Conference Session

Centering Black Experiences in STEM: Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

DeLean Tolbert Smith, University of Michigan - Dearborn; Leroy Long, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach; Aishwary Pawar, University of Michigan

support of their career readiness. He has helped to lead research funded by NSF (award # 2024973) to examine the potential benefit of using critical narratives as a pedagogical tool in the professional formation of engineers.Aishwary Pawar Aishwary Pawar is a doctoral candidate in Industrial & Systems Engineering at the University of Michigan-Dearborn. His main research interest centers on investigating the factors that influence undergraduate enrollment, retention, graduation, and dropout. For his master’s thesis, Aishwary researched how student demographics and background characteristics lead to a more comprehensive understanding of a student’s enrolment and retention at an undergraduate college. For his Ph.D

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 6: Admissions, Transfer Pathways, and Major Selection

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Danyelle Ireland, University of Maryland Baltimore County; Jordan Esiason; Amanda Menier; Rebecca Zarch

graduation plan, preparing the resume and cover letter, and financial literacy.The computing and/or engineering content was required to come from the academic departmentfor each technical course that the seminar was connected to. This content stayed relatively thesame on the engineering side but changed each academic year on the computing side, due toturnover in the faculty/graduate student instructing the course. This model required afaculty/graduate student instructor and a staff member to teach the two sides of the model, aswell as a peer facilitator. This size of a teaching team requires a substantial amount ofcoordination, made easier if one person (typically the staff member) runs point on the logisticsand it is not a very cost-effective model

Conference Session

WIED: Activities and Programs

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Canan Bilen-Green, North Dakota State University; Adrienne Minerick, Michigan Technological University; Cinzia Cervato, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Sonia Goltz; David Wahl, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Patricia Sotirin; Mark Rouleau

also extended to the minimal networking with colleagues at otheruniversities that was occurring since academic conferences were canceled or moved online.Mentors and mentees together explored ideas for alternative mechanisms to meet newfaculty needs, something that the faculty members would have otherwise had to come upwith on their own.Guiding QuestionsPrior to launching the CIMCs, extensive thought and effort were put into crafting discussionprompts for the mentoring groups. These topics have evolved from an initial listing of topicswith prompts for the 2015-2016 Early Career Management (ECM) committees mentionedpreviously. The ECM prompts were refined and improved each year based upon mentor andmentee feedback. Thus, the 2019-2020 version of

Conference Session

Research Frameworks for Identity and Equity: Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division Technical Session 9

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Malini Josiam, University of Texas at Austin; Taylor Johnson, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Janice Hall, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Walter Lee, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Crystal Pee

a largerproject. Next, we establish the criteria for quality, ethics, and equity that we considered. Then,we step through the purpose, theory, sampling, and instrumentation sections in light of thecriteria established. Finally, we present the decision we came to in light of those criteria and ournext steps. In making this process transparent, we hope to help new engineering educationresearchers understand the complex considerations that come with executing a research project. 2. Positionality & ContextThe research team is composed of the Principal Investigator (PI) who submitted the originalgrant proposal to the National Science Foundation (NSF) and received the CAREER grant inwhich this work is situated; and four graduate students

Conference Session

International Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Homero Murzi, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Tahsin Chowdhury, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Lloyd Morris, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education; Jose Torero

. Finally, they mentioned how exploring projectsin a controlled, low-risk environment allowed them to explore areas of research that otherwisethey would not have been able to explore.The Icarus Program was created with the goal of improving sense of belonging, students'engagement and providing students with an opportunity to have out of the classroom experiencesto apply some of the technical knowledge they were learning in their courses while alsodeveloping a cohort and closely interact with their peers and professors. We consider that thisgoal was fulfilled based on the faculty members' perceptions.References[1] J. S. Eccles, "Families, Schools, and Developing Achievement-Related Motivations and Engagement," in Handbook of socialization: Theory

Conference Session

DEED Technical Session 7 Design Mental Frameworks

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hillary Merzdorf, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Donna Jaison, Texas A&M University; Morgan Weaver, Georgia Institute of Technology; Kerrie Douglas, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Julie Linsey, Georgia Institute of Technology; Tracy Hammond, Texas A&M University

. Kerrie Douglas, Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue, studies how to improve the quality of classroom assessments and evaluation of online learning in a variety of engineering education contexts. She holds a PhD in Educational Psychology and a M.A. in Educational Studies, with focus on school counseling. She is a co-PI on the SCALE project, leading the evaluation and assessment efforts. She recently received an NSF award to study engineering instructor decisions and student support during COVID-19 and impact the pandemic is having on engineering students. She also recently won the prestigious CAREER award from the U.S. National Science Foundation to study increasing the fairness of engineering

