-disciplinary degree program. Thisconcentration is not intended to qualify for ABET accreditation under the programspecific criteria for electrical engineering.The Overall BSE Degree ProgramAfter extensive discussions, the founding faculty team decided to build around corevalues of engaged learning, agility and a focus on the individual. Engaged learning isaccomplished by having the main spine of the program be 8 semesters of project workconducted inside an engineering studio. This is an Aalborg style approach3 in whichthere is a single project experience every semester, accompanied by formal instruction inseparate courses. The overall four-year program of study is illustrated in Figure 1. Thespine of projects is the sequence of courses on the left
of the Aerospace Systems and Technology Track, with particularemphasis on the Microsystems Engineering and Technology for the Future Exploration of OuterSpace Regions (METEOR) family of projects will be used as a case example to illustrate theprocess.IntroductionProject-based “capstone” design has become an integral component of the undergraduateengineering experience. As noted by Dym, et al.1, this has been the standard academic responseto address the need to produce engineering graduates able to practice in industry. TheMultidisciplinary Senior Design (MSD) program at the Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT)arose from departmental capstone design experiences within Mechanical, Industrial, andElectrical Engineering2. Since its inception
with “an ability to function onmultidisciplinary teams”1. It is further required that specific skills be identified andassessed via direct measures9. Programs also need to demonstrate that their students havea chance to practice skills associated with each Outcome. Hence a curricular mapping ofsome kind is needed for students to learn and practice their MD skills4.Consistent with ABET requirements we have defined specific skills associated with theABET MD Outcome. Rogers9 recommends establishing 3-5 skills for each ABETOutcome. These help answer the question: “How will you know good MD abilities whenyou see them”? Also see4. The following is an amalgamation of the skills defined byvarious programs across the College:Students will
topics from many fields ofscience and engineering.Teaching MEMS at the University of CincinnatiAs we enter the 21st century, microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) have had a revolutionaryimpact on many areas of science and engineering. The application of MEMS technologies inresearch has already increased the performance of conventional methods in microorganismdetection in environmental monitoring, drug discovery in the pharmaceutical industry, andclinical diagnostics. More importantly, it is enabling access to new information and applicationson the molecular level.1 The conceptual paper by Manz et al.2 triggered an avalanche ofdevelopments and discoveries, which led to an exponential growth of the field.3,4MEMS technologies are now being applied
interdisciplinary seniordesign experience. Since these tactics are derived from our own successes and failures, ourexperiences illustrate the tactics as a case study. Our goal as a general engineering programoffering a B.S. in Engineering with concentrations in Electrical, Mechanical, Computer,Biomedical, and Materials Joining, is to involve every student in an interdisciplinary designexperience with two or more concentrations.We have identified seven key elements that we believe must be coordinated across disciplines inorder to conduct an effective interdisciplinary senior design experience for all students.(1) Faculty roles must be defined, assigned, and appropriately credited. This may be handled bysomeone in a leadership position such as a dean or
Issues Sept 19 CPFM1 Ch. 1 - Introduction CPFM Ch. 2 – Quick Start Guide CPFM Ch. 3 – A Brief Introduction to C Jack, Ch. 10 - Sensors Jack, Ch. 11 - Actuators Sept 26 CPFM Ch. 4 – C Types, Operators, and Expressions CPFM Ch. 5 – C Control Flow CPFM Ch. 6 – C Functions and Program Structures Jack, Ch. 12 – Project Management Oct 3 CPFM Ch. 7 – Microcontroller Interrupts and Timers Jack, Ch. 13 – Motion Control Oct 10 CPFM Ch. 8 – C Pointers and ArraysAs a student read a chapter they were required to take notes in hard bound
innovation awards, including an NSF PYI, IEEE CVPR Best Paper 2004 and U. Colorado's Innovator of the year. He is chair of the IEEE PAMI TC and in 2006 was inducted into the IEEE Golden Core. Dr. Boult's research spans computer vision, image processing, medical imaging, biometrics as well as Computer Networks and wireless sensor networks. Dr. Boult's Vision and Security Technology Lab as over $2M in research funding, with 1 postdoc, 9 graduate students and 16 paid undergraduate students. He has been the primary advisor for more than two dozen Ph.D. students; has published over 150 Papers and holds 5 patents with 8 pending. He has been involved in 3 startup companies, all
