internationalexperience. This paper presents the evidence that there is an overwhelming need for providinginternational experience for students in technical fields and evidence that American students arenot receiving such experience. The lack of student participation is especially prominent atCommunity Colleges or regional campuses, where large number of students tends to live at homeand commute to campus. The paper then presents several programs that have been attempted atvarious institutions and discuss their shortfalls. Finally the paper examines several programs thatoffer promise in providing such experience.The need for International Experience According to Byron Newberry, [1] and J. C. Swearengen, S. Barnes, S. Coe, K.Subramanian [2
the art assetsand code the game.A playable version of individual challenges of the game (“game segments”) are tested byvolunteers from our targe audience of high school and college students. Game testingtakes on two main forms. First, each game segment is tested for playability anddebugging. After revisions based on this round of testing, the game segments are testedfor instructional impact. This round of testing involves interviews, “think aloud”strategies, and pre/post surveys to test content knowledge.Motivation for the ProjectThe use of digital games has grown exponentially since the early 1980’s, when personalcomputers first appeared. Pong, the first commercial video game, became available in1974. The oldest of today’s traditional
students, animportant measure to consider in attempts to boost both the retention of capable students and theperformance, satisfaction, and enthusiasm of those who persist.Acknowledgments The authors would like to extend their thanks to Dr. Nicholas Delgass for his cooperationand support in this study, Jason R. Green for his assistance in computerizing survey materials,and the ChE Division reviewers for their useful suggestions. Page 11.1259.10Bibliography1. Seymour, E. and N. Hewitt, Talking about Leaving: Why Undergraduate Leave the Sciences, Westview Press,Boulder, CO, 1997.2. Lent, R. W., S. D. Brown, J. Schmidt, B. Brenner, H. Lyons and
Engineering Programs,” Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (2004).6. P. Hirsch, J. Anderson, J.E. Colgate, J. Lake, B. Shwom, and C. Yarnoff, “Enriching Freshman Design Through Collaboration with Professional Designers,” Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (2002).7. P. Larochelle, J. Engblom, and H. Gutierrez, “A Cornerstone Freshman Engineering Design Experience,” Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (2004).8. H. K. Qammar, H. M. Cheung, E. A. Evans, S. Prettyman-Spickard, F. S. Broadway, and R. D. Ramsier, “Impact of
groups due to thelow response rates. There are also other validity concerns that are more specific to particularstudies.Table 1. Responses generated by some recent engineering education survey studies. Author(s) Response Rate Napp2 109 21.8% St. Clair & Baker3 369 14.8% Zydney et al.4 155 43.7% Baker et al.5 45 40.9% Brawner et al.6 586 (511 usable) 36.2% Puerzer & Rooney7 96 46.2
. National Science Foundation, NSF Graduate Teaching Fellows In K-12 Education (GK-12) http://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=5472 (accessed March 8, 2006).2. J. Lyons, M. Banich, J. Brader and C. Ebert, (2002). “Formative Assessment of the University of SouthCarolina’s Graduate Teaching Fellows in K-12 Education Program,” Proceedings of the 2002 American Society forEngineering Education Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada, June 16-19, 2002.3. J. Lyons, J. Brader and C. Ebert, (2003). “GK-12 Enhances Teaching Skills of Engineering Graduate Students,”Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Nashville, Tennessee,June 22-26, 2003.4. J. Lyons and S. Fisher, (2004). “Effects of Elementary- and Middle
universities. Race can be included asa third independent variable or it can be considered in other studies. The research should includethe comparison of females in different SMET programs at different universities.Finally, the researcher recommends further research on the retention of females versus males inthe electronics programs at DeVry University.Bibliographic Information1. U. S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2001, December 3). BLS releases 2000-2010 employment projections. Retrieved December 23, 2003, from http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecopro.nr0.htm2. Commission on the Advancement of Women and Minorities in Science, Engineering and Technology Development (2000). Land of plenty: Diversity as America’s competitive edge in science
PCs, butall allow the use of digital ink to generate new documents or annotate existing documents.Included software allows professors to write and problem solve as they would using traditionalpad/pencil using Journal™ or write directly on Word™ or PowerPoint™ slides, save the documentor slides including the notations, and provide them to students in electronic form. This combinesthe ease of digital presentations with the interactivity of the overhead/chalkboard. For example,professors can work out detailed solutions on the computer screen, project the solutions in realtime, and save solutions on the hard drive, all while facing the students. A brief overview ofTablet computing and its development can be seen in table 1. The 60’s
