Brain Break 2:05 pm - 3:00 pm Forum and Panel Discussions Figure 3. Representative Camp ScheduleThe following on-line platforms and tools were utilized as a method to support campassignments and deliver daily instruction:Webex – Webex is an on-line platform, utilized by our university, to host real-time, virtualmeetings and large-scale virtual events. Webex Events, a tool offered by Webex, provides accessto features such as web-polling, Q&A, and chat. By utilizing WebEx Events our students wereable to participate in fun and interactive polling, post questions to instructors, as well as chatwith participants.Canvas – Canvas is an on-line course management system, utilized by our University Professors,to
. Wachter Morris, "Empathy and care within engineering: Qualitative perspectives from engineering faculty and practicing engineers," Engineering Studies, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 137-159, 2013.[9] L. M. Owens and C. D. Ennis, "The ethic of care in teaching: An overview of supportive literature," Quest, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 392-425, 2005.[10] T. Q. Gardner, "A Framework to Guide Design of Interactive and Constructive Learning Op-portunities," in Proceedings of 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah,< https://peer. asee. org/29683, 2018.[11] T. S. Bateman and D. W. Organ, "Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee “citizenship”," Academy of
.Above and beyond the default interventions, specific interventions were made based on coursecharacteristics. Concerns about students with grade and performance anxiety are addressed bybuilding in flexibility that allows for three midterm exam grades to be over-written by the finalexam if students so choose. Alternate exam modalities were also made available: an oral exam, atake home exam, and a design project exam. Lectures are live-streamed on Webex withopportunities for Q&A sessions. These lectures are also recorded. Videos showcasing thelaboratory experiments being conducted are produced and captioned. Qualitative assessment ofstudent performance is provided in a narrative form as a supplement to quantitative marks for allcourse
Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies, Psychology Press, 2004.[36] D. Haraway, “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective,” Fem. Stud., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 575–599, 1988, doi: 10.2307/3178066.[37] J. W. Malazita and K. Resetar, “Infrastructures of abstraction: how computer science education produces anti-political subjects,” Digit. Creat., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 300–312, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1080/14626268.2019.1682616.[38] L. Nakamura, “Indigenous Circuits: Navajo Women and the Racialization of Early Electronic Manufacture,” Am. Q., vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 919–941, 2014.[39] L. T. Smith, Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. Zed
Figure 5, students are asked to adjust the lightingparameters in the Control Panel to generate a rendering result similar to the given reference image.Figure 5: The screenshot of VolumeVisual (quiz component). Compared with the study component shown in Figure 1,we mainly replace the right IR panel with a panel for Q&A.5 User StudyWe conducted a user study to evaluate the effectiveness of VolumeVisual with two groups of participants, based ontheir familiarity with SciVis and VolVis concepts and techniques. Participants in the first group (VolVis-familiargroup) either have taken the visualization course before or are experts in SciVis and VolVis. In contrast, participantsin the second group (VolVis-nonfamiliar group) have little prior
Mar. 07, 2021).[16] N. N. Jones, K. R. Moore, and R. Walton, “Disrupting the Past to Disrupt the Future: An Antenarrative of Technical Communication,” Tech. Commun. Q., vol. 2252, no. 4, pp. 211–229, 2016, doi: 10.1080/10572252.2016.1224655.[17] R. Walton, K. R. Moore, and N. N. Jones, Technical Communication After the Social Justice Turn: Building Coalitions for Action. Routledge, 2019.[18] “Sisterhood | Definition of Sisterhood by Merriam-Webster.” https://www.merriam- webster.com/dictionary/sisterhood (accessed Mar. 07, 2021).[19] M. Adamson and M. Johansson, “Compositions of professionalism in counselling work
Engineering Education AnnualConference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, USA, June 15-18, 2014. Available at [30] P. M. Nissenson, F. L. Wachs, J. L. Fuqua, Y. Zhao, S. Pedroza, and A. C. Shih, “Impact of an Online LearningEnvironment on Student Performance and Perceptions in a Fluid Mechanics Course,” in Proceedings of the 2017American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, OH, USA, June 25-28,2017. Available at [31] F. L. Wachs, J. L. Fuqua, P. M. Nissenson, A. C. Shih, M. P. Ramirez, L. Q. DaSilva, N. Nguyen, and C.Romero, “Successfully Flipping a Fluid Mechanics Course using Video Tutorials and Active Learning Strategies:Implementation and Assessment,” in Proceedings of the 2018 American Society for
for the next week.Table 6: Mapping social and emotional learning concepts to focus group questions (Q) anddaily debriefing self-assessments (SA). Concept Focus Group Question Self-awareness Q3, Q4, Q5, Q6, Q7, SA1, SA2, SA3 Social awareness Q1, Q5, SA1 Self-management SA4 Relationship management Q4, Q6, Q1, SA2, SA3 3.4 Qualitative Data AnalysisThematic analysis, using techniques described in [15], of undergraduate student feedback wasconducted to pull out the common themes mentioned by the 12 undergraduate participants.Because of the small participant number, reflexive thematic analysis was used in
? Sense of belonging and women’s representation in mathematics.,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 700– 17, 2012, doi: 10.1037/a0026659.[21] A. Godwin and G. Potvin, “Fostering Female Belongingness in Engineering through the Lens of Critical Engineering Agency,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 938–952, 2015.[22] E. Seymour and N. Hewitt, Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder: Westview Press, 1997.[23] J. Jorgenson, “ENGINEERING SELVES Negotiating Gender and Identity in Technical Work,” Manag. Commun. Q., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 350–380, 2002, Accessed: Mar. 10, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://journals.sagepub.com.ezproxy.lib.purdue.edu/doi/pdf/10.1177
the 2-hour epic finale Introduce problem 30 min Large group work 10 minutes of internet access 30 min Small group work 10 minutes of Q&A w/instructor 30 min Large group work, present results Time to write up reflection 30 min Celebrate!Individual Reflection Prompts: • Of the