teachingpractices, making their lessons more engaging and effective for students [Prince 2004;Janardhanan and Panda. 2019].After the pandemic, the adoption of technological/digital tools has been maximized; there hasbeen a growing emphasis on integrating technological tools into the classroom [Shivangi2020; Khe et.al., 2020; Sprenger and Schwaninger, 2021]. The students adapted totechnology, and there is a paradigm shift in classroom instruction with technology to maketeaching and learning more engaging, efficient, and effective. However, to harness thepotential of technology-enabled learning, it is essential to upskill teachers in techno-pedagogical skills [Lina et.al., 2020]. Empowering teachers with technological tools forteaching involves providing
worsens [4]. Despite this, the issue of representation within chemical engineeringspecifically remains under-researched. Indeed, a literature search of Chemical EngineeringEducation (CEE) and the ASEE chemical engineering division proceedings yielded only twostudies focused on gender [2, 4]; we did, however, find studies in CEE focused on studentdemographics more broadly [5] and one study in an international journal focused on theexperiences of women in chemical engineering [6].Most research about gender diversity in chemical engineering has focused on women’saspirations to study chemical engineering. Godwin and Potvin (2013) conducted a detailedquantitative analysis of pre-college factors related to students’ reasons for choosing
] Chopra, A.K. (2016) Dynamics of Structures, 5th Ed. Pearson.[7] Clough, R. W., & Penzien, J. (2003). Dynamics of structures. Berkeley. CA: Computers &Structures.[8] Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions,comparisons, and research bases. Journal of engineering education, 95(2), 123-138.[9] McDaniel, C., & Archer, G. (2009, June), Developing A Feel For Structural Behavior Paperpresented at 2009 Annual Conference & Exposition, Austin, Texas. 10.18260/1-2--5095[10] Facciolo, C. D., & Behrouzi, A. A. (2019). Interactive Physical Experiments in anAdvanced Undergraduate Structural Dynamics Course. In 2019 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition.[11] Riley, C., Millar, J. D
J. M. Pearce, “Open-source 3-D printing technologies for education: Bringing additive manufacturing to the classroom,” Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, vol. 28, pp. 226-237, 2015.[4] S. Ford and T. Minshall, “ Invited review article: Where and how 3D printing is used in teaching and education,” Additive Manufacturing, vol. 25, pp. 131-150, 2019.[5] S. S. Horowitz and P. H. Schultz, “Printing space: Using 3D printing of digital terrain models in geosciences education and research,” Journal of Geoscience Education, vol. 62, pp. 138-145, 2014.[6] M. Carrió, P. Larramona, J. E. Baños and J. Pérez, “The effectiveness of the hybrid problem-based learning approach in the teaching of biology: a comparison with lecture
2019 Award for Excellence in Education Abroad Curriculum Design. He has also worked as a construction project engineer, consultant, and safety inspector. He be- lieves that educating the next generation of professionals will play a pivotal role in sustainability standard practices. In terms of engagement, Dr. Valdes-Vasquez has served as the USGBC student club’s adviser and the ASC Sustainability Team’s faculty coach since 2013. He is currently serving as a CSU President’s Sustainabil- ity Commission member, among multiple other committees. In addition, he is involved with various professional organizations at the national level, including the American Society for Engineering Educa- tion (ASEE), the
definition of first-year-in-engineering in mind to bettersupport engineering students during their matriculation year. Findings may also have value tosimilar programs who are interested in supporting students through peer mentorship. Furtherwork on this project will continue data collection and analysis to develop a full list ofrecommendations for engineering educators. References[1] T. L. Strayhorn, College Students’ Sense of Belonging: A Key to Educational Success for All Students, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, 2018. doi: 10.4324/9781315297293.[2] “The Looming Enrollment Crisis,” The Chronicle of Higher Education, Nov. 2019. Accessed: Feb. 09, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://store.chronicle.com
