professional woodworkers employed inthe machine shop will lend a hand for a special piece or two if extra skill is required. Thestudents create a jig and begin assembly after all pieces have been cut. Up to this point most ofthe work is done in one large group, but once boat assembly begins the students typically pick ateam and focus on just one hull. This fosters some friendly competition in class and tends to keepthe students focused and engaged as they strive to build the “better” boat. Figures 1 and 2 showthe students early in the assembly process, stitching the panels and frames of the boats.Homework in the class is a weekly reflection on the construction process. Students areintroduced to new tools and techniques during the week and are
ultimately help facilitate more effective interactions betweenacademia and community.One major limitation is evident within the body of outreach literature. The vast majority ofoutreach literature has historically addressed outreach in a top-down manner where academia isdelivering knowledge in a one-way exchange to recipients. Relatively recently, the research hasbeen reflecting the validity of the knowledge and expertise non-academic communities alreadyhold and that outreach should be a two-way exchange of knowledge. [8], [9]Additionally, most outreach studies focus on outcomes surrounding the recipients of outreachevents. [10] We aim to focus on the other side of outreach: those who participate in facilitatingthe outreach. This will act as a first
exercise gave thestudents an opportunity to examine their current understanding of sustainable building practices. The groupnext traveled to the MorningStar solar home, a net-zero home built for the 2007 Solar Decathlon. A memberof the AE faculty who helped create the home for the competition guided the campers through the homeand explained the team’s considerations when designing the net-zone house. Campers learned about theenergy efficiency standards in passive house designs and how they can be implemented in today's buildingenvironments.Lighting The lighting design portion of the summer camp consisted of a short interactive lecture using visualdemonstrations with Top Hat to facilitate discussion, reflection and engagement with the
& Sellers, 2023) by which ideas can be shared and differences that fall outside thetraditional norms of engineering are reflected upon, discussed, and disrupted. Without anintentional breakdown of the communicated (and often, uncommunicated) power structures thatsystemically message exclusion to Black engineering students via its hidden curriculum (e.g.,Villanueva et al., 2020), the liminal spaces that continue to sustain systemic racism remain intact,restricting students’ agency in breaking down systemic barriers, and formation as engineeringprofessionals. For these barriers to break down, a use-inspired approach was deemed necessary by theauthors in where the target population, Black engineering Ph.D. students and their
Figured Worlds serves as a powerful frame for ourwork because it captures the complex influence of socially- and culturally-produced systems(i.e., figured worlds) on one’s capacity (i.e., agency) to purposefully and reflectively act withinthem. The ways we choose to – or choose not to – represent ourselves as we navigate figuredworlds, and the feedback we receive while interacting with them, serve as indicators ofidentification with social groups and their privileges [13]. For a system to be considered afigured world, it must have four characteristics: (1) historically developed through the works ofparticipants; (2) include social encounters in which participant positions matter; (3) sociallyorganized and reproduced; and (4) relate individuals to
obstacles. When Hispanicstudents’ accomplishments are recognized and celebrated publicly, it serves as positivereinforcement and aids in retaining them in STEM [12]. The academic events are tailored tosupport participants in successfully completing their degree milestones based on their degreelevel. Professional events provide insights into post-graduate opportunities and help develop theskill sets necessary for participants to become successful, inclusive engineers. In summary, theprogram’s objectives are reflected in all these activities, which aim to address the personal,academic, and professional needs of Hispanic engineers. Through our program, we aim to investigate two questions concerning the success ofvirtual mentorship
problems. The students surveyed forStructures II 2022 had already completed Structures I and the survey was completed near the endof Structures II; therefore, the results reflect students who are at the end of the two courses. Thestudents surveyed for Structures I 2022 were surveyed twice throughout the course thus theirresults reflect students’ progression in handling OEMPs.What are the students’ initial responses to encountering an open-ended analysis project?From the affective pathway construction data collected in October 2022, the students initiallyhave a largely neutral response denoted by the Curiosity adjective. As the students progressthrough the project, they encounter negative feelings such as Confusion, Anxiety, Frustration
