Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yuwei Deng, King's College London; Wei Liu, King's College London

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

]. Ultimately, designthinking exercises thinking skills and overall literacy, both during and after achieving learningoutcomes [12].5. CONCLUSIONSThis study first aims to classify engineering design thinking in curriculum design, analyse thecharacteristics and connotations of different introduction approaches, and establish a basicframework and methodology for the study of design thinking in the field of higher engineeringeducation. Finally, the study concludes with a detailed analysis of keywords and key coursetypes in design thinking in higher engineering education, laying the foundation for futureresearch. The backbone of existing research is reflected in the case studies, individualisedcurriculum design, the connotative purpose of the curriculum

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) Technical Session 12

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shruti Misra, University of Washington; Denise Wilson, University of Washington; Soyoung Kang, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

,sequential, mixed methods approach (N = 163) was used to assess the importance of industrymentor and teammate support using quantitative data analysis techniques followed by thematic(qualitative) analysis to explain those results.Likert-type items were analyzed using exploratory factor analyses and resulted in six constructs.Two constructs reflected student perceptions of their learning: engineering design and decision-making skills and adaptability skills. Two forms of support emerged from the factor analysis:industry mentor support and teammate support, and two control variables also emerged: designself-efficacy and preparedness. Support and control variables were then used as dependentvariables in regression models for the two learning outcomes

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) Technical Session 6

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Abdullah Umair Bajwa, Habib University; Abdul Basit Memon, Habib University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

Design, Design Thinking, and Systems Thinking; and "Computer-AidedEngineering", an elective course for juniors and seniors.In general, it is not unexpected that both design frameworks have a comparable approach andpossess features typically present in all design processes. Some of these similarities are:● Both are iterative, adaptive, and collaborative processes that help solve ill-defined and open-ended problems that are not amenable to being routinized or solved algorithmically (aka “puzzles”). The iterative and nonlinear nature of both design methodologies is reflected in the existent feedback loops. This iterative nature can also be viewed as coevolution of the problem space with the solution space. That is, as designers search for

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) Technical Session 3

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yağmur Önder, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Nrupaja Bhide, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Dhinesh Balaji Radhakrishnan, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Jennifer Deboer, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

prior work done in measuring spatialvisualization skills, our work involves contributions concerning international engineeringeducation.We are embarking on this project to develop a test from scratch rather than using existingassessment tools. Before making our own, we want to learn from previous projects what doesand does not work in existing assessment tools with a critical lens. Often, the tests currently usedin literature and the subsequent course or curriculum appear to result in score gains of studentsafter the intervention [3]. We are questioning whether this could be a result of the test notaccurately capturing the spatial visualization skills initially, whether this reflects ceiling/flooreffect in statistical data analyses, or if gains

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) Technical Session 13

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Grace Burleson, University of Michigan; Kathleen H. Sienko, University of Michigan; Kentaro Toyama, University of Michigan

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

refining during the later stages oftheir design processes. Meanwhile, professional participants often reflected on ways theynarrowed down their target context and target users and acknowledged settings in which theirsolutions should not be implemented. For example, one participant described: “There's such a vast diversity of context that patients receive care…it is an extremely complex and varying group…I mean there are lots of cases where [this product] either can't or shouldn't be used.”- Professional participant C4.2.2 Characterization of LMIC contexts Experienced designers acknowledged more nuance and differences across differentLMICs and within them than students. In general, student participants used terms like “low-resource

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) Technical Session 7

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tyler Carter Kreipke, CSC, University of Notre Dame; Kerry Meyers, University of Notre Dame

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

majors [3]. This reflects an influence of self-efficacy on career choice. Self-efficacycan influence students at the beginning of their studies in selecting their major and at thecompletion of their studies by increasing their perceived career options [6]. Finally, self-efficacyis also associated with better mental health in students, specifically seen in reduced anxietylevels in students with higher self-efficacy [7].Clearly, the beneficial practices and traits associated with self-efficacy indicate it as a desiredcharacteristic in students. However, self-efficacy is not simply a static personal attribute thatshould be selected for in admissions processes. It is, rather, a dynamic quality, the cultivation ofwhich should be a central aim of

