?” in Getting well, Sticking Together, Owning the Future Covid Shock, U.S.- China Rupture, and The World in 2050, Bloomberg L.P., November 2020, pp. 51-54, [Online]. Available: https://www.neweconomyforum.com. [Accessed January 25, 2021].[2] J. Causey, Q. Liu, M. Ryu, D. Shapiro, and Y. Zheng, “A COVID-19 Supplement to Spring 2020 Current Term Enrollment Estimates,” National Student Clearinghouse Research Center, June 2020. [Online]. Available: https://nscresearchcenter.org/wp- content/uploads/CTEE_Report_Spring_2020.pdf. [Accessed: January 25, 2021].[3] Ministry of Education (MOE) Department of Statistics, “大專校院研究生概況 [Summary of graduate students],” Highlights of Education Statistics, vol. 114, July 2019. [Online
Proposals Monday Creating and supporting effective arguments Read pp. 35-47 & pp. 95-101Wednesday Creating and supporting effective argumentsFriday Title, mapping, and conclusion slides Read pp. 171-184 & pp. 221-227; HW #5: due on Course Management System by 11:59 PMMonday Problem-Solution Student Mentor Read pp. 264-268 Demonstration; Q & A sessions; Introducing a colleagueWednesday Introducing
? Economics of Education Review, 69, 125– 137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2019.02.001Huang, F. L. (2018). Multilevel modeling myths. School Psychology Quarterly, 33(3), 492. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000272Lee, W. C., Godwin, A., & Hermundstad Nave, A. L. (2018). Development of the Engineering Student Integration Instrument: Rethinking measures of integration. Journal of Engineering Education, 107(1), 30–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20184Li, Q., Swaminathan, H., & Tang, J. (2009). Development of a classification system for engineering student characteristics affecting college enrollment and retention. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(4), 361–376. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2009.tb01033
in Engineering Education,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 53–66, 2009, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01005.x.[36] J. P. Martin and C. Garza, “Centering the Marginalized Student’s Voice Through Autoethnography: Implications for Engineering Education Research,” Studies in Engineering Education, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 1, May 2020, doi: 10.21061/see.1.[37] A. Q. Gates, P. J. Teller, A. Bernat, N. Delgado, and C. K. Della-Piana, “Expanding Participation in Undergraduate Research Using the Affinity Group Model*,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 409–414, 1999, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.1999.tb00467.x.[38] B. F. Skinner, Science And Human Behavior
Food Waste at Wastewater Treatment Facilities. Retrieved 12/16/2020 from https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/documents/Why- Anaerobic-Digestion.pdf.[15] Edwards, J., Othman, M., Crossin, E., Burn, S. (2018). Life cycle assessment to compare the environmental impact of seven contemporary food waste management systems. Bioresource Technology 248(Q): 156-173. www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960852417309744.[16] Food Waste Reduction Alliance (2016). Analysis of U.S. Food Waste Among Manufacturers, Retailers, and Restaurants. Retrieved 12/16/2020 from http://www.foodwastealliance.org/wp- content/uploads/2013/05/FWRA-Food-Waste-Survey-2016-Report_Final.pdf.[17] Food Waste Project, City of West Lafayette. https
, no. 3, pp. 385–419, 2005.[58] N. E. Betz, “Advances in vocational theories,” 4th ed., S. D. Brown and R. W. Lent, Eds. Wiley, 2008, pp. 357–374[59] N. E. Betz, “Self-concept theory in career development and counseling,” Career Dev. Q., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 32–42, 1994.[60] D. Brown, “Summary, comparison, and critique of the major theories,” 2nd ed., D. Brown, L. Brooks, and Associates, Eds. Jossey-Bass, 1990, pp. 338–363.[61] J. L. Swanson and P. A. Gore, “Advances in vocational psychology theory and research,” D. D. Brown and R. W. Lent, Eds. Wiley, 2000, pp. 233-269.[62] G. Hackett, R. W. Lent, and J. H. Greenhaus, “Advances in vocational theory and research: A 20 year retrospective,” Journal of
