of Market- ing Education, and the Association for Consumer Research (ACR) Film Festival. An American Marketing Association (AMA) - Sheth Consortium Fellow, Professor Saint Clair has been recognized for academic excellence by the Ph.D. Project, AMA Foundation, and National Black MBA Association. In 2020, Saint Clair and his co-authors received the ACR Best Working Paper award for their study of diversity market- ing. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Insights gleaned from the GAIN peer-mentoring program pilotAbstractThere is a growing collection of literature that documents the persistence problem in Science,Technology, Engineering
model, loading and deformation magnification factor to beused during the visualization and control the execution of the experiment via start/stop controllerbuttons. Furthermore, the user will be able to choose where to position the model in thesurrounding environment via touchscreen gestures (tapping).3.2. Model Display and Interaction:This step displays the 3D model object and its elements (e.g., supports, arrows showing the appliedloads) projected in the scene based on the visualization data received from the back-end client.The user is also able to reposition and realign the model in the environment via touchscreengestures. These include “dragging” using one finger to translate the object in the environment,“pinching” with two fingers to
ofincorporating SCL practices into course implementation and provides clear examples of howthese strategies could be more easily incorporated into existing content to improve studentlearning.AcknowledgementsThis project is funded by the NSF-EEC-1825669 and the CRLT Gilbert Whitaker Fund for theImprovement of Teaching funded by the University of Michigan Office of the Provost.References[1] M. Stains et al., “Anatomy of STEM teching in North American Universities,” Science, vol. 359, no. 6383, pp. 1468–1470, 2018.[2] K. A. Nguyen et al., “Students’ expectations, types of instruction, and instructor strategies predicting student response to active learning,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 2–18, 2017.[3] A. M. Kim
Paper ID #33932Modeling Trajectories of Latent Classes to Understand the AcademicPerformance of Engineering StudentsHeather Lee Perkins, North Carolina State University Heather graduated from the Applied Social and Community Psychology program in the spring of 2021, after completing her Bachelor of Science in Psychology from the University of Cincinnati. She has par- ticipated in various research projects examining the interaction between stereotypes and science interest and confidence, their influence upon womens’ performance in school and the workplace, and their pres- ence in the media and consequences for viewers. Her
, University of Southern Indiana Brad holds a BS in Electrical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology (1989) and an MS in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Purdue University (2001). His past work experience includes eleven years at Delphi (formerly Delco Electronics) as an Advanced Project Engineer, eleven years at Whirlpool Corporation as a Lead Engineer/Solution Architect, and three years at Ivy Tech Community College as an Instructor/Program Chair of Pre-Engineering. Since 2015, he has been employed at the University of Southern Indiana as an Assistant Professor of Manufacturing Engineering Technology. He holds three patents, has served as an IEEE section officer since 2004, and has been a
the fatigue experiments are destructive since weneed to apply cyclic loading until the failure of the structure. Also, fatigue experiments may takea long time since, in some cases, we need to apply a very large number of cycles in order tocause a fracture in the specimen. Both of these issues (i.e., cost and time) are not an issue in VLssince a) it is free for students to run as many experiments as they desire and b) theaforementioned “fast-forwarding” button allows students to conduct all experiments within amatter of seconds. Thus, in the case of the fatigue lab, we can easily plot the S-N curve based onthe VL results, whereas doing so based on the hands-on experiments alone is difficult.6. Conclusions and Future WorkIn this project, we
andcommunicating their results. Besides, students are asked to meet with professionals in industry who cantell them about the usability of the course content. For example, they have to ask what open-endedproblems they face in their company and its problem-solving process.Similarly, they have to ask professionals about their decision-making process and compare it with thosetaught in the class. After their meetings, they report what they found on a discussion board, andstudents must reply. Students also have to engage in problem-finding through an iterative process. Theyget feedback from their peers to build a better problem definition and project goal submitted to theinstructional team after several weeks. The course ends with a summative assessment in
