gardner, Vanderbilt University Stacy Klein-Gardner’s career in P-12 STEM education focuses on increasing interest in and participation by females and URMs and teacher professional development. She is an Adjunct Professor of Biomedical Engineering at Vanderbilt University where she serves as the co-PI and co-Director of the NSF-funded Engineering For Us All (e4usa) project. Dr. Klein-Gardner formerly served as the chair of the ASEE
. The material learned in this course… a. will be of value to me after graduation. b. was useful in my pursuit of my career and/or graduate school goals. c. helped me see the relevance of engineering to the real world. d. helped me learn the importance of experimental design to biomedical engineering. 3. I would like to see reflections used in other courses. 4. I would recommend this course to a friend.Engagement with SBG System QuestionnaireReferring to the standards while completing work: ● While completing the written deliverable for Module 1, I referred to the standards listed on the grading rubric. ● While completing the written deliverable for Module 2, I referred to the standards listed
such as Skype and Facetime to interact with each other when they are not physically proximate. • Gen Zs desire services to be available on demand, at any time, and with low barriers to access. It’s normal for them not to wait. • Gen Zs tend to be more career-focused earlier on in college and more of them are interested in being entrepreneurs than millennials.Learning PreferencesSome of the principal learning preferences are described below [8]: • Active learners prefer to understand and retain knowledge best through an active process such as applying or discussing information or explaining it to others. • Reflective learners prefer to absorb knowledge and think about it for some time
study, and success for first-semester students acclimating to college and learning how toself-advocate for accommodations. These basic modifications of breaking down large projectsand documents, and providing direction have been met with positive responses. Incontinuation, these modifications remain in all sections of the first-semester and second-semester engineering classes with more directed instructions during the project work times.Recent modifications due to online and hybrid learning, include making the slides available atleast 48 hours before class, and recorded lecture videos available after class. Future work willfollow students with ASD through their college career to assess their success and persistencein the engineering
´olica de Chile. His Major is Electrical Engineering and his Minor is Energy. Currently, he is a research assistant of the Engineering Education Division, responsible for supporting research tasks and collaborating in data collection and analysis. Gonzalo managed a pre-engineering program to encourage high school students to study careers in engineering and science. He also volunteered as a teacher in communication skills and personal development, aimed at training high school students in vulnerable backgrounds.Jorge A. Baier, Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile He is an associate professor in the Computer Science Department and Associate Dean of Engineering Education at the Engineering School in
engineering and also outreach to pre-college students to introduce them to science and engineering career opportunities. Ms. Marlor joined University of California, Berkeley in 2013. She has a B.S. in Materials Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.Dr. Cynthia J. Finelli, University of Michigan Dr. Cynthia Finelli is Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Professor of Education, and Director and Graduate Chair for Engineering Education Research Programs at University of Michigan (U-M). Dr. Finelli is a fellow in the American Society of Engineering Education, a Deputy Editor of the Journal for Engineering Education, an Associate Editor of the IEEE Transactions on Education, and past chair of
East Hartford, CT as well as Crash Safety located in East Hampton, CT. Both of these experiences has helped him strengthen his knowledge in data analytics and optimization. One of Michael’s biggest interests in Ergonomics and Human Factors which he plans to purse later in his career. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Analysis of STEM Students’ Ability to Respond Algebra, Derivative, and Limit Questions for Graphing a Function 1 Emre Tokgöz, 1Samantha Scarpinella, 1Michael Giannone 1 Emre.Tokgoz@qu.edu, 1 Samantha.Scarpinella@qu.edu
demonstrate it.* The definition of “meeting a course objective” is achieving a “C” level (70%) on the task. Table 2: CE401 Course Assessment for 2020 Course Objective Assessment How Evaluated and Remarks a. Describe challenges facing civil All graded events in the course address this engineers in professional practice now 4 objective and students solidly met the and in the future. requirements. b. Develop short-term and long-term This specific course objective is only professional goals, to include directly addressed by the Career Paper, but