thisconsensus was the mapping of the core curriculum to the Fundamentals of Engineering (FE)examination to ensure that students will be prepared to succeed in that recognized engineeringbenchmark.IntroductionIn the engineering profession and education over the past fifty years, a lot has changed, and a lothas stayed the same, depending upon the viewpoint and application of the term. Definitions forthe terms “engineer” and “engineering” can be found in Table 1 for both the year 1956 and 2006.The 2006 definition of “engineer” includes the first 1956 definition of “a designer andconstructor of engines.” Of most interest may be the expansion from the 1956 “applied science”to the 2006 “application of science and mathematics” as well as references to
passengers and elevenvictims on the ground [1]. The investigation indicated that this incident was a result of a bombplanted in luggage by Libyan agents. Until 2001, airlines and regulators were struggling withhow best to protect passengers from the threat of terrorist attempts to plant explosives due to lackof technology and processes.A 1,200 pound car bomb exploded underneath the World Trade Center in New York on Friday,February 26, 1993 killing six people and injuring scores more [2]. The entire bomb material wasassembled at a cost of a few hundred dollars. The blast happened during the busiest hours at theWorld Trade Center. As a result, it caused panic in over 100,000 people who worked in or visitedthe 1,700ft towers that day. Investigations
importance of the artifact and then to explain how the artifact reflects theculture which produced it. The fruits of these activities were two group presentationsduring the course of the semester –practicing the final methodology of the end project—and a group paper in English to summarize their project in Sevilla, Spain, and inMilwaukee, Wisconsin, two cities seemingly disparate in culture.Evaluation and assessment of collaborative effortThe end-of-semester student questionnaire results appear in Table 1. Page 12.53.5 Proceedings of the 2007 American Society of Engineering Education Conference and Exposition Copyright @ 2007
“Today, we are in the midst of a technology revolution that is even larger and moredramatic in its sweep than the industrial revolution.” These words from “The future ofengineering education” by Dr. Wayne Clough, president of Georgia Tech [1], sound a clarion callto academia to change and adapt. Dr. Clough’s thesis is that computer based technology ischanging the dynamics of the workplace and that academia must transform if it is to serve theneeds of industry and our students. An “innovative interdisciplinary” approach is needed. Dr. Clough’s sentiments are echoed by L.S. Fletcher, a past president of the ASME in aletter to the editor: “Is Mechanical Engineering Obsolete?” Fletcher laments the resistance tochange, the narrowed focus of
teamwork itemsincluded Team members (across disciplines) discussed design tradeoffs during the project. Thecomplete survey items are included in Table 1 along with the means and standard deviationsacross all responses. Table 1 – Survey Questions with mean and standard deviation reported Std Question Mean Dev Team members (across disciplines) worked together in initial brainstorming meetings 3.32 0.66 Team members (across disciplines) discussed design tradeoffs
telecommunications. She is completing a PhD on "A Philosophy of Engineering Practice for the 21st century, including sustainable futures". Page 12.654.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Engineering Sustainability?!IntroductionOur world faces many challenges – climate change, drought, flooding, poverty, urban slums,water shortages, severe pollution, substance abuse, homelessness, profligate resource use,megacities, peak oil, land salinity, AIDS, malaria, and so on. It is already acknowledged thatwe are consuming the earth’s resources faster than natural systems can recycle them 1 and thatwe are “putting
technologies based on Virtual Instrumentation, it is now possible toimplement multidisciplinary labs that span different facets of engineering from control and signalprocessing to embedded design, from chemistry and physics to electrical and computerengineering. In this paper, we will explain how Virtual Instrumentation helps to establishmultidisciplinary labs. We will also examine a modular, cost-effective, laboratory platform, NIELVIS (Educational Laboratory Virtual Instrumentation Suite) from National Instruments thathas gained acceptance in academia as platform to teach concepts in sensors & transducers,circuits, electronics, microcontroller programming, control, signal processing and embeddeddesign and test.1. IntroductionThe recent years
academic quarters (22 weeks). The MSD experience is a studio course in that it adopts ageneral approach to student interaction that is hands-on, instructor facilitated, and student-centered [1]. Refer to companion paper by Walter et al, 2007 [2]for more details on the overallMSD program at RIT. Like its peer institutions, RIT strives to continuously improve curriculumstructure, integration, and assessment. The MSD course sequence is particularly crucial to thisongoing improvement due to its culminating nature. Accordingly, the Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology (ABET) Criterion 3 Program Outcomes and Assessment states thatengineering programs must demonstrate that their students attain the following set of attributesupon graduation
