of Texas at Arlington and his Ph.D. in Industrial Education from Texas A&M University. Page 13.1109.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Student Perceptions of Academic Honesty in an Electronic AgeToday students arrive at a university accompanied by information and communicationtechnologies (ICT) that enable them to acquire information in support of academic endeavorsfrom a wide array of public and private sources, including co-located and virtual peers andprofessionals. The ubiquitous nature of these technologies creates a tension between facultyexpectations and student expectations regarding their proper
consuming activity of viewingaudio visual materials such as DVDs. Require the students to view the materials on theirown time at the library (room use only) and write a three paragraph “executive summary”that is collected and serves as discussion points during class.Learning Technique Number 5 - Preparing to TeachDoyle in Integrating Learning Strategies into Teaching 9 suggests that we give thought toenhancing student learning, by asking and answering the following seven questions.Question #1 - Prior Knowledge: What background information do my students need to beprepared for my course?Application of the Theory:By letting students know what prior knowledge you are assuming they already have and bysuggesting ways to review or fill in missing
prepared by the engineering staff at Cypress Semiconductor Inc. This book is also available at www.cypress.com For an evaluation copy please contact cuap@cypress.com. • Several student design projects were defined and completed, including embedded controllers, encryption systems1, temperature log systems, monitoring systems, and telephone log systems. • As a byproduct, this effort identified interesting research in the area of design methodologies for reconfigurable Σ∆ ADC design. Papers have been published in peer- reviewed conference proceedings.The main goal of the course material is to teach students the fundamental, theoretical conceptsand practical skills required in designing and building
isgiven to the class the first week of the semester. (See the example for Fall 2005 in theAppendix.) Each student has three weeks to write a formal proposal describing andevaluating at least two distinct concepts for a solution to one or more of the requiredfunctions of the project, e.g., concepts to satisfy the Initial Testing requirements.(Instruction in technical communications is provided with “just-in-time” workshopsgiven by the University Writing Center during the course “studio” time.) Normally, adraft is submitted, graded, and returned for resubmission. The draft and the resubmissionusually count equally, together representing about 10% of the individual course grade.Students self-select into teams of four (to the extent possible) in the
(for GSU Mission Annual Faculty Institutional Peer Review Merit Review Effectiveness of Faculty Review (Annual) COST Mission Every 3 years Success Faculty Review
complete selected writing prompts to aid the program directors with RET program assessment.The SDSM&T RET program is situated in Rapid City, the second largest city in South Dakota –a state with a total population just below 800,000. Due to the rural nature of the host state andinstitution, the RET program faced unique challenges. For example, the small size of SDSM&Tallowed for a RET program that spanned a variety of departments throughout campus, with noone department having a research agenda robust enough to serve all ten teachers. Distance wasanother factor. Traditionally about half of the teachers involved in the program had residencesbeyond a commutable distance; therefore housing accommodations were secured on
help triangulate findings from the framework study. This studyprovided descriptors for aspects of engineering practice using terminology that is meaningful inany discipline3. For example, one of the 85 aspects is “Reduce costs (either in design,construction, operations or maintenance) use detailed technical and business knowledge toachieve required cost reductions while minimizing performance loss”. Not all engineers work inevery aspect, however, each aspect is supported by detailed evidence from the study. Someaspects have been part of every participant’s work, such as “Coordinate work of peers,subordinates and superiors; perform technical checks on work, watch for roadblocks, mayprovide advice and feedback, may review technical competence
their research, complete the application and write a brief project proposal detailing theirresearch. A committee reviews all proposals based on their merit with a primary objective ofselecting high caliber undergraduate engineering students (with a GPA of 3.5 or higher) whohave the desire and aptitude to pursue graduate studies (preferably in sustainable engineering).These students must also have an interest in completing an inter-disciplinary and cross-culturalexperience. Students are notified in March prior to the summer internship regarding the awarddecision. Shortly thereafter, students begin preparations for study in Brazil including applyingfor passports and visas. The Pitt IRES program provided finances for student travel, living
