.” Journal of Engineering Education. Vol. 94, No. 1, Pp. 103-120.4 Van der Poel, Ibo and Peter-Paul Verbeek, Guest Editors. 2006. Special Issue of Science, Technology, and Human Values on “Ethics and Engineering Design.” Vol. 31, No. 3 (May).5 E.g., Grasso, Domenico, Kara M. Callahan, and Sandra Doucett. 2004. “Defining Engineering Thought.” International Journal of Engineering Education. Vol. 20, No. 3, Pp. 412-415.6 Winner, Langdon. 1980. “Do Artefacts Have Politics?” Daedalus. Vol. 109, Pp. 121-36.7 Winner, Langdon. 1995. “Political Ergonomics.” In Richard Buchanan and Victor Margolin, Editors. Discovering Design. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Pp. 146-70.8 Ibid, p. 151.9 Ibid, p. 165.10 Ibid, p
; and exploring economic and ethical issues associated with nanomanufacturing. Aprofessional development component was also designed into the 10 week research program,which has morphed over the past three years, based on evaluation of students at the end of theirsummer experience.REU ProgramThe NSF Nanoscale Science and Engineering Center for High-rate Nanomanufacturing (CHN)focuses on nanomanufacturing research is an equal partnership among three universities(Northeastern University, the University of Massachusetts Lowell (UML), and the University ofNew Hampshire) that are located about an hour’s drive apart. For the last three summers, theCenter has held a Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) program. The participantsspent 10 weeks
roughly at the beginning, middle, and end of thesemester. Each Reflection assignment included seven to ten questions, and the three questionsused in the current analysis were: The Solution Question: Included on Reflection One, Question Six “Is there more than one way to solve the problem your [team] faces? What are other possible solutions? How do you know which one is best? Can you ever be completely sure that solution is the one that should be implemented?” The Ethics Question: Included on Reflection Three, Question Three “What other possible solutions are there to the ethical problem? Which solution to the ethical problem do you think is best and why? How confident are you in the solution
guidelines for student portfolios have evolved over the last decade as moreprofessional attention has been given to the nature and purpose of a portfolio as part of studentwork in engineering. Key motivators that have improved professionalism in portfolios includeincreased attention to issues of accreditation and ethics and to the requirement of life-longlearning as a professional obligation. These elements of “portfolio thinking” usually reside wellwithin the bounds of engineering education. 1, 10, 12However, as the world becomes more complicated, knowledge and experience beyond thetechnical must be exhibited by an engineering professional. Increased awareness of theimportance of fields outside engineering – those academic subjects usually grouped
Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology (HST). She received a Ph.D. in Medical Engineering from the HST (1994). Dr. Greenberg’s interests include signal processing for hearing aids and cochlear implants, as well as research in bioengineering education.Mark Bourgeois, Northwestern University Mark Bourgeois is a PhD student in Philosophy at Loyola University Chicago as well as the Administrator of the Northwestern site of the VaNTH ERC. He teaches ethics in biomedical engineering courses at Northwestern and in the VaNTH summer REU program, as well as a dedicated course in ethics in regulation in the Northwestern School of Continuing Studies graduate program
nuclearenergy to raise awareness of nuclear power and its related issues in security, safety, and nuclearenvironmental protection.Course modules are developed to supplement a required freshman engineering course GEEN 100Engineering Design and Ethics (Introduction to Engineering). The modules give an overview ofnuclear engineering to students to broaden their career options. Two new elective courses arebeing developed. An engineering elective is for engineering seniors on nuclear energy andnuclear engineering. It is intended to prepare students for the workforce and/or graduate studiesin the nuclear engineering field. The second elective is for all majors, and it will focus on energyfor America's future, covering nuclear energy among other alternatives
(CEE 4601) is a senior-level holistically-oriented course designed toexpose mature undergraduate students to a wide range of practical aspects in the profession ofengineering, including the following: Page 13.1004.2- An examination of self-abilities and interests- Leadership and management- Organizational structure and theory- Management of self- Management of others- Communications (verbal and written)- Teams, groups, and group thinking- Project management- Ethics in engineering- Marketing professional technical services- A global view of the emerging engineering marketplaceAn Examination of Self-abilities and InterestsFor
is the co-coodinator of the first semester engineering course at Virginia Tech, and her research interests include undergraduate research, curriculum development and engineering ethics instruction. Page 13.231.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Assessing Students’ Learning Outcomes during Summer Undergraduate Research ExperiencesAbstractHighly promoted and funded by NSF and other agencies, undergraduate research experienceshave many benefits to students and also present a great opportunity for them to learn globallycompetitive skills. Having recruited 22 NSF REU sites