learned.IntroductionThe ability of students to work effectively in interdisciplinary teams is recognized as a key skillin corporate and governmental settings. Multidisciplinary teams are critical in industry to bringtogether the diverse skills sets required to design, manufacture, test, market, and sell products.Multidisciplinary teams have been used effectively at national labs for decades and are essentialfor approaching problems that require a wide array of skills and that are too complex for researchteams based in any single discipline.1 In an increasingly global and competitive world, theseskills are anticipated to be even more crucial for success. The National Academy ofEngineering’s report, Educating the Engineer of 2020, identifies collaboration by
the First Year of Accreditation ResponsibilityDuring summer 2006 when PEV assignments were being made, the ABET website11 showed 13institutions with ASEE-assigned programs due for visits in fall 2006, as listed in the appendix(Table 2 and Table 4). However, the actual number of PEV assignments varied from thisnumber in several ways. First, one of those institutions had two ASEE-assigned programs tovisit. Second, two of those institutions offered only a single accredited program, but ABETpolicies require that every team must have at least two PEVs. Third, one of the programsdetermined not to seek re-accreditation. At that point, the number had become 13 + 1 + 2 - 1 =15 PEV visits.Further, one multidisciplinary engineering program required an
engineering programsand colleges re-envisioning their curricula to meet the demands of the “Engineer of 2020.”8Numerous models of engineering design can be found in the literature.9 But even though theengineering community has not universally adopted any one model, the main steps andactivities are common across most of the models. For this project, we followed thefollowing steps: 1. Identify and define the need 2. Gather information 3. Establish design objectives 4. Generate alternatives 5. Converge to a final solution 6. Implement final solutionThe convergence step (#5) derives from prior work by the first author in productdevelopment.10,11 In this “set-based” approach, rather than select a “best” alternative fromthe set
method to use in order to spark student passion. While there isno question that reading and certain audio-visual materials can lead to student learning,experiential learning stirs more enthusiasm in students. Once the enthusiasm and desire forlearning a topic is there, the possibilities of learning breakthroughs are limitless. Service-learning (SL) allows students to put their learning into practice. Once the student sees that theservice experience will have a real impact on people’s lives; the “ownership” of the project andthe desire to learn increase dramatically11.The typical retention rate for various teaching styles is shown in Table 1. A study of instructionbetween control group and students with SL experience showed that the students in
crate, creating pre-launch and launch procedures, and deciding the initialexperiments to be performed.Some of the experiments proposed for the project were solar cell studies of voltage and current athigh altitudes, guiding the payload to land in a desired location, achieving high bandwidthcommunication with the ground, obtaining temperature, pressure, and humidity measurementsduring flight, and taking pictures from the payload. A timeline was then set for the completion oftasks, and duties were assigned to team members. The breakdown of the timeline andresponsibilities are shown in Table 1 and Table 2.Once the group came to a consensus concerning the desired outcomes of the project, researchbegan to determine the optimal process to follow
background of multi-disciplinary engineering educationat MSU and also mentions the multi-disciplinary study we have conducted over the past18 months.1 We offer our student learning outcomes for multi-disciplinary skills, whichwere developed collaboratively, and also recount our failed attempt at establishing abaseline for these outcomes with a fictional scenario and series of questions to whichstudents wrote responses. The main focus of the paper is the development of a multi-disciplinary rubric, a tool that other programs may be able to adapt for their own use.The paper includes a summary of some of the literature about developing rubrics and adescription of the process we used to design and test the rubric. Also included are resultsfrom a pilot
group of closely related projects, which are all focused on a particularapplication. Project families are typically built around areas of common interest held by one ormore faculty members in the college, regardless of what discipline or technical background theymay be from. Often, a family of projects is closely aligned with a particular technology track.Within each project family, the faculty are offering several inter-related projects.As of the Fall Quarter, 2006-1, the faculty of the KGCOE have defined four project families. Atthe moment, these project families have a close affinity to the "technology tracks," but alsoexhibit some overlap across tracks. The current families are listed below:Assistive Devices Project Family - Sponsored by
