entrepreneurship education program at the university. Throughexploratory factor analysis, the ESE-E demonstrated a 7-factor solution. Factors includedproduct ideation, business planning, customer discovery, team and network formation, ideapitch, people and human resources, and finance. Additionally, correlational analysesdemonstrated that these seven factors were related to each other positively. This means that ifstudents are confident about one entrepreneurial-related skill described in this instrument, theyare likely to feel confident about other entrepreneurial-related skills described in the instrument.Further and interestingly, students with a growth creative mindset tended to have high self-efficacy for product ideation, team formation, and people
Paper ID #38601A Measure of Inventive Mindset for Use in K-12 Engineering and InventionEducationDr. Joanna K. Garner, Old Dominion University Dr. Garner is the Executive Director and a Research Professor at The Center for Educational Partnerships, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA.Dr. Melissa G. Kuhn, Old Dominion University Melissa G. Kuhn, Ph.D., is an education specialist at the Center for Educational Partnerships.Jayme M. CellitiociMatthew Carter ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 A Measure of Inventive Mindset for Use in K-12 Engineering and Invention Education
,engineering ability, and entrepreneurial ability) and examine beliefs about general intelligencefor triangulation to explore whether general intelligence might globally influence the beliefs inthe other three domains.Teaching ability: Several researchers have examined the teaching ability of instructors throughthe lens of growth and fixed mindset aiming to encourage faculty to develop a growth mindset.For example, Frondozo et al. [26] tested a hypothesis that similar to the growth and fixedmindsets associated with intelligence, there would be growth and fixed mindsets related toteaching ability. Their study revealed that a growth mindset about one's teaching abilitypositively predicted greater work engagement mediated by enjoyment. Other studies have
scholarship of teaching and learning in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). More specifically, her current engineering education interests include entrepreneurial mindsets, user-centered design, project-based learning, and broadening participation in STEM particularly for populations historically underrepresented in STEM fields. As a teacher-scholar, Dr. Hargrove-Leak is passionate about applying what she learns in her re- search in the classroom, while mentoring undergraduates in research projects driven by their personal and professional interests, and in service in the local community to get young people excited about STEM. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023
Paper ID #36871Narrative Inquiry in Engineering Education: A Systematic Literature Re-viewMs. Alexandra Mary Jackson, Rowan University Alexandra Jackson is a second year PhD student at Rowan University seeking a specialization in Engi- neering Education. She began her research in Rowan’s Experiential Engineering Education Department in the Fall of 2019, and has developed interests in entrepreneurial mindset and student development. In particular, she is interested in assessment of entrepreneurial mindset through quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods, and is currently working in survey, concept map, and narrative
University Alexandra Jackson is a second year PhD student at Rowan University seeking a specialization in Engi- neering Education. She began her research in Rowan’s Experiential Engineering Education Department in the Fall of 2019, and has developed interests in entrepreneurial mindset and student development. In particular, she is interested in assessment of entrepreneurial mindset through both quantitative and quali- tative methods, and is currently working in both survey and concept map assessment. She was awarded an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship in April, 2022, and hopes to continue her research in entrepreneurial mindset assessment using narrative inquiry.Dr. Cheryl A. Bodnar, Rowan University Dr. Bodnar is an
. Structured deliverables provideguidance as to what elements of a design process may be appropriate to move through theengineering design process. The scaffolding to emphasize prototyping and adoption of aprototyping mindset may help as a pedagogical tool [33]. Artifacts that are created in thesecourses reflect tangible evidence of activity. From the idea to realization, there are means todescribe the role, purpose, and creation of prototypes. Gerber & Carroll [19] describe theconnection and process of prototype creation. Houde & Hill [20] discuss different types ofprototypes as what do prototypes prototype (function, looks-like). Makerspaces also provideadditional context for the tools, mindsets, and community of practice [21-23, 11].Design
6. Wamsler, C., & Brink, E. (2018). Mindsets for sustainability: Exploring the link between mindfulness and sustainable climate adaptation.Design Sciences 1. Devecchi, A., & Guerrini, L. (2017). Empathy and Design. A new perspective. 2. Hess, J. L., & Fila, N. D. (2016). The manifestation of empathy within design: findings from a service-learning course. 3. Kolko, J. (2014). Well-designed: How to Use Empathy to Create Products People Love. 4. Kouprie, M., & Visser, F. S. (2009). A framework for empathy in design: Stepping into and out of the user’s life. 5. Li, J., & Hölttä-Otto, K. (2022). Inconstant Empathy—Interpersonal Factors That Influence the Incompleteness of User Understanding
confidence was critical for this participant: I think I just got the hang of it…I was like “Oh, maybe I can do this” because it seems my skills are up to par now…it was more like I knew that my skills weren’t there [initially] to be able to pursue AI/ML. But then afterwards once I had those skills because I was forced to [develop them] from the engineering curriculum, I realized that I could do it...However, for some, perseverance was not enough to develop these skills. The following individualrecognized their perseverance and growth mindset, but felt it wasn’t enough: I felt like I’ve been around people who I feel like have this better natural ability than I do, but I’m willing to like to put in the time and effort to try to do
the classroom,” Support for Learning, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 140-147, 2001.[30]. L. S. Vygotsky, “Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes,” Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.[31]. E. Hmelo-Silver, “Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn?,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 16, no. 3, pp.235-266, 2004.[32]. L. Liu, J. A. Mynderse, A. L. Gerhart, and S. Arslan, “Fostering the entrepreneurial mindset in the junior and senior mechanical engineer curriculum with multi-course problem-based learning experience,” In Proc. FIE 2015: The 45th Annual Frontiers in Education (FIE) Conference, pp. 1-5,.2015.[33]. J. W. Creswell, And W. Zhang, “The application
align with the researchresults in Venkatesh, Fong, and Yeter [44], where researchers investigate how engineeringundergraduates consider ethics within their engineering courses. Similarly, Venkatesh et al.incorporated the EDIPT model to guide students through a newly designed engineeringcourse [45]. Findings show that most students were fixated on professionalism and client-centered responsibility, such as meeting customers’ requirements via problem-solving. Thus,it is evident that the EDIPT model is highly relevant in Asia as the concept and problem-solving mindset embedded in the model align with the existing skillset and critical thinkingskills of the students in Singapore.In the Western context, American scholars have utilized a case study