Conference Session

Thinking Outside the STEM Box: Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joseph Valle, University of Michigan - Ann Arbor; Amy Slaton, Drexel University; Donna Riley, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

identifications cannot possibly be playing a role [31]. Meritocratic ideologies supportindustrial capitalism’s long-standing stratified wage structures and vice versa. For example, theidea of engineering classrooms as inclusive, tolerant sites of learning fully shaped by DEIintentions makes complete sense of divergent educational opportunities across communities: noteveryone can be an engineer, in every sense of those words. If we are unbiased, the absence ofBlack students from graduate programs in STEM, say, can only be explained by the intellectualand behavioral deficits of absent persons. That is, the “post-racial” U.S. need worry no moreabout anti-Black, misogynistic, anti-trans or other social-structural “flaws” and accepts that somepersons will

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susan Lord, University of San Diego; Matthew Ohland, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Richard Layton; Marisa Orr, Clemson University; Russell Long, Purdue Engineering Education; Joe Roy, American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE); Hayaam Osman, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Catherine Brawner

in 2008, 2011, and 2019 and from the IEEE Transactions on Education in 2011 and 2015. Dr. Ohland is an ABET Program Evaluator for ASEE. He was the 2002–2006 President of Tau Beta Pi and is a Fellow of the ASEE, IEEE, and AAAS.Marisa K. Orr (Associate Professor) Marisa K. Orr is an Associate Professor in Engineering and Science Education with a joint appointment in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Clemson University. Her research interests include student persistence and pathways in engineering, gender equity, diversity, and academic policy. Dr. Orr is a recipient of the NSF CAREER Award for her research entitled, ”Empowering Students to be Adaptive Decision-Makers.”Joe Roy (Director of Institutional

Conference Session

ETD - A Technology Potpourri I

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Osazuwa Okundaye, Texas A&M University; Malini Natarajarathinam, Texas A&M University; Mathew Kuttolamadom, Texas A&M University; Francis Quek, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Sharon Lynn Chu, University of Florida; Qing Li; Shaoping Qiu, Texas A&M University

distribution. Dr. Natarajarathinam has chaired 91 graduate capstone projects, and several undergraduate capstone projects, and has served on two master’s committees. Dr. Natarajarathinam was chosen as of the “40 under 40” faculty by the American Society of Engineering Educations, Prism Magazine in 2018.Sharon Lynn ChuMathew Kuttolamadom (Associate Professor) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com ‘All Together Now’ - Integrating Horizontal Skills in Career Technical Education Classes with Making and Micromanufacturing Osazuwa Okundaye 1 , Malini

Conference Session

ERM: Persistence and Attrition in Engineering

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kanembe Shanachilubwa, Pennsylvania State University; Catherine Berdanier, Pennsylvania State University; Gabriella Sallai, Pennsylvania State University

et al., "On the Road to Becoming a Professor: The Graduate Student Experience," Change, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 18–27, 1999.[26] E. Hocker, E. Zerbe, and C. G. P. Berdanier, "Characterizing Doctoral Engineering Student Socialization: Narratives of Mental Health, Decisions to Persist, and Consideration of Career Trajectories," 2019.[27] P. J. Miller and R. Fossey, "Mapping the Cultural Landscape in Engineering Education," J. Eng. Educ., vol. 99, pp. 5–22, 2010.[28] I. Bleijenbergh, M. L. Van Engen, and C. J. Vinkenburg, “Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal,” An Int. J., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 2013, doi: 10.1108/02610151311305597.[29] G. Sharma, "Pros and cons of different

Conference Session

WIED: Community

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Callie Miller, James Madison University; Daniel Castaneda, James Madison University; Melissa Aleman, James Madison University

(unsolicited specialrequests from students or other faculty members, extra service loads as the “tokenrepresentative” of an underrepresented group, emotional labor and management at home, etc.),these labors were amplified once the uncertainty of COVID-19 hit students, colleagues, and athome. True to our experiences, the pandemic exacerbated the already known gendered dynamicsbetween students, and students and faculty; but our narratives seek to explore how these knownstudent and colleague behaviors were experienced and understood by the researchers during theuncertain climate of the pandemic. We believe our storied experiences of the gendered andinstitutional stressors of the pandemic that unmoored us will resonate with academics at large,and with

