activities andsupports designed to increase student success, attitudes, workforce readiness, and STEM self-efficacy; and to ensure substantial student participation in project activities through a specialbadge system incentivizing participation using an online academic social networking platformcalled Course Networking (the CN). Through the CN, students at all three campusescommunicate with each other, building a community among the students at each campus.The Urban STEM Collaboratory project goals are to: 1. Increase at each institution the recruitment, retention, student success, and graduation rates of academically talented and financially needy undergraduate mathematical sciences and engineering majors; 2
: Opportunities and Obstacles to Bystander Intervention1. IntroductionResearch finds that harassment, incivility, and racialized microaggressions areacute in STEM fields and that these behaviors present an obstacle to the retentionand advancement of women.1 The National Academy of Sciences, among otherorganizations, recommends that organizations aggressively promote climate andcultural changes to expand women’s participation (National Academies of Sciencesand Medicine, 2018). Historically, however, most efforts to reduce harassment andother harmful practices, including legislation, reporting systems, and training, havefailed (Feldblum and Lipnic, 2016; Dobbin and Kalev, 2019; Tinkler, 2012).Bystander training, which gives participants skills to
as software packages that requirespecialized training but are at the same time more accessible than those used by programmersand software developers. A deeper understanding of the specific differences in how students[1]think about and motivate themselves to learn computational tools is valuable to improving ourteaching in this critical area.Previous work by the author with 2nd, 3rd, and 4th year students identified a great distribution instudent’s utility value and interest in using MATLAB within their major-specific courses [2], andthat these distributions were unaffected by student’s course grades or achievement of learningobjectives. Casual conversations with students who perceived MATLAB as not being usefulindicated they would not pursue
long history of assessing inclusion, and reflected in this history is a wealth ofinclusion-related scales that differ in their purpose, focus on certain psychological constructs,intended audience, type of entity, and abstractness [1] - [3]. Although there is great appeal tousing an existing scale that has been shown to be valid, reliable, and generalizable, there aredisadvantages when needing it to be well-suited to a group with unique characteristics, such aswe describe exists at a National Science Foundation (NSF) Engineering Research Center (ERC).Understanding ERCs. An NSF ERC is a multi-institutional entity that consists of faculty, staff,postdoctoral scholars, and students (graduate and undergraduate) from several universities andacross
deep learning. This is a significant resultgiven that we did not advise students on why we were asking them to reflect, or what we hopedthey would gain from the activity. Our study provides quantitative evidence that answeringreflection prompts correlates with improved performance on exams and qualitative evidence thatstudents believe that reflection can help with conceptual understanding and deep learning.Reflection should be considered as a strategy for helping students think critically about coursematerial.Key Words: Reflective practice, Quantitative Study, Computer Organization1 IntroductionIt is important for college students to understand the “big picture” of their undergraduatecurriculum and how it prepares them for their careers [1
content in order to build on what students haveapparently learned in the lower-level classes, and ensure that students learn all cybersecuritytopics, and particularly about networking topics and common software vulnerabilities. 1 IntroductionSoftware vulnerabilities in commercial products are an issue of national security, financial andeconomic stability, and consumer confidence. Data breaches caused by these vulnerabilities canlead to interruptions in public services, monetary loss, and loss of privacy. The 2020 VerizonData Breach Investigation Report [1] indicates that there were 3,950 data breaches in 2020 in theUnited States. Software vulnerabilities continue to increase as tracked by National Institute ofStandards and Technology (NIST
) provide students with hands-on laboratory skills, and (iii) offer studentsengaged in an online course in-person experiences and the corresponding academic and socialbenefits.The objective of this course is to develop critical thinking, teamwork and collaborative skills, aswell as the ability to use physical laboratory equipment to obtain and analyze data. Weeliminated some of the homework problems to account for the time spent in preparation for lab,the lab sessions, and writing the post-lab reports. The labs accounted for 10% of the total gradeand included a prelab quiz, a post-lab report, and one or two exam questions for each lab.The three labs were: 1. Introduction to Pipetting 2. DNA Extraction, PCR, and Gel Electrophoresis 3
social justice content within an engineering course,educators may feel confused about why certain students embrace this type of curricularintervention while other students engage minimally or outright reject it.There has been extensive research on the relationship between learning and motivation of studentsin general and the conclusions related to teaching and learning can and should be applied toteaching social justice topics in the engineering classroom. According to Ken Bain in What theBest College Teachers Do, “People learn best when they ask an important question they care aboutanswering or adopt a goal they want to reach…If we are not seeking an answer to anything, wepay little attention to random information.” [1] Therefore if we are
