. Zizka, “Employability skills for 21st-century STEM students: the employers’ perspective,” High. Educ. Ski. Work-Based Learn., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 591–606, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1108/HESWBL-10-2019-0148.[2] K. J. B. Anderson, S. S. Courter, T. McGlamery, T. M. Nathans-Kelly, and C. G. Nicometo, “Understanding engineering work and identity: a cross-case analysis of engineers within six firms,” Eng. Stud., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 153–174, Dec. 2010, doi: 10.1080/19378629.2010.519772.[3] A. Briliyanti, J. W. Rojewski, D. J. L. Colbry, and K. Luchini-Colbry, “STEMAmbassadors: Developing Communications, Teamwork, and Leadership Skills for Graduate Students,” presented at the 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Jun
Engineering at UL Lafayette in 2013, the Outstanding Senior Faculty Research Award from the ME De- partment in 2016, MSU and BCOE Faculty Research Award in 2018; he was named to the Jack Hatcher Chair in Engineering Entrepreneurship in 2018 and promoted to Full Professor in 2019. In his profes- sional societies, Dr. Liu was elected a Fellow of ASME in 2017, a Fellow of SAE in 2019, and received the SAE Forest R. McFarland Award in 2020. Dr. Liu is a Professional Engineer registered in Ohio State and also holds active membership in ASEE and AAAS. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 DEVELOPMENT OF AN ONLINE PHASE-FIELD THEORY COURSE FOR MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
solutions to their needs, whichin turn may help to improve graduate student mental health and aid in facultyadvisor mentoring and management responsibilities.2 Current State of Graduate Student Mental Well-BeingMental health needs among graduate students are likely 10% higher than therest of the population, potentially causing a mental health crisis within academia(Hyun et al. 2006, p. 256). Graduate students are also not as studied as theirundergraduate counterparts in terms of mental well-being (Cranford, Eisen-berg, and Serras 2009; Levecque et al. 2017; Liu et al. 2019; Nature Editorials2019; Paglis, Green, and Bauer 2006; Schlosser et al. 2011; Sverdlik et al. 2018;Waldeck et al. 1997). University counselors have reported an increase in
Award in 2018, and was inducted into the Virginia Tech Academy of Faculty Leadership in 2020. Dr. Matusovich has been a PI/Co-PI on 19 funded research projects including the NSF CAREER Award, with her share of funding being nearly $3 million. She has co-authored 2 book chapters, 34 journal publications, and more than 80 conference papers. She is recognized for her research and teaching, including Dean’s Awards for Outstanding New Faculty, Outstanding Teacher Award, and a Faculty Fellow. Dr. Matusovich has served the Educational Research and Methods (ERM) division of ASEE in many capacities over the past 10+ years including serving as Chair from 2017-2019. Dr. Matusovich is currently the Editor-in-Chief of the
: Needs of Returning and Direct-Pathway Students,” in 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Indianapolis, Indiana: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2014, p. 24.1238.1-24.1238.13. doi: 10.18260/1-2--23171.[13] J. J. Varney, “The role of dissertation self-efficacy in increasing dissertation completion: sources, effects and viability of a new self-efficacy construct,” College Student Journal, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 932–947, Dec. 2010.[14] Committee on Effective Mentoring in STEMM, Board on Higher Education and Workforce, Policy and Global Affairs, and National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, The Science of Effective Mentorship in STEMM. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2019, p
. C. Batson, “Academic Writing at the Doctoral and Professional Level in Engineering: The Current State of the Field and Pathways Forward,” in 2021 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jul. 2021, [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/36636[5] American Society for Engineering Education, Engineering and Engineering Technology by the Numbers 2019. Washington DC, 2020.[6] J. L. Colwell, J. Whittington, & C. F. Jenks, “Writing challenges for graduate students in engineering and technology,” in 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC, Jun. 2011.[7] S. Simpson, “The Problem of Graduate-Level Writing Support: Building a Cross- Campus Graduate Writing Initiative,” WPA: Writing Program Administration
-relief strategies among undergraduate engineering students," ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022.[8] S. B. Oswalt and C. C. Riddock, “What to Do About Being Overwhelmed: Graduate Students, Stress and University Services,” College Student Affairs Journal, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 24–44, 2007[9] N. H. El-Ghoroury, D. I. Galper, A. Sawaqdeh, and L. F. Bufka, “Stress, coping, and barriers to wellness among psychology graduate students,” Training and Education in Professional Psychology, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 122–134, 2012.[10] A. N. Miller and S. M. Orsillo, 2020, "Values, acceptance, and belongingess in graduate school: Perspectives from underrepresented minority students," Journal of Contextual
’ Motivations and Identities: Understandings and Implications,” presented at the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Available: https://peer.asee.org/29975.[8] M. Bahnson, H. Perkins, D. Satterfield, M. Parker, M. Tsugawa, A. Kirn, and C. Cass. “Variance in Engineering Identity in Master’s Degree-Seeking Engineering Students,” in Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), October 2019, pp.1- 7. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9028414.[9] A. McAlister., S. Lilly., and J. Chiu. “A Framework for Examining Engineering Doctoral Student Identity,” in Proceedings of the 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, July 2021. Available: https://peer.asee.org/36580.[10] A. Godwin., G