2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’23, to appear.18. Amy Hurst, Shawn Grimes, Darius McCoy, Nicholas Carter, William Easley, Foad Hamidi, and Gabrielle Salib. 2018. Board #59: Lessons learned creating youth jobs in an afterschool maker space. In 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--2797219. Anna Keune, Kylie A. Peppler, and Karen E. Wohlwend. 2019. Recognition in makerspaces: Supporting opportunities for women to “make” a STEM career. Computers in human behavior 99: 368–380.20. Garry Kidd and Frank Naylor. 1991. The predictive power of measured interests in tertiary course choice: The case of science. Australian journal of
-Level Aerospace Mechanics of Materials Courses,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, Florida: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2019, p. 33146. doi: 10.18260/1-2--33146.[8] S. D’Mello and A. Graesser, “Dynamics of affective states during complex learning,” Learn. Instr., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 145–157, Apr. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.10.001.[9] K. R. Muis, M. Chevrier, and C. A. Singh, “The Role of Epistemic Emotions in Personal Epistemology and Self-Regulated Learning,” Educ. Psychol., vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 165–184, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1080/00461520.2017.1421465.[10] I. M. Gómez-Chacón, “Meta-emotion and Mathematical Modeling Processes in Computerized Environments,” in From beliefs to dynamic
/pceea.v0i0.12977.[24] C. Morton, A. Huang-Saad, and J. Libarkin, “Entrepreneurship Education for Women in Engineering: A Systematic Review of Entrepreneurship Assessment Literature with a Focus on Gender,” in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, New Orleans, Louisiana: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2016, p. 26725. doi: 10.18260/p.26725.[25] M. Benitez Jr., “Resituating culture centers within a social justice framework,” in Culture centers in higher education: Perspectives on identity, theory, and practice, Sterling, Virginia: Stylus Publishing, LLC, 2010, pp. 119–134.[26] J. Jackson, M. Pearson, A. Huang-Saad, and J.-L. Mondisa, “Innovating Innovation: Advancing Racial Equity in STEM Entrepreneurship Programming,” J
projects can foster the inclusion of students with learning disabilities (Daniela and Lytras, 2019; Nanou and Karampatzakis, 2022). In the case of tertiary education, industrial-scale robots are used to prepare students for careers in industry by emphasizing aspects such as hardware, software, and human-machine interfaces (Nagai, 2001; Brell-Çokcan and Braumann, 2013). However, industrial-scale robots are expensive to purchase. In addition, there is usually some oversight over their usage due to time-sharing and to prevent damage, which prevents "free-play" by students. Some solutions to this include the use of miniature robots and the use of online labs (Mallik and Kapila, 2020; Stein and Lédeczi, 2021). Though these reduce the cost of the setups
the Program is providedfollowed by a detailed recount of the design process.1.1 Background1.1.1 UniversitiesMSU Denver is a primarily undergraduate university that has been classified as both a minority-serving and Hispanic-serving institution since 2019. The University has an open enrollmentpolicy and specializes in non-traditional (e.g., average student age is 25), first-generation (e.g.,57% of the student body), and veteran education. The University primarily serves the Denvercommunity, where approximately 96% of the student body is from Colorado with the vastmajority coming from the surrounding counties. Additionally, EAET offers both bachelor’sdegrees and undergraduate certificate programs.The University of Pécs (UP) is the oldest
University as a faculty member. As a licensed professional engineer in the states of Connecticut and California, Dr. Jiang has been involved in the design of a variety of low-rise and high-rise projects, including office towers, retails, hotels, courthouses, and theatres according to the U.S. and international building codes. He is a member of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC), Structural Engineers Association of Northern California (SEAONC), Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI), and American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE).Dr. Zhuwei Qin, San Francisco State UniversityDr. Jenna Wong, San Francisco State University Dr. Wong is an Assistant
: The CDIO Approach," J. Malmqvist, S. Östlund, D. R. Brodeur, and K. Edström, Eds., Second edition ed: Cham : Springer, 2014.[3] M. Wisnioski, "What's the Use? History and Engineering Education Research," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 244-251, 2015.[4] D. T. Bourdeau and B. L. Wood, "What Is Humanistic STEM and Why Do We Need It?," Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 205-216, 2019, doi: 10.5642/jhummath.201901.11.[5] J. W. Bequette and M. B. Bequette, "A place for art and design education in the STEM conversation," Art Education, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 40-47, 2012.[6] D. Henriksen, "Full STEAM ahead: Creativity in excellent STEM teaching practices," The STEAM journal, vol. 1, no
