ASEE PEER - Search Results

Displaying results 1 - 30 of 520 in total

← Previous
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
…
17
18
Next →

Board 317: Improving Undergraduate STEM Writing: A Collaboration Between Instructors and Writing Center Directors to Improve Peer-Writing Tutor Feedback

Conference Session: NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Robert Weissbach, Indiana University - Purdue University, Indianapolis; Ruth Camille Pflueger, Pennsylvania State University, Behrend ; Immanuel Edinbarough, P.E., The University of Texas, Rio Grande Valley; Corinne C. Renguette, Indiana University - Purdue University, Indianapolis; Brandon Sorge, Indiana University - Purdue University, Indianapolis; Gamini P. Mendis, Pennsylvania State University, Behrend ; Matthew Rothrock; Annwesa Dasgupta; Johanna Bodenhamer, IUPUI
Tagged Topics: Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

Paper ID #38796Board 317: Improving Undergraduate STEM Writing: A CollaborationBetween Instructors and Writing Center Directors to Improve Peer-WritingTutor FeedbackDr. Robert Weissbach, Indiana University - Purdue University, Indianapolis Robert Weissbach is currently chair of the department of engineering technology at IUPUI. From 1998 - 2016 he was with Penn State Behrend as a faculty member in Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology. His research interests are in renewable energy, energy storage, and engineering education.Ms. Ruth Camille Pflueger, Pennsylvania State University, Behrend Ruth Pflueger has been the

Relevance Score: 3.2099369

The CS POGIL Activity Writing Program

Conference Session: Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 1
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Helen Hu, Westminster College of Salt Lake City; Tricia D. Shepherd; Clifton L. Kussmaul, Green Mango Associates, LLC; Patricia B. Campbell, Campbell-Kibler Associates
Tagged Divisions: Faculty Development Division (FDD)

Paper ID #37231The CS POGIL Activity Writing ProgramDr. Helen Hu, Westminster College of Salt Lake City Helen H. Hu received her Ph.D. in computer science from the University of Utah. She is a Professor of Computer Science at Westminster College and a member of the ACM. Her research interests include active learning pedagogies and broadening participation iTricia D. ShepherdDr. Clifton L. Kussmaul, Green Mango Associates, LLC Clif Kussmaul is Principal Consultant at Green Mango Associates, LLC. Formerly he was Associate Professor of Computer Science at Muhlenberg College. Visiting Fulbright-Nehru Scholar at the University

Relevance Score: 2.3674664

Cultivating technical writing skills through a scaffold peer review-approach of lab reports in a junior-level laboratory course

Conference Session: Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division (ELOS) Technical Session 2: Manurfacturing, Simulation, Safety, and Technical Writing
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Yan Wu, University of Wisconsin - Platteville
Tagged Divisions: Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division (DELOS)

Paper ID #36849Cultivating technical writing skills through a scaffold peerreview-approach of lab reports in a junior-level laboratory courseDr. Yan Wu, University of Wisconsin - Platteville Yan Wu graduated from Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, in 1996 with a bachelorˆa C™s degree in Precision Instruments and a minor in Electronics and Computer Technology. She received her M.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Alaba ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Cultivating technical writing skills through a scaffold peer review of lab reports in a junior

Relevance Score: 2.3466785

Work in Progress: Can In-Class Peer Reviews of Written Assignments Improve Problem Solving and Scientific Writing in a Standard-Based, Sophomore Laboratory Course?

Conference Session: Biomedical Engineering Division (BED): Best of Works in Progress
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Casey Jane Ankeny, Northwestern University; Ken Gentry, Northwestern University; David P. O'Neill, Northwestern University; Philippa Eshun
Tagged Divisions: Biomedical Engineering Division (BED)

Paper ID #38280Work in Progress: Can In-Class Peer Reviews of Written AssignmentsImprove Problem Solving and Scientific Writing in a Standard-Based,Sophomore Laboratory Course?Dr. Casey Jane Ankeny, Northwestern University Casey J. Ankeny, PhD is an Associate Professor of Instruction at Northwestern University. Casey received her bachelor’s degree in Biomedical Engineering from the University of Virginia and her doctorate degree in Biomedical Engineering from Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University where she studied the role of shear stress in aortic valve disease. Currently, she is investigating equitable

Relevance Score: 2.3466785

Using Trained Tutors to Improve Mechanical Engineering Technology Student Writing