.1742-1241.2011.02659.x.[8] S. M. Van Anders, “Why the academic pipeline leaks: Fewer men than women perceive barriers to becoming professors,” Sex Roles, vol. 51, no. 9–10, pp. 511–521, Nov. 2004, doi: 10.1007/S11199-004-5461-9/METRICS.[9] R. Ysseldyk et al., “A leak in the academic pipeline: Identity and health among postdoctoral women,” Front. Psychol., vol. 10, no. JUN, p. 1297, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.3389/FPSYG.2019.01297/BIBTEX.[10] N. D. Jackson, K. I. Tyler, Y. Li, W. T. Chen, C. Liu, and R. Bhargava, “Keeping current: An update on the structure and evaluation of a program for graduate women interested in engineering Academia,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings
[disciplinary]. And then all of my job experience before coming here… I really didn't have any experience with [interdisciplinary resilience] before and I didn't have any really like good, uh, like interdisciplinary experience.For example, for Student H (2019, 2020), working as an interdisciplinary graduate scholar after adisciplinary-focused undergraduate experience involved having to figure out problems for whichthey have “no concept, no frame of reference.” Similarly, Student I (2021) explained, “if you’reasking me something about [disciplines outside of my major], no, I don’t know it at all. I havenever even taken a test.” The IR scholars also noted that rigid, lockstep course structures as wellas course scheduling problems across
interactions with peers and faculty withinthe first 10 weeks (about 2 and a half months) of graduate school reduced the impact of stress,both physically and psychologically, for the next 6 months [7]. Overall, we know that at least40% of all doctoral students do not complete their programs, and much of this attrition could beprevented and is not reflective of student capability [8].Simultaneously, doctoral degrees awarded in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics(STEM) continue to be disproportionately awarded to white students. In the 2019-20 academicyear, 71.3% of all STEM doctoral degrees awarded to U.S. citizens and permanent residentswere awarded to white students, even though the U.S. population is approximately 59.3% white.Only 4.3
serving as the Chair of the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) Road Vehicle Aerodynamics Forum Committee, a committee responsible for developing and maintaining SAE standards, technical papers, and special publications related to road vehicle aerodynamics and wind noise performance and test techniques. He is a member of UNC Charlotte Military Affairs Committee. In addition to the SAE International, he is an active member of various professional societies, such as the American Institute of Aeronautics and As- tronautics (AIAA), American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), American Society for Engineer- ing Education (ASEE), and American Physical Society. He is a member of the AIAA Turbulence Model Benchmarking
Paper ID #39415Conceptualizing Program Quality in Engineering Education Ph.D. ProgramsDr. Le Shorn Benjamin, University of Houston Dr. Le Shorn Benjamin has amassed over a decade of experience in the field of education. Her career spans local and international borders and have included roles in educational research, program administra- tion, higher education accreditation and K-12 teaching. She is the recipient of the Robert Newby Award for Diversity Efforts, the Central Michigan University College of Graduate Studies 2019 Outstanding Dissertation Award, a Central Michigan University Department of Educational Leadership
’ reflections over the longer term.5. AcknowledgementsThe EPSRC Centre for Doctoral Training in Embedded Intelligence is co-sponsored by theEngineering & Physical Sciences Research Council in the United Kingdom (grant numberEP/L014998/1). The authors are grateful to Dr Poul Kyvsgaard Hansen at Aalborg University(Denmark) and to Dr Ade Mabogunje at Stanford University for insightful discussions aboutthe scoring method used on candidate’s approach and attitude to this exercise. All the CDT-EI researchers who participated in this study are gratefully acknowledged.References[1] C. Torres-Sánchez and P. P. Conway, "Transition Zone: A Training Ethos Designed to Scaffold a Ph.D. Degree," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa
graduates and institutional support at their post-graduation employer (typically auniversity or academic institution) are key to increasing the representation of minorities inSTEM faculty roles [4]. To increase the number of doctoral degrees earned, there must be anincrease in the number of Hispanic students entering graduate programs. According to theEngineering by the Numbers ASEE report, even though Hispanics represent 18.7% of the USpopulation, only 9.2% and 6.1% of master and doctoral degrees, respectively, are awarded toHispanic recipients [5]. Further, the numbers decrease again when faculty appointments areconsidered, where only 3.6% of faculty appointments in engineering are held by Hispanicprofessors.Convincingly, increasing Hispanic
Knowledge: AFramework for Teacher Knowledge,” Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarshipin Education, vol. 108, no. 6, pp. 1017–1054, Jun. 2006, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x.[15] M. Schmid, E. Brianza, and D. Petko, “Developing a short assessment instrumentfor Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK.xs) and comparing the factorstructure of an integrative and a transformative model,” Comput Educ, p. 103967, Jul.2020, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103967.[16] C. S. Chai, “Teacher Professional Development for Science, Technology,Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education: A Review from the Perspectives ofTechnological Pedagogical Content (TPACK),” The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher,vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 5–13, 2019