. Because best practices suggestlimiting course outcomes to six or under [7], [8] it is unrealistic to think that faculty canadequately assess all thirteen learning outcomes for engineering laboratories described in Table3. This report based on responses from faculty supports the notion that not all lab learningoutcomes are equally important and points towards candidates for a focused set of outcomes thatshould be more thoroughly assessed. Departments should be mindful when determining whichlearning outcomes are best-suited for the ChE laboratory courses, with consideration of whichoutcomes translate to ABET criteria as well as which outcomes can be taught and assessed inother courses. While this paper focuses on understanding how faculty perceive
Paper ID #40323Board 109: BYOE: Laboratory Exercise using Augmented Reality and Vir-tualReality for Environmental Engineering CurriculumDr. Azadeh Bolhari P.E., University of Colorado Boulder Dr. Bolhari is a professor of environmental engineering in the Department of Civil, Environmental and Ar- chitectural Engineering (CEAE) at the University of Colorado Boulder. Her teaching focuses on fate and transport of contaminants, capstone design and aqueous chemistry. Dr. Bolhari is passionate about broad- ening participation in engineering through community-based participatory action research. Her research interests explore the
Paper ID #40103BYOE: Engineering Mechanics with a Twist: Design and Implementation ofaCustom Torsion-Testing ApparatusDr. Jacob Bishop, Southern Utah University Jacob Bishop holds B.S. and M.S. degrees in Mechanical Engineering. He earned a Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Utah State University pursuing his research on the flipped classroom. His research interests are multidisciplinary. In educational research, his interests include model-eliciting activities, open online education, educational data mining, and the flipped classroom. In quantitative methodology and psycho- metrics, his interests focus on the use of
;scientific communication [24, 25]. For case study, the surveyed literature was used to assessknowledge and understanding, perception, and social communication [12, 23].Implication of the study The scoping review shows that most online lab studies focus on the use of online labs tofacilitate knowledge and understanding. This limits our understanding of how engineering labscan be used to facilitate many of the learning outcomes outlined in Brinson’s framework oflearning outcomes. Future studies may explore how online labs can be used to promote otherlearning outcomes that the KIPPAS suggests. Also, future studies could conduct the reliabilityof the identified assessment tools and other assessment tools such as model design andconstruction, mind and
Student Learning in Undergraduate Engineering Education by Improving Teaching and Assessment,” Adv. Eng. Educ., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1–30, 2019.[28] National Research Council, How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded edition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2000.[29] H. W. Fennell, G. S. Coutinho, A. J. Magana, D. Restrepo, and P. D. Zavattieri, “Enhancing student meaning-making of threshold concepts via computation: The case of Mohr’s circle,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2017, vol. 2017-June.[30] K. Smith, S. Sheppard, D. Johnson, and R. Johnson, “Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom-Based Practices,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 94, no
Paper ID #39597Redesigning a multi-disciplinary measurement lab and statistics course:An approach for navigating competing prioritiesDr. Nick A. Stites, University of Colorado Boulder Nick Stites is the Director of the Integrated Teaching and Learning Program at CU Boulder and an in- structor with the Integrated Design Engineering program. Dr. Stites is the principal investigator (PI) of the Denver-Metro Engineering Consortium , which is a partnership between local community colleges and universities to support engineering pathways for transfer students. He is also a co-PI for TeachEngi- neering.org, which provides no-cost
allow students to understand the theoretical models pertaining to the experiments and 1appreciate how theory and practice come together, and which further validates results fromsoftware models. For each design experiment, the guidelines are formulated with the ABETOutcomes in mind. This course focuses on three outcomes as defined by ABET Criterion 3 forthe BSME programs; they are as follows:Outcome 1: An ability to identify, formulate, and solve complex engineering problems byapplying principles of engineering, science, and mathematics.Outcome 5: An ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provideleadership, create a
engineering and design work.Dr. Molly Y. Mollica, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Molly Y. Mollica (she/her) is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC). Dr. Mollica earned her B.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Ohio State University (OSU), M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from OSU, and Ph.D. in bioengineering at the University of Washington. She also trained as a postdoctoral scholar-fellow at Bloodworks Northwest Research Institute. Molly’s wetlab research interests are at the intersection of engineering mechanics, mechanobiology, and health equity. Her educational research interests are in community-engaged learning, project-based
Paper ID #40106Designing the Laboratory Experience from the Ground Up: CustomLaboratory Equipment and Writing-Intensive PedagogyDr. Jacob Bishop, Southern Utah University Jacob Bishop holds B.S. and M.S. degrees in Mechanical Engineering. He earned a Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Utah State University pursuing his research on the flipped classroom. His research interests are multidisciplinary. In educational research, his interests include model-eliciting activities, open online education, educational data mining, and the flipped classroom. In quantitative methodology and psycho- metrics, his interests focus on the
practices.Dr. Ajay P. Malshe, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Ajay ”AJ” P. Malshe is currently R. Eugene and Susie E. Goodson Distinguished Professor of Mechani- cal Engineering at Purdue University. He is the Co-Director of Purdue’s Engineering Initiative (PEI) for Manufacturing. He has a collective professional experience of 40 years, partly overlapping, in industries (as a Board Member, CTO, and entrepreneur) and academia. He has gained a national and international reputation in advanced manufacturing, multifunctional-resilient-sustainable bio-inspired designing, func- tional multi-materials, and system integration and productization. Over the decades, application areas of his interest and contributions are