Collection

2021 Fall ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Meeting

Authors

Donna M. Schaeffer, Marymount University; Jillian Drake, Marymount University

cybersecurity vulnerabilities are often result from ethical omissions or oversights.Just as engineers respect engineering professional ethics, so must citizens who participate incrowdsourcing or open innovation endeavors which solicit, gather or process data. Taxonomies provide a useful mechanism to understand and classify various social ortechnical phenomenon. In this paper, we will share a taxonomy that identifies how professionalengineering ethics are represented and brought to life in 21st century crowdsourced engineeringprojects, which include commercial and research efforts from Dell Technologies, Ennomotive,Innocentive, IDEO, Digital Humanitarian Network, the Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team, andthe United States’ government Challenge.gov

Collection

2021 Fall ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Meeting

Authors

W. M. Kim Roddis, The George Washington University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

, resulting in harmful lead levels. The problem was fixed in 2004, but thousands ofchildren suffered permanent damage [6].With the less land intensive rapid sand filter in place, the 25 acre fenced and closed McMillanpark was sold to the government of DC. In 2021, this space remains chained off and idle, withthe neighborhoods continuing to protest the city’s development plan [7]. This provides andexample to discuss difficulties and failures in government attempts to redevelop public land.McMillan WTP satellite view, Google Earth [8]Curated case studies are used widely in the teaching of engineering ethics [9]. The efficacy ofusing case methods in civil engineering is established. The benefits of using this approach are improved retention of

Collection

2021 Fall ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Meeting

Authors

Beth (Ann Elizabeth) Wittig, City University of New York, City College; Alison Conway, City University of New York, City College; Naresh Devineni, The City College of New York

; impacts, including consequences of failure);academic ethics; professional ethics; professional certifications; importance of written and oralcommunication. 2. Technical aspects of Civil Engineering: areas of specialization; fundamentaldesign and critical thinking exercises to address Civil Engineering related problems.Through these topics, the student will learn to: 1. Identify a broad range of career opportunitiesand areas of specialization within the field of civil engineering; 2. Recognize the expectations ofthe Civil Engineering profession, as outlined in the ASCE Code of Ethics; 3. Identify the stepsrequired to earn licensure as a professional engineer and to become certified in a range ofspecializations within Civil Engineering; 4. Discuss

Collection

2021 Fall ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Meeting

Authors

Marvin Gayle; Danny Mangra

Tagged Topics

Diversity

concerns. Theeffectiveness of these methods is also called into question since students have multiple methodsavailable to communicate, and to access information on the internet. Online proctoring servicesalso exist however there is an associated cost. Even here however student have found way tobypass protocol for proctored online exams [8]. This is a place for a technical resolutionhowever this must coexist with an effort to engage a student own sense of ethical responsibility.A student’s academic integrity is a close correlation with that student’s personal integrity [9].Academic integrity has to exist alongside a personal ethical sense of responsibilityOne of the first steps in this process is for the instructor to define academic integrity

Collection

2021 Fall ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Meeting

Authors

Kofi Nyarko, Morgan State University; Sacharia Albin, Norfolk State University; John Okyere Attia P.E., Prairie View A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

daily meetings with mentors, the frequency for which 100% of participants report was “just right.” Likewise, the weekly program- wide lunch sessions were successful at creating a sense of community. ● Women report greater gains in confidence than men, who also had positive gains. ● The 2020 cohort had greater gains in knowledge concerning presenting research and ethics in research, yet lower gains in knowledge related to career options and graduate school awareness and preparing research proposals as compared to 2019. ● Participants report increasing their sense of belonging as scientists, but not feeling like members of a scientific community. 2020 participants were much more likely to report

Collection

2021 Fall ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Meeting

Authors

Paige Janae Harvey, Morgan State University; Otily Toutsop, Morgan State University; Kevin Kornegay, Morgan State University

participants to acclimate to their research projects before the programstart.Throughout this work, participants were able to gain or further develop skills in some of thefollowing areas: Ethical Hacking, Data Science, Intrusion Detection Systems, Linux, MachineLearning, Networking, and Python, as well as interact with a designated smart device and testingenvironment. In the first summer, participants were assigned a smart glucose meter and taskedwith 1) exploiting the potential threats associated with installing smart devices onto unsecurednetwork configurations via address resolution protocol (ARP) poisoning, and 2) exploring socialengineering tactics through cloning the device user application. Additionally, in the followingsummer, participants