identification have been identified as strengths among individuals withautism [30, 31].CodeWithin epistemic communities, code represents the language, drawn from theory, that supportsepistemic community members in understanding and interpreting experiences. The codes offercommunity members a common way of communicating about their experiences and observationsor for examining or reflecting on their experiences [20]. In the engineering department, a codeshift was made possible through the introduction of specific language that framed neurodiversityas an asset; this change in language usage was in stark contrast to previous use of language thatreflected a framing of neurological variations as cognitive disorders.The most important example of the code used
by Dr. Miriam Sweeney of the School of Library and Information Science atthe University of Alabama) to engage participants in the histories, politics, and socialconsequences of engineering (and other technical fields), 4) completing the self-guided HallowedGround Project (developed by Dr. Hilary Green) , and 5) a final written reflection on theirexperiences guided as a "3-2-1" writing prompt (What are 3 things that have left an impressionon you from your time [participating in these activities]? What are 2 impacts that you think thesehistories continue to have on education? What is 1 thing you would want to learn more aboutrelated to these topics?).From the final focus group in 2022, the students reported that the prompt to reflect on
Introduction Week 2 Technology Training Week 3 Healthy relationship building Week 4 Time management Week 5 Resume Writing and Job Interview Preparation Week 6 Invited Guest Speaker from local industry Week 7 Influencing People Week 8 Leadership & Delegation Week 9 Project Progress Report Week 10 Entrepreneurship Week 11 Accountancy & Budgeting Week 12 Diversity & Gender issues in professions Week 13 Health & Safety Week 14 Field trip Week 15 Project PresentationsProject-based Work Studio environmentExperiential learning incorporates hands-on learning and reflection on learning [23]. A principalchallenge that STEM
broader discussion and reflection of how the findings might inform futurealliance efforts.c. Future Work As the Project ELEVATE Alliance institutions have recruited the first cohort of mentorsand mentees, we are in the process of scheduling the mentor training sessions through theCIMER. This training will occur in Spring 2023 and will consist of four 1.5 hour sessionsutilizing CIMER Entering Mentoring curriculum with a focus on mentorship of junior faculty.Discussion and case studies will center DEI concepts and skills in this training. We will also bepreparing for the Project ELEVATE Summer Retreat, to be held in June 2023. This retreat is animportant event in our community building and will create and sustain cohorts and affinitynetworks
ensuring communicative effectiveness of our end product.Theoretical Framework: Figured Worlds and Narrative AgencyIn their seminal work, Holland and colleagues (1998) conceptualized the complex interactionsbetween social systems and individuals as agency and identity formation in figured worlds. Theydefine this concept as the realized capacity for an individual to purposefully and reflectively act(i.e., agency) on contexts containing “socially-produced, culturally-constructed activities” (i.e.,figured worlds, Holland et al., 1998, p. 40-41). As individuals iteratively interact with and withinthese figured worlds, they make meaning of themselves and form their identities. Figured worldsinclude four characteristics: (1) they are historically
prior work done in measuring spatialvisualization skills, our work involves contributions concerning international engineeringeducation.We are embarking on this project to develop a test from scratch rather than using existingassessment tools. Before making our own, we want to learn from previous projects what doesand does not work in existing assessment tools with a critical lens. Often, the tests currently usedin literature and the subsequent course or curriculum appear to result in score gains of studentsafter the intervention [3]. We are questioning whether this could be a result of the test notaccurately capturing the spatial visualization skills initially, whether this reflects ceiling/flooreffect in statistical data analyses, or if gains
. Mueller-Alexander and H. J. Seaton, “Researching Native Americans: Tips on vocabulary, search strategies and internet resources.” Database, 17(2), 45, Apr. 1994.[2] A. Soto, A. B. H. Sanchez, J. M. Mueller-Alexander, and J. Martin. “Researching Native Americans: Reflections on Vocabulary, Search Strategies, and Technology.” Online Searcher, 45(5), 10–19, Sep./Oct. 2021.[3] D. Thomas, “Reflections on Inclusive Language and Indexing.” Key Words, 28(4), 14–18, Win. 2020.[4] D. Thomas, “Another Look in the Mirror: Correction to Reflections on Inclusive Language and Indexing.” Key Words, 29(2), 26, Sum. 2021.[5] S. Ullstrom, “Decolonizing the index.” Indexer, 34(3), 110–112, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.3828/indexer
design and implementation of learning objective-based grading for transparent and fair assessment; and the integration of reflection to develop self-directed learners. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Response Process Validity of the CBE Adaptability Instrument When Used With Engineering InstructorsI. IntroductionThere have been several calls of action to change undergraduate engineering education with onefocus being on the adoption of research-based instructional practices [1]. Adoption of research-based instructional practices have been shown to contribute to attracting and retainingundergraduate STEM students [2]. This is particularly important given that more than