Page 11.1138.3themselves that they made a good initial decision.3 Lindgaard also relates this phenomenon to theshown tendency of doctors to make a diagnosis following their initial hunches from a patient’s1most immediately obvious symptoms. Putting this in the context of making design decisions,even though experience in the form of design knowledge may be accessible to an inexperienceddesigner, (s)he may feel compelled to select a concept to embody based on a subconscious desireto validate an initial ‘gut feeling.’ So, the challenge becomes finding innovative ways to guide anengineer toward the best solution(s) by building on existing design experience while simultane-ously discouraging tendencies to make choices or evaluations based on
benefited from several CUNY PSC grants.Appendix:An Excel program is used to calculate the force in a 4-charge configuration.Figure A-1: The R, S, T, U charges are located on two bars. R-S and T-U are differentpolarities for the case of magnets. The T-U bar scans horizontally. The two bars are of Page 11.1328.8equal length (15 cm). The vertical T-U bar is 1 cm above the horizontal R-S barThe Excel program is displayed below.The above Excel columns are used to compute the vertical forces on the horizontal bar as exertedby the vertical bar. The vertical bar scan across the horizontal bar and a plot of force versus scandistance can be generated. A log
student’s mindset. The use of Excel and LabVIEW in data analysisand simulation prepares students well for the paradigm shift and for keeping the transfer optionopen.VI. AcknowledgementsWe thank B. Taylor, T. Como, and A. Kisselev for their able assistance in the development oflaboratory apparatus. Some equipment and software items are purchased with NYS Perkingrants and NSF ATE grants. This project benefited from several CUNY PSC grants.VII. Appendix:An Excel program is used to calculate the force in a 4-charge configuration. Page 11.1268.8Figure A-1: The R, S, T, U charges are located on two bars. R-S and T-U are differentpolarities for the case of
method as their preferred technique. They typically estimate the uncertainty in theircount to be +/- 0.5 beats. In addition, students practice their timing technique and estimate theuncertainty of timing due to their response time using the stop watch. This is done using astopwatch to time ten second intervals displayed on an online timing device. With practice,students could typically measure within +/- 0.15 s of the “true” time. An insightful studentrecognizes that the timing device can give a misleading impression of accuracy -- limitations intiming technique introduce a significant uncertainty that exceeds both the published 0.01%accuracy of the device and the ILE of +/- 0.01 s.Students obtain the pulse rate first by measuring the time for
Professor in the School of Life Sciences at Arizona State University. He received his Ph.D. in 1973 from the University of Oklahoma. Dr. Lawson' s research centers on the nature and development of scientific reasoning patterns such as hypothetico-deductive, probabilistic, proportional, combinatorial, analogical and correlational reasoning. Major interests involve determination of factors that influence the development of these reasoning patterns during childhood and adolescence and determination of their relationship to each other and to scientific concept acquisition. Page 11.470.1© American Society
25 20 15 10 5 0 1-2 3-4 5-6 7-8 9-10 11-12 Scores catagories Student in GraphicsClass Engineering Students who did not take Graphics Fig. 5 Post-test graphics class, PSVT R and surface development testsReferences1. S. A. Sorby, and A. F. Wysocki, “Introduction to 3D Spatial Visualization an
EffortAbstractThis paper focuses on the development of a sustainable assessment plan for the ElectricalEngineering program at the University of Detroit Mercy. Other programs at theuniversity have adopted variations of this plan, which requires coordination amongdepartments. The paper will discuss the merits and shortcomings of this approach to thecontinuous assessment problem and explain why the adopted process was chosen.Background and Preparation for First EC2000 VisitIn the late 1990’s, the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology’s (ABET)Engineering Accreditation Commission published new criteria for the accreditation ofengineering programs, Engineering Criteria 2000.1 Criterion 3 calls for programs todefine program outcomes and to measure