Conference Session

DEED Technical Session 10: Empathy and Human-centered Design

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Imane Aboutajedyne, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University; Ahmed Aboutajeddine, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University; Yassine Salih Alj, Al Akhawayn University; Shawn Jordan, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus

the Context Canvas, teams of graduate students andfaculty were invited to participate in a workshop to redesign a project spine course inengineering. This design decision to have a combined team of faculty and students is at the heartof a CBPD approach to course design. Before attending the workshop, participants individuallyobserved different design courses of the undergraduate engineering curriculum to collect dataabout a current course. They observed class sessions, explored the syllabus of the course andinteracted with students and instructors of the course. The observations were documented byeach participant. Instructions about what to observe and how to document were not given to notinfluence participants and allow different observation

Conference Session

ERM: Instruction and Engagement

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aparajita Jaiswal, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Devang Patel, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Yi Zhu, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Jin Su Lee, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Alejandra Magana, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

.[27] has revealed that developing an understanding of team members' emotions in virtual teamshelps them promote their team members' well-being. Therefore it is good to note that studentsidentified improving empathy as one of the improvement strategies.The intervention discussed in this study allowed the students to reflect on benefits, challenges, andstrategies to improve team communication. Reflecting on their experiences had the goal ofencouraging them to understand the team's functioning better and make effective decisions [28].Since the course follows cooperative project-based learning and students have been working anddelivering all their assignments in a group, we wanted them to develop rapport by making themaware of the role of

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mohammad Uddin, East Tennessee State University; BEVERLY SMITH, East Tennessee State University

Paper ID #38267East Tennessee Noyce STEM Teacher Preparation ProgramMohammad Moin Uddin (Dr.) Dr. Mohammad Moin Uddin is a Professor in the Department of Engineering, Engineering Technology, and Surveying at East Tennessee State University. He holds a joint appointment as a Professor of Engineering and Engineering Technology Program and as a Graduate Faculty member of the Graduate School. He also serves as the Director for the TTU-ETSU Joint Engineering Program. Dr. Uddin is an exemplary engineering technology educator. He has made significant contributions to engineering technology education and the whole profession

Conference Session

Design Experiences in Manufacturing Education

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jaby Mohammed, Illinois State University; Klaus Schmidt, Illinois State University; Jeritt Williams, Illinois State University

) and desired personal characteristics for the graduatestudents (e.g., critical thinking, problem-solving approach, data preparation, analytics, andpresentation). The contributions from the advisory board were the driving force for the newdirection and strategy for the graduate program. Industry professionals suggested and inputsfrom the board were successfully incorporated.A study by Stelyn (2019) suggested the perception of students played an important role in thestructure for the new course providing a learning experience. The student feedback and studentfocus group were used in generating new course structure, operations, and the course impact fortheir career. Student evaluations of teaching and learning and student suggestions on

Conference Session

CIT Division Technical Session #3

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Margaret Ellis; Godmar Back, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Walter Lee, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Kirk Cameron, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Crystal Pee

with a series of tutorials and set-up instructions, they learn to reachout to peers and faculty members in addition to wiki instructions and videos. Students enterwith various levels of course and personal computing experience. Students learn and practicethese skills alongside supercomputing, benchmarking, architecture, and performance.Table 3: This table highlights the components of the research group intended to create asupportive community and broaden participation in the computer systems subfield ofcomputer science. Related Component Details

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division Technical Session - Machine Learning, IoT, Writing Center Peer Tutors, Conceptual Modeling

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth Pluskwik, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Yuezhou Wang, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Lauren Singelmann, North Dakota State University

of this research project is to gain insights into learners’ motivation levels and how itevolves during the last two years in college, as well as to extend current Educational Data Miningresearch and Machine Learning analysis described in the literature. It is significant on two fronts:1) we will extend the ability of ML in analyzing reflective written artifacts to explore studentphysiological and emotional development; 2) the longitudinal study will help monitor theprogressive change of motivation in college students in a PBL environment.Preliminary results from an initial preliminary study are promising. By analyzing writtenreflection journal entries from previous students, the ML algorithm has differentiated keywordsinto three student

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Catherine Cohan, Pennsylvania State University; Lauren Griggs, Pennsylvania State University; Ryan Hassler; Mark Johnson, Pennsylvania State University, Altoona Campus; Mikhail Kagan, Pennsylvania State University, Ogontz Campus; Amy Freeman, Pennsylvania State University; Peter Butler, Pennsylvania State University; Tonya Peeples, Pennsylvania State University

graduate andundergraduate students across STEM disciplines. Dr. Peeples been an active member of the American Institute ofChemical Engineers (AIChE), the American Chemical Society (ACS), the National Organization for the ProfessionalAdvancement of Black Chemists and Chemical Engineers (NOBCChE). She received the Outstanding Service Award andPioneers of Diversity Award from AIChE Minority Affairs Committee. She received a Million Women MentorsTrailblazer Award from STEM Connector and is a member of the American Institute for Medical and BiologicalEngineering College of Fellows. Dean Peeples currently serves as a leader in the NSF INCLUDES Aspire Alliance and anAdvisory Board Member for The American Association for Advancement of Science (AAAS) Open