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) Technical Session 11

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Glenda T. Kelly, Duke University; Joshua Granek, Duke University; Claudia K. Gunsch, Duke University; Joseph L. Graves Jr., North Carolina A&T State University; David Singleton, Duke University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

designed to address this training gap and transcendcommunication barriers between disciplines while promoting team science through creation ofan integrated inter-disciplinary educational model that reflects rapid advances in microbiomeresearch and the need for both interdisciplinary research and professional skills to address thesechallenges [6]. This paper reports on the evaluation of this project over five years with a focuson challenges identified in training graduate students with different entry level skills and acrossdisciplines. Strategies and training elements implemented to successfully address thesechallenges were made possible through close collaboration between the evaluation team andproject leadership who were highly responsive to

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) Technical Session 13

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Megan Hammond, University of Indianapolis; Kenneth Reid, University of Indianapolis; Stephen J. Spicklemire, University of Indianapolis; Joseph B. Herzog, University of Indianapolis; Suranga Dharmarathne, University of Indianapolis; David Olawale, University of Indianapolis; Najmus Saqib, University of Indianapolis; Christopher M. Stanley; George D. Ricco, University of Indianapolis

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

also the president and founder of Valgotech LLC, a company that was awarded the highly competitive Small Business Technology Transfer and Research (STTR) Phase 2 grant by the National Science Foundation (NSF) to develop advanced Lithium Sulfur batteries for drones and other applications.Dr. Najmus Saqib, University of Indianapolis Najmus Saqib is an Assistant Professor in the R.B. Annis School of Engineering at the University of In- dianapolis (UIndy). Saqib received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Colorado School of Mines (CSM), focusing on ”Optical Diagnostics of Lithium-Sulfur and Lithium-Ion Battery Electrolytes using Attenuated Total Reflection Infrared Spectroscopy”. He likes to use innovative

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Katherine Drinkwater, Duke University; Charlotte Sendek; Allison N Stocks, Duke University; Paula Kworekwa; Julius Mugaga; Robert Tamale Ssekitoleko; Ann Saterbak, Duke University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

Duke studentstravel with Duke faculty for eight weeks over the summer to work with local nonprofits (Figure11). They worked in integrated Duke-Makerere teams to identify gaps in healthcare delivery thatcould be solved with the creation of a biomedical device. Prototyping was done in theDesignCube with occasional help from local craftsmen.Assessment and Initial ObservationsDuke DesignCubeSix teams that worked in the DesignCube completed a reflection survey about their initialimpressions of the space (Appendix C). This includes four EGR 101 (first-year design) teams,one independent study design team (four undergraduate students), and one research project(undergraduates, graduate students, and two faculty). This is a preliminary tool to gauge how

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) Technical Session 11

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Charlotte Marr de Vries, Pennsylvania State University, Behrend College

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

theirdesigns during the judgment-free "Concept Generation Phase." In the next phase of the game,"Concept Selection and Debate," they must argue with their teammates to select the best designto submit for their fictional group project. The twist of the game is that the initial bias of students–which design they would like the team to submit– as well as their personality –the method thatthey use to argue– are both determined by randomly dealt cards. This causes the students to stepoutside of their comfort zone and internally reflect on how they argue their opinions normallyversus how others might make a similar argument. In the "Grading" phase of the game, the teamreceives a score based on if they were able to receive a majority or total consensus. The

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) Technical Session 5

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew Lucian Alexander P.E., Texas A&M University - Kingsville; Michael Preuss, Exquiri Consulting, LLC; Breanna Michelle Weir Bailey P.E., Texas A&M University - Kingsville; David Hicks, Texas A&M University-Kingsville ; Rajashekar Reddy Mogiligidda, Texas A&M University - Kingsville; Velda Basak Soydas; Lihua Zuo

