a number of reasons, including ensuring that academic terminology and workshopmaterials were relevant and well adapted to the local institutional context. Further, it helpedbuild capacity and expertise through authentic partnership and knowledge sharing. There wasalso parity in leadership and contribution for running the workshop exercises. Finally, agileapproaches–like on-the-fly changes to facilitation activities in response to the energy andexperiences of the faculty participants in the room, as well as post-mortem reflections at theend of each day–help the team pivot exercises.Secondly, the workshop was designed exclusively using active learning strategies. A pitfall ofworkshops on active learning strategy is that the pedagogical
integration of the otherdomains as well as for the skills and knowledge associated with those domains. Thus, we usedthe characteristics of engagement were comprised by Cunningham and Kelly’s (2017) epistemicpractices of engineering in this study because they are reflective of the nature of engineering,specific to the habits of mind reflected in the Framework for P12 Engineering Learning, butgeneral enough to be more likely to arise in the interviews. The three groups of stakeholderswhose views were examined in this study are not engineers and it was unlikely that theirreflections on STEM engagement would be specific enough for the Framework (2020) to be themost meaningful descriptors of their views. For example, it was unlikely that the community
’ learning capability throughindividual development and peer engagement. The course design allows students to activelyparticipate in learning as a “resident” living in a “neighborhood”. Besides the traditionalindividual work, various group activities are performed inside one group and among multiplegroups, or the “households”. Students feel more obligated to better performance and high-qualitylearning outcomes. Another focal point of this study is the assessment of student learning underthe proposed course frame, where tailored tutorials and guidance are vital. Although supportfrom the teaching team is essential in this “neighborhood”, we still want to put students in thecenter as the leader of their study. The ongoing data collection reflects the
researchers to the field—for example, in National ScienceFoundation Research Initiation in Engineering Formation (RIEF) grants, and CAREER BroaderImpacts and Educational Plan activities—which require traditionally-trained faculty to developengineering education research skills. Reflecting this shift, the number of qualitative researcharticles in engineering education reflects the increase in interest in qualitative methods and theneed for introductory material for pivoting researchers. It has been the norm for engineeringeducation researchers to partner with emergent and pivoting engineering faculty members tomentor them through this transition, but the process is often time- and resource-intensive. To meetthis need, we have developed this primer on
what they learned and how it applies to the real-world. These qualitative data wereanalyzed using thematic analysis to detect patterns within the reflections. The results show that the bio-inspired projects engaged students by connecting theory, practice, and application when teachingmathematically intensive engineering subjects, while also instilling an entrepreneurial mindset amongstudents, enhancing their creativity by combining art and STEM, and sharpening their professional skills.The study concludes with details related to the instructor’s intervention and lessons learned so that otherengineering instructors can easily replicate in the classroom.1. Introduction1.1 Problem IdentificationFor engineering students, it is very important to
engineering services” as this was the intent of the terminology they used. Thischange will be reflected in future editions of the CEBOK.The preface goes on to state: All civil engineers, including students studying civil engineering, those who teach civil engineering, early career civil engineers, those who mentor early career engineers, those who employ civil engineers, those who design civil engineering projects, those who lead and manage groups of civil engineers and civil engineering projects, and those who conduct research in civil engineering should be interested in the CEBOK3, as we all, as members of an amazing and exciting profession, should be committed to and supportive of preparing the next
. Structured deliverables provideguidance as to what elements of a design process may be appropriate to move through theengineering design process. The scaffolding to emphasize prototyping and adoption of aprototyping mindset may help as a pedagogical tool [33]. Artifacts that are created in thesecourses reflect tangible evidence of activity. From the idea to realization, there are means todescribe the role, purpose, and creation of prototypes. Gerber & Carroll [19] describe theconnection and process of prototype creation. Houde & Hill [20] discuss different types ofprototypes as what do prototypes prototype (function, looks-like). Makerspaces also provideadditional context for the tools, mindsets, and community of practice [21-23, 11].Design