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lois Joy; Nia Yisrael, Jobs for the Future

. Thisstudy fills these gaps with case study research on technology internships at two Floridacommunity colleges. In this research we explore, engineering and information technologyinternship structure; participation; and outcomes on program persistence, program completion,and self-efficacy in future technology and career engagement. Our case study research drawsfrom both qualitative and quantitative data from a range of perspectives including students,faculty/administrators and employers who provided the internships. Findings show that credit-bearing technology internships prepared students to be successful in technology careers,strengthened student self-efficacy and confidence towards their technology education and careergoals, and provided a

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division: Ethics Education Assessment

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew Green, LeTourneau University; David Dittenber, Cedarville University

]. It hasbeen demonstrated that students tend to believe that their peers are cheating as much, if not more,than they do [9], [3]. Students are also unlikely to report the cheating of other students [9]. Thesefindings, taken together, reinforce the importance of the established institutional culture onstudents’ academic integrity practices. Students believe that faculty carry the responsibility todissuade cheating - for example, by not reusing exams and assignments – and faculty memberswho fail to do so are perceived as permitting cheating behaviors [3]. While this may not be theway faculty members would wish for students to approach their courses, it does reinforce the factthat the opportunity exists for an individual faculty member to

Conference Session

Architectural Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ryan Solnosky, Pennsylvania State University; Robert Leicht, Pennsylvania State University; Ziyi Wang, Pennsylvania State University

discipline. Additionally, the currentadministration of advising distributes a small number of advisees to each faculty member. However, thatmodel would likely work in the shift to interdisciplinary team advising. From a collaboration standpoint,concerns arose regarding how students are grouped and the potential disparity regarding the number ofstudents across the disciplines. For example, the feasibility of having more than one person in a disciplineon the same team, with most discouraging this option. There were two faculty who thought that disciplinespecific teams might be nice given building challenges for certain disciplines rather than multi-disciplinaryteams. The alumni open-ended feedback on teamwork regarding accountability focused

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods (ERM) Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jameka Wiggins, The Ohio State University; Amanda Johnston, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Kerrie Douglas, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Julie Martin, The Ohio State University; Ines Direito

instructor decisions and student support during COVID-19 and impact the pandemic is having on engineering students. She also recently won the prestigious CAREER award from the U.S. National Science Foundation to study increasing the fairness of engineering assessments. In total, she has been on the leadership of more than $24 million dollars in research awards. Her research on evaluation of online learning (supported by two NSF awards #1544259,1935683, ) has resulted in more than 20 peer-reviewed conference and journal publications related to engineering learners in online courses. She was a FutureLearn Research Fellow from 2017-2019; a 2018 recipient of the FIE New Faculty Fellow Award and was the 2021 Program Chair for the

Conference Session

Two-Year College Potpourri

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cynthia Pickering, Arizona State University; Laurie MiLler McNeill, Westchester Community College; Mara Lopez, Arizona State University; Juan Rodriguez, Westchester Community College; Sarah Belknap, Westchester Community College; Elaine Craft, Florence-Darlington Technical College; Caroline Vaningen-Dunn

the Future of Innovation in Society in ASU’s College of Global Futures. She practices Socio-technical Integration Research as an embedded social scientist who collaboratively works with technologists (STEM students, STEM faculty, and Tech Companies) to increase reflexive learning during technology development and implementation to pro-actively consider the impact of technology decisions on local communities and society at large. This work creates spaces and processes to explore technology innovation and its consequences in an open, inclusive and timely way.Laurie S. Miller McNeill (Director of Institutional Advancement )Mara LopezJuan R Rodriguez (Professor)Sarah Belknap (Instructor Of Mathematics)Elaine L. Craft

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods (ERM) Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alexandra Lee; Garam Lee, Michigan State University; John Keane, Michigan State University; Goun Choi, Michigan State University; S. Patrick Walton, Michigan State University; Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia, Michigan State University

designed to connect the scholarship recipients with a faculty member whocould provide them with guidance and resources provided by the college (e.g., career services,tutoring) and to support students’ motivation (see Table 2 for the mentoring meeting occurrenceby the student, Table 3 for mentor meeting protocol, and Figure 1 for data collection process).Sample Selection During the initial review of available meeting notes, we applied a purposeful samplingstrategy to focus our analysis on a single mentor within the program and her mentoringexperiences with three mentees (see Figure 1 for rationale of sample selection) [33, 34]. Theselected mentor was a female engineering faculty member with over 20 years of experience. Thethree focal