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

wasrepresentative of the cohort and that the outcomes can be treated as an accurate reflection ofthe participants’ opinions. Confidence intervals for the surveys were all lower than 3.5% at a95% level of confidence.In each year, the pre-participation response sets facilitate “a consideration of the knowledgebase of the CC transfer students in the summer bridge program as the students were asked torate their level of experience” [22] with as many as 27 different topics. “A ten-point scale wasused and informants were instructed to submit a rating of zero for ‘no experience/ability’ and arating of ten for being ‘well informed/very capable’ in the area” [22]. “The responses facilitateda rank ordering of ratings by topic, with the highest mean as the primary

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) Technical Session 10

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shannon Barker, University of Virginia; Jessica Taggart, University of Virginia

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

visualization of both a low-fidelity and a high- Week 8 testing fidelity prototype, and a plan for how field testing might be carried out. summary Outline of pitch Included an outline for each deliverable, using the rubrics as guides Week 9 and proposal Practice pitch A run through of the oral pitches for the class and the teaching team Week 10Finally, at the end of the project, each student wrote a personal reflection and completed apeer evaluation of each team member. The personal reflection assignment asked each studentto describe what was learned during the project and why it was significant for them. Promptquestions around the design process itself were used as a guide to help students focus theirreflection

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) Technical Session 5

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kavitha Chandra, University of Massachusetts Lowell; Sumudu Lewis, University of Massachusetts Lowell; Susan Thomson Tripathy, University of Massachusetts Lowell

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

Chapter 7 (Collaborate) Students draw “core valuealigning core values with Chapter 8 (Align actions with trees” to identify and reflect onactions; key-takeaways from Goals and Values) their core values and align withthe workshop series actions (adaptation of B.Carr’s “Live your Core Values” exercise [25]). The workshop series concludes with a spontaneous talent show and

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) Technical Session 1

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ibukunoluwa Eunice Salami, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Logan Andrew Perry, University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

their designs before they are built in a real-world experiment because they can makeaccurate conclusions from 3D prototypes [33]. This can reduce issues that are being caused bynot having enough foresight of the engineering development process ahead of implementation.Future WorkAllowing students to experience and master situations that reflect real life is the core goal ofauthentic learning. According to some academics, emerging technologies are particularly adeptat supporting inquiry-based learning environments by developing "genuine" science learningenvironments and, perhaps more significantly, by involving students in scientific inquiry [34].The capacity of augmented reality (AR) technology to engage students and create a setting forgenuine

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) Technical Session 13

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nancy Ruzycki, University of Florida

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

weaknesses for the design process and that fullermore complete LCA are built out through use of multiple tools with differing sustainabilityinformation and focus areas.Student teams were expected to send in weekly reports to document progress on the project as wellas use the project management website to track progress for the project, shown in Figure 7. Thepurpose of the reports was to create reflective practices in students and ensure they were on trackfor project completion.Figure 7. Example student team weekly report snapshot. Students list the group members, the goalsfor the week, and the accomplishment and time contributions of each member towards those goals.The end of the document (not shown) lists the tasks/goals for the upcoming

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) Technical Session 9

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lauren Taylor Wagner, The Ohio State University ; Tyler Milburn, The Ohio State University; Krista M. Kecskemety, The Ohio State University; Bob Rhoads, The Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

. A. LeMasney, H. M. Shuster, and K. Mallouk, “First-year engineering students’ interpretation of curiosity in the entrepreneurial mindset through reflective practice,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2020. doi: 10.18260/1-2--34678.[5] F. Hassan, A. Ammar, and H. J. LeBlanc, “Entrepreneurial Mindset Learning (EML) Activities in a Digital Logic Course,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2022.[6] J. Kadlowec, M. Amadoro, and A. Osta, “A Statics and Dynamics Project Infusing Entrepreneurial Mindset,” in ASEE North Central Section Conference, 2021.[7] Engineering Unleashed, “What is KEEN?” https://engineeringunleashed.com/what-is- keen

