!Nevertheless, this study shows that the essentials are nearly identical between the two institutions Page 13.313.15so neither of them has decided to substantially eliminate material from the shorter (3 hour)course.Simply going faster is clearly a bad idea; after all, the objective is learning, not teaching. An“expert” might be able to cover all of the essentials in a single lecture, especially if s/he hasauctioneer’s training, but this would not facilitate learning. There are, however, ways to gofaster while not significantly affecting student learning, as described below under“Recommendations”.Shifting the burden to the students should be considered
Representation: Theory, Applications, and MPEG-7 Standardization, Springer, 2003.20. S. Geman and D. Geman, “Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions, and the Bayesian Restoration of Images,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 721–741, 1984.21. Stan Z. Li, Markov Random Field Modeling in Image Analysis, Springer, 2001. Page 13.371.15Appendix A : Initial Course Syllabus UNC Charlotte Machine Vision Lab - ECGR3090/6090/8090 Syllabus http://www.visionlab.uncc.edu/index2.php?option=com_content&task=... ECGR3090/6090/8090 SYLLABUS Written by Andrew Willis
dailyclassroom who participated in an OST. Three teachers surveyed were directly involvedeither with an Energy Club, a Math Club or FAME. The Fellows surveyed were eitherfacilitators of their own Math Club(s) or assisted the two graduate Fellows in FAME orEnergy Club. This survey was designed to capture the perspective of each person filling Page 13.1235.10out the survey with respect to the student, the teacher, the school, the Fellow or thegraduate Fellow. For example, if a Fellow were filling out the survey, then they wouldthink about their students in the OST Club when answering the question, “Doesparticipation in the OST Club positively affect the students
Testing. The Nature and Measurement of Learning Potential.Cambridge, UK: The Cambridge Press.20. Massachusetts, D.o.E. (2001). Massachusetts science and technology/engineering framework. Malden, MA:Massachusetts Department of Education.21. American Educational Researchers Association, American Psychological Association, and the National Councilon the Measurement in Education (1999). Standards for educational and psychological measurement.22. Urdan, Timothy C. (2001). Statistics in Plain English. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Association, Publishers.23. Bordens, Kenneth and Abbott, Bruce. (2005). Research Design and Methods: A Process Approach. New York,NY: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.24. Miertschin, S., Goodson, C., Faulkenberry, L., Steward, B
Conference. Honolulu, HI.[5] Adams, J., Tashchian, A. & Shore, T.H. (1999). Frequency, recall and usefulness of undergraduateethics education. Teaching Business Ethics 3: 241-253.[6] Bekir, N., Cable, V., Hashimoto, I, & Katz, S. (2001). Teaching engineering ethics: A new approached. stProceedings of the 31 ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, # 0-7803-6669-7/01. Reno, NV.[7] Muskavitch, K.M.T. (2005). Cases and goals for ethics education: Commentary on “connecting case-based ethics instruction with educational theory. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11, 431-434.[8] Rogers, T.B., Kniper, N.A., & Kirker, W.S. (1977). Self-reference and the encoding of personalinformation. Journal of Personality and Social
and has given presentations at national and international conferences. She served as Section Coordinator for the Twin Cities Section (1988-1989) and has been a Vice President on the Board of Directors for the Eastern Division (1994), Measurement Science and Technology (1995 to 1997), Publications (2001), Operations (2002-2004) and now Learning & Development (2005-present) where she is involved in developing long term objectives in metrology Education and Training. She has received the following awards for her work in metrology • NCSLI Best Paper Award (co-author), Applied Category (2007)• Arthur S. Flemming Award (2004); • Algie Lance “Best Paper” Award (tied
STS-107’s. Crater-like equations were also used as part that foam had neverof the analysis to assess potential impact damage to the wing leading edge RCC. Again, previously been a safetythe tool was used for something other than that for which it was designed; again, it of flight issue.predicted possible penetration; and again, the Debris Assessment Team usedengineering arguments and their experience to discount the results.As a result of a transition of responsibility for Crater analysis from the Boeing A new support teamHuntington Beach facility to the Houston-based Boeing office, the team that conducted failed to admit whenthe Crater analyses had been formed fairly recently, and therefore could be
(s) meeting AYP goals in the 2006/2007 school yearwas also used as a related accomplishment factor. Participant Goals. All participants, the teachers, parents and collaborative partners,were tasked to develop an understanding of the importance of working together for a Page 13.441.7common vision of science and mathematics excellence within each learning community.• Objective 1: Participants will define what “critical thinking” is and how it should be implemented in each learning environment.• Objective 2: Participants will understand the importance of working with students to develop a workable, fair and consistent assessment rubric. This