at Virginia Tech. Dr. Lo is the co-coodinator of the first semester engineering course at Virginia Tech, and her research interests include undergraduate research, curriculum development and engineering ethics instruction. Page 13.993.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Preliminary Findings from a Quantitative Study: What are Students Learning During Cooperative Education Experiences?AbstractSince most of our engineering students follow careers in industry, of particular importance ishow cooperative experiences help to make better engineers. Although cooperative experiencesare
topicscovered and the variety between them caused a great deal of discontinuity in the course material.Therefore, the new structure emphasizes subjects where engineering tools are used to solve ordisseminate the course material in modules that are interrelated and reinforced throughout thecourse. In the first course, three subject modules were created for this purpose: • Engineering Design and Analysis • Engineering Ethics • Engineering SustainabilityIn the first course, students will use engineering skills such as the problem solving method andstatistical analyses while completing design activities. They will analyze and communicate theirresults in a technical poster competition. The second course builds on previously learned skillswith the
-world reinforcementof sustainable engineering practices and promotes the education of ethically responsible andinternationally aware students. We postulate that this move away from competition-basedmotivations and towards community service will be particularly appealing to non-traditionalengineering students such as minorities and women.This paper will examine the case study of EWB-Westlake High School, the first ever high schoolEWB chapter, which was chartered in the Fall of 2006, and conducted a work trip to Tanzania inJuly, 2007. The program assessment surveys address which specific activities were effective andwhich need future refinement, and explore the impact that an engineering service learningprogram can have on the future goals of the
thesix professional skills to the ABET engineering criteria, engineering education in the US today is“falling far short of preparing engineering graduates for practicing—and leading—in a change-driven, knowledge-intensive, global society that will characterize the decades ahead.”3In Restructuring Engineering Education: A Focus on Change, the NSF recommends thatengineering courses include early and continued exposure to environmental, political and socialissues and their international and historical contexts, as well as legal and ethical implications ofengineering solutions.4 Oberst and Jones argue that engineers shape and are shaped by “theemerging realities of a truly global workforce. Engineers as a professional group are thuscanaries in the
in-class discussions. The paperpresents a number of films that can be used for such analysis, indicating corresponding contentand other resources. Issues covered include creativity, entrepreneurship, organizational behavior,ethics, and others. The common ways of framing the film-based material to build relevant classexperience are also outlined.IntroductionWhen Edmund Phelps (Nobel 2006 in economics) recognized cinema as one of his learningtools, he probably was not expecting to inspire Italian management consultants to write a bookhow watching movies can help managers4. The story, after the book was published last year,made news in the Wall Street Journal15, indicating that perhaps watching feature films can be agood antidote for management
construction profession since construction isconstruction under constraint like drawing and specification2. Increasingly, both contractors andengineers must supplement technical mastery with business and communication skills, and anunderstanding of the ethical and societal impact of technical solutions. Traditional constructionengineering and management undergraduate programs, at over 130 credit hours for a BS degree,are not set up to handle an increased liberal education component or radically different modes ofcurriculum delivery such as team-based or affective domain modalities. The ABET EngineeringCriteria 2000 attempts to address this issue in the accreditation process.1In 1994 ABET held a workshop on accreditation criteria with financial support
in which it occurs13. In Figure 2, “mastery” is placed at the intersection of Page 13.1231.4cognitive and psychomotor development and “moral and ethical development” at theintersection of social and affective domains. When viewing the diagram, developmentallyadvancing in mastery or moral development would equate to moving along an axiscentered on the construct and coming out of the plane of the paper toward the viewer.The highest order of development for mastery would be self-directed learning orcognitive autonomy, akin to the construct that engineering educators call “life longlearning.” For moral and ethical development, a higher order of