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) Technical Session 13

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cecelia Kinane, University of Michigan; Kaitlin Tyler PhD, ANSYS, Inc.; Alan Taub; Abdon Pena-Francesch

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

presentation anddistilled into a poster presentation. These presentations allow for reflection on how the projecthas developed over the course of the semester, reiterating the importance of holisticconsideration in design decision-making. Students have the opportunity to present theirsemester’s work and improve their communication skills through an open poster session for thedepartment, and received feedback from faculty, undergraduate and graduate students external tothe course.Student Feedback and Course OutcomesThis restructured Sustainable Materials Design course has been delivered for two years, withimprovements in course content, structure, and assignments towards SDG-centered projectsbased on student feedback. Additionally, students were given

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) Technical Session 9

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Pamela L. Dickrell, University of Florida; Estefany Soto, University of Central Arkansas; Louis S. Nadelson, University of Central Arkansas

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

survey. Examining and coding the 392open-ended responses from students allowed for research analysis based on the frequency ofcodes. Reading all open-ended responses allowed for course development faculty reflection onhow the current peer mentors are, or are not, helping students develop confidence in their roles.AnalysisQuantitative Data. Given the constraint of not having a control group or pre-post scores forcomparison, we determined that the best way to analyze our data was descriptively. Ourquantitative data consisted of the frequencies for the five levels of our three Likert scale items.Thus, our analysis focused on calculations of central tendency and variation to report our datadescriptively.Qualitative Data. We analyzed our qualitative

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) Technical Session 14

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Donna Jaison, Texas A&M University; Hillary E. Merzdorf, Texas A&M University; Lance Leon Allen White, Texas A&M University; Kerrie A. Douglas, Cornell University; Karan Watson P.E., Texas A&M University; Tracy Anne Hammond, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

news sources. Hammond is dedicated to diversity and equity, which is reflected in her publications, research, teaching, service, and mentoring. More at http://srl.tamu.edu and http://ieei.tamu.edu. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 An Insight into User Experiences of an Intelligent Tutoring System to Learn Sketching Skills Donna Jaison Dr. Hillary Merzdorf Lance White Dr. Kerrie Douglas Dr. Karan Watson P.E. Dr. Tracy HammondAbstractSketching is a valuable skill for many engineering students to support the development of variousauxiliary skills such as refined spatial visualization, problem-solving

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) Technical Session 14

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alexander R. Murphy, University of Texas at Dallas; Abigail Susan Whittle; Katherine Fu, Georgia Institute of Technology; Julie S. Linsey, Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

AmericanSociety for Engineering Education. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation.REFERENCES [1] T. Kösa and F. Karakuş, “The Effects of Computer-Aided Design Software on Engineering Students’ Spatial Visualisation Skills,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 296–308, 2018, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2017.1370578. [2] S. P. Dow, K. Heddleston, and S. R. Klemmer, “The Efficacy of Prototyping Under Time Constraints,” in Proceedings of the seventh ACM conference on Creativity and cognition, 2009, pp. 165–174. [3] B. A. Camburn, D. Jensen, R

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) Technical Session 7

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sonia Travaglini, Stanford University; Sheri D. Sheppard, Stanford University; Helen L. Chen, Stanford University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

’ programs.DiscussionThe self-efficacy survey findings suggest that students increased their engineering skills whileusing the kits to complete their space ‘missions’, which was also reflected by the student teams’final presentations successfully demonstrating their completed nano-satellite systems operationand capabilities. To further understand the findings, word clouds (Figure 8) were created fromstudents’ responses to the open-ended survey questions in order to get a general impression ofhow students felt the kits and tools engaged them in their learning experiences. Figure 8: Pre-course (left) and post-course (right) word cloud of student responses to the question “How do you think the nano-satellite kit will support/supported your learning?”The pre

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) Technical Session 2

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Corey James Kado, Florida Polytechnic University; Elisabeth Kames, Florida Polytechnic University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)