nuclearengineering program ranges from basic science and engineering research to more applied andoperationally oriented work. Some examples of recent research results include: a study of thesensitivity of fallout calculation codes to input parameters 1 ; development of classified andunclassified neutron transport codes; performance evaluation of a new field-portable,mechanically cooled, high-purity germanium gamma spectrometer 2 ; and a study of weatheringeffects on uranium oxides for attribution purposes 3 . Given the current world environment, there is little need to reiterate the importance ofunderstanding the technical aspects of WMD. With technology changing rapidly, the need tokeep education current while anticipating future needs is a demanding
year. IMPaCT began as an adaptation of PurdueÓu"jkijn{"uweeguuhwn"EPICS (Engineering Projects in Community Service). The EPICS program was initiated in thefall of 1995 with NSF funding and has been hugely successful.1 In surveys of 1078 students whojcxg"rctvkekrcvgf"kp"vjg"rtqitco.":6'"qh"vjg"uvwfgpvu"tcvgf"vjg"rtqitco"cu"cp"qxgtcnn"ÐCÑ"qt"ÐDÑ"on a letter grade scale. The students rated such areas as how much the program helped theircommunication skills, ability to work on a team and understanding the design process, alongwith several other categories. The program has won several awards including the 1997 ASEEChester F. Carlson award for Innovation in Engineering Education. Also, Iowa State, NotreDame, Georgia Tech, Case Western, Penn State
. Furthermore, two new programs,Architectural Engineering and a dual degree program in Environmental Engineering/B.S.Chemistry (environmental science) will be offered beginning fall 2007.To accomplish the above the School of Engineering and Textiles developed a five-year strategicplan around three major initiatives: 1) Recruitment and retention strategies oriented to attract,recruit and retain ultimately a diverse student body of 300 engineering students, 2) an integratedfirst two year engineering curriculum that emphasizes unity of knowledge across disciplines andpromotes engineering as both a profession and service to humanity, and 3) preparing students tobe life-long learners by developing student-centered learning communities enhanced by a state-of
Page 12.479.5close contact with VBI researchers throughout the course. Near the end of the course, BSCstudents made a visit to the VBI facilities for a tour and discussion of course progress. Thus, theproject required team collaboration and consultation between and BSC faculty and VBIresearchers. For delivery of the learning modules BSC emphasized: (1) introduction to thescenario, (2) introduction to the multiple disciplines, (3) development of strategies, and (4)implementations and conclusions. The first two steps were conducted in the classroom andonline, while the last two were conducted jointly between BSC and VBI. At VBI the CI- TEAMprovided hands-on workshops for BSC faculty and allowed for student discussions with expertsin the
professional staff at the Archer Center for StudentLeadership Development, the two 1-credit experiences (Professional Development I—PD-1and Professional Development III—PD-3, respectively) have become an indispensable part ofthe engineering educational experience of our students. A third part of this experience(Professional Development II—PD-2) is taught independently by faculty from the School ofHumanities and Social Sciences. Development began in the mid 1990s, and starting with theClass of 2001, these courses have been taken by all engineering students. The present paperdescribes our experiences in developing this experience and incorporating it into the curriculum,the assessment process that has been used to redesign the curricular content on a
teami For an exception, see Seat, E. and Lord, S. M., “Enabling Effective Engineering Teams: A Program for Teaching Page 12.564.2Interaction Skills,” Journal of Engineering Education, Oct. 1999, pp. 385-390.pedagogy) is that students find themselves in patterns of unproductive team communication thatcan lead to conflicts. What is more, they may be ill-equipped to manage or resolve thoseresulting conflicts, and thus find themselves inadequately prepared to handle team issues in theworkplace.1-2The Department of Mechanical Engineering at a large Western University recently adopted aformalized, integrated communication and engineering
!∀∀# ∃ % & ∋( ∃ ) + , % + + % & − %& . % & ∋/ 0 ) 1 2 ∋3 ) 1 2 ∋4( ) 1 + 2% + + + %( + % 5 + 1 6# 7∀ !7 7∀2 , + %0 0 !∀∀6 ∋ )6 8 % + 69#:!% + ; ∋ < ) + %&
bring major concepts in Science, Mathematics, Physics and Computer Sciencetogether in a game-centric action-based project. The game consists of many modules, but we, asa first stage effort, specifically target the game modules which relate to the following:1. Mathematics and Physics a. Relation to vector analysis, probability, transformations, integration and differentiation, physics motion equations, exponential and doubly exponential functions used in fogging. b. Matrix operations for basic translation, rotation, and scaling.2. Computer Science a. Object Oriented Programming (OOP) i. Classes and objects as game components b. Data structures used in maintaining players information and