] Moor, S. S., Piergiovanni, P., and Keyser, D., “Design - Build - Test: Flexible process control kits for theclassroom,” ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2003, p 7361-7371.[16] Hsieh, S. and Hsieh, P.Y., “Web-based Programmable Logic Controller Learning System,” Frontiers inEducation Conference Proceedings, Boston, MA, November 6-9, 2002 (on CD-ROM).[17] Hsieh, S. and Hsieh, P.Y., “Animations and Intelligent Tutoring Systems for Programmable Logic ControllerEducation,” International Journal of Engineering Education, 19(2), 2003.[18] Hsieh, S., “Design of Web-Based Ladder Logic Tool Kit for Programmable Logic Controller Education,”Proceedings of 2005 ASEE Annual Conference, June 12-15, 2005, Portland, OR
-2005. She is currently Program Director for Mechanical Engineering Technology in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the College of Engineering, Technology, and Architecture.Natalie Segal, University of Hartford Prior to her appointment as a full-time teacher of technical communications at S. I. Ward College of Technology at the University of Hartford, Assistant Professor NATALIE SEGAL worked for more than 20 years as a technical writer and taught technical writing part-time at Ward College for eight years. She holds her Bachelor's Degree in English Education from the University of Connecticut, a Master's Degree in English from Trinity College and a Master of Fine Arts in
. 82. H. Li, C.C. Liu, and M.J. Damborg – Web-Based Tutoring in Power Engineering – IEEE Trans. on PowerSystems, Vol. 18, no. 4, pp 1227-1234, 2003.3. L.J. Bohman, B. A. Mork, and D. O. Wiitanen – Power Engineering Design Projects - IEEE Trans. onPower Systems, Vol. 19, no. 1, pp 152-156, 2004.4. R.S. Balog et. al. – Modern Laboratory-Based Education for Power Electronics and Electric Machines -IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, Vol. 20, no. 2, pp 538-547, 2005.5. M. E. H. Benbouzid and G. A. Capolino – A Project-Oriented Power Engineering Laboratory - IEEE Trans.on Power Systems, Vol. 11, no. 4, pp 1663-1669, 1996.6. S. Chedid and S. Rahman – A Decision Support Technique for the Design of Hybrid Solar-Wind PowerSystems - IEEE Trans. on Energy
). Details of each of the design steps are presented in the following sections. Identify Establish Generate Select Test Set Final Customer Target Product Product Product Specifications Needs Specifications Concept Concept(s) ConcepFigure 1. Design Process, Adapted from Ulrich2. Page 11.1401.2Identify Customers NeedsOne of the reasons that a capstone design course is particularly well-suited for the application ofa structured design methodology is that the course typically serves several
, Salt Lake City, UT, 2004, Session 3566.6 T. R. Hsu, “Teaching ME Undergraduates in MEMS Design and Manufacture”, ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Expo, November 2000, Orlando, Florida, DE-10A.7 L. Lin, “Curriculum Development in Microelectromechanical Systems in Mechanical Engineering”, IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 44, No. 1, February, 2001, pp. 61-66.8 J. R. Davis, Interdisciplinary Courses and Team Teaching: New Arrangements for Learning, Westport, CT: American Council on Education and the Oryx Press, 2002, pp. 61-64.9 A. J. Muscat, E. L. Allen, E. D. H. Green, L. S. Vanasupa, "Interdisciplinary Teaching and Learning in a Semiconductor Processing Course", Journal of Engineering Education
own.Manufacturing Cost and InnovationThe percentage of jobs in the manufacturing sector has slowly been decreasing since the1940’s decade. In the early 1940’s, over 30% of all US employment was within themanufacturing sector declining to 11.0% of all employment by the end of 2005.Additionally, US employment in manufacturing sharply decreased from a steady value ofapproximately 17 million to approximately 14.5 million between the years 2000 and2004.10 (Figure 1). Page 11.579.3 Figure 1. US Employment in Manufacturing:1995-2004 (Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics)It is important to note that while the percentage of jobs in the manufacturing sector wassteadily
Commercialization and Entrepreneurship,” Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (2005).14. D. F. Radcliffe and J. Humphries, “Making the Link between Engineering Management and Undergraduate Research,” Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (2004).15. A. C. Estes, R. W. Welch, and K. F. Meyer , “Will Ten Pounds Fit into a Five Pound Bag?,” Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (2005).16. S. H. VanderLeest, “Advocating Breadth in a World of Depth,” Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference
students carefully explained the refrigeration cycle from athermodynamic point of view. They also describe the cycle using the first law ofthermodynamics. They provided T-s diagrams for the real and ideal cycles and identifiedopportunities for efficiency improvements based on the Carnot Cycle. The group alsopresented the appropriate metric, COPrefrigeration for a household refrigerator as shownbelow: Q% evaporator COPREFRIGERATION ? W% electric _ motorWhere,Q% evaporator = Evaporator load, kWW% = Electric motor load, kW electric _ motorExperimental Design: The students outlined in detail all the necessary steps to measurethe proposed metric. The outlined steps