Conference Session: Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI) Technical Session 10
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: David Clippinger, Pennsylvania State University, Behrend ; Ruth Camille Pflueger, Pennsylvania State University, Behrend College; Steven Nozaki, Pennsylvania State University, Behrend ; Johanna Fouts Bodenhamer
Tagged Divisions: Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)

Writing. Paper presented at 2019 ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2—33610[2] Ware, R., & Turnipseed, N., & Gallagher, J. R., & Elliott, C. M., & Popovics, J. S., & Prior, P., &Zilles, J. L. (2019, June), Writing Across Engineering: A Collaborative Approach to Support STEMFaculty’s Integration of Writing Instruction in their Classes Paper presented at 2019 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2—33671[3] Damron, R., & High, K. (2009, June), Writing To Learn: The Effect Of Peer Tutoring On CriticalThinking And Writing Skills Of First Year Engineering Students Paper presented at 2009 AnnualConference & Exposition, Austin, Texas. 10.18260/1-2—5684[4

Relevance Score: 1.778648

Assessing Faculty Implementation of Laboratory Report Writing Instructional Modules

Conference Session: Teaching Tools: Communication (NEE)
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Sean St. Clair, Oregon Institute of Technology; Dave Kim, Washington State University, Vancouver; Charles Riley, P.E., Oregon Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions: New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)

aerospace, automotive, and rail structures. He has been the author or co-author of over 180 peer-reviewed papers in these areas.Dr. Charles Riley, P.E., Oregon Institute of Technology Dr. Riley has been teaching mechanics concepts for over 10 years and has been honored with both the ASCE ExCEEd New Faculty Excellence in Civil Engineering Education Award (2012) and the Beer and Johnston Outstanding New Mechanics Educator Award (2013). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Assessing Faculty Implementation of Laboratory Report Writing Instructional ModulesAbstract“An ability to develop and conduct appropriate experimentation, analyze and interpret data, anduse

Relevance Score: 1.7749119

Leveraging Incentives, Disincentives, and Peer Feedback to Enhance Student Performance

Conference Session: Military and Veterans Division (MVD) Technical Session 1
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Kyle Patrick Ditonto, United States Military Academy; Brandon Lawrence; Sam Yoo, United States Military Academy
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Military and Veterans Division (MVD)

, “ESL students’ experiences of online peer feedback,” Computersand Composition, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 443–461, Jan. 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.compcom.2007.03.002.[14] D. Boud and N. Falchikov, “Aligning assessment with long‐term learning,” Assessment &Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 399–413, Aug. 2006, doi:10.1080/02602930600679050.[15] K. Lundstrom and W. Baker, “To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer reviewto the reviewer’s own writing,” Journal of Second Language Writing, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 30–43,Mar. 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2008.06.002.[16] J. van der Pol, B. A. M. van den Berg, W. F. Admiraal, and P. R. J. Simons, “The nature,reception, and use of online peer feedback in higher education,” Computers

Relevance Score: 1.7593063

Plickers and Peer Instruction in a Software Design Course

Conference Session: Computing and Information Technology Division (CIT) Technical Session 9
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Drew Alex Clinkenbeard, California State University Monterey Bay; Joshua B. Gross, California State University Monterey Bay
Tagged Divisions: Computing and Information Technology Division (CIT)

application displays which students had correct answers sothese students were chosen to explain why they did not choose the incorrect answers. These stu-dents were selected because the instructor did not wish to single out students who got the questionwrong.An addition to the peer instruction model being followed here is the requirement that studentswrite down the questions and their answers to them. The instructor emphasizes that writing downthe question and all the answers, correct or otherwise, is important to their learning [12]. At theend of each class sessions students must turn in a PDF document with their individual answers aswell as the answer arrived at after group discussion. Students were also instructed to write downwhy any of their

Relevance Score: 1.7582891

Write from the Start in Engineering: Mixed-Methods Results of a Collaboration between a First-Year Biomedical Engineering Class and a University Writing Center

