was run to examine if LCDLMs offered differentialbenefits or effects based on the gender of participants. Four modes of engagement were assessed:Interactive, constructive, active, and passive scores. Participants were grouped by their gender:male and female. First, we checked preliminary assumptions, and results revealed that data wasnormally distributed, as assessed by inspecting the Normal Q-Q plots. There were no univariateand multivariate outliers, as assessed by boxplot; there were linear relationships, as evaluated byscatterplot, and no multicollinearity; and variance-covariance matrices were homogeneous, asassessed by Box’s test of equality of covariance matrices (p = 0.473); variances werehomogeneous, as assessed by Levene’s Test of
, vol. 104, p. 197–214, 2019.[15] A. Pedro, Q. T. Le and C. S. Park, "Framework for integrating safety into construction methods education through interactive virtual reality," Journal of professional issues in engineering education and practice, vol. 142, p. 04015011, 2016.[16] Q. T. Le, A. Pedro and C. S. Park, "A social virtual reality based construction safety education system for experiential learning," Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, vol. 79, p. 487–506, 2015.[17] C. Boton, "Supporting constructability analysis meetings with Immersive Virtual Reality- based collaborative BIM 4D simulation," Automation in Construction, vol. 96, p. 1–15, 2018.[18] R. Sacks, J. Whyte, D. Swissa, G
) introduce the website interface/functionality/moduledesign and what optimization (or testing) techniques did the team use in 2 minutes; 3) brieflydemonstrate the workflow of the website in 1.5 minutes. Each team has a Q&A section wherethey can answer questions from other students and assessors.We invited three evaluators to grade students’ projects, including two females and one male. Theevaluators have had at least 3 years of experience working as full stack/back-end web developers.They were asked to grade the students’ presentations from five aspects: 1) the novelty of the idea;2) the technical depth; 3) the website’s design; 4) the presentation; and 5) the Q&A session. Thefinal grade for each team was 25 points, which was evenly divided
: Theme 3: Theme 4: Engineering Interactions 1 Interactions 2 Active Learning (Problem solving) (Office hours) (Q&A) (Experiential)While the importance of interactions between students and instructors is a critical element ofundergraduate education that is common to all fields and disciplines, the remaining two topicsthat emerged from topic modelling were more specific to engineering. Topic 1 emphasizedstudent preferences for more problem-solving time and practice with TAs. This relates directly tothe theme of problem-solving which is highlighted by the ABET (accreditation board forengineering and technology) student outcome #1: “an ability to identify
,” presented at the 39th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Antonio, TX, USA, Oct. 18-21, 2009. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/5350571.[18] J. M. Holland, D. A. Major, and K. A. Orvis, “Understanding how peer mentoring and capitalization link STEM students to their majors,” Career Dev. Q., vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 343-354, Dec. 2012, doi: 10.1002/j.2161-0045.2012.00026.x.[19] A. R. Rockinson-Szapkiw and J. L. Wendt, “The benefits and challenges of a blended peer mentoring program for women peer mentors in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM),” Int. J. Mentor. and Coach. Educ., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1-16, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1108/IJMCE-03-2020-0011.[20
a problem. And then we'd have five minutes of takeoff and review, and just like have the professor solve the problem for us. So I thought that kept me really engaged in the class, I never fell asleep in that class. (ST5)Qualitative student survey data also reported a number of aspects of teaching practices thatengineering students found effective. For example, instructor availability, easy access to coursematerials, well-presented lectures, and take-home assessments were mentioned in the followingcomments in the student survey. [In response to the question on teaching practices that helped them learn effectively.] Instructor making themselves available after lecture for Q&A: served similar function to
modeling and simulation of emergent behavior in air transportation,” Complex Adaptive Systems Modeling, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–26, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.1186/2194-3206-1-15/FIGURES/10.[7] E. Z. Berglund and M. Asce, “Using Agent-Based Modeling for Water Resources Planning and Management,” J Water Resour Plan Manag, vol. 141, no. 11, p. 04015025, May 2015, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000544.[8] Q. Huang, D. C. Parker, T. Filatova, and S. Sun, “A review of urban residential choice models using agent-based modeling,” vol. 41, pp. 661–689, 2014, doi: 10.1068/b120043p.[9] M. W. Macy and R. Willer, “FROM FACTORS TO ACTORS: Computational Sociology and Agent-Based Modeling,” Annu. Rev. Sociol, vol. 28, pp. 143–66, 2002
