, 425–435.Duval-Couetil, N. & Wheadon, J. (2013). The value of entrepreneurship to recent engineering graduates: A qualitative perspective. in Proc. 2013 IEEE Front. Educ. Conf. 114–120.Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. New York: Routledge.Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Ballantine.Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72 (1), 218-232.Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2x2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80 (3), 501-519.Henry, M. A., Shorter, S
some limitations: (1) Results are based on studentretrospectives containing the reflections of students regarding their teamwork experience. (2) Wecould not interview students, so all results are based on students’ reflections of teamwork. Futurework should explore this further with control groups to better identify if it is online instructionthat lends itself to improved teamwork.References[1] K. S. Koong, L. C. Liu, and X. Liu, “A Study of the Demand for Information Technology Professionals in Selected Internet Job Portals,” vol. 13, p. 9.[2] M. P. Sivitanides, J. R. Cook, R. B. Martin, B. A. Chiodo, and F. Landram, “Verbal Communication Skills Requirements for Information Systems Professionals,” J. Inf. Syst. Educ
career and life experiences impact it, with the goal of both understanding andpromoting confidence in the graduate student population.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of the National Science Foundation,under Grant #1463825. They would also like to acknowledge the support and contributions ofDr. Shanna Daly, Stacy Mann, and Mark Leshok to the project.References[1] D. L. Peters & S. R. Daly, “The challenge of returning: Transitioning from an engineering career to graduate school,” In American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, B.C., June 2011.[2] M. L. Strutz, J. E. Cawthorne Jr., D. M. Ferguson, M. T. Carnes, & M. Ohland
. In contrast to the concept map view, the topics provides a rich environment toqualitatively examine related data.Data CollectionGaming research papers in engineering education were infrequent in the early 2000’s 10 9 , andprior to 2006, there were few abstracts published in the ASEE annual conference proceedings.Therefore, the data search included all ASEE annual conference papers from 2006-2020 using theASEE Conference Proceedings Search.The search terms included game, gaming, gamer, gamify,and gamification in the title of the paper. Relevant paper abstracts and metadata were included inthe sample. We reviewed each abstract and excluded papers on topics not related to games andlearning, such as game theory or sports, and papers without
ethnicity of the childparticipants included 36.7% African American, 13.3% Asian, 36.7% Caucasian, and 13.3% self-identified as “other” or two or more ethnicities. Caregiver’s educational backgrounds rangedfrom a high school degree to a doctoral degree and approximately 30% of the caregivers having acareer in a STEM field and/or some experience related to STEM. Pseudonyms are used toidentify participants.ResultsResults are organized by research aim and include finding highlights from on-going analyses.The data sources that informed these insights are from multiple data sources – interviews withchild(ren) and caregiver(s), video recordings of in-person sessions using stand-alone cameras,and video recordings of at-home interactions with the
. [Accessed: 06- Mar-2021].[4] R. Miller and B. Linder, “Is Design Thinking the New Liberal Arts of Education?,” 2015.[5] A. F. McKenna, “Adaptive Expertise and Knowledge Fluency in Design and Innovation,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri and B. M. Olds, Eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 227–242.[6] M. J. Safoutin, “A methodology for empirical measurement of iteration in engineering design processes,” Citeseer, 2003.[7] A. F. McKenna, J. E. Colgate, G. B. Olson, and S. H. Carr, “Exploring Adaptive Expertise as a Target for Engineering Design Education,” in Volume 4c: 3rd Symposium on International Design and Design Education, 2006, vol. 2006, pp
during thefaculty connection hour events helped our instructions in the fall semester; (b) Q8-Q14 gauge facultyinterest and preference for future development opportunities.Again, your honest feedback is greatly appreciated.Q1 How many times did you attend the faculty connection hour(s)?Q2 What did you benefit the most from the faculty connection hour(s)?Q3 I believe that I was better prepared for my lab course(s) because of attending the faculty connectionhours. A. TRUE (1) B. FALSE (2)Q4 The faculty connection hour(s) helped me mentally while preparing for the fall semester. A. TRUE (1) B. FALSE (2)Q5 The faculty connection hour(s) helped me better engage my students in the fall semester. A. TRUE (1) B. FALSE (2)Q6 Many strategies
Science Foundation under Grant No.2000599. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. The preliminary stages of this work are supported by funds from the Office of theExecutive Vice President and Provost at The Pennsylvania State University as part theuniversity’s strategic plan related to transforming education.References[1] D. R. Brodeur, P. W. Young, and K. B. Blair, “Problem-based learning in aerospace engineering education,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Proc.,2002, doi: 10.18260/1-2-10974.[2] J. T. Bell and H. S. Fogler, “Implementing virtual reality laboratory accidents using the half-life game