]. Thoseinstitutions with larger endowments reflected higher performance and retention than thoseinstitutions allocating minimal resources. In addition, school size, climate, and collective efficacywere components reported in the literature which affected student success [32], [33]. Hoy andTarter reported higher achievement rates from institutions who significantly emphasized onacademics as well as faculty trust [34]. Less populated institutions reported higher achievementlevels and higher retention patterns [35], [36], [37], while it was observed that institutions withhigher standards of collective responsibility for learning experienced higher student performancerates. Coleman reported that more than 20% of student success is linked to the family
theiractual practice (psychomotor) or to speak up when they see unsafe behavior among their peers.In addition, a considerable number of responses did not demonstrate any understanding of safetyprocedure and practice among the students.Among the responses, a few responses were noteworthy as these responses demonstrated the twoextremes: lack of safety knowledge and resources available for safety, and proper understandingof safety and reporting needs. The comments were paraphrased below. • Comments reflecting safety incidents that were not reported to EH&S: o Students left a soldering iron on and unattended for an extended period. o Students were disassembling a large steel structure which was not properly supported
college selection and math and science achievement.Moreover, socioeconomic status influences access to resources and experiences. Thus, somefamilies and parents must be made aware of STEM career opportunities. With this knowledge,parents can guide their children to enter a specific field, particularly in technology-related areas(Scheitle & Ecklund, 2017; Yerdelen et al., 2016). Also, religion and spirituality can influence anindividual’s likelihood of entering a STEM field. Religious people are more likely to bediscouraged from entering STEM careers, particularly physics- and biology-related fields(Scheitel & Ecklund, 2017). The findings of Scheitel and Ecklund (2017) reflect that lower levelsof interest in science and higher rates of
refining during the later stages oftheir design processes. Meanwhile, professional participants often reflected on ways theynarrowed down their target context and target users and acknowledged settings in which theirsolutions should not be implemented. For example, one participant described: “There's such a vast diversity of context that patients receive care…it is an extremely complex and varying group…I mean there are lots of cases where [this product] either can't or shouldn't be used.”- Professional participant C4.2.2 Characterization of LMIC contexts Experienced designers acknowledged more nuance and differences across differentLMICs and within them than students. In general, student participants used terms like “low-resource
), an HSI in the State University of New York (SUNY) system. In year one, Cohort Apiloted the PD modules in Tier 1 which featured reflective exercises and small culturallyresponsive activities to try with their STEM students. In year two, Cohort A piloted the PDmodules in Tier 2 and peer-mentored Cohort B as they piloted optimizations introduced to Tier 1from Cohort A feedback. Three types of optimizations came from faculty feedback. The firstconsidered feedback regarding delivery and/or nature of the content that influenced a subsequentmodule. The second involved making changes to a particular module before it was delivered toanother faculty cohort. The third takes into account what worked and what didn’t to decidewhich content to bring into
the development of a Sense of belonging. Tinto [14] also comments that studentswith a strong Sense of belonging tend to persist because it boosts motivation and the willingnessto be involved with other people, further promoting persistence.Figure 2 presents the CLD built with the causal relationships described in the previousparagraphs. A higher sense of belonging in URM students increases their willingness to persistand complete a program, which in turn reflects on a larger number of URM graduate studentsand a diversification of the STEM field which in turn improves the Environment. A moreinclusive environment will impact positively the Sense of belonging. Figure 2. Causal Loop Diagram for hypothesis 2For the third
teamwork. Smith and Imbrie [18]characterize effective teams and teamwork according to the following elements: positiveinterdependence (sharing a common objective), individual and group accountability(embracing responsibility for the work), encouraging interaction (interpersonal engagementleading to concrete action), teamwork skills (including effective communication, decisionmaking, leadership and conflict resolution), and group processing (reflection that recognisessuccesses and identifies areas for improvement). Conflict resolution also has an impact onincreasing student commitment towards the team, as they feel they are more validated byparticipating and their opinions are being taken into consideration [19]. Skills and structurestherefore have
experience and understanding of the techniques. Students wereasked to submit the task distribution and responsibilities to the instructor prior to each O-Edesign lab activity. This project is reflective of the adopted instructor-structured cooperativelearning strategies that include assigning roles to members of each group, rotating rolesperiodically, allowing team member’s rate each other’s contributions and group accountability.On the team reports, students were instructed to outline the steps taken to arrive at solutions,potential alternatives, and limitations, much like a standard Senior Project design. In addition to team lab reports, team presentations were also part of their learningactivities, and they were asked to include the