learning communities- Understanding the role of collaborative work in an undergraduate engineering program.Learning Sciences 1. Goleman, D., McKee, A., & Waytz, A. (2017). Empathy (HBR emotional intelligence series) 2. Ickes, W. (1993). Empathic Accuracy. 3. Kvalsund, R., Baardsen, B., & Allgood, E. (2016). Mindfulness Subjectivity through Q Methodology: Training and Practising Mindfulness in an Educational Program as Influential and Transformative. 4. Lebuda, I., Zabelina, D. L., & Karwowski, M. (2016). Mind full of ideas: A meta- analysis of the mindfulness–creativity link. 5. Oxley, J. (2011). The Moral Dimensions of Empathy Limits and Applications in Ethical Theory and Practice
disciplines, CBE—Life Sciences Education, 19(3), ar46, 2020.[18] C. S. Dweck, “Mindset: The new psychology of success,” Random House, 2006.[19] R. W. Hass, J. Katz-Buonincontro, and R. Reiter-Palmon, “Disentangling creative mindsets from creative self- efficacy and creative identity: Do people hold fixed and growth theories of creativity?” Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(4), 436, 2016.[20] K. Schumann, J. Zaki, and C.S. Dweck, “Addressing the empathy deficit: beliefs about the malleability of empathy predict effortful responses when empathy is challenging,” Journal of Personality and social psychology, 107(3), 475, 2014.[21] Q. Cutts, E. Cutts, S. Draper, P. O'Donnell, and P. Saffrey
eprotocol utilized in this publication Ide f Determine scope of project and focus Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria for search[7]. As shown in Figure 1, the Re ea ch Q e Determine relevant sources ofproposed protocol includes five ScR Ide f literature References for Study
, “Exploring Agency in Capstone Design Problem Framing,” Studies in Engineering Education, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 96, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.21061/see.69.[4] X. Du, A. Lundberg, M. Ayari, K. K. Naji, and A. Hawari, “Examining engineering students’ perceptions of learner agency enactment in problem- and project-based learning using Q methodology,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 111, no. 1, pp. 111–136, 2022.[5] M. Wilson-fetrow, V. Svihla, S. Wettstein, J. Brown, and E. Chi, “Consequential Agency in Chemical Engineering Laboratory Courses,” in American Society of Engineering Education Conference Proceedings, Minneapolis, MN, 2022.[6] R. A. Engle and F. R. Conant, “Guiding Principles for Fostering Productive
://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.217[7] Li, C. Q. (2021). Teaching mechatronics to non-traditional mechanical engineering students- an adaptive approach. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 11(3), 4-20. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v11i3.15833[8] Craig, K. (2001). Is anything really new in mechatronics education? IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine 8(2), 12-19. https://doi.org/10.1109/100.932752.[9] National Science Foundation Award https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1935708
Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, 4th ed. SAGE Publications, 2021.[23] V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qual. Res. Psychol., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, Jan. 2006, doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.[24] A. Loignon, “RIEF Project Advisory Board Meeting,” Aug. 17, 2022.[25] P. P. Shah, R. S. Peterson, S. L. Jones, and A. J. Ferguson, “Things Are Not Always What They Seem: The Origins and Evolution of Intragroup Conflict,” Adm. Sci. Q., vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 426–474, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1177/0001839220965186.[26] A. Loignon and S. Wormington, “Psychologically Safe for Some, but Not All? The Downsides of Assuming Shared Psychological Safety among Senior Leadership Teams,” Center for Creative
principle used to solve. Table 1 Fundamental Engineering Principlesa) Section The ability of an object to resist stress is proportional to its A = ∫dA Properties area (A), first moment of area (Q), and second moment of Q = ∫y·dA area or moment of inertia (I). Ixx = ∫y2·dAb) Static Sum of all forces on object, part, or
response. 𝑝𝑝: 𝑝𝑝 value of a Mann Whitney U-testcomparing pre- and post-survey distributions. Bias: Noting if the result was significant betweenpre- and post-survey responses and that the distribution does not appear to have acquiescencebias. 3.a. Responses from Hispanic/Latino(a) Population Pre-survey Response Post-survey Response Q. Mode Med. 𝜎𝜎 𝑓𝑓 Skew Mode Med. 𝜎𝜎 𝑓𝑓 Skew 𝑝𝑝 Bias 1 4 4 1.14 0.48 -1.23 5 5 0.80 0.65 -2.06 0.004 Yes 2 1 2 1.19 0.13 0.45 1 1 1.41 0.54 1.32 0.314 3 5 5 0.67 0.83 -3.27 5 5 0.32 0.88 -2.48 0.526 4 4