, 2006.[2] X. Tang, Y. Yin, Q. Lin, R. Hadad, and X. Zhai, “Assessing computational thinking: A systematic review of empirical studies,” Comput. Educ., vol. 148, no. January, p. 103798, 2020.[3] H. Shoaib and S. P. Brophy, “A systematic literature-based perspective towards learning and pedagogy of computational thinking,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 2020-June, 2020.[4] P. J. Denning, “Computational Thinking in Science,” Best Writ. Math. 2018, pp. 67–77, 2019.[5] D. Weintrop et al., “Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms,” J. Sci. Educ. Technol., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 127–147, 2016.[6] K. Brennan and M. Resnick, “New frameworks for studying and
this work was provided by the USA National Science Foundation's ImprovingUndergraduate STEM Education (IUSE) program under Award No. 1836504. Any opinions,findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authorsand do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] L. Gelles, S. M. Lord, G. D. Hoople, D. A. Chen, and J. A. Mejia, “Compassionate Flexibility and Self-Discipline: Student Adaptation to Emergency Remote Teaching in an Integrated Engineering Energy Course during COVID-19,” Education Sciences, vol. 10, no. 11, p. 304, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10110304[2] B. Momo, G. D. Hoople, D. A. Chen, J. A. Mejia, and S. M. Lord, “Broadening
. (2018). African American social work faculty: Overcoming existing barriers and achieving research productivity. Research on Social Work Practice, 28(3), 309.2. Beech et al., (2013). Mentoring programs for underrepresented minority faculty in academic medical centers: A systematic review of the literature. Academic Medicine, 88(4), 541.3. Butz, A. R., Spencer, K., Thayer-Hart, N., Cabrare, I. E., & Byars-Winston, A. (2018). Mentors’ motivation to address race/ethnicity in research mentoring relationships. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, doi:10.1037/dhe0000096.4. Byars-Winston, A., Gutierrez, B., Topp, S., & Carnes, M. (2011). Integrating theory and practice to increase scientific workforce diversity: A
• Discuss paradox of • Values in engineering significance of something that the Streets. New Haven: Yale development related practices might seem simple or distinct University Press, 2020. to Roman Empire • Environmentally and • Undermine assumptions about S. Alaimo. Bodily Natures: Science, • Identify and describe socially responsible what comprises the “one” Environment, and the Material Self. different ways of engineering person, force, thing, or being Bloomington: Indiana University seeing nature in under investigation
areplotted as red +’s. Plots without boxes indicate that all responses besides the median response areoutliers. Recalling the Likert scale currently in use, the 1–4 on the horizontal axis are as follows:agree (1), tend to agree (2), tend to disagree (3), disagree (4).Next, we look for correlations between responses to different survey questions and also to coursegrade. Specifically, we calculated Spearman’s rank-order correlation coefficients r andcorresponding p-values for survey questions 2–10 and for students’ course grade. The nullhypothesis is that there is no monotonic association between the data (course grade and surveyquestion responses). The results are shown in Table 4. Responses for only a few questionsshowed moderate correlations, which
. http://www.ieagreements.org/assets/Uploads/Documents/History/25YearsWashingtonAcc ord-A5booklet-FINAL.pdf (accessed Apr. 16, 2018).[4] C. E. Harris, M. Davis, M. S. Pritchard, and M. J. Rabins, “Engineering Ethics: What? Why? How? And When?,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 93–96, 1996, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1996.tb00216.x.[5] J. L. Hess and G. Fore, “A Systematic Literature Review of US Engineering Ethics Interventions,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 551–583, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s11948- 017-9910-6.[6] C. E. Harris, “The good engineer: Giving virtue its due in engineering ethics,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 153–164, 2008, doi: 10.1007/s11948-008-9068-3.[7] L. M. Steele et al., “How
activities. Author Laughton is in her first year at the Citadel, but is already thedepartment’s Chemical Hygiene Officer. Her role as Vice President of Campus Affairs in studentgovernment and her service on the EH&S Committee at a larger, research-focused institutionenabled her department to entrust her with the students’ laboratory safety. While she may still belearning the Citadel’s policies, she has sufficient context from her previous leadership roles toadapt quickly and begin to streamline procedures. While not core to Laughton’s career goals, herprevious experiences allow her to complete her role’s responsibilities with minimal time input.The most important reasons that a student participates in a student government organization
