accomplished through invitedspeakers from industry who deliver seminars on specialized topics of surveying practice orprofessional ethics. Page 13.38.2Objectives of the course include building personal connections between surveying students and afull-time surveying faculty member, building a sense of community among peer students, anddeveloping team skills. Entrance to the surveying engineering major at Penn State University isvery different than entrance to other engineering majors. Most engineering students are acceptedin their major during the first semester of their third year. Surveying engineering students areadmitted to the university directly
basic concepts of statistics related to engineering problems; use ethics; societal, environmental and safety considerations to make engineering design decisions. The study proposition is that the LITEE case studies with its emphasis on open-ended Page 13.1320.3 problems might help minority students achieve the above course objectives c to k.Implementation of Case Studies and ResultsThis section discusses the results of implementation using case studies at Hampton University.Two case studies, Mauritius Auditorium Design, and Lorn Textiles case studies were used in asection of Introduction to Engineering class
that time, these programs put a minimal emphasis on what was known as “softskills”. These education deficiencies were corrected mainly through feedback from employers and by theaccreditation criteria from ABET. The traditional accreditation criteria started addressing these issues and thecurrent TC2K criteria from TAC of ABET has stressed the emphasis on the abilities of graduates tocommunicate, work in teams, understand and value lifelong learning and ethical issues, thus helping to closethe gap between the student’s preparation at graduation and “the real world”. Furthermore, colleges anduniversities have intensified their student support services, offering workshops and similar activities forstudents to learn how to write resumes, dress
themselves, and the other at the Archeology Laboratory at CinnamonBay in the Park, demonstrating the close-range photogrammetry results to that point. The publicpresentation at the Leinster Bay factory site is shown in Figure 5. Figure 5. Wild introduces the virtual preservation project at the Leinster Bay site.The VICH defines the Humanities: “The humanities explore what it means to be human, throughhistory, literature, folklife studies, cultural anthropology, archaeology, philosophy, ethics,comparative religion, law, and the history and criticism of the arts.” 12 The notion of applying Page 13.1387.9engineering to explore what it means to
sustainability of theethanol process by developing a facility to eliminate waste from the production process.This paper will describe the incorporation of the biomass-to-ethanol design project into our firstyear engineering program, the assessment methodology used and the expected educationaloutcomes of the project.IntroductionAll first year engineering students who enter our program Calculus-ready take a two semestercourse sequence: ENG1101 (Engineering Problem Solving and Analysis) and ENG1102(Engineering Modeling and Design). These courses are designed to introduce first yearengineering students to basic engineering topics: 3D visualization and modeling, ethics,engineering design and problem solving, software proficiency, and technical communications
, andmathematics.IntroductionThe use of visual-based systems in modern culture and education is becoming more prevalent,requiring schools to adapt their curricula and instructional practices accordingly. Visual literacyis becoming central to curricular initiatives as society begins to rely heavily on visualization andvisual communication strategies 1. Education, aesthetics, communication, ethics, research, andother aspects of learning have placed emphasis on visual science and visual literacy as a responseto our increasingly complex, highly visual, and interconnected society 2. Developinginstructional materials and methods of instruction that develop visualization abilities, meeting theneeds of technology educators, and preparing students for future careers in STEM areas
/Measuring_Progress/Posters/Faculty_satisfaction_poster.pdf)4 Fox & Mohapatra, 2007. Page 13.287.9 5 Bradley, R. T. (1982). Ethical problems in team researcher: A structural analysis and an agenda for resolution. The American Sociologist, 17, 87-94. 6 Dewey, T. G. (2007, December, 14). Big opportunities in small science. [Point of View].The Chronicle of Higher Education, B16. 7 Dewey, T. G., 2007. 8 Dewey, T. G., 2007. 9 Fox, M. F. (1998). Women in science and engineering: Theory, practice, and policy in
Electronics 4 ENGL 210 Tech Writing 3 NUEN xxx Plant Systems and Ops 3 ENTC 359 Instrumentation 4 ENTC 370 Thermodynamics 4 ENTC 402 Inspection Methods 3 ENTC 376 Strength of Materials 4 NUEN xxx Reactor Theory 3 ENGR 482 Eng. Ethics 3 ENTC 371 Thermal Systems 3 Total Hours 18 Total Hours 16 SENIOR FALL SENIOR SPRING ENTC 419 Project Management 3 ENTC 420 Senior Project 3 NUEN xxx PRA/Nuclear Safety 3
4 engineering tools and techniques. [ABET Criterion 3 Outcomes (b) and (k)] 5. Communicate solutions clearly, both orally and in writing. [ABET Criterion 3 4 Outcome (g)] 6. Work effectively in diverse teams. [ABET Criterion 3 Outcome (d)] 3 7. Apply professional and ethical considerations to engineering problems. [ABET 3 Criterion 3 Outcome (f)] 8. Incorporate understanding and knowledge of societal, global and other contemporary issues in the development of engineering solutions that meet
higher education : Foundations forsuccess. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.[6] Colwell, J. L. and Jenks, C.F., (2005). “Student Ethics in Online Courses: Some Case Histories,” ASEE IL/INSectional Conference, DeKalb, IL. Page 13.338.7
of the course. Theaddition of more TAs is both a gift and curse because it provides more manpower to pick up theresponsibilities of the course. More personnel also adds a new dynamic, namely, group work.As engineers we encourage group work, due to its obvious benefits6,7. As every undergradengineer learns, working in a group can also be very difficult due to the varying personalities andwork ethics of the group members. These same challenges extend to working in a team of TAs. • Delegate course responsibilities equally emphasizing that each team member reserves an equal share of the work • Assign tasks based on each members strengths