6. REFERENCES[1] T. B. Welch, C. H. G. Wright, and M. G. Morrow, “Experiences in Offering A DSP-based Communication Laboratory,” Digital Signal Proc. Workshop, 2004 and the 3rd IEEE Sig. Proc. Education Workshop, pp. 68-72, Aug 2004[2] W.-S. Gan, “Teaching and Learning the Hows and Whys of Real-Time Digital Signal Processing,” IEEE Trans. on Educ., vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 336-343, Nov. 2002[3] M. D. Galanis, A. Papazacharias, and E. Zigouris, “A DSP Course for Real-Time Systems Design and Implementation Based on the TMS320C6211 DSK,” 14th International Conf. On Dig. Sig. Proc., vol. 2, pp. 853-856, July 2002[4] S. L. Wood, G. C. Orsak, J. R. Treichler, D. C. Munson, S. C. Douglas, R. Athale, and M. A. Yoder, “DSP
, Pennsylvania State University-Erie Robert S. Weissbach received his Ph.D. in electrical engineering from Arizona State University. He is an associate professor of engineering at Penn State Erie, the Behrend College, where he is currently the program chair in Electrical Engineering Technology. His research focuses on power electronics, power systems and multidisciplinary education. Page 11.629.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Facilitating Entrepreneurship Education at Primarily Undergraduate Institutions (PUIs): Proposed Functional and
," Bureau of Sociological Research, University ofColorado, Boulder, CO 1994.[3] P. A. Rosati, "The Learning Preferences of Engineering Students from Two Perspectives," presented at FIE '98 -Frontiers in Education, Conference Proceedings, Tempe, Arizona, 1998.[4] R. M. Felder, "Meet Your Students: 1. Stan and Nathan," Chem. Eng. Educ., vol. 23, pp. 68-69, 1989.[5] Committee for the Review to the National Science Foundation Directorate for Education and Human Resources,"SHAPING THE FUTURE New Expectations for Undergraduate Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering,and Technology," National Science Foundation, 1996.[6] P. T. Terenzini, A. F. Cabrera, C. L. Colbeck, J. M. Parente, and S. A. Bjorklund, "Collaborative learning vs.lecture/discussion
variables; self-regulated learning and classengagement. The two variables accounted for a small percentage of calculus variance (1.1%), (F(2, 223) = 1.217; p = .2).The regression analysis results prompted further investigations on the data. A comparisonbetween passing and failing students was done by examining distribution of self-regulatedlearning variable with calculus grades (see Figure 1). Page 11.1113.5 80.00 S e l f r 70.00 e g u l a 60.00 t e d 50.00 l e a r n 40.00 i n g 30.00 Fail Pass Calculus performance Figure 1. Distribution of Self-regulated by calculus
impressive. The statistical analysis of the results of these contestspresented above provides a quantitative measure of the performance of students on a universitywide basis for undergraduate students and on a state wide basis for graduate students. Recentpublished proceedings are listed in the reference section of this paper. REFERENCES1. Beddingfield Mario, Khalid Ahmed, Roger Painter, and T.D. Byl. Desorption Isotherms for Toluene and KarsticMaterials and Implications for Transport in Karst Aquifers. In E.L. Kuniansky, editor, U. S. Geological SurveyKarst Interest Group Proceedings, Rapid City, South Dakota, October 12-14, 2005, p.188. Also available athttp://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2005/5160/PDF/sir2005
the integration between resources, time, cost, and quality. In such anenvironment, students are able to comprehend project controls information and develop a feel forthe impact which certain decisions have on project goals and objectives, thus creatingknowledge. While additional research regarding the use of modeling and simulation in projectcontrols is underway, the findings contained herein point towards a larger role for its use infuture projects and engineering education.IntroductionAspects of the project management function such as planning, control and monitoring require theintegration of time, cost, and quantity of work with available resources. Since the early 1950’s,the classical scheduling methods of the Critical Path Method (CPM
study has been utilized for teaching and research in varioussubject areas. Newberry17 used a double pendulum for students to learn and understandHamilton’s principle. Gulley found that a double pendulum was a useful case in learning the S-function of Matlab18. Swisher et al19 mentioned to use a double pendulum as a case study in anintegrated vibrations and system simulation course. Romano20 applied a double pendulum toresearching a modular modeling methodology in real-time multi-body vehicle dynamics. 2. Use of the case in ME 592-30/492-03 AMD In the fall of 2005, the double pendulum case was repeatedly used in teaching and learning AMD. The case and its variation were integrated with various teaching and learning scenarios. The first use of