;search_scope=01CALS&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine& tab=everything&query=any,contains,information%20seeking%20and%20communicating% 20behavior%20of%20scientists%20and%20engineers&sortby=rank&offset=0[8] G. J. Leckie, K. E. Pettigrew, and C. Sylvain, “Modeling the Information Seeking of Professionals: A General Model Derived from Research on Engineers, Health Care Professionals, and Lawyers on JSTOR,” Libr. Q., vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 161–193, 1996.[9] W. B. Badke, “Can’t Get No Respect: Helping Faculty to Understand the Educational Power of Information Literacy,” Ref. Libr., vol. 43, no. 89–90, pp. 63–80, Apr. 2005, doi: 10.1300/J120v43n89_05.[10] N. G. Kobzina, “A Faculty–Librarian
; Sons, 2020.[16] J. Kania and M. Kramer, “‘Collective impact’, Stanford social innovation review winter 2011,” Palo Alto, CA, 2011.[17] M. Q. Patton, Developmental evaluation : applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. New York : Guilford Press, 2011.[18] S. N. Leonard, R. N. Fitzgerald, and G. Riordan, “Using developmental evaluation as a design thinking tool for curriculum innovation in professional higher education,” High. Educ. Res. Dev., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 309–321, Mar. 2016.[19] J. M. Case and G. Light, “Emerging Research Methodologies in Engineering Education Research,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 186–210, Jan. 2011.[20] D. Kember, Action learning and action research
.[14] J. Cohen, "Teaching effectively with Zoom: A practical guide to engage your students andhelp them learn," Journal of Public Affairs Education, DOI: 10.1080/15236803.2020.1834676,2020.[15] M. Islam, D.-A. Kim, M. Kwon, "A Comparison of Two Forms of Instruction:Pre-Recorded Video Lectures vs. Live ZOOM Lectures for Education in the BusinessManagement Field," Sustainability 2020, 12, 8149. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198149, 2020.[16] D. Serhan, "Transitioning from face-to-face to remote learning: Students’ attitudes andperceptions of using Zoom during COVID-19 pandemic," International Journal of Technology inEducation and Science (IJTES), 4(4), 335-342, 2020.[17] Q. Wang, C. Huang, C.L. Quek, "Students’ perspectives on the design and
students. The overallstructure and organization of the class, weekly presentations, and discussions, and learning socialinnovations as an interdisciplinary topic were well received by the students.Table 4: Summary of student feedback on the class Survey Q: We welcome your written comments below. What is something/are some things that the instructor does well e.g. something you hope that the instructor continues to do in the class in the future? “In general the course is perfect, but it is too much material for the time of a summer class” “The instructor has great ideas that he introduced to the class and fostered discussion. Introduced a great number of innovations” “Well-thought topics, organized discussions, good moderation, and
10-13, 2012. 9. M.E. Hernitter, D.R. Scott, and R. Pangasa, “Teaching Programming Skills with MATLAB,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exhibition, Albuquerque, NM, June 24-27, 2001. 10. J. Turner and J.P. Hoffbeck, “Putting Theory into Practice with Simulink,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exhibition, Portland, OR, June 11-15, 2005. 11. E.M. Eke, “Using Simulink, Matlab, and LEGO Mindstorms to teach a Project-Based Control Systems Design Course,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exhibition, Seattle, WA, June 14-17, 2015. 12. Q. Dai and Z. You, “Using MATLAB to Solve Engineering Problems for Undergraduates,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exhibition, Chicago, IL, June 18-21, 2006. 13. C. Aroskar and Y.R. Zheng
time to explore on their own can be a key aspect of developing thesecompetencies. Beyond the travel component, we consider the academic aspect of these types ofprograms (i.e., courses associated with it) and also intentionally design learning activities thatallow students to obtain complementary learning gains to what they are experiencing by the factof being abroad. Including self-reflection as part of the assignments have proven to help withawareness.References[1] B. K. Jesiek, Q. Zhu, S. E. Woo, J. Thompson, and A. Mazzurco, “Global Engineering Competency in Context: Situations and Behaviors,” p. 16, 2014.[2] L. A. Braskamp, D. C. Braskamp, K. C. Merrill, and M. Engberg, The Global Perspective Inventory (GPI): Its Purpose
