opportunities to practice combining skills and lessons from different disciplines, which limits students’ ability to draw connections, integrate knowledge, and participate in the intentional practice of professional skills needed to develop expertise [7].Recognition that an integrated approach to engineering education - where knowledge and skillsare developed throughout the curriculum rather than presented in separate courses - is notnew. In 2005, the development of ABET accreditation criteria clarified the need for a neweducation paradigm based on an integrated approach [9]. Research has demonstrated thatan integrated curriculum can lead to better outcomes. In their review ofengineering curricula, Froyd and Ohland [10] noted
studies working on election security issues and advocating for the rights of historically disenfranchised peoples. Dr. Ricco is a member of ASEE, the Alpha Chi Sigma professional chemistry fraternity, and the National Lawyers Guild.David Olawale (Assistant Professor)Md Rashedul Hasan Sarker © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com The DesignSpine: Evolution of an Authentic Project-Based Integration of Design in an Engineering CurriculumAbstractA common theme among business leaders is that young engineers will require a proclivity toadapt to novel technologies and prepare for jobs or even entire industries that
collection and analysis. Section 6 presents the results achievedfrom data analysis. Section 7 concludes the paper and discusses possible future work.3 Background3.1 Integrated Learning (IL)There is often a gap between what academia teaches to students and what industry needs fromgraduates [14]. To effectively participate in teams within industry, some high-level skills areneeded. In real projects, challenges in combining different concepts will arise. Designing a qual-ity curriculum can accelerate the required skill-learning speed. In traditional teaching models,courses are offered in vertical sequence, and students may not have the chance to contribute tosimulated realistic projects [3]. IL is an approach used to help students face challenges
and curricula design on an already packedcybersecurity curriculum with several prerequisites. In fact, such packed curricula are common inSTEM degrees, and pose challenges whenever new material needs to be integrated, such as AI.Moreover, instructors in AI and cybersecurity are not usually cross-trained. In other words, anexpert in cybersecurity rarely has expertise in AI, and vice versa. Unfortunately, this results in afew cross-trained researchers and practitioners in the future cyber workforce.Like most computing disciplines, cybersecurity relies on various computing sub-disciplines suchas networking, systems, and infrastructure. AI techniques have been widely used in a growingbody of cybersecurity literature to address the complex
to effectively integrate this topic into capstone given constraints such astime, other curriculum requirements, and student expectations that their capstone class time befocused on making progress on their team projects. Having taught the Capstone Design coursefor seven years, we obtained feedback from students over years of course offerings that theywant to spend their class time directly working on their projects and are most motivated byassignments that have an obvious connection to their respective projects. Described briefly in anonline knowledge base [8], we chose an approach that involved an introductory lecture ondisability, accessibility, and UD from a local expert, follow-up individual reflection, and a team-based assignment that
an effort to “change the culture of science to bemore welcoming and inclusive” [5]-[7]. In the wake of George Floyd’s murder and the racialjustice protests that followed, many national organizations issued Black Lives Matter statementsand pledged to redouble their efforts to address the racialized history and impact of science [8],[9]. These statements expressed similar sentiments and commitments to “increasing theparticipation, inclusion, and empowerment of historically underrepresented segments of societyin all venues where [science and engineering] is taught, practiced, and supported.” One approachto fulfilling these commitments is the notion of “decolonizing” the STEM curriculum [10]. Suchan approach does not seek to “reject established
one-of-kind parts or low-volume production is needed. Another advantage of AM is theability to facilitate vertical integration within an enterprise. In addition to expediting productdevelopment, the AM framework facilitates the development of innovative products of highervalue, which can offer a competitive advantage over standard low-cost products. One of the leadadaptors of AM for end parts is the aerospace industry due to the high added value of AM-enabledinnovative parts. A prominent example of the adoption of AM for critical flight parts is the leapengine fuel nozzle developed by General Electric [4]. The original nozzle consisting of 19 partswas redesigned with more intricate fuel channels leading to improved ignition efficiency of 25