. What engineers need to experience andknow, in addition to “hard” knowledge, is further explained by Shuman and Besterfield-Sacre as“process-oriented skills and awareness-oriented skills.”2 Process-oriented skills include“communication, teamwork, and the ability to recognize and resolve ethical dilemmas.”3 Theseskills are powerful when combined with awareness skills involving “understanding the impact ofglobal and social factors, knowledge of contemporary issues, and the ability to do lifelonglearning.”4 But what are the most effective ways of incorporating process and awareness-oriented practices into engineering curricula already crowded with necessary science, math, anddisciplinary courses? How can engineering schools, which must ensure that
valuableinsights into associated technical, ethical, and professional issues. Lessons learned from failureshave substantially affected civil engineering practice. The history of development of practice inmany engineering disciplines is, in large part, the story of failures and of the changes tostandards and procedures made as the result of forensic analyses. In addition to technical issues,concepts such as professional and ethical responsibility are highlighted by the cases. Somespecific examples are presented.Introduction The requirements that civil engineering programs have to meet now, and will have tomeet in the future, are contained in a number of documents. These include the general andprogram specific Accreditation Board for Engineering and
as well asemerging engineering fields suited to student interest. Likewise, it is essential to provide asocial, economic and ethical context to application of nanotechnology in manufacturing,medicine, and other contextual areas driving research and development. This provides a uniquechallenge and requires an approach which successfully integrates nanotechnology into currentacademic programs. Such an approach has the added benefit of enhancing student engagementand motivation. The result will be a better educated population of engineers, with anappreciation for the critical importance of nanoscale approaches to solving societal problems. b. Value of active/problem-based approachThere are many references regarding the value of problem
to compare the content of Capstone Design courses atdifferent colleges, or used by the instructor to develop and improve an existing course.Other Activities and Lectures:This listing is slightly different from the first one because some of these are student activities,while others are course lectures that are given to introduce the student to new topics or toreinforce and expand on topics. Other Activities: 1. Ethics 2. 3-D CAD Program: Pro-Engineer, Solidworks, or Catia 3. Teamwork Skills Lectures: 4. Resumes and Interviewing 5. Entrepreneurship 6. Patents and Licensing 7. Professionalism 8. Tolerances and Dimensions 9. Design for Safety 10
management, ethics, and professionalism. The authors havedeveloped a number of failure case studies for classroom use. Pilot studies have been carried outover several semesters in order to assess the use of failure case studies in civil engineering andengineering mechanics courses. Prior results were presented at the 2007 ASEE annual meeting,and that paper provides much of the background behind the work.1 First, case study topics are linked to specific ABET general and civil engineeringprogram criteria.2 3 Case study presentations and reading assignments have been developed tobuild student knowledge. Students are given specific homework and examination problems thatrequire application of the case studies. ABET criterion 3 defines 11 program
professionaland ethical responsibilities; (h) appreciating the impact of engineering solutions in a global andsocietal context; (i) engaging in life-long learning; and (j) understanding contemporary issues.These criteria, particularly 3h and 3j, were selected because of evidence from the Michigan Tech2006 graduating civil and environmental engineering student exit interviews that “ISD studentknowledge and recognition of these issues [Criteria 3h and 3j] far out-paced those of their peersin conventional senior design courses.” 9This paper only provides information on the first phase of the assessment program. Morerigorous assessment will begin in summer 2008. Survey data will be organized and analyzedusing SPSS, a statistical analysis and data management
. Course DevelopmentA Curriculum Context and Course ObjectivesIn our ECET curriculum, there are a few existing courses pertaining to the computer securitycourse. They are Computer Networks, Wireless Communications and Networks, Computersecurity discussion may be involved those courses, and we believe that it will be much better tointroduce the security topics systematically in this course. This will allow students be aware thatsecurity is an integral part of computer and network applications. Besides the technical solutionto secure computer systems, topics related to social engineering such as ethics and laws can bediscussed in-depth as well.As an integral part of computer engineering technology program, the primary goal of this coursewas to
, either as individual topics,components, or units that can be used as specific learning modules, into existing coursework.In fact, many approaches have been found to be quite successful for augmenting engineering andtechnology instruction by inserting additional materials into mainstream instruction38.Addressing engineering ethics is a prime example of how specific topics can be infused intocurricula without adding additional courses. Some avenues that have been shown to work wellinclude integrating focused components (theory as well as case study analyses) into specifictechnical courses39-43, examining issues during technical problem solving in specific technicalcourses44, issues and topics for review during capstone experiences45-46, specific