Education: The Need for a Plurality of Perspectives on Disability,” Remedial Spec. Educ., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 267–278, Jul. 2011.[49] T. Shakespeare and Others, “The social model of disability,” The disability studies reader, vol. 2, pp. 197–204, 2006.[50] R. R. Grinker, “Autism, ‘Stigma,’ Disability: A Shifting Historical Terrain,” Curr. Anthropol., vol. 61, no. S21, pp. S55–S67, Feb. 2020.[51] J. C. Sarrett, “Biocertification and Neurodiversity: the Role and Implications of Self- Diagnosis in Autistic Communities,” Neuroethics, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 23–36, Apr. 2016.[52] Robertson and Ne’eman, “Autistic acceptance, the college campus, and technology: Growth of neurodiversity in society and academia,” Disabil. Stud. Q., 2008
. Svarovsky, C. Smith, V. Núñez, and A. Douglass, “Head Start on Engineering: Supporting engineering interest development in early childhood for low-income families,” Hands On! Magazine, vol. Fall, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://www.terc.edu/hands-on-magazine-fall-2019/[36] R. E. Stake, Multiple case study analysis. New York: The Guilford Press, 2006.[37] R. K. Yin, Case study research and applications: Design and methods, 6th ed. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, 2018.[38] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2015.[39] K. Charmaz, Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2006.[40] S. A. Pattison et al
materials for free on the lab’s website and expand our offeredlanguages to include other minority language populations in Boston, such as Portuguese, CapeVerdean Creole, and Mandarin Chinese. We hope that by offering multilingual opportunities toaccess complex engineering systems through play, students will see ways that they can affecttheir local community issues and exhibit changed mindsets about who can call themselves anengineer.Supplementary MaterialsThe public version of the English/Spanish prototype of Next Stop! is available at this link:https://sites.tufts.edu/marvez/2022/12/13/next-stop-teaching-transit-engineering-through-board-games/Sources[1] Q. Wang and M. Abbas, “Designing web-games for transportation engineering education
learning environment: A qualitative exploration of computer science classrooms,” Computer Science Education, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 119–145, Jun. 2004, doi: 10.1080/08993400412331363853.[18] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice, 4th edition. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc, 2014.[19] T. J. Lund et al., “The best of both worlds: Building on the COPUS and RTOP observation protocols to easily and reliably measure various levels of reformed instructional practice,” LSE, vol. 14, no. 2, p. ar18, Jun. 2015, doi: 10.1187/cbe.14-10-0168.[20] M. Piburn and D. Sawada, “Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP) Reference Manual. Technical
at the 2023 Collaborative Network for Computing and EngineeringDiversity (CoNECD), Feb. 2023.[9] J. Martin and S. Newton, “Uncovering Forms of Wealth and Capital Using AssetFrameworks in Engineering Education,” in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & ExpositionProceedings, New Orleans, Louisiana: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2016, p. 27087. doi:10.18260/p.27087.[10] S. L. Dika, M. A. Pando, B. Q. Tempest, and M. E. Allen, “Examining the CulturalWealth of Underrepresented Minority Engineering Persisters,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ.Pract., vol. 144, no. 2, p. 05017008, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000358.[11] K. A. Renn and K. D. Arnold, “Reconceptualizing Research on College Student PeerCulture,” The Journal of Higher Education, vol. 74
watch as additional learning material, however students found them to beoverwhelming and they were not aligned with the textbook available although they both coveredthe same topics.The second course was also taught online , but then OER was offered as a resource.Instructions were still given in class but students could use the OER platform as a resource if theyneeded to. The third course was taught in-person using a combination of OER and flippedclassroom. Students were supposed to watch lectures before coming to class and class time wasused for class activities, quizzes, and problem solving through Q&A.These courses were taught by the same instructor, the author of this article. Although thisperformance assessment study was done by the
reforming a capstone design course.” Higher Engineering Education Research, (1), pp. 132-137, 2012.[32] B. K. Wan, Q. Li, C. M. Yang, and B. S. Ding, “Team Work: A Good Form to Cultivate Innovation Ability and Team Spirit.,” Higher Engineering Education Research, (2), pp. 83-84, 2004.