Conference Session: Exploration of Written and Team Communication
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: D'Arcy Randall, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin; Hyesun You, The University of Iowa; Daniel S. Puperi, The University of Texas at Austin; Thomas E. Lindsay, The University of Texas at Austin; Rhya Moffitt Brooke, The University of Texas at Austin
Tagged Divisions: Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

research introductions. Class homework: Students apply what they learned in the workshop to their second draft. Students begin meeting UWC consultants. At the UWC: The BME writing instructor runs training sessions for consultants. Consultants begin working with students. Week 3 In class: Students bring to class the second draft for peer review. (This second draft is not included in the Assessment.) Week 4 Students submit their final (third) draft. Week 5 Students complete the first set of short reflections on their UWC consultation Post-Semester The BME writing instructor administers the second self

Relevance Score: 1.6780802

Effectiveness of Transfer Focused Writing Pedagogy on Undergraduates’ Lab Report Writing in Entry-Level Engineering Laboratory Courses at Three Universities

Conference Session: Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH) Technical Session 13: Lab Experiences
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Dave Kim, Washington State University, Vancouver; Charles Riley, P.E., Oregon Institute of Technology; Ken Lulay, P.E., University of Portland; John D. Lynch
Tagged Divisions: Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH)

. Alba-Flores [5] implemented the peer review process in a Circuit Analysis lab course resulting in anincrease in students’ awareness about the importance of technical writing and improved writingassessment results. Corneal [6] developed a sequence of three templates to guide studentsthrough the process of technical report writing and implemented it in a first-year engineering labcourse.According to the theories of learning transfer [7], describing how past experiences affect learningand performance in a new situation, the transfer of writing skills from first-year composition toengineering can be classified as ‘far transfer’ that contains very few abstract or generaloverlapping features [8]. In a previous study to improve engineering

Relevance Score: 1.676261

Work in Progress: How to Get Faculty to Use and Leverage Makerspaces in Their Courses — A Peer-To-Peer Mentoring Model

Conference Session: Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 6
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Maria-Isabel Carnasciali, University of New Haven; Enakshie Prasad; Eric Marcus, University of New Haven; Stephanie M. Gillespie, University of New Haven; Joseph Smolinski
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Faculty Development Division (FDD)

ability of scholarship, writing their career goals, and aligning their actions with their goals [12].Similarly, another facilitated peer-mentoring program with women faculty members yielded positiveimpact on academic skills and manuscript writing [14]. Another research involving junior doctors foundthat peer mentoring promotes psychosocial well-being by helping build support structures, building asense of community, and allowing the new interns navigate their professional environment.Related to peer mentoring is the use of accountability partners as a way of generating motivation towardsgoal achievement [17, 18, 19]. Accountability partners are based on the idea that having a peer partnercan influence one’s commitment towards a personal goal

Relevance Score: 1.6609842

Board 26: Work in Progress: Technical Scientific Writing across the BME curriculum

Conference Session: Biomedical Engineering Division (BED) Poster Session
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Amy Adkins, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Naji S. Husseini, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Lianne Cartee, North Carolina State University at Raleigh
Tagged Divisions: Biomedical Engineering Division (BED)

enroll in the same required Physiology course, which includeslabs with multiple full scientific writing deliverables, in the Fall 2023 (FA23) semester. NorthCarolina State University’s Institutional Review Board has reviewed and approved theprocedures of this study.The technical writing modules focus on one report section at a time, allowing students to usefeedback to rewrite that section multiple times. For example, when learning about each section ofa scientific report (e.g., Methods), students were provided a handout describing conventions ofthe genre and appropriate writing style. With this information, they wrote an initial draft that wasanonymously reviewed by two peers. After using this feedback to make improvements, studentssubmitted a

Relevance Score: 1.4972808

Board 121: Using Tutor-led Support to Enhance Engineering Student Writing for All

Conference Session: Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LIBED) Poster Session
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Johanna Bodenhamer, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis ; Robert Weissbach, Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis; Ruth Camille Pflueger, Pennsylvania State University, Behrend College; Corinne C. Renguette, Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis; Brandon Sorge, Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis; Annwesa Dasgupta; Immanuel Edinbarough P.E., The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley
Tagged Divisions: Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)

knowledge of sound conventions[5]. Furthermore, student-centered approaches have been observed to be more successful whenthe student understands the genre conventions [5]. Three student-centered approaches forimproving writing include peer-to-peer, collaborative, and scaffolded.Peer-to-Peer ApproachesOne facet of peer-to-peer writing interventions is considering students’ academic level and thefeedback they can offer their peers. An approach to improving scientific writing sought todetermine if student academic year impacted the ability to provide effective peer-to-peer tutoring[6]. Peer-to-peer tutoring did show an improvement in student writing outcomes, regardless ofthe academic year of the peer. Conversely, researchers analyzing the writing

