Paper ID #33638Development of an At-home Metal Corrosion Laboratory Experiment forSTEMOutreach in Biomaterials During the Covid-19 PandemicMr. Christopher James Panebianco, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Christopher J. Panebianco, B.Eng., is a Ph.D. Candidate at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (ISMMS). He earned his B.Eng. in Chemical Engineering from The Cooper Union in 2016. His research focuses on developing novel biomaterials for repairing injured intervertebral discs. He has been a Teach- ing Assistant at ISMMS and The Cooper Union for 3 years, and has a strong interest in teaching and research in
contract engineer at Engineer Inc., a Gainesville education enterprise that designs and distributes STEM laboratory kits to remote learners. She is currently working as an intern in an effort to expand her scope to the aerospace field.Dr. Sean R. Niemi, University of Florida Sean R. Niemi is a Lecturer in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at UF, and founder of the MERGE (MEchanical engineeRing desiGn pEdagogy) Lab focusing his research and teaching efforts on Capstone Design, Mechanical Design, Design for Manufacturing, and Instrumentation Design. Sean co-advises the UF Rocket Team (Swamp Launch), mentoring a group of interdisciplinary students in developing a 10,000 ft. apogee rocket for the
Paper ID #32607A New Approach to Equip Students to Solve 21st-Century GlobalChallenges: Integrated Problem-Based Mechanical Engineering LaboratoryDr. Siu Ling Leung, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Siu Ling Leung is an Assistant Teaching Professor and the Director of Undergraduate Laboratories of the Mechanical Engineering Department at the Pennsylvania State University. She is developing a new engineering laboratory curriculum to empower students’ cognition skills and equipped them to solve real-world challenges. Her past engineering education experience includes undergraduate curriculum management, student advising
Paper ID #33831SAFABOT: A Robotics Learning Platform for a Hands-on, Laboratory-basedApproach in an Introductory ECE CourseMr. Steven M. Beyer, United States Air Force Academy Mr. Steven M. Beyer is an Instructor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the United States Air Force Academy, Colorado. He recently received his Master’s in Computer Engineering (Distinguished Graduate) at the Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio. His thesis investigated vulnerabilities in commercially-available smart home devices, demonstrating how an eaves- dropper can track users, identify devices, map
Paper ID #32814Eye-Track Modeling of Problem-Solving in Virtual ManufacturingEnvironmentsRui Zhu, Complex System Monitoring, Modeling and Analysis Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State Univer-sity, University Park, PA, 16802, USA Rui Zhu is a Ph.D. candidate in the Harold and Inge Marcus Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering at the Pennsylvania State University. Her research interests focus on sensor-based modeling, analysis, and optimization of complex systems, with applications in virtual reality, healthcare, and smart communities.Dr. Faisal Aqlan, The Pennsylvania State University - Erie Campus Dr
Automation, Robotics, Data Acquisition, and Test and Measurement. He has lead technologies teams as well as been an entrepreneur. He consults with industry and academia. He is a Senior Member of the IEEE. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 A Framework for Remote Hardware Lab Course Delivery — Rapidly Adjusting to 2020AbstractThis paper describes a framework for enabling students to remotely interact with laboratorycomputers and equipment for traditional, in-person laboratory courses. This framework wasdeveloped due to the closure of campus facilities and the transition to remote course delivery inresponse to the COVID-19
plasma, materials characterization, 3D printing, and student assessment. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Transition to Virtual InstructionDuring the spring 2020 academic term, students and instructors were required to transition fromin-person instruction to a virtual learning mode. This transition occurred at the mid-point of thesemester, moving from an in-person student-teacher interaction to a virtual environment. Whilethis transition was unexpected for students and instructors, it was also an opportunity tounderstand how student learning outcomes were affected and how students reacted to thischange. Both lecture and laboratory
providing students with a hands-on laboratory experience featuring thedevelopment tools, network topologies, and design paradigms needed for building real-world IoTproducts, primarily IoT Edge Devices. This paper describes the development process, lessonslearned, and exemplar student outcomes from our work.The IoT sector has grown rapidly in the past few years to become a critical infrastructure thataffects our daily lives in many ways. 1 IoT sensor networks deployed throughout our homes,offices, hospitals, factories, cities, power grid, and beyond provide the opportunity for greatersecurity, safer environments, reduced energy consumption, higher levels of comfort, and manyother benefits. Managing these ever-expanding networks using only Cloud