18:56:09, 2022, doi: 10.1186/s40594-022-00347-x.[13] S. Swartz, B. Barbosa, and I. Crawford, “Building intercultural competence through virtual team collaboration across global classrooms,” Bus. Prof. Commun. Q., vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 57–79, 2020.[14] P.-S. D. Chen, A. D. Lambert, and K. R. Guidry, “Engaging online learners: The impact of Web-based learning technology on college student engagement,” Comput. Educ., vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 1222–1232, 2010.[15] C. C. Robinson and H. Hullinger, “New benchmarks in higher education: Student engagement in online learning,” J. Educ. Bus., vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 101–109, 2008.[16] X. Du and A. Kolmos, “Increasing the diversity of engineering education–a gender analysis in a PBL
an Essential Construct and an Essential Way of Life,” J Psychoeduc Assess, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 3–36, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1177/07342829211057640.[33] N. K. Schlossberg, A. Q. Lynch, and A. W. Chickering, Improving higher education environments for adults: Responsive programs and services from entry to departure. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1989.[34] D. Baskerville, “Mattering; changing the narrative in secondary schools for youth who truant,” J Youth Stud, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 834–849, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1080/13676261.2020.1772962.[35] B. Giangrasso, S. Casale, G. Fioravanti, G. L. Flett, and T. Nepon, “Mattering and Anti- Mattering in Emotion Regulation and Life Satisfaction: A Mediational
, “The Conflict-Handling Modes: Toward More Precise Theory,” Manag. Commun. Q., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 430–436, Feb. 1988, doi: 10.1177/0893318988001003009.[11] R. R. Blake, J. S. Mouton, L. B. Barnes, and L. E. Greiner, “Breakthrough in Organization Development,” 1964.[12] “Self-Assessment: Dutch Test for Conflict Handling.”[13] T. A. O’Neill, N. J. Allen, and S. E. Hastings, “Examining the ‘Pros’ and ‘Cons’ of Team Conflict: A Team-Level Meta-Analysis of Task, Relationship, and Process Conflict,” Hum. Perform., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 236–260, 2013, doi: 10.1080/08959285.2013.795573.[14] M. Borrego, J. Karlin, L. D. McNair, and K. Beddoes, “Team effectiveness theory from industrial and organizational psychology
’ metacognition during an engineering design project,” Perform. Improv. Q., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 117–136, 2010.[21] Í. O’Sullivan, “Enhancing a process-oriented approach to literacy and language learning: The role of corpus consultation literacy,” ReCALL, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 269–286, 2007.[22] C. D. Troy, R. R. Essig, B. K. Jesiek, J. Boyd, and N. T. Buswell, “Writing to learn engineering: Identifying effective techniques for the integration of written communication into engineering classes and curricula (NSF RIGEE project),” in 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2014, p. 24.1406. 1-24.1406. 19.[23] H. Steenkamp, A. L. Nel, and J. Carroll, “Retention of engineering students,” in 2017 ieee global engineering education
and JCP articles from 1988 to 1997: A methodological review. The Journal of Experimental Education, 69(3), 280–309.Li, Q., McCoach, D. B., Swaminathan, H., & Tang, J. (2008). Development of an instrument to measure perspectives of engineering education among college students. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(1), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2008.tb00953.xMalmi, L., Adawi, T., Curmi, R., de Graaff, E., Duffy, G., Kautz, C., Kinnunen, P., & Williams, B. (2018). How authors did it – a methodological analysis of recent engineering education research papers in the European Journal of Engineering Education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 43(2), 171–189. https
Conference & Exposition, 2011, p. 22.1656. 1- 22.1656. 15. doi: 10.18260/1-2--18492.[27] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications, 2014.[28] J. W. Creswell and T. C. Guetterman, Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research . New York, US. Pearson, 2019.
. for Eng. Educ., Washington, DC., USA, 2020.[34] M. Correll, D. Albers, S. Franconeri, and M. Gleicher, “Comparing averages in time series data,” in Proc. of the SIGCHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2012, pp. 1095–1104.[35] G. Affleck, A. Zautra, H. Tennen, and S. Armeli, “Multilevel daily process designs for consulting and clinical psychology: a preface for the perplexed.,” J. of Consulting and Clinical Psychol., vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 746-754, 1999, doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.67.5.746.[36] A. T. Jebb, L. Tay, W. Wang, and Q. Huang, “Time series analysis for psychological research: Examining and forecasting change,” Frontiers in Psychol, vol. 6: 727, pp. 1-24, June 2015, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00727[37