experience from another class or extracurricular activities that have their own designprocess to follow.Of the observations made during the research many of them were not surprising and expectedresults. These included the following. The senior ME 465 students didn’t have much change intheir design processes from the beginning to the end of the semester. This wasn’t surprising sincethey had already spent their entire academic career forming this process through other classesand personal experiences. The other not surprising thing with the senior ME 465 students is thatthey came in with more general knowledge of the design process than the incoming freshmanwith little to no engineering background. This means that during their time at [university
), computer-based simulationprojects of similar complexities were used to address the same topics.Creative thinking is an important skill needed for modern workplace in engineering and technology fields[3]. Instructors in higher education consider various ways of integrating creativity and innovation into thecourses they teach to better prepare students for their future careers [4]. Study shows that between the twocommonly-used approaches that enhance creativity, i.e., teaching vs. practice creativity, stimulatingcreativity by practices is considered to be more effective [5]. In addition, many professors used project-based learning [6, 7] when trying to foster creativity in their courses [8, 9].Due to robotics’ multi-disciplinary nature, we think
iniatives or other projectsthat are expected to last a minimum of 5 years. Courses are designed around anexperiantal learning pedagogy and not a lecture format.At NYU there are roughly 40 VIP teams operating. Students join teams for threesemesters. Each semester students enroll for one credit, and at the end of three semester,with three credits earned, students are able to apply their participation in VIP as atechincal elective towards their graduation. The three semester model creates anopportunity for students to move from beginners in their first semesters to team leaders intheir last, replicating how they might grow in their future careers. It also means that VIPprojects outlast any individual students participation. Students enter the VIP
pursuing a Master’s of Engineering in Biomedical Engineering at Cornell University.Carly Merrill, Bucknell University Carly Merrill is currently working in the healthcare industry where she is pursing a career in strategic product development. She has recently earned a Bachelor of Science Degree in Biomedical Engineering from Bucknell University.Dr. Jove Graham, Geisinger Jove Graham, PhD is an Associate Professor in the Center for Pharmacy Innovation and Outcomes at Geisinger, a nonprofit integrated health system in Pennsylvania.Troy Schwab, Bucknell University Troy Schwab is a computer scientist currently working as a federal consultant, specifically concerning data engineering. He received undergraduate degrees in
implementation of unconventional aerospace concepts, mightnaturally increase diversity in the field. Furthermore, there are many factors contributing to whether or nota student may choose to pursue a STEM-related career. Research suggests that early math achievement,math self-efficacy beliefs, and early exposure to STEM-related subjects are all indicative of whetherstudents enroll in STEM majors. While math achievement is a significant indicator of a student’s interestin engineering related fields, early exposure to STEM is one of the most influential factors in whetherstudents continue to seriously pursue related fields in their later academic career.The intent of this paper is to show that early STEM exposure, along with the implementation
level of confidence building prototypesIn the spring of 2020, questions taken from the General Engineering Self-Efficacy Scale [4] wereadded to the pre- and post-course surveys to assess student self-efficacy. Self-efficacy refers toan individual’s belief that they can do certain things [2], in this case the belief that they cansucceed in engineering. Studies have found that self-efficacy correlates with both academicperformance [5] and persistence [6]; research has found that while some aspects of women’sself-efficacy in engineering have increased over the years, their self-efficacy tends to decreaseover the course of their academic career [7]. Two questions from the survey are included here inFigures 8 and 9. The first question relates to
easierjustification of equipment and labor investment costs. Perhaps more importantly, studentsrepeatedly encounter the equipment and explore different portions of the apparatus throughout thecurriculum. Anecdotal feedback from the students on the learning gains from using real hardwareand preparing them for future careers in engineering has been positive. This feedback has beengathered verbally in the lab and through five-year post graduation surveys. Future work mayinclude more formal assessments of this apparatus specifically and an exploration on whetherstudents learn and retain information better through this tiered approach using a modularexperimental apparatus compared to an approach using independent experiments.Bill of MaterialsThe bill of materials
