Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE) Technical Session 2

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Timothy Aaron Wood P.E., The Citadel

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE)

. 2017, p. 7.[65] T. A. Wood, D. D. Nale, and K. T. Brown, “Student Response System Best Practices for Engineering as Implemented in Plickers,” in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Jul. 2021. Accessed: Aug. 10, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/student-response-system-best-practices-for-engineering-as- implemented-in-plickers[66] M. T. H. Chi and R. Wylie, “The ICAP Framework: Linking Cognitive Engagement to Active Learning Outcomes,” Educational Psychologist, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 219–243, Oct. 2014, doi: 10.1080/00461520.2014.965823.[67] J. A. Mirth, “A Specifications-Based Approach for the Design and Delivery of a Statics/Dynamics Course,” presented at the 2019

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE) Technical Session 2

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Carl O. Hilgarth, Shawnee State University; John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE)

– Distinguished Lecture: “Pipeline, Pathway, or Ecosystem – Do our Metaphors Matter?” Dr. Alan Cheville, Bucknell University.19. G. L. Sills, P.E., M.ASCE; N. D. Vroman, P.E.; R. E. Wahl, P.E., M.ASCE; and N. T. Schwanz, P.E. Overview of New Orleans Levee Failures: Lessons Learned and Their Impact on National Levee Design and Assessment. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering © ASCE / May 2008, pg. 556-565.20. Foltz, Z., Kaur, A., Tushaus, W. H., Mikelson, C. S., Skalak, B. V., and Mina, M., The United States Energy Policy: As Determined by Non-experts. Proceedings of the 2012 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference (2012). American Society for Engineering Education.21. Beever, J., & Hess

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE) Technical Session 2

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE)

ofa common good.Yet among the younger generation there is some understanding of the common good in theirefforts to cause us to change our behaviours so as to reduce the impact of climate change. Butthat conception is limited because it only focuses on one aspect of human behaviour.Underlying all human action is a set of values that help us to say yes or no to the actions thatjoin us one to another interpersonal or through object design. Thus in the model oftechnology presented in exhibit 1 the basis of technological design, for that matter all design,is the value system of the designer(s). Developing a value system (call it philosophy,theology, ethics- what you will) is part of human development, and therefore, part of humanlearning [29], and

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE) Technical Session 1

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sayyad Zahid Qamar, Sultan Qaboos University, Oman; Omar S. Al Abri, Sultan Qaboos University, Oman; Moosa Salim Al Kharusi; Sayyad Basim Qamar, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE)

becomes drastically less effective. Newequipment is procured (major cost), but technical staff are not properly trained. Maintenancecontracts not signed for critical (and costly) equipment. Replacements for faculty and staff are notplanned well in advance. When sustainability is not practiced, and is not an integral part of theculture, how can it be taught effectively?Policy Making IssuesABET criteria for accrediting engineering programs [24-26] states that Student Outcomes (SO)“describe what students are expected to know and be able to do by the time of graduation …knowledge, skills, and behaviors.” In their earlier (a to k) version, SO (c) was defined as “an abilityto design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE) Technical Session 2

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

R. Alan Cheville, Bucknell University; Sarah Appelhans, Bucknell University; Stewart Thomas, Bucknell University; Rebecca Thomas, Bucknell University

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE)

University. At Bucknell he helped found the Maker-E, an electronic MakerSpace for students.He is currently interested in engineering design education, engineering education policy, and the philosophy of engineering education. He has served as associate editor on several journals, an ABET PEV, and on several national-level advisory boards.Dr. Sarah Appelhans, Bucknell University Sarah Appelhans is a postdoctoral research assistant at Bucknell University. She earned her PhD in Cultural Anthropology at the University at Albany (SUNY). Her dissertation research, ”Flexible Lives on Engineering’s Bleeding Edge: Gender, Migration and Belonging in Semiconductor Manufacturing”, investigates the intersections of gender, race

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE) Technical Session 1

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John R. Reisel, P.E., University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE)

methods and in renewable energytechnologies. But by their very nature as electives, technical elective courses should not beteaching material that is expected to be learned by every student graduating from a particularengineering discipline. Requiring students to take several such courses may impact their abilityto take courses from other disciplines which may be beneficial to them in achieving theirpersonal career goals. Therefore, it is important for engineering programs to consider the resultsthey are intending to achieve by requiring students to take technical electives, how these coursesmay be impacting the overall education of the students, and what is an appropriate number oftechnical elective courses to require. It can be noted that ABET