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 11: Program Descriptions and Learning Analytics

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Laura Cruz Castro, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Tiantian Li, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Leyla Ciner; Kerrie Douglas, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Christopher Brinton, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

FYE program'scontent. However, currently, LMS data are often only used for at-risk prediction. Despiteyielding meaningful insight, such predictions often disregard the need to also provide insightsinto course decision making. In this case study, we present a human-operator approach thatpredicts students at risk while also returning insights into the classroom. We conclude that careerexploration items contained the highest amount of explained variance when predicting students'final grade. The single use of students' access to career exploration content was able to predictstudent’s final grades with an 84% precision in the class. The results generated with a human-categorized model give the instructional team insights on the importance of these

Conference Session

WIED: Support for All in the WIED Community

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jia Zhu, Florida International University; Monique Ross, Florida International University; Disha Patel, Florida International University

Community of Practice to Develop the Scholarly Identity of Doctoral Students,” International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 30–37, 2016, publisher: International Society for Exploring Teaching and Learning. [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1106332[20] E. Crede, M. Borrego, and L. McNair, “Application of community of practice theory to the preparation of engineering graduate students for faculty careers,” vol. 2, pp. 1–22, Jun. 2010.[21] C. G. Berdanier, C. M. McComb, and W. Zhu, “Natural Language Processing for Theoretical Framework Selection in Engineering Education Research,” in 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). Uppsala, Sweden: IEEE, Oct. 2020, pp

Conference Session

ERM: New Research Methods and Tools

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Maimuna Begum Kali, Florida International University; Stephen Secules, Florida International University; Cassandra McCall, Utah State University

, we needed toensure the audio narrative resources that resulted from the project were as high quality,understandable, and authentic to the student experience as possible. Secules’s prior professionaland educational experience in acoustics enabled his exploration of the topic, and the fundedgrant’s advisory board includes members with expertise on podcast audio specifically.One of the specific challenges encountered was matching the tone and accent of student actors tointerview participants. We selected student actors in collaboration with an Associate Professor ofTheatre at Florida International University (FIU), and aligned the actor with the participant interms of gender and approximate age (since both participant and actor are Bachelor’s

Conference Session

Architectural Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ryan Solnosky, Pennsylvania State University; John Phillips, Oklahoma State University

provide three class size facts for a typical given year: 1) the class size,2) how many students are assigned to a faculty, and lastly, 3) how many students are assigned toan industry mentor. Table 1 provides a statistical breakdown of these. It is well known that programsize varies, ranging from 3 to over 100 students in the capstone, with a mean of 35.7 students.Larger capstones inherently have difficulties depending on how they are taught, however,depending on the staffing large capstones can be manageable [16]. Programs indicated that a givenfaculty member advises from 3 to 50 students, with an average of 13.5 students. For programs withstudent teams, this average number of students per faculty member is manageable whenconsidering in-depth

Conference Session

DEED Technical Session 5 Design Teams

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

William Oakes, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Paul Leidig, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Andrew Pierce, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

itself, the assessment strategyshould promote these attributes. Where possible, assessments are imbedded into the work of theproject and the team.Assessments of students in EPICS consider an individual’s holistic body of work in the contextof a larger team environment. The assessment process is designed to accommodate students fromdifferent majors working in different phases of the design process and in different roles. Theassessment practices are also intended to follow the form of personnel performance reviews inindustry, to help equip students to thrive in their careers after graduation. Each student isevaluated on five outcome criteria: 1. Accomplishments, 2. Design Process, 3. Reflective and Critical Thinking, 4. Teamwork or

Conference Session

Community Engagement Division Technical Session 4- COVID and Virtual Learning

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shaoping Qiu, Texas A&M University; Malini Natarajarathinam, Texas A&M University

. Borja, and M. E. Bentley, "Grandmothers, fathers, and depressive symptoms are associated with food insecurity among low-income first-time African- American mothers in North Carolina," Journal of the American Dietetic Association, vol. 109, no. 6, pp. 1042-1047, 2009.[7] R. G. Bringle and J. A. Hatcher, "A service-learning curriculum for faculty," 1995.[8] A. W. Chickering, "Strengthening democracy and personal development through community engagement," New directions for adult and continuing education, vol. 2008, no. 118, p. 87, 2008.[9] H. Said, I. Ahmad, S. S. S. Mansor, and Z. Awang, "Exploring different perspectives on limitations and promises of service-learning as an innovative pedagogy: review