the ability to work together while solving an open-ended designproblem, and being able to overcome any obstacles that arise. These obstacles involve differingwork ethics, personalities, and communication styles. Inevitably, these differences can lead toconflict, and a need to resolve disagreements within the team. These ever-present emotionalaspects to working in a team are found not only in student projects, but also on the projects theywill be working on once they graduate. Finding the skills as a student to successfully navigatethe myriad of issues that may arise when working with others, sets student up for success in theirengineering careers after graduation, as shown by Jones (1996) [1] and Seat et al. (1996) [2].Often students who are
relationships reported amongst respondents? 2. How do the results obtained from the previous study compare to the findings of this cross- university study?Study DesignTo further examine the role of familial influence on student engineering major choice, this studyemploys a multi-methods approach facilitated through a survey with both quantitative andqualitative components. Data obtained from elements of the survey were first analyzedindependently from each other. These independent analyses were followed by a combinedinterpretation phase that sought to understand the results in reflection of one another. To aid inthe analysis and interpretation of results, Social Cognitive Career Theory is used as a theoreticalframework for this
courses that include students with a wide range of prior exposure toengineering. The design projects engage students with a tentative interest in engineering and limited priorhands-on experience, while also challenging the skills and creativity of those students already committedto an engineering career. This workshop will allow participants to learn about and carry out some of thesehands-on projects for themselves. At the workshop, participants will be provided with materials that theycan take with them back to their home institutions.The efforts to increase diversity in engineering have resulted in a challenge for introduction toengineering classes of supporting students with a wide range of prior exposure and degree of interest inengineering
- neering career in industry. During his career, Dr. Hamrick served in a broad range of positions including design, product development, tool and die, manufacturing, sales, and management. His teaching style brings practical, innovative, experience-based learning to the classroom, where hands-on projects that reflect real-world applications are valued by students. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 FYEE 2022 Workshop summary Todd Hamrick, PhD, West Virginia University Student Success Beyond Covid, Teaching The Workforce Of 2026The workshop will consist of a presentation, breakout
ideal for both 1) first year (success) classes and 2) facultyteaching any discipline related class.Faculty who desire to provide student with methods to improve performance in their class will findthese LC—HI methods both effective and efficient. From a faculty perspective they are intuitive,very easy to implement, require little time to introduce, create opportunity for studentaccountability, will not detract from time on topical material, and a high percentage of studentswill use them.References[1] W. C. Leuwerke, S. Robbins, R. Sawyer and M. Hovland, Predicting engineering major status from mathematics achievement and interest congruence, Journal of Career Assessment, 12, 2004, pp. 135–149.[2] B. F. French, J. C. Immekus and W
Society for Engineering Education, 2022 GIFT: Retention Improvement Efforts in the Engineering and Computing Undergraduate Living and Learning Community at the University of South Carolina Author: Ed Gatzke, Faculty Principal for USC Green Quad Living and Learning CommunityThe University of South Carolina Engineering and Computing Living and Learning Community (ECC) is focused onhelping students succeed in their academic careers. For many years, program activities include a one-hour professionaldevelopment course, linked coursework for mathematics and chemistry courses, and residence hall tutoring availability.Recent efforts include an early move-in boot camp, additional linked courses, and new spring
ofEngineering Success (AcES) was founded in 2012 for non-calculus ready first-time freshman(FTF) engineering students. AcES consists of a week of activities prior to the fall semester and asemester-long course in academic success and professional development, where students buildprofessional networks and improve their success skills through team activities, field trips, mathreviews, projects, academic success workshops, and career exploration. AcES charged a nominalapplication fee, but program specific scholarships were provided to remove the financial barrierfor underrepresented students such as low-income, women, underrepresented minorities (URM),and first-generation. AcES faced significant recruitment challenges due to the institutionalrecruitment
Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Prior to graduate studies, Erica joined Teach for America and taught high school chemistry in Las Vegas. While her primary research involves water and wastewater, she has strong interests in engineering education research, teacher professional development, and secondary STEM education. In 2021, Erica received the ASEE Pacific Southwest Early Career Teaching Award and two awards at UNLV for mentoring undergraduate and graduate students. She also received the Peter J. Bosscher Outstanding Faculty Advisor Award in 2019 from Engineers Without Borders and was recognized as a Nevada Woman in STEM by Senator Jackie Rosen.Cory Budischak, Temple University Cory is a teacher and researcher who
. Broadly categorized, students’understandings of success related to career preparation and opportunities—an expected theme forthose in technical degree programs, happiness or enjoyment in life, and living a life of purpose—what some might call “the good life.” Edwin’s response to our questions related to successreveals such understandings of success are not necessarily exclusive: “To me, [success] meansbeing able to fulfill your own personal purpose, while at the same time, enjoying it and making agood living out of it, I would say. That’d be success.”Though student participation in specific majors clearly shapes notions of success, students’insistence that the profitability of a future career is not the only—and sometimes not even theprimary
this pedagogical practice is implemented on first-year engineering students, it will have a significantimpact on their ability to organize, streamline and communicate an idea, provide a quick overview of aproject, or even showcase their academic and professional accomplishments through a resume, coverletter, elevator pitch and other persuasive technical documents. From their freshmen year, they willdevelop confidence to write and present simply, concisely, accurately, and coherently. This skill willcarry on with them in their future careers, aiding them in successful articulation of ideas, technicalinformation, and research to a global audience.
forthe Bridge students and their parents/guardians/siblings. Bridge instructors and college anduniversity administrators are invited. Meritorious Bridge student scholastic performances arerecognized in various categoriesE-Portfolio: The students will be coached in using an E-Portfolio system to document theirexperiences. Each student will prepare and upload a reflective essay documenting theirprofessional career aspirations and its relationship to the college education.Collaborative Courses: These are intended to support learning in Calculus and Physics, thehistoric 'weed-out' courses for engineers and are attended by all selected Bridge students. TheSCLC courses meet twice a week for 2 hours in addition to the regular Calculus or Physicscourse
benefits to their career advancement [10]. Increasedretention has been reported within engineering engagement [11-13]. Improved diversity, especiallyin regard to gender, has also been documented within engagement [14-16].This paper presents an approach that builds on the prior literature to create an alternate pathwaythrough the first year in engineering that includes community-engaged learning community (LC)classes. Evidence from the experience is shared along with lessons learned.Context: First-Year CurriculumPurdue University has had a dedicated department or school responsible for the first-year ofengineering for more than 60 years [17]. All engineering students at Purdue University are requiredto complete a common first year core of classes
feels they have in the relevant environment), and relatedness (sense of social connection and support within the relevant environment). In sum, research regarding the self-determination theory would suggest that both perceived success and the sense of support in the form of a caring instructor would predict overall motivation or empowerment as described in the MUSIC model. The usefulness factor in the MUSIC model suggests that motivation increases when students perceive the utility of their academic work toward earning their degree or their future career. The utility of their work can be in the short term, such as needing to pass a required course, or in the longer term, such as the value of learning information relevant
projects integrated with the undergraduate engineering curriculum. Dr. Surupa Shaw | Texas A&M University | Higher Education Center at McAllen TX I. INTRODUCTION The undergraduate engineering curriculum forms the fundamental knowledge base for our future engineerswho would be serving the global society. It is imperative for the undergraduate engineers to get a reality checkon the utility of their classroom knowledge that would help them shape their career path and would providethem a valuable appreciation of the course content. Phylis Blumenfeld et al. [1] emphasized on the compellingargument of making projects an integral part of the learning process, as they promote student
concentration in structural seismic engineering. Dr. As- sadollahi completed his Ph.D. in Engineering from The University of Memphis with a concentration in geo-structures in 2013. He currently an Associate Professor and Department Chair of Civil and Environ- mental Engineering at Christian Brothers University. He is a registered professional engineer in the State of Tennessee.Mr. Mardarius Liddell Thomas, Christian Brothers University Mardarius Thomas is a student affairs practitioner, higher ed and career consultant, and retention strate- gist. He is a graduate of the University of Mississippi, where he obtained his Bachelor of Science in Communicative Disorders. He furthered his education at Mississippi College and