. Breckon. “Using QSR‐NVivo to facilitate the development of a grounded theory project: An account of a worked example.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology, vol. 13(4), pp. 283- 302, 2010.[22] J. McCabe. “Racial and gender microaggressions on a predominantly-White campus: Experiences of Black, Latina/o and White undergraduates.” Race, Gender & Class, vol. 16 (1-2), pp. 133-151, 2009.[23] M.M. Camacho & S.M. Lord. " Microaggressions" in engineering education: Climate for Asian, Latina and White women. In 2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Rapid City, SD, USA, October 12 – 15, 2011, pp. S3H-1, IEEE, 2011[24] J. Minikel-Lacocque. “Racism, college, and the power of
Paper ID #34774Understanding the Impact of Inequity on Student Learning ExperiencesDuring a Time of Multiple CrisesDr. Geraldine L. Cochran, Rutgers University Dr. Geraldine Cochran is an Assistant Professor of Professional Practice in the School of Arts and Sci- ences and the Department of Physics and Astronomy at Rutgers University. She is a physics education researcher and teaches the large enrollment, introductory physics courses for engineering students. She supports STEM education research and outreach projects, and diversity, inclusion, equity, and social jus- tice efforts in physics and STEM.Bryce Troncone
grades and stress over thechallenge of connecting with faculty members remotely. Some items were motivated byobserved differences in student work, which faculty surmised was due to the added challengesstudents faced in working collaboratively on homework, projects, and in study groups.The survey prompts were preceded by the following statement: The current coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak is causing extra stress for many people, including families with children of all ages. We would like to know how things are going for you and your family related to this situation. Please answer the following questions about your experiences and feelings over the last few weeks, using the following scale. 1
), emailed facultyto ensure the lesson was being recorded if they could not be at least synchronous, and all contentexchange to include HW and project submissions was through the LMS. The result of this rapidshift to embracing shared standards is that many School of Engineering faculty who taught fullyonline during Fall 2020 have achieved 95-100% compliance with the Quality Matters onlinereview rubric, securing institutional approval for their online course to be taught in the future, ifneeded.Administration – Opportunities for growth and Continuity of InstructionWhile leading articles on higher education focused on many strategies that were not effective forremote instruction, The Citadel was fortunate to enjoy key early successes thanks to
focused on implementation and only showed a static diagram (see Figure 7). For ad-hoccorrespondence, some YouTubers bounced between implementing the linked list and showing anexample using the diagram, but the two were not tightly coupled. For one-to-onecorrespondence, YouTubers stepped through their code and illustrated the corresponding changein the diagram, thus keeping the program state and diagram state in sync.DiscussionWhat (if anything) should we standardize?We might be tempted to think that diagram standardization is the answer to simplify all of thevariety. Certainly, chemistry seems to rely on standardization: how one professor draws Fischerprojections in one university is how another will draw the same Fischer projection. However
– Students indicated which, if any, of the onboarding programs they participated in. • Demographics – Students provided demographic information including race, ethnicity, gender identity, sexual orientation, age, admission status, citizenship, education level of parent(s)/guardians(s), and major.The long-term plan for this project is to longitudinally track students’ academic progress to assessretention and progress through degree completion in Clark School and at the University of Maryland.Finally, the outcomes of future TerrapinSTRONG initiatives will be evaluated, which will allow for acomparison of the efficacy of virtual and in-person programming.ProcedureThe survey was sent out electronically by email to 1154 new
. He was among the 25 outstanding faculty design team, from 14 States, of the nationwide initiatives: Global Skills for College Completion (GSCC) and Taking College Teaching Seriously (TCTS). He developed and led several faculty professional development and curriculum development seminars and workshops in STEM pedagogy, locally and nationwide. He co-led Project Quantum Leap - Advanced Leadership and Curriculum (PQL-ALeC) a year-long seminar that promoting leadership and mentoring skills, curriculum development, and teaching math in compelling contexts at LaGCC. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Work in Progress: A Model to Improve
outlined in Figure 3. Figure 3. Steps in the computational and physical modeling and simulation processes1 https://fineartamerica.com/featured/cow-looking-over-split-rail-fence-on-the-blue-ridge-parkway-john-harmon.htmlOur case study comes from an undergraduate research project that was not part of a formalcourse. A local manufacturer wanted to investigate the possible application of a product in a newmarket. They had the capability to manufacture 8ft long 4in diameter solid rods from a blend ofrecycled polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP), and wanted to explore the use of these rodsas fence rails in agricultural applications. Developing a polymer blend was motivated by PPhaving higher inherent stiffness but somewhat limited