Relevance Score: 1.4966924

Client-Focused Technical Writing through Laboratory Report Preparations in Geotechnical Engineering: A Case Study

Conference Session: Committee on Educational Policy Presents: Pillars of Our Classrooms
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Nirmala Gnanapragasam, Seattle University
Tagged Divisions: Civil Engineering Division (CIVIL)

communicate” as part of homework, laboratory section andcoursework with their peers as audience. In a sophomore level circuits course, as part of ahomework assignment students had to write a user’s manual for PSpice, a circuit simulation software. Writing a User’s Manual is a common task for those entering industry involvingproduct design. In a junior level electronics course lab section, students were required to write amemo to their classmates explaining the behavior of their circuit. This assignment provided anopportunity for the students to explain their circuit to their peers while learning how their peers’circuits worked without having to

Relevance Score: 1.4844341

Writing in discipline-appropriate ways: An approach to teaching multilingual graduate students in mechanical engineering

Conference Session: Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 4: Mentoring Programs in Graduate Education
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Xixin Qiu, Pennsylvania State University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Graduate Studies Division (GSD)

) working with writing centertutors, (2) creating (in-house) discipline-specific writing-intensive course, (3) building upsupport groups consisting of peers, advisors and writing specialists. For the purpose of thisstudy, I review below only first two areas of interest. For a fuller review of the currentlandscape of graduate-level writing support available in engineering, readers should refer toBatson [4].Working with writing center tutorsAs a university-wide service to students, employees and faculties who need professionalsupport for any kind of writing task, writing centers have long served as a default solution toproblems in writing. Engineering professors also commonly recommend the tutoring serviceat the writing center to those who struggle

Relevance Score: 1.482702

WIP: Improving Writing Instruction, Practice, and Feedback in an Introduction to engineering course

Conference Session: First-Year Programs Division (FYP) - WIPS 1: Programs & Curricula
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Shazib Z. Vijlee, University of Portland; Molly Hiro, University of Portland
Tagged Divisions: First-Year Programs Division (FYP)

the most useful resources were: • (Giroux & Moje, 2017) – defines “engineering literacy” and suggests ways for engineering faculty to design assignments to help students reach this goal • (Reynolds & Vogel, 2007) – describes a concrete exercise that teaches students the importance of linguistic precision in engineering writing • (Smelser, 2001) – introduces best practices for using peer review in engineering writing instruction • (Rosenberg, 2005) – is an accessible guide to technical writing that focuses on concision, tables and graphics, and other “professional secrets.”These resources provided a foundation for the project outcomes, especially the student and faculty-facing writing reference

Relevance Score: 1.4809698

Refining Instructional Modules for Engineering Lab Writing Using a Community of Practice Approach

Conference Session: Committee on Effective Teaching Presents: Evaluation, Assessment, & Performance
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Charles Riley, Oregon Institute of Technology; Dave Kim, Washington State University, Vancouver; Ken Lulay, P.E., University of Portland; John D. Lynch, Washington State University, Vancouver; Sean St. Clair, P.E., Oregon Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions: Civil Engineering Division (CIVIL)

Paper ID #36811Refining Instructional Modules for Engineering Lab Writing Using aCommunity of Practice ApproachDr. Charles Riley, Oregon Institute of Technology Dr. Riley has been teaching mechanics concepts for over 15 years and has been honored with both the ASCE ExCEEd New Faculty Excellence in Civil Engineering Education Award (2012) and the Beer and Johnston Outstanding New Mechanics Educator Award (2013). While he teaches freshman to graduate- level courses across the civil engineering curriculum, his focus is on engineering mechanics. He im- plements classroom demonstrations at every opportunity as part of a

Relevance Score: 1.4792376

A Near-Peer Mentoring Framework for a Civil and Environmental Engineering Curriculum

Conference Session: Committee on Educational Policy Presents: Holistic Students
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Marie Bond, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Ramez Hajj, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Jeffery R. Roesler, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Arthur R. Schmidt III, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Jacob Henschen, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Tagged Divisions: Civil Engineering Division (CIVIL)