. McGraw Award; Purdue’s life-time Murphy Teaching Award for outstanding undergraduate teaching; induction into Purdue’s Book of Great Teachers (an honor reserved for only 267 faculty in the history of Purdue University at the time of his induction); Purdue Teaching Academy Fellow and Execu- tive Board (charter member); the Ronald Schmitz Award for Outstanding Service to FIE; the ASEE IL-IN Outstanding Campus Representative; the ASEE Hewlett Packard Award for Excellence in Laboratory In- struction; the ASEE IL-IN Outstanding Teaching Award; Marquis’ Who’s Who in the World, in America, in Engineering and Science, and in Education.Dr. Anne M. Lucietto, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Lucietto has focused her
to help students gain a better understanding ofhow the knowledge are useful in real-world situations. Particularly, nine simulation labs and twosimulation projects were used in the class of summer 2020.In order to evaluate the effectiveness of the designed simulation labs and projects in helpingstudents to grasp and then apply the control concepts and ideas, surveys were conducted in thesummer 2020 class to collect students’ opinions and feedbacks. Among the 27 participatingstudents, 81.4% of students “agree” or “strongly agree” that simulation laboratory exercisesincreased their interest in the subject, 85.1% of students “agree” or “strongly agree” thatsimulation laboratory exercises helped them better to learn course content, and 77.7% of
undergraduate students [6-8, 12].A natural and efficient way of teaching renewable energy into curriculum is the project-basedapproach, shaping the course content to local industry fields. Course content and deliverymethods should be structured to meet the demands and challenges of such a dynamic,interdisciplinary and complex applied science field. Laboratory work is a critical component ofthe engineering education, and a core component of technical programs. Unfortunately, in therenewable energy case, the equipment is expensive, in terms of acquisition and maintenance,requiring adequate space and utility access. To cope with such challenges we are proposing inthe next academic year to develop a virtual renewable energy laboratory, consisting of
statistics, research methodology in nutritional science, and research methods for healthcare education. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 A Journey from End Systems to Backbone Routers - A Virtual Lab Environment for Online Computer Networking Courses Zhaohong Wang∗ Jing Guo†AbstractCarrying out purely online laboratory for the computer networking course is challenging in a fewaspects. Students lack tangible interaction with the physical user interface of physical networkingequipment, and for the instructor, setting up a virtual environment precisely matching the realphysical lab is
teaching and research have been in the areas of engineering materials, fracture mechanics, and manufacturing processes. In par- ticular, he has been very active in pedagogical research in the area of writing pedagogy of engineering laboratory courses. Dr. Kim and his collaborators attracted close to $1M research grants to study writing transfer of engineering undergraduates. For the technical research, he has a long-standing involvement in research concerned with manufacturing of advanced composite materials (CFRP/titanium stack, GFRP, nanocomposites, etc.) for automotive, marine, and aerospace applications. His recent research efforts have also included the fatigue behavior of manufactured products, with the focus of
requirements of technicalwriting. Indirect measurements were conducted using a questionnaire survey in a TransportationEngineering laboratory course. The itemized report scores and survey results show that dataanalysis and interpretation of results are the most challenging sections for students to write.Faculty feedback was ranked by students as the most effective activity to help them improvetechnical writing skills, followed by individual practice and the use of a good writing sample.Additionally, students who initially perceived their writing skills to be weak reported a higherdegree of improvement at the end of the course. Student surveys also affirmed that short writtenassignments moderately improved ABET outcome 6 because the writing process
Surveying LabAbstractIn 2020, the COVID pandemic forced educators to pivot to an online teaching modality in themiddle of spring semester. In preparation for a summer offering of a surveying and geomaticsclass, faculty chose to develop a virtual laboratory that could provide a quality, virtual learningexperience for students that would fully meet the course learning outcomes. The resulting virtuallaboratory centered on a series of videos that put the student in a second-person perspective of anote-taker on a survey crew. The modules built around these videos not only allowed for a fullyvirtual delivery of the laboratory, with students participating from as far away as Saudi Arabia,they also ensured full participation of every student, something