Collection

2021 Fall ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Meeting

Authors

Sadan Kulturel-Konak, Pennsylvania State University, Berks Campus

education (Washington, D.C.), vol. 110, no. 4, pp. 925-948, 2021, doi: 10.1002/jee.20418.[6] M. Gadola and D. Chindamo, "Experiential learning in engineering education: The role of student design competitions and a case study," International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 3-22, 2019.[7] D. R. Mikesell, D. R. Sawyers, and J. E. Marquart, "External engineering competitions as undergraduate educational experiences," in 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2012, pp. 25.624. 1-25.624. 14.[8] I. E. Esparragoza, A. Konak, S. Kulturel-Konak, G. Kremer, and K. Lee, "Assessing engineering students' ethics learning: Model of domain learning framework," Journal of

Collection

2021 Fall ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Meeting

Authors

Ashley Lytle, Stevens Institute of Technology; Alexander John De Rosa, Stevens Institute of Technology (School of Engineering and Science); Frank T Fisher, Stevens Institute of Technology (School of Engineering and Science)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

exposure on stem and non‐stem student engagement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46(7), 410–427. doi: 10.1111/jasp.12371Shin, J. E. L., Rosenthal, L., Levy, S. R., Lytle, A., London, B., & Lobel, M. (2016). The roles of the Protestant work ethic and perceived identity compatibility in graduate students' feelings and attitudes toward STEM and non-STEM fields. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 22, 309-327.Shively, R. L., & Ryan, C. S. (2013). Longitudinal changes in college math students’ implicit theories of intelligence. Social Psychology of Education, 16(2), 241-256. doi: 10.1007/s11218-012-9208-0Usher, E. L., Li, C. R., Butz, A. R., & Rojas, J. P. (2019

Collection

2021 Fall ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Meeting

Authors

Dimitrios Stroumbakis P.E., City University of New York, Queensborough Community College; John Migniuolo, Mig-Tech Fluidics Design; Bernard Hunter

technical ability was noted in EE students over the MEs. Figure 4. Show average scores with improved DNA Technology Self-AwarenessQ1**= Interested in the DNA Bio Tech Fields** (P< 0.001)Q2= Interested in societal and ethical issues (medical and health applications)Q3=** Confident in my ability to understand scientific and engineering conceptsQ4= Comfortable asking for help from others (professor, peers, TAs)Q5**= Interested in collaborating with peers from different Eng. MajorsPhase 2 Survey ResultsThe Fall 2020 semester students were surveyed for the same reason, to quantify scores in self-awareness.However, for this case, we were to select our UR candidate from our process review. Table 1 depicts thelarge gain in self-awareness and

Collection

2021 Fall ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Meeting

Authors

Mohammad Abu Rafe Biswas, The University of Texas at Tyler; Aws AlShalash

, P. Cornwell, D. T. Kawano, J. E. Mayhew and S. Moseley, "The Impact of Scaffolded Writing Instruction on Followup Course Assignments," in ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual, 2020.[6] L. G. Kisselburgh, J. L. Hess, C. B. Zoltowski, J. Beever and A. O. Brightman, "Assessing a Scaffolded, Interactive, and Reflective Analysis Framework for Developing Ethical Reasoning in Engineering Students," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, 2016.[7] T. Kunberger, C. Geiger and K. A. Reycraft, "Structured Introduction to Information Literacy Using a Scaffold Project in an Introductory Engineering Course," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, 2016.[8] J. Hammond and P

Collection

2021 Fall ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Meeting

Authors

Michael B. O'Connor PE P.E., New York University

higher and (ii) the rankings' distribution orspread. The question for the NYU BSCE program is how much misalignment of ranking withinthe n-tuple can be tolerated without requiring intervention to correct the problem. This wasresolved using the criteria and decision rules discussed below.The use of mixed-methods for continuous improvement in the NYU BSCE programThe NYU BSCE program implemented a mixed-methods approach to evaluating its three mainassessment measures for its 2020 ABET Self-study report (SSR) and continuous improvementinputs. Mixed-methods analysis and evaluation were performed for all seven ABET studentoutcomes. Four outcomes had three components (SO1-Complex problems, SO2-Design, SO4-Professional and ethical responsibilities, and