groups [12,13]. In 2006 the NCEES added the requirement for a master’s degree or equivalent education toits model law with a goal for implementation of this requirement in 2020; in 2014 thisrequirement was removed from the model law [14].The primary driver for graduate education is to impart the skills and knowledge needed in theprofession, which also enable a successful and rewarding career. The ASCE has explored theoutcomes that should be met to prepare civil engineers for entry into the profession, detailing“the knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary for entry into the practice of civil engineering atthe professional level” in the CEBOK [6, p. vii]. The Body of Knowledge has evolved andchanged over time, from an initial document in 2004
, developing, andmaintaining the online platform through which the Parsons Problems were offered to students.References[1] B. W. Char and T. T. Hewett, “A first year common course on computational problem solving and programming,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2014.[2] R. Bualuan, “Teaching computer programming skills to first-year engineering students using fun animation in Matlab,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2006.[3] D. Ronan and D. Cenk Erdil, “Impact on computing attitudes and career intentions in a rotation-based survey course,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 2020-June, 2020.[4] Code.org, CSTA, and ECEP Alliance, “2020 State of Computer Science Education: Illuminating Disparities,” 2020.[5
Operations Research from Pennsylvania State University (PSU) in 2010 and 2012, respectively. Dr. Ashour was the inaugural re- cipient of William and Wendy Korb Early Career Professorship in Industrial Engineering in 2016. Dr. Ashour’s research areas include applied decision making, modeling and simulation, virtual reality, and process improvement. He contributed to research directed to improve engineering education.Mr. James Devin Cunningham, Carnegie Mellon University PhD student in Mechanical Engineering at Carnegie Mellon University, with research interests in machine learning and reinforcement learning.Christian Enmanuel Lopez, Lafayette College I am an Assistant Professor of Computer Science with an affiliation in
MSD related complaints reported by the workers where they were exposed to awkwardpostures.It's been rigorously established that the students learning with hands-on projects escalate their interest andmotivation to lead a successful career in the industry upon graduation. Students' learning performancecurve alleviates while using the project-based learning (PBL) technique, as they experience the process inreal-time [7], [8]. They apply their theoretical knowledge acquired in class within the defined context. Anengineering technology level-4 course named "Ergonomics and Process Optimization" had been instructedfollowing the PBL technique in Fall 2019. A total of 18 students were divided into nine groups assigneda real industrial problem and
engineering students. Theapplicability of PID in many different career fields, implies that many degree programs couldbenefit from adding it to their curriculum. Mechanical Engineering, Electrical Engineering,Chemical Engineering, Electrical Engineering Technology, Mechanical EngineeringTechnology, etc. are all degrees that either already offer disciplines or courses that study thedesign and use of automated control [5].Part of the Advanced PLC laboratory at our university, the Amatrol Process Control System,shown in Fig. 1, is used to teach programming of industrial equipment for controlling the flowrate and level of fluids [3]. It is not concerned with the theory of PID control, rather it focuses onthe programming of industrial equipment and the
broader awareness of career pathways in CEE and how URMs cansucceed in a professional engineering career.A change in leadership and personnel occurred in the third year but the RevED team was able toanalyze student interviews that revealed how our students perceived diversity and inclusion atthe university. The analysis of these interviews helped influence the future interview protocol tobe used in the fifth year. Curricular development continued with the guidance of student clinicteams. These teams developed small assignments and classroom examples using globalexamples, domestic examples, and even utilized methods to engage visual learners. This effort isimportant since the inclusion of students’ lived experiences is based in critical education