© American Society for Engineering Education, 2021 2021 ASEE Conferencetools. Interactions with friends, classes, projects, and other staff and instructors have also beenshown to aid in student involvement within the space [6]. Reoccurring tools such as the 3Dprinter and computer stations were also often identified as "gateway" tools that could aid in theearly introduction of the students into the space [11]. Knowing the importance of tools and theirinteractions can help create a pathway for students to enter the space and become morecomfortable with tools in the future [11, 12]. The approach taken here, which looks for ways tobetter engage students within the makerspace by understanding their interactions with
community college women in engineering and computer science. Theresearch will explore if (1) such networking interventions increase community college women’smotivation, self-efficacy, and confidence in engineering & computer science and (2) thenetworking interventions result in greater retention of community college women in engineering& computer science programs. The project was launched in Western Massachusetts with anevent co-sponsored by PVWIS and SWE called “Unleash Your Inner STEM” in February, 2021.Similar events will be piloted in Los Angeles and Houston. SWE will target multiple hightransfer community colleges in each regional area.Activities and EventsPVWIS events support community college women in STEM by providing a peer group
. Andersson and L. Bendix, “eXtreme teaching: A framework for continuous improvement,” Comput. Sci. Educ., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 175–184, Sep. 2006, doi: 10.1080/08993400600912335.[14] E. García, C. Romero, S. Ventura, and C. de Castro, “Using rules discovery for the continuous improvement of e-learning courses,” in International Conference on Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning, 2006, pp. 887–895.[15] N. F. Veltri, H. W. Webb, A. G. Matveev, and E. G. Zapatero, “Curriculum mapping as a tool for continuous improvement of IS curriculum,” J. Inf. Syst. Educ., vol. 22, no. 1, p. 31, 2011.[16] L. Booth, J. Preston, and J. Qu, “Continuous program improvement: a project to automate record-keeping for accreditation
the course, students will have the basic skills to plan and execute a failure310 analysis on a failed component. The final project will be a complete analysis, written report, and oral report on a broken part.Biomedical By the end of the course, students will have an understanding of materials used in theMaterials 320 medical industry and how these materials are selected and processed for making implants or surgical tools.Corrosion By the end of the course, students will understand the basic types of corrosion andControl 340 degradation which occur in common engineering materials, including metals, polymers, composites, and reinforced concrete. They will
, reflection is gaining traction as a tool to help studentsthink about their study habits, exam performance, command of the course content, and teaminteractions. Yet few validated instruments exist to systematically document what students arelearning from reflection experiences. The purpose of this research project is to providepreliminary evidence of validation for an instrument to capture the knowledge gains of studentsfrom doing reflection activities in a course context. Having a validated survey will allowresearchers and educators to compare knowledge gains across activities, between classes, andeven across institutions. In order to create the instrument, the research team followed the surveyvalidation process. The 72 items, or questions for the
]. Additionally, this strong interest inbiomaterials is reflected economically. In 2019, the global market for biomaterials was estimatedto be worth $106.5 billion, and revenues from biomaterials are projected to increase to $348.4billion by 2027 [5]. To ensure these societal and economic demands for novel biomaterials aremet, we must prioritize educating diverse students about designing, engineering, and testingbiomaterials [6], [7].One way to meet this goal is through K-12 outreach. Outreach is an important activity forincreasing the number of students studying science, technology, engineering, and mathematics(STEM) at the university level [8], [9]. This is especially important for increasing therepresentation of individuals who are traditionally
on bridge related research projects and student competitions.Dr. Christopher R. Shearer, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Dr. Shearer is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology. His research investigates the chemical, physical, and mechanical properties and durability performance of infrastructure materials, with a focus on sustainable concrete materials technology. He also researches new strategies to improve STEM education.Dr. Benjamin Z. Dymond, University of Minnesota Duluth Ben Dymond obtained his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Civil Engineering at Virginia Tech before obtaining his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering at the