wastewater, she has strong interests in engineering education research, teacher professional development, and secondary STEM education. In 2021, Erica received the ASEE Pacific Southwest Early Career Teaching Award and two awards at UNLV for mentoring undergraduate and graduate students. She also received the Peter J. Bosscher Outstanding Faculty Advisor Award in 2019 from Engineers Without Borders and was recognized as a Nevada Woman in STEM by Senator Jackie Rosen. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 WIP: Contract grading as an alternative grading structure and assessment approach for a process-oriented, first-year
students take the traditional path consisting of two 2-credit introductory engineeringcourses. The first course, ENGR 131, focuses on design, teaming and career exploration usingExcel as a computer tool to model systems and analyze data. The second course, ENGR 132,introduces students to MATLAB and more formal constructs associated with computation.Two other pathways are offered to students to meet the first-year engineering requirements. Onepathway combines the traditional introductory courses into one 4-credit course, ENGR 130. Thispathway is ideal for students who have some or most of the first-year requirements met throughAP credit.The other pathway leverages Learning Communities(LC), where students participate onvertically integrated project
solution for increasing nextgeneration experts (NGE) in engineering and computing careers [1]–[4]. Montana StateUniversity’s (MSU) open access mission is to educate the sons and daughters of its state’scitizens. In accordance with this mission, the Norm Asbjornson College of Engineering(NACOE) has preserved their practice of a single application and acceptance process forprograms in the college. Upon acceptance to MSU a student may declare any program in theNACOE regardless of their academic readiness. Both MSU and the NACOE recognize manycommunities in Montana have limited access to advanced coursework (e.g.: calculus, physics,computer science, etc.) anticipated for first year engineering or computing students. Open accessinvites first year
lost time and tuition fees since leaving the engineering field costs studentsapproximately $500k over the course of their careers [4].Factors that contribute to students leaving engineering programs include lack of belonging, quality ofadvising and instruction, and performance in first-year courses. Research shows that a lack of sense ofbelonging is one of the biggest reasons a student leaves engineering [5]. In addition, the quality of advisingand course instruction has a significant impact on student persistence in an engineering program [6,7].Students’ persistence can be greatly improved if there is a culture of collaboration in their academicenvironment [8]. It has been shown that fostering a community environment, both in and out of
a drill section while enrolling in GNEGcourses. The drills are primarily used for outside speakers including each of the departments,career services, multicultural center, and other student support services such as academiccoaching. During drills, students learn about all engineering majors, and go through series oftalks that foster transition from high school to becoming a quality engineering student. Lastly, asa part of GNEG courses, students meet once a week with a peer mentor. Peer mentors helpstudents to build an understanding of the campus resources and guide their mentees throughtopics such as time management, interacting with faculty, and effective study habits.In March 2020, when classes transitioned to remote learning, the hands
engineering such asthe impacts on society, career opportunities, along with the need for strong communication andcreativity skills, have been shown to be important to students entering the field of engineering[18].References[1] Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. 2020. Criteria For AccreditingEngineering Programs, 2017 – 2018 | ABET. [online] Available at: [Accessed 6 May 2020].[2] Bennett, D., Kapoor, K., Rajinder, K., & Maynard, N. (2015) “First Year Engineeringstudents: Perceptions of Engineers, Engineering Work Amongst Domestic and InternationalStudents.” The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education. ISSN: 1838-2959,vol. 6, Issue 1, pp. 89-105.[3] Compeau, S. “The Calling of an Engineer: High School Students
Paper ID #36388Lessons Learned from COVID That Have Been Transferred to Post-COVIDTeaching and LearningDr. Michael Cross, Norwich University Michael Cross is an Assistant Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering teaching classes in the areas of circuits, electronics, energy systems, and engineering design. Cross received degrees from the Rochester Institute of Technology and the University of Vermont and began his academic career at UVM where he taught courses in the areas of analog and digital circuits, electronics, semiconductor physics, power electronics, and engineering design.Dr. David M. Feinauer P.E