Undergraduate Engineering Students for Developing IoT Competencies A Case Study at Tecnologico de Monterrey in Mexico,” Proc. 2019 IEEE 11th Int. Conf. Eng. Educ. ICEED 2019, pp. 90–95, 2019.[17] A. Kindarto and Y. Q. Zhu, “The future of decision making process in the government’s IT project in industry 4.0 Era,” Proc. - 2019 5th Int. Conf. Sci. Technol. ICST 2019, pp. 19–24, 2019.[18] Y. Wang, A. Faath, T. Göerne, and R. Anderl, “Development of a toolbox for engineering in project teams for industrie 4.0,” in Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, 2018, vol. 2.[19] D. S. Ozkan, H. G. Murzi, A. Salado, and C. Gewirtz, “Reality gaps in industrial engineering
‐year, multi‐institution study of women engineering student self‐ efficacy," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 27-38, 2009.[9] Q. A. Blanco, M. Carlota, A. Nasibog, B. Rodriguez, X. V. E. Salana and F. Gagani, "Probing on the Relationship between Students' Self-Confidence and Self-Efficacy while engaging in Online Learning amidst COVID-19," Journal La Edusci, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 16- 25, 2020.[10] J. Heo and S. Han, "Effects of motivation, academic stress and age in predicting self- directed learning readiness (SDLR): Focuses on online college students," Education and Information Technologies, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 61-71, 2018.[11] N. Ramo, E. Hald and A. Huang-Saad, "Synchronous vs. asynchronous vs
underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology,engineering, and math,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117, no. 12, pp.6476-6483, 2020.[5] C. Baillie, A. Pawley, and D. Riley, Engineering and social justice: In the university andbeyond. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press, 2012.[6] D. Riley, “Engineering and social justice,” Synthesis Lectures on Engineers, Technology, andSociety, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1-152, 2008.[7] K. Scheidgen, “Social contexts in team formation,” Historical Social Research/ HistorischeSozialforschung, vol. 44, no. 4 (170), pp. 42-74, 2019.[8] S. C. Hsu, K. W. Weng, Q. Cui, and W. Rand, “Understanding the complexity of projectteam member selection through agent-based modeling,” International
conference: Envisioning future media environments, 2011, pp. 9-15.[13] F. F.-H. Nah, Q. Zeng, V. R. Telaprolu, A. P. Ayyappa, and B. Eschenbrenner, "Gamification of education: a review of literature," in International conference on hci in business, 2014: Springer, pp. 401-409.[14] D. Dicheva, C. Dichev, G. Agre, and G. Angelova, "Gamification in education: A systematic mapping study," Journal of Educational Technology & Society, vol. 18, no. 3, 2015.[15] A. M. Toda, P. H. Valle, and S. Isotani, "The dark side of gamification: An overview of negative effects of gamification in education," in Researcher Links Workshop: Higher Education for All, 2017: Springer, pp. 143-156.[16] J. Majuri, J. Koivisto, and J
the course. Figure 1. Sample of a dashboard from Dynamics at the end of a semester. The mastery objectives are shown in the lower right portion of the dashboard.You can tell a lot about the student by looking at the dashboard. This student was reluctant to participatein the activities called Q&C and MA Self-Assessment and missed a few classes near the end of thesemester. The student mastered 12 of 16 objectives (note that H.1 is considered close enough in ourscheme). It appears that the student had some trouble finishing the module assessments because objectiveJ is the very last step in all problems. The student was well above the class in mastering conservation ofmomentum, likely because they worked hard on the associated
. Interdiscip. J. Hum. ICT Environ., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 47–61, May 2008, doi: 10.17011/ht/urn.200804151352.[5] J. Parkinson and Q. Cutts, “Investigating the Relationship Between Spatial Skills and Computer Science,” in Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research, Espoo Finland, Aug. 2018, pp. 106–114. doi: 10.1145/3230977.3230990.[6] M. Fisher, A. Cox, and L. Zhao, “Using Sex Differences to Link Spatial Cognition and Program Comprehension,” in 2006 22nd IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance, Sep. 2006, pp. 289–298. doi: 10.1109/ICSM.2006.72.[7] P. J. Guo, “Online python tutor: embeddable web-based program visualization for cs education,” in Proceeding of the 44th ACM