/skillslearned were highlighted. These new code definitions offered nuanced information, which wereneeded to characterize the six interviews in the current study. During the analysis process, thecode definitions and final code designation was negotiated among research group members toproduce intercoder reliability. The full codebook for the overall project can be found in anupcoming manuscript (Cross et al., 2021).ResultsThe results of this study are consistent with previous research suggesting that a system ofoppression called the double standard exists in engineering education. The double standard inengineering education is defined in this study as a set of principles produced by the chilly climateof engineering that serve to benefit the majority
assignment. Based on the survey responses, the sample for the study was 125undergraduate engineering students in a single technical research university.Data Collection and Survey InstrumentData for this study were collected through an electronically administered survey in Qualtricsbased on Sharma’s [9] instrument of cultural orientations. The survey was administered toengineering students from different engineering disciplines as part of the larger project approvedby the Institutional Review Board (IRB), which focuses on Hofstede’s original four culturaldimensions [1], [3]. However, we focused on the power distance and uncertainty avoidanceconstructs in this study.We found both constructs consistent and relevant to measure the perceptions of
studentseven asked for and received the $10000 scholarship, as promised by the dean of the college.For some students, participating MATHCOUNTS was actually the very first time they set theirfeet in a university campus. For those 6th, 7th, and 8th graders, the first good impression would goa long way in shaping their mind. To accomplish this, we opened our labs for tour during thecompetition for coaches, parents, and siblings, and at the end of competition for the competingstudents. These labs included many of the research labs in the College of Engineering. Duringthe tour, people saw projects the college students involved, such as the SAE racing car, the 3Dprinting lab, the talking and moving robots, the solar photovoltaic and thermal lab, a
are introduced to success strategies, including time management, study skills, learning styles, and test-taking strategies. There are engineering projects designed to motivate students to become active learners, responsible students, and ethical engineering professionals. Each student will learn what to expect from his/her studies as an engineering major. All Engineering LLC scholars are enrolled in the same section that includes students in the general FAMU and FSU population. From 2015-2018, the students were enrolled in the faculty liaison’s section of the course. This allowed students to interact with the faculty in a formal academic setting, as well as the informal academic setting during the
part of the course.Another faculty member mentioned spending time reflecting on how best to approach groupprojects in the online environment. They stated, “I had a group project in the spring and they hada hard time working together in terms of common times and just engaging at a distance, so ifthey’re not all on campus, and not even in the same time zone, it created some challenges.”In terms of a positive impact due to COVID-19, one faculty member mentioned that recordinglectures as videos provided the opportunity to “flip the classroom” and change their typicalteaching method. This was something they had wanted to incorporate previously but did not havethe time or opportunity. However, one faculty had the opposite experience. As a more
interviewtranscripts, the interview responses were shared with a small group of engineering and scienceeducation graduate researchers for help with coding. Descriptive and in vivo coding methodswere used for first cycle coding, and pattern coding was used for second cycle coding. Thisproject was conducted with approval of the institution’s IRB, project #IRB2020-375.The graduate perspective on the role of GLAs in the lab Before any change in roles could be commented on, the initial self-perception of a GLA’srole and responsibilities in the laboratory classroom had to be assessed to provide a baseline for a“normal” in-person semester. Perhaps not surprisingly, all GLAs surveyed indicated that theynoticed a change in their role and responsibilities since
thedismay of this group of students, the professor had not allowed them to self-select project groupsand instead used group formation software to create heterogeneous groups. As their conversationprogressed, it became apparent that several of these male students had not previously been in agroup with a female classmate, and were not happy that they had to be now. In reference to thegirls in their class, they callously used names such as “annoying girl”, “space cadet” and “coffeebitch”. Their annoyance with the assigned groups was obvious except for one student whom theothers dubbed “lucky”; he was in a group with Nicki. Their conversation continued as follows:“Lucky” student: But he made it so most of the groups have a girl in themStudent 1: Yeah