a significant increase in their engineering identity after completion of theirchosen project or certificate, specifically in regards to their recognition as an engineer by theirfamily, peers, and instructors.Introduction Society is experiencing accelerating change: big data, the Internet of Things, machinelearning, artificial intelligence, robotics, 3D printing, biotechnology, nanotechnology, renewableenergy, satellites, and drones are some of the technologies creating new opportunities anddemanding a skilled engineering workforce. The rapid pace of innovation and the growingnumber of products rely on engineers, as designers, to have a wider range of skills andknowledge [1]. The need for critical thinking and adaptive learning skills
is taught over three quarters, starting inthe fall quarter. The fall quarter covers medical imaging physics, descriptors of image quality,radiography, fluoroscopy, mammography, and optical imaging. The winter quarter covers computedtomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The spring quarter covers nuclear medicine(radiopharmaceuticals, planar radionuclide imaging, single-photon emission computed tomography(SPECT), and positron emission tomography (PET)) and ultrasound. Table 1 contains the list of lecturestaught during the course. Each quarter is graded individually and doctoral and master’s students must passall three quarters to progress with their degree. Table 1. List of lecture topics from the 2020-21
(anduniversity) culture that values evidence-based teaching practices. Specifically, the NSF-fundedproject aims to make active learning (AL) the default method of instruction in early STEMcourses across the institution. The project builds on existing work on grassroots change in highereducation (Kezar and Lester, 2011) to study the effect of communities of practice on changingteaching culture. Within departments, the project leadership has created course-basedcommunities of practice that include instructors for the targeted courses, as well as otherdepartment faculty interested in broadening adoption of evidence-based teaching practices.The Physics and Astronomy Department at the R-1 institution at which this study takes placebegan engaging in change
, benefits thepersonal growth of the students themselves and the nation to keep up the excellence and overallleadership. However, international students, especially graduate students, in the United Statesmight fall into several exclusive issues and dilemmas that negatively influence the constructionof their academic identity [1]. Firstly, changing policies on visas and immigration havenegatively and systematically affected international graduate students arriving on U.S. campuses.This uncertainty due to changes in the political climate and global events unproportionallyimpacts students from countries such as Iran and China [2]–[4]. Secondly, an internationalstudent visa has a limited duration and associated criteria to ensure legitimate status. They
engineering identity.They have maintained and unquestioned technology as a core concept usually associated withengineering and value-neutral artifacts developed to solve problems by applying only specializedknowledge.Nevertheless, this conception of technology is far from reality. As currently accepted, technologyis a corpus of sociohistorically contextualized knowledge that embodies its creator’s culture,opening the door to diverse engineering conceptions [1]. In that sense, if a monolithicperspective of engineering continues, it is possible to consider technology as one kind of materialmanifestation of the engineering subculture, which includes only one set of shared commongoals, particular priorities, beliefs, values, and the specific jargon
activities are inincreasing demand in industry and education because modern tasks and products are morecomplicated than before and companies need effective collaboration in their teams to meet theirgoals [1]–[5]. Teams whose members are dependent of each other in their goals and tasksperform better than individuals [6]–[8]. Working in teams has the potential to provide a higherlevel of diversity, and teammates could learn from each other and exchange more opinions [3].Hence, effectively working in teams is a crucial ability for candidates seeking jobs, and recruiterscontinue to evaluate this ability [9], [10]. According to the Job Outlook survey performed by theNational Association of College and Employers (2010), the “ability to work in a team
focuses on (1) how to design and change educational and work systems through studies of practicing engineers and educators and (2) how to help students transition into, through and out of educational and work systems.Monique Ross Assistant Professor, Knight Foundation School of Computing and Information Sciences and STEM Transformation Institute at Florida International University, research interests include broadening participation in computing through the exploration of: 1) race, gender, and identity in the academy and industry; 2) discipline-based education research that informs pedagogical practices that garner interest and retain women and minorities in computer-related fields. She uses her scholarship to