develop undergraduate-level training materials associatedwith the context of research. Topics covered include the scientific method, ethics in research,documentation and treatment of research data, publication practices, presentation of results, thestructure of the broader research community, the graduate school application process, effectivepresentations, and abstract writing. The “learning objects” (videos, readings, case studies, anddiscussion activities) we created have been used to introduce undergraduates to the conduct ofscience and engineering research. These resources have been tested in formal classroom andseminar venues, through an “Introduction to Engineering Research” course in our EngineeringPhysics bachelor’s degree program and a
problems.In contrast in some areas such as those listed in Criterion 3, items g and i which deal withcommunications and the understanding of professional, ethical and social responsibilities, theIEM makes no differentiation between engineers, technologists or technicians. For all of thepeople in these three groups, they are expected to communicate clearly with others and toconduct his or her activities ethically. Thus to be in agreement with these accords in these twocategories, there would not need to be a change in Criterion 3 items g and i for either two year orfour year programs.Applied Science CriteriaThe 2008-2009 ASAC of TAC criteria3 differentiates between baccalaureate and associatedegree programs primarily in Criterion 3, Program Outcomes
Science Foundation (NSF) sponsored and the NAE hosted a workshopaimed at developing successful models for technological literacy courses at the college level. Theapproach advocated in this paper arose in one of the breakout groups at that workshop.The name “Technology in Context” captures the central idea behind the approach: courses thatcombine specific engineering or scientific knowledge with an understanding of the historical,social, and ethical context in which the technology is arises and is implemented. Three keyfeatures define the approach: 1. Start with existing courses and modify them so that they explicitly pursue TL outcomes and help students develop TL traits. This aspect leverages existing faculty expertise and
strategies for careergrowth and renewal, (3) leadership, innovation, and entrepreneurial development, and (4) social,ethical, and political stewardship in bioengineering. In this work, we describe our best practicesand outcomes in developing these student activity sessions. We also share our experiences onincorporating facets of this initiative into a sample bioengineering educational curriculum andpresent its relevance to visionary frameworks that include the Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology’s Criterion 3, the National Academies’ Engineer of 2020 and theNational Science Foundation’s Strategic Plan.Introduction There is lively ongoing debate about the essential underpinnings of an engineeringeducation. With growing disparity
managementplan, and test plan. Actual design and verification are conducted in a team environment usingmodern software and hardware tools. Ethics and legal issues are also discussed as part of thecourse. In the subsequent sections, details of the course are provided, as well as, evaluation ofcourse outcomes and students’ learning experience in this course.Course Objectives and TopicsIn our ECE graduate curriculum, the Engineering Project and Management is a core courseintended for the first-year graduate students. This course focuses on the skills required to managethe development of effective system architectures from concept through engineering design andproduction. The course objectives are i) to understand ethics and the common developmentprocess of
, legitimate, and ethical use in anacademic setting. Activities that once might have been considered “cheating” might now beconsidered demonstrations of the ability to collaborate, a skill highly valued in corporateAmerica. To investigate the tension that may exist, the authors report herein a summary ofbackground information from the literature and the results of a preliminary survey of students.According to the Center for Academic Integrity at Duke University, “three quarters of collegestudents confess to cheating at least once.”14 Students who participated in an exploratory surveyat the University of Houston reported the following questionable behaviors involving ICT. • “People not only use computers but cell phones, as well. Text messages are
engineeringprofession. A freshman course “Introduction to Mechanical Engineering” has been developedwith the objective to address such topics as the necessity of good communication skills;professional ethics; the importance of innovation, critical thinking, team work, diversity, andlife-long learning. The effectiveness of addressing these issues in a freshman course incomparison with the traditional approach to teaching an introductory mechanical engineeringcourse has been assessed through a study involving student surveys administered in control andpilot class sections at the beginning and at the end of the course. The results of the studydemonstrate that the pilot group of students exposed to novel course materials acquiredenhanced understanding of the