(3,4) D flip-flops. Lab (7,8,9) Lab (7,8,9) Ability to evaluate the output of Exam 2(5), Exam 3, Exam 2 (3,4,5), sequential logic systems including lab 7,8,9,10 Exam 3, lab 7,8,9,10 synchronous and asynchronous operations. 2.3. Statistical toolsIn this study, we have utilized innovative assessment tools such as the probability distributionfunction of students’ grades in each objective for Fall 2019 and Fall 2020. We have analyzed thedifference between students’ grades in each objective individually and we also have looked at theaverage grade of students in each objective. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test (K-S test) andhypothesis test statistic (t-test) were the
. Ralston, University of Louisville Dr. Patricia A. S. Ralston is Professor and Chair of the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at the University of Louisville. She received her B.S., MEng, and PhD degrees in chemical engineering from the University of Louisville. Dr. Ralston teaches undergraduate engineering mathematics and is currently involved in educational research on the effective use of technology in engineering education, the incorpo- ration of critical thinking in undergraduate engineering education, and retention of engineering students. She leads a research group whose goal is to foster active interdisciplinary research which investigates learning and motivation and whose findings will inform the
the importance of resiliency and sustainably in civil engineering. Thisincrease in vocabulary is also evident in the sample responses in Table 3. Student Responses to "What is Civil Engineering?" 12 10 Frequency 8 6 4 2 Pre 0 Post re ct s s
the research study.A total of 119 practicing engineers volunteered to take the SOMCI, which included 108completed responses. Participants were asked to provide demographic information, includinggender, years of engineering experience, the highest level of education, and engineering area(s)of expertise shown in Table 1. Practicing engineers' years of industry experience varied from 1year to 39 years, and the sample consisted of 26% female, 72% male, and 2% identified as other.As an incentive to take the concept inventory, the engineers were invited to participate in a $250raffle. A total of 153 engineering undergraduates elected to take the concept inventory, with 129complete responses. The students who took the concept inventory came from 8
softer skills such as communication and social judgement.References[1] ASME, “2028 Vision for Mechanical Engineering,” New York, 2008. Accessed: Apr. 19, 2021. [Online]. Available: www.asme.org.[2] “Achieving BEEd’s Vision of the Engineering Education System,” in Engineering education: Designing an adaptive system, Washington: National Academy Press, 1995.[3] J. Dugan and S. Komives, “Developing leadership capacity in college students,” Multi- Institutional Study Leadersh. A Proj. Natl. Clear. Leadersh. Programs, 2007.[4] B. Ahn, M. F. Cox, J. London, O. Cekic, and J. Zhu, “Creating an instrument to measure leadership, change, and synthesis in engineering undergraduates,” J. Eng. Educ., 2014, doi: 10.1002/jee
insight into how well this framework impresses on them. The sum of thesefindings will provide the foundation for scaled infusion of EOP throughout the curriculum andpotential adoption of this approach across many engineering and design programs.REFERENCES[1] N. A. of Engineering, The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. 2004.[2] “Engineering for One Planet,” Engineering For One Planet, 2020. https://engineeringforoneplanet.org/.[3] United Nations, “The 17 Sustainable Development Goals,” sdgs.un.org, 2015.https://sdgs.un.org/.[4] I. S. Rampasso, R. Anholon, D. Silva, R. E. Cooper Ordóñez, O. L. G. Quelhas, and L. A. D. Santa-Eulalia, “Developing in engineering students a critical analysis about
theassessments, so students could examine the problems proposed by their peers and review thesolutions. Furthermore, we will form focus groups and interview students to use them as asupplementary data collection tool.References[1] S. D. Brookfield, “Self-Directed Learning,” in International Handbook of Education for the Changing World of Work: Bridging Academic and Vocational Learning, R. Maclean and D. Wilson, Eds. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2009, pp. 2615–2627.[2] M. S. Knowles, “Self-Directed Learning: A Guide for Learners and Teachers.,” 1975, Accessed: Jan. 19, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED114653.[3] F. Amaliyah, Y. L. Sukestiyarno, and M. Asikin, “Mathematical Problem Solving Ability in Self-Directed
to create presentations to other 4.26 4.67 0.24 teachers/professionals at meetings about your summer learning(s)*p ≤ 0.05** p ≤ 0.01*** Bonferroni adjusted p=0.05/12 ≤ 0.004Effect size: .1 to .29 small, .3 to .49 medium, and larger than .5 large [27] The 2019 survey included questions about participants’ comfort level in performing thetasks listed in Table 3. The overall increase in teachers’ comfort in performing tasks related tocurriculum development and inclusion of engineering and scientific research in their classactivities, suggests that the program had a positive impact with some statistically significant gains.“Creating problems with multiple solutions” (p ≤ 0.01), “Presenting