as missing in colleges that are part ofthis project:C.1. Ability to apply mathematical and natural science principles into the product design process;C.2. Ability to apply fundamental engineering principles for effective solution of practical problems in the product realization process;C.3. Ability to analyze and develop intelligent electromechanical systems;C.4. Application relevant technology tools within the product realization environment;C.5. Development of awareness of the professional and ethical responsibilities for sustainable design, in order to ascertain the impacts of the engineering solution on the global society and environment;C.6. Ability to work within a multi-disciplinary collaborative product
, computational fluid dynamics, professional ethics, and piano technology.Donald Richter, Eastern Washington University DONALD C. RICHTER obtained his B. Sc. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering from The Ohio State University, M.S. and Ph.D. in Engineering from the University of Arkansas. He holds a Professional Engineer certification and worked as an Engineer and Engineering Manger in industry for 20 years before teaching. His interests include project management, robotics /automation and air pollution dispersion modeling. Page 13.1326.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008
• MET 103 – Engineering Graphics & Intro to CAD• HUM 102 - English Composition: Writing, Speaking,• MNET 105 – Applied CAD Thinking II • IE 224 – Production Process Design• MATH 138 – General Calculus I • IE 473 - Safety Engineering• MATH 238 – General Calculus II • MET 303 – Applied Thermodynamics• MATH 309 – Math Analysis for Tech • ECET 201 – Circuits I• MNET 315 – Industrial Statistics • CPT 310 - Computer Design Fundamentals for• Humanities Elective – HUM 211, 212 or HIST 213 Computer Technology• PHIL 334 - Engineering Ethics and Technological • MET 235 – Statics for Technology Practice • MNET
societal & global issues diversity, professional, mastery of knowledge, construction materials skills & tools of CCET prof., ethical & social
eleven engineering programs Pierre G. Lafleur, Yves Boudreault and Richard Prégent École Polytechnique de Montréal, Québec, CANADAContextFor 135 years, École Polytechnique de Montréal has provided an engineering program in theprovince of Québec, Canada. During its long history it has, successfully, faced and overcamemany challenges in several areas such as teaching, research, funding, and internationalcollaborations. The recent process through which it has, thoroughly, remodeled its elevenengineering undergraduate programs is, however, quite unique. This remodeling, in part,reflected on the basic mathematics courses and the complementary courses (social andeconomical aspects of engineering, ethics, etc.). It
local Ventures group. The reviewers at the Ventures group will judge whether theidea is suitable for a non-disclosure agreement, and will base their decision only on thefinal report. The prospect of a design beginning the patent process, serves as furthermotivation to clearly express the ideas of the design. Due to the quantity and quality ofwriting required, as well as the revision process used, both of our senior design coursessatisfy internal institutional writing requirements.EthicsAs design teams are required to enter a medical environment, student witness first-handthe importance of medical ethics. All students are required to undergo the relevantHIPAA training at the mentor’s medical institution
overview, organizations missions, strategies and tactics, competitiveness, and productivity • Product design: value analysis, legal, ethical & environmental issues, standardization, life cycles, concurrent engineering, design for X. • Product documentation including: product structure, bill of materials (BOM), item master and part numbering systems, product costing. • Project management: • Supply chain management: • Inventory management: • Materials requirements planning (MRP) and enterprise resource planning (ERP): • Just-In-Time (JIT & Lean Operations).In addition to the above lecture content, student team present lectures on various topics
conditions to ensure success e. Seeks help when the challenge exceeds current capability in the given time constraintsPractitioner a. Displays integrity, consistency, ethical, and professional demeanor in engineering practice and relationships b. Embraces and employs appropriate professional codes, standards, and regulations c. Engages with engineering professionals and organizations to support excellence in engineering practice d. Demonstrates citizenship through service to society on local, national and/or global scales e. Brings responsible engineering perspectives to global and societal issues Learning outcomes for co op education Kettering University’s program7 is the
much progress you have made in each area as a resultof taking this course (1 = None .. 4 = A Great Deal)18c. Understanding of the non-technical man 290 2.55aspects of an engineering career (e.g. woman 77 2.29 2.1 .029economic, political, ethical, and/or social 97issues).… select the amount you have changed as a result of taking this course for the described item oractivity.(1 = None .. 4 = A Great Deal)19l. Develop ways to resolve conflict and man 291 2.54 2.5 .012reach
assurances we need about their work ethic and motivation. This topic is a good example of the discussions that immunize the group, preparing everyone for potential problems that could otherwise reduce productivity.‚ What approaches can we learn from literature review and workshops? Collaborating in the process of gathering outside information has significantly improved our knowledge for a minimum of time spent. As long as at least one group member attends each available workshop on teaching or grant writing, the entire group can benefit from the main points of the workshop. Similarly, hearing about a book second-hand may not provide as much benefit as reading the book, but the most pertinent information can be communicated