May 20, 2021].[16] L. Dickerson, “Unmanned vehicles forecast – Airborne systems”, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.forecastinternational.com/fistore/prod.cfm?FISSYS_RECNO=99&title=Unm anned-Vehicles-Forecast---Airborne-Systems. [Accessed May 20, 2021].[17] Deloitte, “2021 aerospace and defense industry outlook”, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEw iL85PI59jwAhVUG80KHRKDBg4QFjACegQIAxAD&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww2.del oitte.com%2Fcontent%2Fdam%2FDeloitte%2Fus%2FDocuments%2Fenergy- resources%2Fus-eri-aerospace-defense-industry- outlook.pdf&usg=AOvVaw16JFR3s11cTRIWHJBpDyGp. [Accessed May 20, 2021].[18] M. O'Hair
. Commun. Q., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 350–380, Feb. 2002, doi: 10.1177/0893318902153002.[36] K. L. Meyers, M. W. Ohland, A. L. Pawley, S. E. Silliman, and K. A. Smith, “Factors relating to engineering identity,” Glob. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 14, no. 1, p. 13, 2012.[37] H. Stonyer, “Making engineering students-making women: The discursive context of engineering education,” TEMPUS Publ., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 1–8, 2002.[38] K. L. Tonso, “Student engineers and engineer identity: Campus engineer identities as figured world,” Cult. Stud. Sci. Educ., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 273–307, Sep. 2006, doi: 10.1007/s11422-005-9009-2.[39] J. P. Martin and C. Garza, “Centering the Marginalized student’s voice through autoethnography: Implications for
complete their tasks slowly. Tokens(then and now) are not allowed to exit PR until three (or more) reviews have been completed.Under the assignment model, five reviewers were assigned. If three of a token’s assignedreviewers fail to complete their review, the token is stuck. Several students expressed frustrationwith tokens in this state.Keep It FunA personal PR statistics dashboard was added. This feature seeks to enhance intrinsic motivationfor PRs by applying gamification. Instructors can give a star to a student’s PR. Students earn athumbs-up when a token is revised in response to their PR comment. Students also see the totalnumber of PRs they have completed and a Q (quality) statistic which is computed based on thewords used in their review
. Livingstone, D. Ramirez, E. B. Barko, and A. L. Johnson, “Racial Identity and Body Image Among Black Female College Students Attending Predominately White Colleges,” Sex Roles, vol. 63, no. 9–10, pp. 697–711, 2010, doi: 10.1007/s11199-010-9862-7.[41] S. Mir, “Not Too ‘College-Like,’ Not Too Normal: American Muslim Undergraduate Women’s Gendered Discourses,” Anthropol. Educ. Q., vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 237–256, 2009, doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1492.2009.01043.x.[42] L. D. Patton and S. L. Simmons, “Exploring Complexities of Multiple Identities of Lesbians in a Black College Environment,” Negro Educ. Rev., vol. 59, pp. 197–215, 2008.[43] V. Purdie-Vaughns and R. P. Eibach, “Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive
the end of the semester.What is Chegg and how do students use it to cheat on exams?To begin, the authors must again emphasize that Chegg is not unique. Many companies providesimilar services for students. The services detailed here are not the only services Chegg offers tostudents, they are the ones that were used to cheat on exams in this class.Students sign up for a Chegg account for a monthly fee. This subscription gives them access tomany services, but the two used for cheating are “homework solutions” and “expert Q&A”.The homework solutions section allows students to search Chegg’s vast database of solvedhomework problems. Students can search for questions by key words or typing phrases from theproblem into Chegg’s search engine. For