, two near-peer mentoring programs are described and implemented in thecontext of a large (200+ students) project-based introduction civil and environmental engineering(CEE) course. They were developed to provide sustainable, effective methods for near-peermentoring that could be implemented on a larger scale. The two near-peer mentoringframeworks, targeted mentoring and general mentoring, were developed based on the followingobjectives: 1. Provide first-year mentees with additional project input and technical writing and presentation feedback. 2. Provide first-year mentees additional information about campus life, the curriculum, and professional opportunities based on the experience of current upper-level students. 3. Create

Relevance Score: 1.4767488

Writing as an URM STEM Community: Increasing Competitiveness and Success of Underrepresented Minority STEM Pre-tenure Faculty and Postdoctoral Researchers through Community Grant and Other Academic Writing Experiences

Conference Session: Continuing Professional Development Division (CPD) Technical Session 1
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Mehrube Mehrubeoglu, Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi; Cherish C. Vance, The Ohio State University; Kimberle Ann Kelly; Janel L Ortiz, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Shawanee' Patrick, Texas A&M University; Philip Olawale Adebo; David Chimene; Joseph William Newton Leo Reustle, Hampton University Department of Marine and Environmental Science
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Continuing Professional Development Division (CPD)

have a dedicated time and place to get together towork on, improve on, and progress in their writing [8]. Funded by Graduate School, this writinggroup allowed peer discussions and interactions, as well as presentations by facilitators on avariety of writing topics [8]. This small group environment for dedicated writing is similar to theWriting Sessions described in our paper, but without the limitation of disciplines, or the type ofwriting. The importance of writing beyond graduate school has long been recognized by multiplegroups so much so that several institutions have incorporated writing related workshops andprograms for faculty [13]-[17]. Most of these efforts, though focused on writing engagementsand improving writing competencies

Relevance Score: 1.4740766

Work in Progress: KLIQED, A Feedback Tool for Fostering Peer Engagement during Student Oral Presentations

Conference Session: Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI) Technical Session 5
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Gbetonmasse B. Somasse, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Melissa Wrobel, University of Michigan
Tagged Divisions: Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)

-progress introduces the KLIQED tool along with itsrationale, a template, emerging evidence on its effectiveness from students’perspectives, and tips for instructors. Future work includes survey data analysisand a content analysis of the peers’ comments collected from completed KLIQEDsheets to further assess the effectiveness of the tool.Keywords: Oral communication, student engagement, project-based learning,attentionBackground and MotivationThe value of oral communication skillsCommunication skills, including reading, writing, listening, and presenting, are essentialcompetencies for entering the workforce and for participating in society. Therefore, degreeprograms in all disciplines (e.g. liberal arts, science, and engineering) are expected to

Relevance Score: 1.4715137

Redefining first-year engineering education through the lens of belonging and peer leadership

Conference Session: First-Year Programs Division (FYP) - Technical Session 9: Identity & Belonging 1
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Anna Newsome Holcomb, Georgia Institute of Technology; Jacqueline Rohde, Georgia Institute of Technology; Lakshmi Raju
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: First-Year Programs Division (FYP)

Georgia TechPeer Leader Resources Survey 1: What do you want out of a peer mentor in ECE Select all that apply Self-developed Discovery Studio? Write-in provided Survey 2: What support did your peer leader in ECE Discovery for “any other types Studio provide? of support” • Help completing ECE Discovery Studio Assignments • Help building a community at Georgia Tech • Help finding opportunities at Georgia Tech • Help navigating difficult

Relevance Score: 1.4689573

Peer oral exams: A learner-centered authentic assessment approach scalable to large classes

Conference Session: First-Year Programs Division (FYP) - Technical Session 3: Evaluation & Assessment
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Marko V. Lubarda, University of California, San Diego; Alex M. Phan, University of California, San Diego; Maziar Ghazinejad, University of California, San Diego; Nathan Delson, eGrove Education; Saharnaz Baghdadchi, University of California, San Diego; Curt Schurgers, University of California, San Diego; Minju Kim, University of California, San Diego; Josephine Relaford-Doyle, University of California, San Diego; Carolyn L. Sandoval, University of California, San Diego; Huihui Qi, University of California, San Diego
Tagged Divisions: First-Year Programs Division (FYP)