IEEE and serves as an Associate Editor for International Journal of Electronics American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Enhancing Student Learning via Hardware in HomeworkI. Introduction:An important problem that has come up over the years in some engineering programs is the lossof laboratory experiences in favor of more theoretical emphasis in upper division courses. InElectrical Engineering (EE) curriculums, the majority of programs now include laboratory workonly in introductory courses such as circuits and logic design [1]-[3]. Advanced courses such asElectronics II, Communications, and others have lost their labs due to the curriculum changesand the
(c) organizational change. These studies have revealed that peersand teams unite the themes of meaningful and consequential learning and equity and inclusion.2. Meaningful and consequential learningOur focus of curriculum reform has been towards shifting activity to meaningful, consequentiallearning in activity-based studio and laboratory courses to better prepare students to connect theknowledge they are learning in school to the messy, open-ended work they will encounter aspracticing engineers (NAE, 2020). Meaningful, consequential learning centers on work thatpositions students on teams in the role of engineers where they need to identify core foundationalprinciples as conceptual tools to progress (Johri & Olds, 2011). We draw upon
Coarsening, Best Choice clustering requiredsignificant modifications to the original algorithm in order to accommodate the changes. Inaddition to the lists and maps constructed in the previous part, a special map was constructed forstudents who are connected via mutually enrolled non-lecture courses. These could be tutorial orlaboratory sections. The rationale behind removing lectures is to reduce the density of theconnections in the network. There would be more opportunities for cohort-based collaborationsin tutorial and laboratory sections, as opposed to during lectures. Hence, effective cohorts couldstill be formed by disregarding lecture sections.Using the two sets of constructed lists and connectivity maps, for students connected by allcourses
universities closed their campus and moved most or alllectures and labs online. Lab instructors were forced to convert their physical labs to online withlimited preparation time. It is important to highlight that only putting course content on the web,without using appropriate pedagogical models and principles, without appropriate means ofcommunication between participants and instructors and without the use of modern informationtechnologies to present the learning content, is not enough to fulfill educational goals [1].There are many educators that have already tried diverse ways to provide remote or virtualengineering labs [2]. All types of laboratories offer certain advantages. Engineering studentsshould be offered, through the duration of their
Paper ID #32550Switching from Hands-on Labs to Exclusively Online Experimentation inElectrical and Computer Engineering CoursesDr. Dominik May, University of Georgia Dr. May is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Transformations Institute. He researches online and intercultural engineering education. His primary research focus lies on the development, in- troduction, practical use, and educational value of online laboratories (remote, virtual, and cross-reality) and online experimentation in engineering instruction. In his work, he focuses on developing broader educational strategies for the design and
undergraduatecourse in Measurements and Instrumentation (ME 3113). This course has an average enrollment of90 students per semester. The course was taught by the same author during spring 2020 (50% face-to-face, and 50% online), summer 2020 (100% online), fall 2020 (100% online), and spring 2021(100% online). The course has a lecture component that comprises 60% of the course (twoindividual midterm exams and eight individual homework assignments are considered as evaluationmethods), and a laboratory component that comprises the remaining 40% of the course (five teamlaboratory assignments and one individual laboratory assignment are considered as evaluationmethods). Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, both components were taught in a face-to-faceenvironment with
wireless sensor networks, intelligent agents, agent-based manufacturing scheduling, systems control and automation, distributed control of holonic systems and integrated manufacturing, agile manufacturing, virtual reality and remote laboratory applications in edu- cation. He has authored or co-authored various journal and conference publications in these areas. Mert Bal is currently the Chair and Associate Professor at the Miami University, Department of Engineering Technology, Ohio, United States of America. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Developing Robotics Engineering Technology Program to Address the Workforce Skills Gaps in
with changing regulations. The microbiology students analyzed the implications ofthe new policy from the perspective of identifying populations of microbes present in wastes withvarying amounts of organics content to represent current and future wastes. Results of the analyseswere shared between classes by the students. Teaching and learning effectiveness were evaluatedusing direct assessment (homework assignments and laboratory reports) and indirect assessment(student self-perception surveys and oral presentations) methods. Bloom’s Taxonomy ofeducational objectives were used to evaluate levels of cognitive achievement attained throughproject activities. The assessment results demonstrated that the students advanced their knowledgein the