Applied, vol. 145, no. 3, pp. 229- 245, 2011.[17] E. C. Kokkelenberg and E. Sinha, “Who succeeds in STEM studies? An analysis of Binghamton University undergraduate students,” Economics of Education Review, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 935-946, 2010.[18] Q. Li, H. Swaminathan, and J. Tang, “Development of a classification system for engineering student characteristics affecting college enrollment and retention,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 361-376, 2009.[19] K. Klopfenstein and M. K. Thomas, “The link between advanced placement experience and early college success,” Southern Economic Journal, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 873-891, 2009.[20] P. Kauffmann, C. Hall, G. Dixon, and J. Garner, “Predicting
as the unit tests for aspecific function passing without error). To provide the flexibility to allow each student todemonstrate their learning in the way best suited to them, the grading category (quizzes,assignments, Projects 1 and 2, and Project 3) in which the student scored highest was double-weighted in the final grade (i.e., 40% of the final grade instead of 20%).5. Space. Class meetings and office hours were held exclusively on Zoom. Information regardingthe class was distributed among several platforms: GitHub for the content and rubrics forassignments, worksheets, and projects; Canvas for grades, announcements, anddiscussions/Q&A; and a course website for readings and project descriptions. While meeting onZoom worked overall
Funke. Complex Problem Solving: The European Perspective. Psychology Press, 2014, Books.google.com, books.google.com/books?id=O- ZHAwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_atb#v=onepage&q&f=false.[9] Gehringer, Edward F. “Peer Grading Over the Web: Enhancing Education in Design Courses.” North Carolina State University, 1998, pp 1-11.[10] McAlpine, Iain, and Carl Reidsema. "The role of student peer review and assessment in an introductory project-based engineering design course." ConnectEd, International Conference of Design Education. 2007.[11] CATME Smarter Teamwork, Purdue University, 2021, https://info.catme.org/.[12] Iris Cushing, M.F.A. Assistance given to the authors, review of electronic work through the
engineering: research and practice of an interest-based engineering challengesframework", European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 44, no. 1-2, pp. 103-122.Krüger, M. & Diercks-O'Brien, G. 2013, Cooperative and self-directed learning with thelearning scenario VideoLearn: Engineering education using lecture recordings.Liu, W., Tan, R., Peng, Q., Li, H., Li, Z. & Yang, B. 2020, "Impact of TRIZ learning onperformance in biologically inspired design", International Journal of EngineeringEducation, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 974-987.Lönngren, J., Adawi, T. & Svanström, M. 2019, "Scaffolding strategies in a rubric-basedintervention to promote engineering students’ ability to address wicked problems", EuropeanJournal of Engineering Education
see a measurabledifference in reverberation time between the two states of the room, particularly in the higher-frequency octave bands.The required materials for the lab included: 1) a smart phone with a sound recording app (e.g.,Hi-Q MP3 Voice Recorder), 2) a reverberant room in a home (bathroom or garage), 3) soundabsorbing materials that can be added and removed from room (towels, carpets, curtains,blankets, etc.), and 4) MATLAB with the Signal Processing Toolbox for filtering and dataanalysis, 5) an impulsive sound source, such as a balloon pop or hand clap.The lab handout included basic acoustic theory, including for room acoustics, an explanation ofreverberation time, and how to compute instantaneous sound pressure level, 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆
asked questions to thateffect, the audience and client were able to probe deeper into the assumptions and analysismethodology for the second team.Mentioned previously, during the proposal presentations, students in the class played the role ofthe client’s engineering team. They were tasked with assessing the proposal pitch from atechnical perspective and reporting to the client on how effective the product was described,assessing the technical merits of the proposed heat transfer analysis, and rating the ability of theteam to complete their stated deliverables. Completing this assessment necessitated the reviewersto ask questions and probe deeper into the presented proposal. An interesting phenomenonemerged between the in class Q&A and the