find efficient solutionsto the problem. When this logical sequence of steps or instructions are developed to form aneffective procedure, this process can be automated to solve similar problems. Debugging refersto identifying and fixing errors in the algorithm, both during the development of the algorithmand when students attempt to transfer the algorithm to a new context. Iteration is the process ofrevisiting effective algorithms to improve their efficiency until an optimum state is reached.Generalization occurs when the algorithms and CT skills are transferred to effectively addressproblems in other domains. Because iteration and generalization require the problem context toallow sufficient time for reflection and modification of the solution
theteaching and learning of a physics course through the students' perception. The modifiedILD has the same three stages as the original ILD, with two main differences in whoperforms the experiment and when it is performed. Specifically, the three phases in themodified ILD are 1) predict, 2) experiment (by students working in groups, not theinstructor), and 3) reflect (in groups, not individually). The first phase, prediction, beginswith the analysis of a physical situation in which students have to predict the behavior ofthe situation based on the knowledge imparted in the session by the instructor. This occursat the end of the instructor's exposition. The second phase occurs in the laboratory sectionof the course and relates to students' experience
8-week intervention period. The survey collected their perceptions regardingan innovative teaching method used for the laboratory course. The pre-and-post comparisonallows for contrasting student opinions in three main areas: type of instruction, teachingstrategies, and student response to the instruction. The study presents some of the laboratoryactivities' outcomes and limitations. One specific activity, the capacitor discharge experiment,will be thoroughly discussed to compare the traditional physical setup with the technology-basedversion. Findings highlight the pros and cons of the teaching method used and reflect on what hasbeen learned. It also suggests potential next steps for further improvement.Keywords: Physics laboratory course
initiative to comprehend and buildmore in-depth information and skills needed for scientific applications. Hence, an undergraduatecourse should incorporate applied laboratory implementation applications. As such, educators areresponsible for ensuring that students acquire a strong sense of learning motivation and scientificinquiry skills [12]. School laboratories are a crucial part of any STEM education. They enhancestudents’ engagement in a variety of experimental learning skills, such as conception andexperimentation followed by reflection, analysis, and data interpretation. Establishing the worthof the laboratory equipment in the department is crucial before starting a comparison of labmodalities. Topics in the laboratory manual for Introduction
pandemic, the projectwas not evaluated. In 2022, the “evaluation laboratory” tool of Open LMS was added to theproject in design thinking methodology. Using this tool, students can submit the initial seminarplanning to be evaluated by teachers and at the same time do peer review of other groupsactivities. They can ask questions and make reflections about other groups activities sodeveloping critical thinking during this process before submitting the final seminarpresentation. The project has attended expectations, resulting in better academic performance,as well as contributing to the development of the competencies and skills that were aimed tobe developed.IntroductionThe Physics subject is applied to the First-Year students of the Engineering
smartphone's location, which can be used for a variety of purposes such asmaps, tracking, and location-based services.A special feature of these physical data recorded by the internal sensors, however, is that theycan be used beyond their actual purpose with the help of additional programs, so-called apps.This makes it possible to carry out both qualitative and quantitative experiments in a widerange of subject areas, especially in physics. Smartphones thus represent small, transportablemeasurement laboratories. The project presented in this paper focuses on the latter point, inwhich the sensors installed in smartphones are used to carry out quantitative experiments. Themain advantages of the devices are to be exploited, which are reflected in their
energy from a basketball backboard, the decision to use piezoelectricgenerators, otherwise known as buzzers, was made shortly after. There were multiple ideas forhow to attach the generators to the board as well as where to place them. The original paperprototype contained three panels of four buzzers each (Figure 1). However, after research into thesizes and ability of the buzzers, the decision was made to construct fewer sensors per panel and totailor the number of panels required to the specific system. Scoreboards that required a higherinput of energy would simply need to obtain more panels to work. The portability factor of thedesign was a priority throughout the project. This was reflected in the paper prototype by the useof Velcro dots to
long-term goals are. Students then re-assessed whether the job they envisioned alignswith what they learned from their informational interview. The final piece of the assignment wasfor students to reflect: Who might be best served by working in this job? What is the futureprognosis of this job, especially in light of climate change? And would this be a job that youwould actually want? The assignment culminated with short (less than 10 minute), in classpresentations where other groups were able to ask questions. I assessed the assignment by quantifying students’ perception of it in four categories. Ialso collected qualitative data by asking students open-ended questions about their experience. In this report, I share students
to pause and reflect on how these experiences may impact our classrooms going forward.In fact, some of these experiences may actually have produced encouraging outcomes and if so,we need to take the time to assess and evaluate how to translate them back into the learningenvironment of our classrooms going forward. One may even be able to argue that the onlineexperience had a positive impact on learners that, for one reason or another, were notcomfortable interacting in an in-person classroom. For these students, we might say that theonline experience gave them a front-row seat and perhaps allowed them to engage morecomfortably. For other students, the exact opposite might be the case. Additionally, with onlinelearning there were also new
-tests to measureoverall learning levels was not feasible. Furthermore, these would necessarily have to beconducted via an online form, which, in turn, would cast doubt on the reliability of the results asit would not be possible to guarantee that student answers fully reflect their accurate knowledgelevels.AcknowledgmentsThe authors want to acknowledge the leadership and financial support of the School ofEngineering of Universidad Andres Bello, Chile. We also thank the Educational and AcademicInnovation Unit (UNIDA) for mentoring and guidance in developing scientific articles in highereducation research.In addition, the authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of Writing Lab, Institutefor the Future of Education, Tecnologico de
shape of spacetime curvature, therelationship between time and gravity, and the direction objects move in curved spacetime.These questions were developed specifically for this study, as the Relativity Concept Inventoryonly contains questions about SR and not GR [13]. For a complete list of survey items used,see Appendix B. The pre-post surveys can be compared between the two groups to see howthe different demonstrations affected participants’ understanding of these topics.Participants’ rate their agreement with nine statements on a standard five-point Likert scale torecord their attitudes toward GR, physics, and science in general. These statements are largelydrawn from [25] but modified for undergraduates and to reflect the focus on