formodern manufacturing industries. In addition, integrating these systems to facilitate the operationsof a traditional production line is essential. The systems integration issue has compounded anexisting problem for the manufacturing sector as companies already struggle with workforcerecruitment. Although the manufacturing sector has continued to experience significant declinesin workforce; from about 30% in 1960 to about 10% in recent years due to an increased relianceon technology [11-12], identifying and recruiting talents to use and manage these technologies hasremained a challenge. To address this problem, the support and involvement of educators, especially in theengineering and technology fields, will be imperative. Unfortunately
delivering thehands-on component of the class where students applied their knowledge of additivemanufacturing, material properties, and mechanical design (part of a course curriculum) for asocietal benefit, through a hands-on experience.1. Introduction:Manufacturing subject is an important aspect of a mechanical engineering undergraduatecurriculum. As the manufacturing techniques have advanced over the years, the curriculum hasalso evolved to include many special topics and elective courses focusing on covering advancedmanufacturing, design, and materials research. This includes courses focusing on rapidprototyping, non-traditional machining, nano and micromachining, microelectromechanicalsystems, nanotechnology and nanomanufacturing, and in recent
Institute ofScience, Bangalore in 2003. This project is funded by the Ministry of Human ResourceDevelopment, a branch of the Indian government and is an online curriculum developmentprogram in sciences and engineering at university and research levels [37]. 235 courses inweb/video format were developed considering five core disciplines: mechanical engineering,civil engineering, computer science and engineering, electronics and communicationengineering, and electrical engineering. An additional 600 web video courses were created inmajor branches of engineering, and physical sciences at the undergraduate, and postgraduatelevels and management courses at the postgraduate level [38].NPTEL is the largest online repository in the world of courses in
REFERENCES[1] D. W. Jorgenson and K. J. Stiroh, "Information technology and growth," American Economic Review, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 109-115, 1999.[2] J. Dedrick, V. Gurbaxani, and K. L. Kraemer, "Information technology and economic performance: A critical review of the empirical evidence," ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 1-28, 2003.[3] M.-C. Boudreau and D. Robey, "Enacting integrated information technology: A human agency perspective," Organization Science, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 3-18, 2005.[4] J. T. Edwards and G. T. Woo, "An Organized Approach: Challenges Faced by Today's New Engineers in the Petroleum Industry," in SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 2006
Paper ID #37460Expansion of Biomedical Devices in an Engineering DesignProject to Promote Student WellnessIsabel MillerSara Rose Vohra Sara Vohra is an undergraduate studying Bioengineering with a minor in Chemistry at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign. Her interests lie in education as well as medicine with a future career goal as a physician.Calvin CostnerKarin Jensen Karin Jensen, Ph.D. is a Teaching Associate Professor in bioengineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Her research interests include student mental health and wellness, engineering student career pathways, and
studyabroad and/or benefit from working with international partners in their co-operative or internship programs. However, there is value in integrating international programs in the engineering curriculum to provide these experiences to most students, permitting them to get a global education and increase their value to potential employers. To this end, the authors at Clemson University in the US, and Universidad de Guanajuato in Mexico worked together with an industry sponsor in a capstone design project course. The industry sponsor provided a problem common to their operations in the states of South Carolina, US and Guanajuato, Mexico and challenged the student teams to find a solution that would be as common to both locations as
Engineering (2019) and Bachelor of Science degree in Biological Engineering (2017), both from Utah State University. She is passionate about student success and support, both inside and outside of the classroom.Catherine Mcgough Spence (Assistant Professor)Rob Sleezer (Associate Professor, Twin Cities Engineering) Rob Sleezer serves as an associate professor in the Department of Integrated Engineering at Minnesota State University, Mankato. As an active member in ASEE and IEEE Rob works to connect the learning of engineering to the practice of engineering. He supports learning across the breadth of electrical engineering and facilitates a seminar where student engineers engage in design and professional learning.Jodi