," Nursing Standard, vol. 23, no. 40, pp. 35-40, 2009.[3] H. A. Simon, "Making management decisions: The role of intuition and emotion," Academy of Management Perspectives, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 57-64, 1987.[4] S. E. Dreyfus and H. L. Dreyfus, "A Five-Stage Model of the Mental Activities Involved in Directed Skill Acquisition," California University Berkley Operations Research Center, No. ORC-80-2, 1980.[5] J. Bransford, A. L. Brown and R. R. Cocking, How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School, Expanded ed., Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2000.[6] M. Chi, R. Glaser and M. J. Farr, The Nature of Expertise, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.[7] C. M. Seifert, A. L. Patalano, K. J. Hammond and T. M
Testing and13 Pressure: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective," in Building Autonomous Learners:14 Perspectives from Research and Practice using Self-Determination Theory, W. C. Liu, J.15 C. K. Wang, and R. M. Ryan Eds. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2016, pp. 9-29.16 [3] N. T. Butz, R. H. Stupnisky, R. Pekrun, J. L. Jensen, and D. M. Harsell, "The impact of17 emotions on student achievement in synchronous hybrid business and public18 administration programs: A longitudinal test of control‐value theory," Decision Sciences19 Journal of Innovative Education, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 441-474, 2016.20 [4] M. Hastie, I. C. Hung, N. S. Chen, and Kinshuk, "A blended synchronous learning
online classes.Participating instructors also discussed various strategies to overcome these barriers during thefocus group setting. Our research team is currently working to also identify these strategies andtheir effectiveness in overcoming barriers to using active learning in online teaching.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant NoDUE-1821488. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References[1] M. Dancy, C. Henderson, &, C. Turpen, (2016). How instructors learn about and implementresearch-based instructional strategies: The
material is based upon work supported by the United States Agency forInternational Development (USAID) under Grant No. USAID-Egypt NFO:72026318RFA00002. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect USAID's views.References[1] J. Yang, C. Schneller, and S. Roche, The role of higher education in promoting lifelong learning. UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning in Hamburg, 2015.[2] B. Karleuša, A. Deluka-Tibljaš, N. Ožanić, and S. Ilić, "The Role of Higher Education in Developing Awareness about Water Management," in 11th International Symposium on Water Management and Hydraulic Engineering-WMHE 2009, 2009.[3] S. S. Ashraf, S
librarianexperience and interest in acquiring knowledge, skills and abilities in data management [7]; anda willingness to innovate, take risks and experiment [8, 9]. On an interpersonal level, it requiresdeveloping and sustaining trusted relationships between the data or liaison/subject librarian(s)and researchers [9]. At the organizational level, the support of library administration andinstitutional prioritization of data services are critical factors [8].The depth and duration of these interactions with researchers may range from shorter-term“project-based” interactions [9], to “deep dives” into the data practices of an individual or team[10, 11], to long-term, “program-based” relationship-building and collaborations with a programor department [7].Some
ground effect 3D printed structure, showed 37%increase in the downforce and 26% reduction in the drag force. The capstone was done over 1-semester and was assessed based on progress reports submitted on bi-weekly basis, presentationby the end of the project, final report, and team work participation. Using these assessment tools,many of the ABET outcomes were met as will be shown in the paper.IntroductionAerodynamics and flow around car profile are significantly important for F1 design teams. Thefirst designs in the 1950’s were relatively sleek, despite having to compensate for the enormousengines mounted in front of the driver. Down force was a little known concept at that time, so theteams tried to rely on eliminating drag to achieve higher
equation is defined as the order of the highest derivative appearing in the equation and ODE can be of any order. A general form of a first-order ODE can be written in the form dy/dt + p(t)y + q(t) + s = 0 where p(t) and q(t) are functions of t. This equation can be rewritten as shown below d/dt(y) +y p(t) = - q(t) - s where s is zero. A classical integrating factor method can be used for solving this linear differential equation of first order. The integrating factor is e∫p dt . Euler Method Graphical methods produce plots of solutions to first order differential equations of the form y’ = f(x,y), where the derivative appears on the left side of the equation. If an initial condition of the form y(x0) = y0 is also specified, then the only solution