make use of Hofstede's dimensions, which in an original studyyielded four dimensions of culture that distinguish countries from each other [9]:Individualism, which is the capacity to belong to a group and to work collectively.Power distance reflects the relationship between dependence and the degree to whichgroups can accept an unequal distribution of power. Uncertainty avoidance considershow individuals cope with uncertainty. And masculinity assesses the emotional rolesamong members of society and estimates how much a society is driven by competitionand success [20]. However, through new research in 23 countries, Hofstede added afifth dimension called long-term orientation that reflects the encouragement of futurereward-oriented activities
and intuitively.Lib [1] described a series of steps used to develop high levels of skill in a sport. These stepsincluded drills and practice, a coach, and most importantly by playing the sport. Lib contrastedthese steps to a conventional engineering classroom approach wherein a person is being talked toabout the sport and rarely, if ever, plays. In the context of the engineering classroom, formationof engineers, and development of subject mastery we summarize these simple steps proposed byLib as: 1) a series of iterative tasks repeated many times until correct, 2) by working with expertswho observe and instruct and correct and provide a structure of iterative and progressiveconstructive failure, and 3) by reflecting on their progress and
empiricallearning. The long history of empirical learning in the field of construction engineering showsthe significant potential of cognitive development through direct experience and reflection onwhat works in particular situations [4]. Of course, the complex nature of the constructionindustry in the twenty-first century cannot afford an education through trial and error in the realenvironment. However, recent advances in computer science can help educators develop virtualenvironments and gamification platforms that allow students to explore various scenarios andlearn from their experiences. More specifically, digital gamified solutions can be used to createan interactive virtual environment where students can learn through guided active
and different perspectives,-how are each of us approaching the same general problem? And doing different assessments. We could also present it at a conference.A different RED team member reflected on the CoP as follows: “I just wanted to add that I saw this [RED Consortium monthly] call very helpful as well . What we’re trying to do here is really hard, and we had the same issues. It was really helpful to know it wasn’t just us and reinforce that it is difficult.”Support and collegiality Finally, we see important support and collegiality emerging in the context of the REDCoP. The CoP provides benefits that were not specifically expected when we began our workwith RED teams, and not all RED teams experience
Note1. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantNo. 2000487 and the Robertson Foundation under Grant No. 9909875. Any opinions, findings,and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and donot necessarily reflect the views of the funders. 4 ReferencesAuthor (2022).Berry, III, R.Q., Rimm-Kaufman, S.E., Ottmar, E.M., Walkowiak, T.A., Merritt, E., & Pinter, H.H. (2013). The Mathematics Scan (M-Scan): A measure of mathematics instructional quality. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia.Dale, M. E., Godley, A. J., Capello, S. A., Donnelly, P. J
, interesting, motivated, and efficient. Secondly, the aimwas to better illustrate the power of linear algebra to explain fundamental principles andsimplify calculations in various fields, including engineering, computer science, mathematics,physics, biology, economics, and statistics. Thirdly, the focus was on better communicatingthe importance of linear algebra in the applied field, reflecting it as a scientific tool. Lastly,the objective was to empower students’ abilities to solve more complicated and applicableproblems in the real world. This paper’s primary focus is on the redesign effort, whichincorporates MATLAB and introduces active learning into the course, while still coveringall the core topics in any basic linear algebra class. This
courses (Authors 1 and 2) met every other week to discuss the students’ progress andmake instructional adjustments whenever necessary. By meeting to reflect on the students’progress, professors shared the underlying beliefs that graduate students overwhelmingly held.So, a closer look at the survey data and reflections merited further analysis. The data in theseresults point to some of these deficit ideologies in greater detail.Study LimitationsDue to the nature of the case study design [43] (rather than a case-control design), an appropriatecontrol or comparison group that included funded teaching assistants across the engineeringdisciplines that was not required to take the engineering education course was not identified.This study does not aim
theirdemonstrated success in effecting academic change; we are particularly interested in learningfrom their experiences with and suggestions for creating DEIJ-focused changes. This papersynthesizes what we learned in a series of semi-structured interviews in which we asked about 1)their perspectives on community of practice as a theory of change and whether it is appropriatefor this work, and 2) their reflections on and examples of effective DEIJ efforts as well asbarriers to operationalizing change theories in practice.The following section introduces the CIT-E CoP in the context of the literature on communitiesof practice as a theory of change. Then, we describe our methods and results; this is followed bya discussion of what we have learned so far