mentoring students on senior design .projects. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.comWIP: Integrating Modern Development Practices into a Software Engineering CurriculumAbstract: The field of software engineering is ever changing. The latest IEEE Curriculum Guidelines,SE2014: Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Software Engineering waspublished in 2014. Since then, the discipline has continued to evolve as the complexity of softwaresystems has reached unprecedented levels. This growth has resulted in organizations shifting to a formof development referred to as DevOps. DevOps is "an interdisciplinary approach and means to
this concentration are selected from data analytics for decisionmaking, machine learning, and selected advanced courses in operations research and statistics.This concentration prepares students for some jobs as analysts or consultants, or for Master's-level studies in analytics.” The 15 hours of “analytics elective” requirements for Georgia Tech’sconcentration are to be from those listed below (13). Although comparison in some cases maynot be truly direct, there is enough similarity to show a trend. In both curriculums listed below,there is an obvious focus on data and data analysis building to a body of knowledge wheregraduates will be able to use such analysis for “Decision Making”. Course Number Required Course Name (3 to 6 hours
Paper ID #36747The integration of entrepreneurship in a school-ageengineering curriculum (Resource Exchange)Karen Plaster Karen Plaster is a Professor of Practice in the LeBron James Family Foundation School of Education at the University of Akron. She has a B.S. in Industrial & Systems Engineering from The Ohio State University, an M.S. in Adolescent and Young Adult Education: Mathematics Licensure from The University of Akron, and is currently a Ph.D. student at Kent State University. Her research interests include STEM education, curriculum integration of engineering and entrepreneurship, afterschool
Paper ID #36850Integrating DevOps to Enhance Student Experience in anUndergraduate Research ProjectRyan Gniadek Undergraduate Student, Department of Computer Science, Virginia Tech Research interests include software engineering, programming languages, and computer systems. My professional experience is in the financial technology and enterprise software industries.Margaret O'neil Ellis Margaret currently serves as an Associate Professor of Practice of Computer Science in the College of Engineering at Virginia Tech. She is focused on instructing and designing curriculum for CS2104 Problem Solving in Computer
several courses reducing time spent introducing newconcepts, equipment, and procedures. The time saved is used to advance higher-level learningobjectives as described below.Deployment of these integrated experiments was enabled by the development of a dataacquisition and control board based on the Arduino platform. This allows a single board to meetall data acquisition and control needs for a general engineering program. It also has theadvantage of being low cost, potentially enabling advances in remote laboratories. Furtherbackground and rationale for this project are presented below along with an overview of thehardware and examples of how content is threaded throughout the curriculum.1.2 Program backgroundThe experiments presented here were
a brief introduction tothe curriculum in a series of videoconference meetings and ongoing support via one-to-onecommunication throughout the implementation period. The faculty participants were free to usethe activity worksheets we provided, to modify them, or to develop their own approaches forincorporating the models into their respective courses. Two of the instructors in the study do notcover centroids as an integration application in their respective courses. This difference addsvariability to the data set with respect to the scale of the intervention.Note that the present intervention does not include specific targeted spatial skills traininganalogous to that used in the studies mentioned above. Rather, we hypothesize that access to
Paper ID #37137Critical Review and Refinement of a ProfessionalDevelopment Survey for Engineering Undergraduates,Toward an Integrated Tool for Reflection Across theCurriculumBahar Memarian (Postdoctoral Researcher ) Bahar Memarian is a researcher and educator with research interests in the areas of Engineering Education (Problem- solving, Learning-outcomes Assessment, Experiential Learning, Design, and Creativity) and Human Factors Engineering (Cognitive-systems Engineering, User Experience, Display Design, and Interaction). She obtained her Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering and the Collaborative Specialization in
highereducation provides the opportunity to learn theory and apply it, students can be left with alimited ability to learn through authentic experiences [6]. This proves to be particularlyproblematic in engineering disciplines. The curriculum tends to focus more on theoreticalfoundations and less on the practical application and skills needed in the workforce [6]. Studieshave shown that to enhance the value of engineering graduates in the industry, they must acquireentrepreneurial abilities such as identifying an opportunity, solving problems, thinkingcreatively, and generating societal value [1], [3]. Therefore, engineering institutions have begunto recognize the importance of teaching technical skills coincided with entrepreneurial skills togenerate