, WELCOME. She is the principal investigator for several grants related to recruitment and retention of diverse engineering students, including a National Science Foundation Research Experiences for Undergraduates site and a Research Experiences for Teachers site.Olga Pierrakos, James Madison University OLGA PIERRAKOS is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering at James Madison University. Prior to this, Dr. Pierrakos served as National Academy of Engineering CASEE Postdoctoral Engineering Education Researcher (PEER) at Virginia Tech and aspects of this published work were a result of this postdoctoral appointment. Dr. Pierrakos holds a B.S. in Engineering Science and
the multiple natural known-relationshipswithin the learner’s development to promote a greater internal drive for learning.Over the course of a three-year period, three cohorts (totaling ~120 students) have participated inlearning experiences which have been designed according to the relationships in the Four-Domain Development Diagram. Engineering students in "learning experiences" designedaccording to the diagram report significantly higher levels of interaction with peers as learningcollaborators, greater use of integrative cognitive strategies during self-directed learning and ahigher degree of moral reasoning than comparison groups (these results are being publishedelsewhere). While it is not possible to establish a definitive cause
“current entrepreneurship education tends to migratetowards its natural focus of ‘least resistance’ – the traditional business management processareas”32 is thankfully expanding to include growth in curricula and programs.34 However, withthe offerings serving 18 to 22 year-old students so similar to MBA-level activities to includebusiness plan writing, case studies, and guest speakers, one must ask if undergraduates are beingeducated in a way that aligns with their unique needs and interests.If the opportunity discovery experience by traditional undergraduates differs from adult nascententrepreneurs (to include MBA students), the questions become “how” and what are thepedagogical methods that will increase students’ abilities to discover
system including guidelines for writing studentobjectives and grading rubrics are presented along with an assessment of the success of thesystem.IntroductionEngineering capstone design is a course unlike any other course at Grove City College becausethe purpose of the course is for students to apply the knowledge they have gained across many ofthe subjects they have studied during the previous three years of engineering school. The goal isfor students to have an opportunity to practice engineering in a team environment similar to theenvironment they are likely to experience upon graduation. A different type of class calls for adifferent process for assessing student performance than might be found in more theoreticalcourses. In their survey of
Society of Black Engineers (NSBE) [1] which is a large country-wide organization (and local chapters) with lots of opportunities for networking, job search, career advancement, etc. (10) Write a follow-up paper to be submitted to the ASEE Conference for dissemination.In addition. it is important to establish a pipeline from our BS to our graduate programs and fromhigh schools to our BS programs. This pipeline will help us in recruiting. It is also important to offerall minority students in engineering mentoring on the issues of retention, graduation and careeradvancement.To pursue these objectives, we received a grant from the James Irvine Foundation.After the first quarter, we held a survey of freshman mostly in Engineering
points out the Foundation Coalition leaders regard their model as anevolving process.Colbeck4 draws on a broader academic tradition to develop an Institutional Process Model whichshe tests against experiences in the ECSEL Coalition. In this work, the processes that govern Page 13.1251.3institutionalization are categorized in three separate groups: regulative (administrative rules,budgetary constraints), normative (“peer pressure,” fear of “looking bad” to peers) and cognitive(being convinced that the change is “the right thing to do”). Among the conclusions in the studywas the result that the cognitive processes were the strongest of the
AC 2008-1155: U.S.-INDIA INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH, EDUCATION, ANDINDUSTRY EXPERIENCES FOR STUDENTS IN ACOUSTICS ANDNON-DESTRUCTIVE EVALUATIONChetan Sankar, Auburn University Dr. Chetan S. Sankar, Thomas Walter Professor in the Department of Management is an expert on IT and telecommunications management. He is also an expert on case study development and has developed more than 30 case studies, many of which have won awards for their ability to motivate and challenge students. He works closely with industries to write research-based case studies for use by engineering and business students. He has published more than 150 refereed papers in journals, book chapters, and conference proceedings.P K