worse for low-income and URM students [6].• In cohort 3, the annual survey showed potential issues in academic integrations and self- regulation. Academic integration is a measure of the students’ perceptions of their academic experiences with faculty, counselors, and administrators, as well as perceptions about their career preparation at their institutions. Self-regulation is the awareness, knowledge, and control of cognition. It includes the students’ ability to control their effort and attention in the face of distraction and uninteresting tasks [5] which also may reflect the potential lack of motivation seen in the pandemic generation [6].• Academic performance goals as measured by GPA were met with recent cohort
design task, using a multimethodapproach.We hypothesize that an exemplar-based approach to learning—reflected in brain activitypatterns—will reinforce the impact of examples in design tasks, by increasing the salience of theexample design features relative to the abstract relationships that unite them. In contrast, anabstraction-based approach to learning—reflected in different patterns of neural activity—mayemphasize the abstract design rules governing the example designs, thus offering protection fromdesign fixation to their features. Based on prior literature, we further hypothesize [1], [2], thatdifferences in domain expertise between mechanical engineering and product design wouldmitigate these effects.MethodOverview & Design
Teacher Education Program have led her to design studies that seek to understand how to optimize learning with different model mediums such as immersive virtual reality. At the TSL, Camila works on projects that support teacher education through online learning experiences.Justin Reich, Massachusetts Institute of Technology ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Practicing Facilitating STEM Discussions: A study on the use of a digital simulation tool for teachers Engineering requires complex, team-based problem-solving skills, and engineeringeducation should reflect this needed expertise. However, teachers rarely get the opportunity topractice honing crucial
were recruited to do a reading andreflection about the findings connected to the 2-day conference for the contingent faculty. Fromthe dean’s responses, the authors paint a picture on the challenges that also impact deans frommaking changes for contingent faculty.Literature Review The focus of this paper are deans and their reflective responses to the data collected fromthe contingent faculty participants who participated in the 2-day conference [2]. We will discussthe roles and responsibilities of deans before discussing and contextualizing contingent facultyand their perilous positions. Deans are faced with the tall task of managing both up to theirbosses which are often vice/provosts or higher, and managing down to faculty, both
for him that throughout his definition and defining engineering, we never see him falterin his belief that he may not be able to live up to what he sees an engineer as. In fact, as hedescribes engineering as full of those with “intelligent minds,” we see that he counts himselfamong those with the potential to join them. Demonstrating that on a subconscious level, hecounts himself among those that fit the mold, and because of that, we see an immense boost tobelonging and confidence that he can become an engineer. This is directly contrasted with howour female participant Chad feels about the mold. When prompted to reflect on what she wouldchange in engineering to make herself feel like she was more welcome in engineering, this washer response
mindfulness(see [6] for a detailed review). The first author's (instructor's) experience through end-of-semester student reflections in her other classes and classroom observations strongly supportsstudents' receptiveness to practice mindfulness in the classroom. It is worth noting that theinstructor has been utilizing mindfulness activities in sophomore to senior-level civil engineeringand fundamental mechanics courses for the past four years.Mindfulness practices, innovation, and creativity: Cognition is all forms of knowing andawareness, such as perceiving, conceiving, remembering, reasoning, judging, imagining, andproblem-solving [7]. A research study [18] in psychology revealed that brief mindfulnessinterventions in novices could improve mood
approaches to meet the needs of diverse sets ofstakeholders [1, 2]. Although the value of empathy is clear, how it can be attained or strengthenedis less well-defined. The learning activities that educators in STEM fields may employ vary fromapproaches utilizing role playing to offering service-learning experiences [3]. One potential wayto cultivate empathy is the use of story-driven learning (SDL), defined as the intellectual processof creating, telling, and listening to reflective, evidence-based stories [4].Storytelling is beneficial for inquiry and knowledge construction and is key to promotingcommunication, psychosocial development, and a humanistic approach to others [5–8]. Beyondpersonal narratives and relaying events, storytelling has been
of a problem through use of applicable knowledge and critical thinkingskills. Interest is the student’s desire or curiosity to learn about engineering: an example of this iswhen a student goes above and beyond to gather understanding on the topic. Finally, recognitionis separated into three subfacets, which reflect the deep work done by Carlone and Johnson onrecognition in science identity: lack of recognition, social/teacher recognition, and self-recognition. While Hazari’s work touched on the idea of self recognition, the focus on areasother than recognition by others have not received as much attention as the identity model hasbeen adapted into engineering. In this work, we seek to renew attention to performance,competence, and interest