in Progress: Sustained Implementation of FEA in an Undergraduate Solid Mechanics CurriculumWhile modeling and simulations are taught in upper-level and elective courses, a typicalengineering undergraduate curriculum does not contain consistent integration of simulations. In aprevious study, the author has advocated for early exposure of mechanical engineering studentsto FEA in a sophomore-level solid mechanics course to improve students’ understanding of thesubject matter. This study reports on the continued implementation of FEA in a junior-levelMachine Design class to leverage the full potential of available advanced tools throughout theundergraduate curriculum. Simulations can be particularly useful where a
Paper ID #36730A Highly Integrated and Successful Approach to ProgramDevelopment and Implementation of Accreditation Strategiesfor an Engineering Technology ProgramAshis Nandy (Associate Professor) Dr. Ashis Nandy is an Associate Professor of Electromechanical Engineering Technology at the Northern New Mexico College, Espanola, New Mexico. He received his Ph. D. in Mechanical Engineering from the Pennsylvania State University in 2012. Prior to that, he earned a Master’s degree in Aerospace Engineering from the Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, India (2006), and a Bachelor degree in Mechanical Engineering from
forEngineering and Technology (ABET) [2] are the most two widely recognized accreditationprograms for engineering in North America. Several articles were published in literature thatfocused on teaching methods, curriculum developments and engineering program accreditation.N. Zamani and J. Stagner [3] explained the requirements needed by CEAB for accrediting amechanical engineering program in university of Windsor, Ontario. Hadi, Y. [4] summarized therequirements of ABET accreditation of Manufacturing and Mechanical Maintenance TechnologyPrograms at Yanbu Industrial College. L. Herz et al. [5] described the development,implementation and the challenges encountered of an interdisciplinary bioengineering developedprogram at Lehigh university. A
engineering from Purdue University. Research focus areas include laboratory courses, process safety, and chemical engineering pedagogy.Joanne Beckwith Joanne Beckwith is an assistant teaching professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering at Carnegie Mellon University. She earned her B.S. in chemical engineering from the University of Toledo in 2013, her M.S.E. from the University of Michigan in 2017, and her Ph.D. in chemical engineering from Michigan in 2021. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Work-in-progress: Identifying unit operations laboratory curriculum needsAbstractA
unsuccessful participation of industry practitioners in academia describedabove, this research details an innovative teaching model in which the industry practitionersare integrated in the classroom to teach chapters of classes that take part of the curriculummandatory for students to graduate. The process of selection of the industry practitioners, andtheirs and students’ feedbacks on this model are assessed. This teaching model was applied ina newly founded Construction Management program at the University of Wyoming. Theprogram developed this teaching model as a supplementary feature for attaining AmericanCouncil for Construction Education (ACCE) accreditation status by Spring 2022. Thoughsome changes would be required, the model is expected to be
department’s curriculum during this time period,students took Calculus 3, Statics, Thermo, and Experimental Methods the fall of their sophomoreyear, Dynamics and Vehicle Design the spring of their sophomore year, and Mechanics,Aerodynamics, and Thermodynamics II their junior year. All aerospace classes were only offeredonce a year, and students were taught in large classes with a single instructor as opposed tomultiple smaller course sections with multiple course instructors. Therefore, each year studentcohorts had an extremely homogeneous learning experience as they all took the same courseswith the same instructor.Along the x-axis on the far left we see initial student enrollment across all socioeconomicquartiles at 100% as all students in the
Paper ID #36787An Analysis of Conceptual Integral Knowledge of STEMMajorsEmre Tokgoz (Associate Professor) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com An Analysis of Conceptual Integral Knowledge of STEM Majors Emre Tokgöz Emre.Tokgoz@qu.edu Industrial Engineering, School of Computing and Engineering, Quinnipiac University, Hamden, CT, 06518, USAAbstract. Importance of integral in STEM applications is well-known however the correspondingpedagogical research for
Paper ID #37532Work in Progress: An Integrative Learning-CenteredAdvising Experience for First Year StudentsShelly Gulati (Associate Professor and Chair) Dr. Shelly Gulati is Associate Professor and Chair of Bioengineering. She is also serving as the Faculty Fellow, Academic Advising. She has been at Pacific since 2010. She received a BS in Chemical Engineering from Johns Hopkins University and a PhD in Bioengineering from University of California, Berkeley. She also spent two years as a postdoctoral fellow in London at Imperial College. Dr. Gulati’s research expertise is biomicrofluidics. More recently, her