: • Team members must be present during the experiment. • Team members must sign the cover page of the report indicating a fare share input (peer- review). • Team members are encouraged to use the University Writing Center. • Team members must submit the raw data and the compiled work to the instructor • Team members must be available to meet with the instructor for questions regarding the results and Academic Integrity.Due to space limitations in this paper, only a brief description of the results of the variousassessment tools is provided as follows.Midterm Exam:Four (4) problems were given on the midterm examination. A 70% or more score is consideredas satisfactory to meeting of the corresponding CLO. For
of difficult concepts in engineering science.Christine Loucks-Jaret, University of Washington CHRISTINE LOUCKS-JARET is a Technical Communication Specialist with the Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education at the University of Washington, providing technical writing and editing services to the CAEE team. Tina has an MS in Technical Communication from the University of Washington. She is currently a member of the American Society for Engineering Education and the Society for Technical Communication.Dennis Lund, University of Washington DENNIS LUND joined the CAEE team in 2003 and is currently the Assistant Director. Prior to joining CAEE, he worked in a variety
question beliefs about which we feel strongly. It includes questioning the beliefs of our enterprise culture and any sub-culture to which we belong, and a willingness to express our views even when they are unpopular (with management, peers, subordinates or customers).• Intellectual empathy is awareness of the need to actively entertain views that differ from our own, especially those with which we strongly disagree. It entails accurately reconstructing others’ viewpoints and to self-consciously reason from premises, assumptions, and ideas other than our own.• Intellectual integrity consists in holding ourselves to the same intellectual standards you expect others to honor (no double standards
orientation to the political, socioeconomic, historical, cultural, geographicalperspective of Uganda. Undergraduates completed research and shared their findings with thegroup by providing presentations and fact sheets at the weekly meetings. The undergraduateswere exposed to library research, presentation delivery, and report writing skills in a contextwhich was aligned with their interests as well as the respective projects. During the initial six weeks of the program, the graduate scholarship recipients attendedseparate weekly meetings with the program director for task delegation, resource evaluation,information accumulation, and progress updates. Specifically, the water facility graduatescholarship recipients explored mapping software and
"dcemitqwpf" to complete the design. 2. Design a sports facility including the evaluation of considerations such as economics, ethics, societal, environmental impacts, and constructability. 3. Write a project report that is of a quality commonly found to be acceptable in the engineering profession. 4. Orally present the results of an engineering design project to a wide audience of students, faculty, staff, including coaches and student athletes, using a presentation package such as PowerPoint that is of a quality commonly found to be acceptable in the engineering profession.B. Project SelectionThe process of selecting feasible projects is especially crucial to the success of thecourse. They must present workable
andICE are turned in the next day at the start of the laboratory period. Students have access toinstructors and peer tutoring prior to submittal of the homework assignment so that they mayseek additional assistance with the new concepts if needed.The laboratory assignment further reinforces the module concepts by hands-on experience. Forthe fluid mechanics module, students learn to how to estimate the flow rate (volume per time) ofwater out of a hole. Three methods are utilized: 1) Bernoulli’s equation and flow rate, 2) volumeof water and elapsed time, and 3) particle dynamics and flow rate. Figures 3 and 4 depict aschematic of the test apparatus and a photograph of the test, respectively. Students are requiredto write a comprehensive laboratory
components - Homework and classroom tests (50%) Homework assignments 10% Midterm test 15% Final exam (comprehensive) 25% Page 13.747.5 Special grading components - Individual student project reports and presentations (50%) 1. Applied/practical - imaging systems and hardware 15% 2. Peer-reviewed image processing research material 15% 3. Student-formulated image processing “research” project
is a Junior majoring in Geosciences at Boise State University. Ms. Walters is also a tutor and peer instructor for the Engineering with Precalculus class offered by the College of Engineering at Boise State University.Bill Clement, Boise State University Dr. Clement is an Associate Research Professor in the Center for the Geophysical Investigation of the Shallow Subsurface (CGISS), at Boise State University. Page 13.393.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Developing and Assessing Engineering-Based Modules for a Freshman Engineering ClassAbstractMost