firsthand how to conductwater quality testing in the field. This video was shown to the students after (and within the sameweek) the students participated in an in-person laboratory class period where the studentsexperimentally measured water quality parameters. Prior to reviewing this module, the studentswere briefly introduced to the various water quality parameters that can be measured in the fieldand the advantages of field testing. Two additional videos were created to introduce students totwo topics relevant to water and wastewater treatment, including nutrients and bacteria. Thesemodules were shown to the students prior to the in-person laboratory class period pertaining tothe experimental measurement of nutrients and bacteria in water and
-worldconfirmation of the theory and concepts from lecture classes. All too often, however,undergraduate laboratory classes fall short of enhanced learning and are instead more notable forstudent dissatisfaction and/or frustration [1], [2], [3]. There are several reasons for this problem.First, organized laboratory classes are often used to meet numerous student outcomes such asthose comprising ABET student outcomes (1) – (7) [4]. Second, organized laboratory classes areoften taught separately from theory classes, leading to a disconnect from pre-requisite coursesand uneven understanding among the student cohort. Third, organized lab classes often involveteamwork, without specific instruction or guidance on how to work effectively, how to divide uptasks
-inmultimeter also will not be damaged or have a fuse blown if used incorrectly. Additionally,circuits in Tinkercad can be named, saved, and shared. Figure 3: Using the multimeter in Tinkercad.3. Assignment DescriptionsThe Tinkercad environment was employed in ENGR 111 for two course meetings in Spring 2021for the purposes of circuitry instruction: “Laboratory Preparation” and “Introduction toCircuitry”. Both classes were taught in previous iterations of the course utilizing physicalcircuitry components. However, in the transition from typical to remote instruction, these labscontinued to include the same circuit-building activities. Regardless of iteration, these classeswere both performed by students in groups of 3-4.The
: thetechnical communications course, laboratory courses, and a series of project-based courses. Thetechnical communications course was changed to a rotating face-to-face model, for which lecturevideos and assigned activities were performed on out-of-class days and in-class days were reservedfor workshops. Workshops replaced the traditional guided learning activity approach with activelearning in a think-pair-share format. Students were given strong and weak examples of writing tobe able to give feedback to their peers and improve their own writing prior to submission. Studentsworked on improving their formal written assignments, and therefore improved their capacity fortechnical writing, during class rather than submitting their first writing
core engineering skills in mid-career (second- and third-year) students.This strategy is implemented in a 200-level lecture/laboratory course entitled Introduction toAerospace Engineering for 23 mid-career students. The DBF experience (rocket flight) isscaffolded, leveraging traditional systems engineering and integrated vehicle design approachesdetailed in lecture with hands-on laboratory experiences utilizing experimental measurement,computational simulation, scale flight tests, and prototyping. These experiences foster skills whichnecessarily build upon each other giving the students sufficient tools to design and build their ownrocket in the final six weeks of the course. Each of the individual laboratory projects culminate ina laboratory
classroom demonstrations and illustrative laboratory and field experiences. He has served as an ASCE ExCEEd Teaching Workshop mentor for five years as well as the founding coordinator for the Oregon Tech Excellence in Teaching Workshop.Dr. Dave Kim, Washington State University Vancouver Dr. Dave Kim is Professor and Mechanical Engineering Program Coordinator in the School of Engineer- ing and Computer Science at Washington State University Vancouver. His teaching and research have been in the areas of engineering materials, fracture mechanics, and manufacturing processes. In par- ticular, he has been very active in pedagogical research in the area of writing pedagogy of engineering laboratory courses. Dr. Kim and his
twenty years.The program of instruction includes a laboratory program that uses appropriate laboratoryequipment, kits, and a hands-on project to design, build, fabricate, populate, test, and iterate aDC/DC converter. Assessment summarizes nearly twenty years of successful instruction.IntroductionAlmost all electrical power in industrialized societies now is processed through at least onepower electronic stage. As such, electrical engineers (EE) often encounter power electroniccircuitry and systems when performing their routine duties. A knowledge of how these systemswork gives an EE an advantage in understanding and working with power of a nature that isprovided to every electrical system. As part of an innovative sequence of courses at