). These experiences embedded inthe curriculum and engineering design courses allows engineering students to develop anempathic formation compass required to flourish in co-design processes (Smeenk et al., 2019).In engineering education, especially in programs tending towards engineering science, teachingempathy needs careful pedagogical consideration. As such the need for empathy in engineeringneeds to be more visible to students to make meaningful and purposeful connections with priorassumptions and foster epistemic attitudes toward the construct (Walther et al., 2020). Thisembodiment of empathy in professional education allows students to recognize and reflect on theservice nature of the engineering profession and its potential connections to
theuniversity is to serve the local population of the region in which it is located. 95% of students arecommuters [2], and over a third of the student body are transfer students, predominantly from thelarge network of community colleges serving the East side of Los Angeles. A very highHispanic-enrolling Minority Serving Institution (MSI), 70% of students identify atHispanic/Latinx [1], which is also consistent with the regional population.Student demographic characteristics at Cal State LA are also reflective of the systemicoppression broadly experienced by Communities of Color on the East side of Los Angeles. Themedian family income of students at Cal State LA is $40,300 per year [3], and 60% qualify forfederal Pell Grants [4]. While exact data is not
initiative to comprehend and buildmore in-depth information and skills needed for scientific applications. Hence, an undergraduatecourse should incorporate applied laboratory implementation applications. As such, educators areresponsible for ensuring that students acquire a strong sense of learning motivation and scientificinquiry skills [12]. School laboratories are a crucial part of any STEM education. They enhancestudents’ engagement in a variety of experimental learning skills, such as conception andexperimentation followed by reflection, analysis, and data interpretation. Establishing the worthof the laboratory equipment in the department is crucial before starting a comparison of labmodalities. Topics in the laboratory manual for Introduction
What were the Alliance members’ prior experiences in collaborativenetworks that they bring into the new Alliance? and In the context of equity, how are the newlyformed Alliance’s members’ funds of knowledge being honored and valued?. To answer thesequestions, we used the Framework Method [40] for conducting a qualitative study using a semi-structured interview protocol with members from partner organizations within this Alliance2 .3.1 Data CollectionTwo of the researchers conducted the interviews in which participants reflected on the first fourmonths of the start of the Alliance to gain baseline knowledge of the type of early patterns andnorms being established and factors that may contribute to their establishment. We asked questionsdesigned
communities…” [13, p.761], highlighting the way the STEM curricula centers dominant groups’ cultures andepistemologies. As a result, STEM programs may continue to see high rates of attrition amongIndigenous students [18]. While students from different BLI groups have their own uniquehistories that shape the oppression they experience in STEM, some commonalities in BLI STEMstudents’ challenges are experiencing systemic racism and navigating institutions that value thedominant groups’ culture, which can be quite distinct from their own [5], [13], [16], [17]).Meritocracy in Engineering Becoming an engineer includes learning core values of the profession, subliminally orexplicitly, which may reflect the worldviews of privileged groups. While these
opportunities. IntroductionThe United States (U.S.) has seen an increased emphasis on providing computational thinking(CT) learning opportunities for every P-12 student. The increased emphasis is reflected by theinclusion of CT in the Standards for Technological and Engineering Literacy (STEL) [2] and theNext Generation Science Standards (NGSS) [1]. These standards promote the integration of CTwithin authentic, design-based engineering and science contexts. While the benefits ofintegrating CT and engineering practices are clear, there is still much to learn about the methodsused to integrate CT within authentic engineering design challenges. One strategy, physicalcomputing (the design, programming, and
assignments to help them with motor control and ultrasonic sensor work.But there was still a need to teach them how to create a code that others could read and follow.To achieve repeatable code, comments in the code matter greatly, and the mentors wish they hademphasized this importance more, especially when working in a group where others will readand use your code. Next year the mentors will explain to the apprentices how to comment theircode effectively for others to use.Upon reflection, it would have been helpful to have conflict resolution training for the mentors tobetter help the apprentice teams that were having interpersonal issues. Most issues were easy tohandle but there were some more complex issues. The mentors did have weekly meetings