addition, the simulator will behoused in the Virtual Reality Center at the university so that local K-12 students can experiencethe wonder of flight, as well as some of the engineering aspects of aircraft design. Therefore, thesimulator and its interfaces must be engineered to be used as an effective flight-simulator andinclude the necessary safety parameters, yet simple enough for a non-expert to operate. One goalof this project is that through the experience of using the flight-simulator, K-12 students will bemore motivated to pursue careers in engineering disciplines.Although nearly complete, there are a few aspects of the system that need further engineeringanalysis and development. Finite element analysis will be applied to the mechanical
University of South Florida and Endowed Visiting Professor for the School of Media and Design at Shanghai Jiao- tong University. Fellow and Past President of the International Communication Association (ICA), she served as President of the Council of Communication Associations and the Organization for the Study of Communication, Language and Gender. She is a Distinguished Scholar of the National Communica- tion Association. Her research focuses on career, work-life policy, resilience, gender, and engineering design. She received ICA’s Mentorship Award and the Provost Outstanding Mentor Award at Purdue, where she was University Distinguished Professor and Endowed Chair and Director of the Susan Bulke- ley Butler Center
and in their future careers.1.0 IntroductionTo properly contextualize Carnegie Mellon’s work around DEI, we need to situate it within alarger movement that has gained traction and momentum around engineering and social justice[1]-[3]. These happenings build upon the seminal work of Baillie [4], Riley [5], and their jointwork with their collaborators [6]. This has sprung a series of engineering and social justice-related or -infused courses, seminar series, and workshops across engineering campuses such asthose at the University of San Diego [7], Colorado School of Mines [8], Purdue [9], Stanford[10], the National Academies [11], and others. The most recent illustration is a series of global,humanitarian, and peace engineering programs that
in the Mechanical Engineering Department, as part of a broad effort to redesign the curriculum requirements for the undergraduate degree in Mechanical Engineering. Jeff has over twenty years’ product development and manufacturing experience bringing medical and consumer products to market, through the course of my career journey with Apple, SGI, Nektar, Boston Scientific and Amazon/Lab126. In addition to working with and training engineers in industry, his 9+ years coaching and teaching students in science and sports provide an excellent foundation for educating engineers to make a difference in the world. Specialties: Leading organizations to deliver innovative, thoughtful products; thorough understanding of
resource was through a volunteer program that was also created within SCU. TheSociety of Women Engineers (SWE) chapter had recently created the cleverly named SWE++program where members of SWE teach programming to local 7th grade girls who had notpreviously been exposed to computers or the world of programming. This outreach puts femalecollege students in teaching positions in front of their younger counterparts. This works to shiftimplicit gendered stereotypes that can hinder a pathway to a STEM-related career [6]. SWE++transitioned to online in Spring 2020 and hosted weekly Zoom sessions. Students from theSTEM Outreach class supported these SWE++ lessons by joining the virtual sessions and goinginto Zoom breakout rooms to work with smaller
thedevelopment of the projects. The second program is the IDEAS Learning Community thatengages about 25 first-year students yearly in a one-semester partnership with an outreachprogram from Indianapolis, Indiana which is about an hour from campus. The central classcombines career exploration and integration into the university with discussions and experiencesaround diversity. The engagement with the outreach program provides a context and activitiesthat enhance the learning goals and provides experiences to bring the class together. Thedeliverables are activities for K12 students both at the outreach center and for an annual visit tocampus.EPICS ResultsEPICS is large and complex, with many stakeholders. We first examined the three commonstakeholders of
lead to business and academicpartnerships, career opportunities, and continued friendships. Relevant to the projects, iterationand diverse perspectives can be encouraged through observing actions, overhearingconversations, and impromptu training [9].Ending a hackathonCompetitive and high-pressure environments are frequently documented deterrents to beginnerand non-male participants [3]. Though prizes are not primary motivators for participants at civichackathons [15], the competition itself with collaboration instead of antagonistic settings stillincreases excitement [3]. While some hackathons have eliminated prizes altogether [4], analternative is creating theme-based awards such as Hope’s "The Healthy Communities Award"and "The Information