plan to carry out study abroad opportunities, having community partners in eachlocation also allows for justification for travel for students in both the U.S. and India.Actionable changes for leveraging strengths - within or between teams, or in curricula:In addition to questioning short-term interactions and dynamics, and with the intent of challengingunjust systems toward “critical service learning,” [11] it may be helpful to establish social justiceand global relationship-based reflections [6], [7] toward systemic change. It is well establishedthat students cultivate empathy through partner interaction in service-learning projects, which isassessed by regular reflections [12]. Currently, students on the U.S. team are asked to reflect
Intrinsic Motivation items of the questionnaire were codedon a Likert-scale from “Strongly agree” to “Strongly disagree”. The Learning Styles Inven-tory questionnaire included 44 items that were binary in nature, students picked the bestfit from two presented options, e.g. “I understand something better after I a) try it out orb) think it through”. Each of these 44 items belonged to one of 4 learning styles categories:Activist/Reflective, Sensing/Intuitive, Visual/Verbal, or Sequential/Global. Students wouldthus get a score between 0 and 11 for each category - for example, the 11 items that cor-responded to the Activist/Reflective spectrum were added with a score of 1 if the responsecorresponded to Activist and a score of 0 if the response
technology developed, which requires imagination and the skills to project atechnology into the future. These considerations can be challenging to track for each individualstory, which led to the genesis of this project. III. Methodology: The RRCD Framework The purpose of this project is to design a framework to allow an engineering instructor toquickly and easily integrate a piece of science fiction into their classroom for the purposes ofethical analysis. To accomplish this, we designed the RRCD framework. To begin with, RRCDstands for four question types: Recall, Reflect, Challenge, and Decide. When these questiontypes are answered as a sequence in relation to a piece of science fiction content, they aredesigned to encourage
(e.g., alum)onto the Merge Cube. Within both AR/VR sections, students are asked to reflect on theirexperience and their thoughts on the usage of this technology within the industry and in theircareers. To receive credit for and complete the lab session/assignment, students can be asked tosubmit an informal lab report with their reflections and thoughts about this technology. Thefollowing VR/AR lab and was designed utilizing databases from Schmid et al., 2020 andAbdinejad et al. 2021.Virtual Reality & Augmented Reality Lab – “Getting Real”Due Date: 1 week from the date of postingAssignment format: Group (teams of 2-4), submit one document per group.Glen Keane is the Oscar-winning artist who is behind Disney classics such as The Little
students through examples and reflection on how the content applies to real-worldapplications (21). Active learning modules contained course content information, video tutorials,sample exercises, and self-check features that enabled students to apply elements of self-regulated learning. Technical content knowledge from the course was covered in the modules and reinforcedthrough real-world examples, such as demonstrating how engineers use section views of modelsto show function (figure 1) and using everyday objects to help define technical terms, such asvarious section views cut out of vegetables (figure 2). Video tutorials guided students on how toapply content knowledge in software and technical practice, such as in a video demonstration
including untold stories throughout the history of computing andalgorithms, identity and intersectionality in engineering, designs from engineering that have highsocietal impact, the LGBTQ+ experience in engineering, engineering and mental health, andcultural diversity within engineering. Each module gives a brief overview of the topic, followedby an associated assignment. We made all of these modules available to the students in thecourse and told them to choose one to complete. Each student engaged with their selectedmodule in four specific ways: (1) watching a relevant video; (2) reading and annotating aprovided article; (3) responding in a written reflection to a set of specific prompts relevant to themodule; and (4) conducting an interview
previouswork, we presented the design, execution, and lessons learned of a faculty development programfor instructors of introductory engineering courses developed in a Chilean regional university. Theprogram implemented a collaborative coaching model in which methodological experts led teamsof instructors in designing and creating coursework materials and accompanied theimplementation of the courses through classroom support and weekly reflection sessions. A totalof nine instructors started the program, but six continued during the entire year and ended withsuccessful results. Almost five years after the completion of the program, we wonder: How mightthe faculty development experience have impacted in the long-term the instructional practices