of the Honors College at the University of Arizona. In 2002, she joined the faculty at the University of St. Thomas, where she now is chair of the Department of Computer and Information Sciences, teaching courses in Systems Analysis and Design. Her research interest in group systems continues, and she has recently worked collaboratively with a faculty member in Journalism on ethical issues in web based technologies. Page 13.348.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Customer Based Course Developments – Creating a First Year Programming Course for Engineers and
responsive to the workplace and which incorporates advances and the best practices in science and technology. ‚ To increase the number of traditionally underrepresented students (low-income, ethnic and racial minorities, persons with disabilities, and women) in AET program. ‚ To provide students with a strong foundation of engineering practices and stimulate students’ interest by using a problem-solving approach in state-of-the-art laboratories. ‚ To provide students with leadership, management, and communication skills, as well as an understanding of professional ethics, which will serve as a foundation for future development and success in their careers.To achieve these goals and improve the learning
to develop the integrated theories and methods of these areas; to increase logical thinking, sense of social ethics, social assessment capability; to start thinking without any pre conceived notions; to look for innovative problem solving ideas; to improve communication skills.The expected result of this program is the creation of a number of professionals committed withthe search for social progress not in a demagogic political way but in according to the reality andthe possibilities of the local society. It is necessary to have in mind the idea of a global world andlocal identity. How it is possible to foster such and such community using innovative feasibleways taking into account the impact and try to measure the
change the formation of engineers and so to provide them the tools thatthey will use as professional and as researcher.COPEC understands that the programs should provide the future engineers a generalist formationand to instigate the development some skills such as: communication, knowledge of foreignlanguages, environmental awareness, and ethics among others in order to be prepared to face thecontemporary work market in a world of no borders so extremely competitive and challenging.5. The Formation of the Engineer seen by COPECCOPEC as an organization that works for the future of education has established some guidelines to be applied on the design of engineering programs. The guide lines are the result ofresearches as well experience designing
business plan competitions, speaker series, student entrepreneurship clubs, andseminars. At LTU, the grant provided the funding to integrate the existing entrepreneurialprograms into a new innovative interdisciplinary program focused on developing the“entrepreneurial mindset” on our campus. The skills associated with the entrepreneurial mindsetare communication, teamwork, leadership, ethics and ethical decision-making, opportunityrecognition, persistence, creativity, innovation, tolerance for ambiguity, risk analysis, creativeproblem solving, critical thinking, and business skills (including marketing, financial analysis,and strategic planning). The course described within this paper (EME 4981 Creative ProblemSolving) was one of the courses
technical, social, economicand ethical issues. 3 This application of learning is not only a worthy learning objective in itself,but also an effective route to greater retention of knowledge and depth of mastery. This issupported by Caine 4 who wrote, “Children learn best if they are immersed in complexexperiences and are given the opportunity to actively process what they have learned.” Further,Stevenson and Stigler 5 pointed out that only 16 percent of instruction in U.S. classrooms couldbe characterized as application.Perhaps the most compelling research driving the need for application is that the majority ofstudents learn best when instruction emphasizes application, as Conrath reported in Our OtherYouth. 6 To assist students in achieving
audiences while exhibiting an intuitive understandingof management and leadership with high ethical standards. ASCE’s BOK and ABET identifyspecific requirements that engineering programs must fulfill to be an accredited program, most ofwhich are steps geared towards achieving the same goals as the NAE report. Although notexplicitly stated, problem solving ability is inherent to acquiring accreditation, as shown in thefollowing ABET EC (2000) requirements: (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze and interpret data (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs (d) an ability to function on multi
this course, students should have: [1] 1. An elementary knowledge of the disciplines in engineering, especially the undergraduate programs and extracurricular opportunities available at the our university; 2. A basic understanding of/and experience in the steps and techniques of engineering design; 3. Awareness of some ethical, social, political, and economic influences on and impacts of engineering design; 4. Emerging skills in written and/or oral communication related to engineering design; Page 13.1108.2 5. Introductory skills in teamwork with peers; 6. Preliminary development of habits of mind that engineering
to prioritize the scheduled activities, introduce changes if need be, solicit advice and assistance with the consent of the instructor, and maintain effective working relationships among the members. Instructors also monitor group progress, give feedback on how well each group is doing, report each group’s progress to the class as a whole, and insure adherence to accepted standards of: ethics, social responsibility, and safety.Success in implementing cooperative learning is attributable, in large measure, to: properplanning, efforts, dedication, and foresight of the instructor. Experience definitely is a majorfactor. A proper start for instructors wanting to try active learning for the first