, the instructor decided to pilot peer oral exams in the nextoffering of the course (Spring Quarter 2021).Several differences ought to be noted between peer review, as conventionally implemented, andpeer oral exams to further emphasize the motivation for the latter. Firstly, in peer review,students in reviewer roles typically evaluate or write a critique of the work of their peers beforemeeting with them, whereas during the meeting, they go through the work with them, givingtheir critique or explaining their evaluation and offer pointers for improvement [78], [19], [77].In peer oral exams, on the other hand, the objective of the peer examiner is to dynamically probethe peer examinee’s knowledge and understanding, or, technically speaking, to

Relevance Score: 1.4633759

Peer Mentorship in a Virtual University Setting: A Hispanic Perspective on How Mentorship Broadens Participation in Advanced Degrees

Conference Session: Peer Mentorship, Cross-Race Mentoring Relationships, Race, Gender, Student Success, and Career Outcomes
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Federico Cifuentes-Urtubey, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Paola A. Baldaguez Medina, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Julie E. Lorenzo, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Natasha Mamaril, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Minorities in Engineering Division(MIND)

. and Ph.D. degrees in Educational Psychology from the University of Kentucky. She also has nine years of industry experience. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Peer Mentorship in a Virtual University Setting: A Hispanic Perspective on How Mentorship Broadens Participation in Advanced DegreesAbstract Mentorship is crucial in providing a platform for academic and leadership developmentand success among underrepresented groups in STEM. Studies on mentoring students fromunderrepresented groups in STEM demonstrate the characteristics of strong peer relationships,superior communication skills, and favorable academic and career development

Relevance Score: 1.3136666

Board 216: Areas of Improvement and Difficulty with Lab Report Writing in the Lower-Division Engineering Laboratory Courses across Three Universities

Conference Session: NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Dave Kim, Washington State University, Vancouver; Franny Howes, Oregon Institute of Technology
Tagged Topics: NSF Grantees Poster Session

Paper ID #38622Board 216: Areas of Improvement and Difficulty with Lab Report Writingin the Lower-Division Engineering Laboratory Courses across ThreeUniversitiesDr. Dave Kim, Washington State University, Vancouver Dr. Dave Kim is Professor and Mechanical Engineering Program Coordinator in the School of Engineer- ing and Computer Science at Washington State University Vancouver. His teaching and research have been in the areas of engineering materials, fracture mechanics, and manufacturing processes. In par- ticular, he has been very active in pedagogical research in the area of writing pedagogy in engineering laboratory

Relevance Score: 1.1852955

Investigating Engineering Laboratory Course Assignments and Assessments across Four Institutions and a Case Study on Their Impact on Students’ Lab Report Writing

Conference Session: Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division (DELOS) Technical Session 5: Lab Design
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Dave Kim, Washington State University-Vancouver; John D Lynch; Artem Taran; Anna Yurov; Ryder Sandry
Tagged Divisions: Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division (DELOS)

Paper ID #38620Investigating Engineering Laboratory Course Assignments and Assessmentsacross Four Institutions and a Case Study on Their Impact on Students’Lab Report WritingDr. Dave Kim, Washington State University-Vancouver Dr. Dave Kim is Professor and Mechanical Engineering Program Coordinator in the School of Engineer- ing and Computer Science at Washington State University Vancouver. His teaching and research have been in the areas of engineering materials, fracture mechanics, and manufacturing processes. In par- ticular, he has been very active in pedagogical research in the area of writing pedagogy in engineering

Relevance Score: 1.1844294

Student Use of Artificial Intelligence to Write Technical Engineering Papers – Cheating or a Tool to Augment Learning

Conference Session: Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session_Monday June 26, 3:15 - 4:45
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Ronald P. Uhlig, National University; Shatha Jawad Jawad, National University; Bhaskar Sinha, National University; Pradip Peter Dey; Mohammad N. Amin, National University
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

Paper ID #37054Student Use of Artificial Intelligence to Write Technical EngineeringPapers – Cheating or a Tool to Augment LearningDr. Ronald P. Uhlig, National University From 2010-2014, Dr. Ronald P. Uhlig was Dean, School of Business and Management, National Univer- sity, La Jolla, CA. He returned to the engineering faculty in 2014 and is currently Chair, Department of Engineering, School of Technology and Engineering. During 2005-2010 he served in multiple positions including Chair of the Department of Computer Science and Information Systems, and Academic Pro- gram Director for the Master of Science in Wireless