Academic Development through Prescribed Undergraduate ProjectsAbstractIn this paper a methodology for enhancing the academic development of sophomore-levelengineering and engineering technology students using undergraduate projects is outlined anddiscussed. The specific sample project presented in the paper involves the development ofMATLAB script files and LabVIEW Virtual Instruments (VIs) for solving several EngineeringMechanics problems. The development of the solution for these problems involves theutilization of a number of valuable programming tools and powerful techniques. The selectedstudents will be guided to write a proposal to seek funding for the project through the CollegeOffice of Undergraduate Research (COUR
% send email on their phones, exchanging some 200 email messages eachweek. 66% email peers about classes; 44% email for studying. In contrast, only 43% email onPCs, exchanging an average of only 2 messages per week. Only 20% had used a PDA. 71% ofthe subjects preferred receiving educational materials on mobile phones rather than PCs. 93%felt that its valuable to use phones for teaching. In the UK it is estimated that 81% of 11-15 yearolds and 96% of 16-24 year olds have a mobile phone [7]. Similar projects have been establishedin Europe as well. An example of a pan-European research and development study with partnersin Italy, Sweden and the UK is the "m-learning" project [8]. Its aim is to use portabletechnologies to provide literacy and
to think outside the book. Studentsare asked to find real life examples of the theories and equations learned throughout the courseand to present them to the class. For junior level courses, the topics are broad and oftensomething of personal interest. For senior level classes, the students are to talk to practicingengineers to find actual case studies. In all instances, the topics presented, utilize course theoriesand/or equations. Working in teams students prepare reports and “fun” presentations to be givento their peers. In a class wide competition, the winners are awarded a trophy and given theauspicious title of “The Big Drip” for Fluid Mechanics and “The Great Gear Head” for MachineDesign.IntroductionUpon graduation, young engineers
that don’t flyin a machine shop—at least the ones I’ve been in.” Cory also functioned as the informaltechnical expert, yet he easily accepted input from other members, incorporating good ideas intothe team’s solution. Cory used some humor during the assigned work. For example, whenplanning a repetitive task as part of a solution, Cory said they should write “Rinse and repeat—that’s what’s on shampoo bottles.” However, when time pressure mounted, the humorevaporated and the task became paramount. Cory also worked some with his team to buildconsensus and check group understanding, asking “Are we good with this [aspect of theproblem]?” Further, he gave positive feedback on other members’ work, noting when it was welldone.However, Cory was not
in Engineering Education – with a small “c”) teaching workshops. By 2005, ASCEreclaimed sponsorship of ETW, and the participants ever since have come from those civil,environmental, architectural and construction engineering and engineering technology programsthat the society supports. ASCE has offered two of these workshops per year ever since. At thetime of this writing, there have been 19 ETWs which have been attended by 449 participants Page 13.586.4from 203 different colleges and universities. International universities such as Durban Institute Proceedings of the 2008 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference
. Therefore, while afreshman chemical engineering course must (obviously) contain information about thefield of chemical engineering, it should also find ways to address non-chemicalengineering related issues as well. Here, ample use of guest speakers in CounselingServices or similar offices on campus should be explored.In addition to what has been discussed above, other ideas in freshman chemicalengineering courses exist as well. Roberts discusses a course that focuses on, amongother areas, communication skills13. Worcester Polytechnic Institute looks to mix writingwith first-year engineering in a course taught shared by a ChE faculty and Writing facultymember14. Vanderbilt University describes a course where students are introduced tochemical
an electronic device;• exercise project management skills and use the Gantt chart;• exercise communication skills through preparing a proposal, writing a final report, and presenting in class. Page 13.90.4Details of ProjectIME 157 Electronics Manufacturing is a lower-division engineering course and has no pre-requisite. The lecture meets twice per week for fifty minutes each and the lab meets twice perweek for three hours each over the ten weeks of a quarter. We believe that laboratory work isvery important component in engineering education and Cal Poly’s teaching philosophy is“learning-by-doing”.Each student will work on two projects