. Godwin, "Engineering identity implications on the retention of Black women in engineering industry," in ASEE Annual Conference, New Orleans, LA, 2016.[9] M. S. Ross, J. L. Huff, and A. Godwin, "Resilient engineering identity development critical to prolonged engagement of Black women in engineering," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 110, pp. 92-113, 2021.[10] b. hooks, Feminism is for everybody: Passionate politics: South End Press, 2000.[11] V. Ray, "A theory of racialized organizations," American Sociological Review, vol. 84, pp. 26-53, 2019/02/01 2019.[12] E. P. Douglas, G. A. Dietz, and E. D. McCray, "Whiteness and race in the engineering workplace," in Frontiers in Education Conference, online
, Second Edition. Purdue University Press, 2015.[6] I. Osunbunmi and N. Fang, “Work in Progress: An Early Look Into the Systematic Review of Project-Based Learning in Engineering Education,” in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022.[7] O. Adesope, O. J. Sunday, E. R. Ewumi, A. Minichiello, M. Asghar, and C. S. Claiborn, “Investigating factors that predict academic success in engineering and computer science,” in American Society for Engineering Education Conference, 2021.[8] P. g. de Barba, G. e. Kennedy, and M. d. Ainley, “The role of students’ motivation and participation in predicting performance in a MOOC,” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 218–231, 2016
the Chair of IEEE Northeast Michigan Section, and vice-chair for ASEE North Central Section. He is a senior member of IEEE, founding advisor for the IEEE Student Chapter at CMU, an elected mem- ber of Tau Beta Pi engineering honor society, Omicron Delta Kappa national leadership honor society, and a senior member of IETI.Mrs. Taylor Chesson, Tennessee Technological University Taylor Chesson is an Online Instructional Design Specialist in the Center for Innovation in Teaching and Learning at Tennessee Technological University. She enjoys working alongside instructors to combine traditional teaching methods with best pedagogical practices and emerging technologies. Prior to her role at Tennessee Tech, she worked as a
,” presented at the2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022. Available: https://peer.asee.org/lesson-learned-active-learning-coaching-program-to-promote-faculty-development-and-innovation-in-stem-courses[10] N. Emery, J. M. Maher, and D. Ebert-May, “Studying Professional Development as Part ofthe Complex Ecosystem of STEM Higher Education,” Innov High Educ, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 469–479, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10755-019-09475-9.[11] J. A. Supovitz, D. P. Mayer, and J. B. Kahle, “Promoting Inquiry-Based InstructionalPractice: The Longitudinal Impact of Professional Development in the Context of SystemicReform,” Educational Policy, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 331–356, 2000, doi:10.1177/0895904800014003001.[12] Y. Furman Shaharabani and T. Tal, “Teachers
the global engineering teachingcommunity through our library system.Acknowledgment This work is supported by National Science Foundation Grant EEC-2022275 to createopportunities for revolutionizing the preparation of students. We thank Lani Draper, eSAILInstructional Designer, for her help in developing the module videos.References[1] R. J. Marandi, B. K. Smith, R. F. Burch, and S. C. Vick, “Engineering soft skills vs. engineering entrepreneurial skills,” Int J Eng Educ, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 988-998, 2019.[2] R. Reagans and E. W. Zuckerman, “Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams,” Organization Science, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 502-517, 2001.[3] P. Pazos et al
of Science, are still insufficient tomeet the need (National Science Board NASEM, 2018). In the field of engineering, for example,the Institution of Engineers Australia showed there is a gap between employers' expectations andengineers’ skills: “While the existence of a persistent skills shortage is difficult to quantify, it isclear that Australia is facing an engineering skills disparity that needs to be addressed” (Bell &Briggs, 2022, p. 16). This skills shortage and the high expectation of employers create highpressure that generates anxiety and stress when recent graduate experiments join a company(Jackson, 2014; Kolmos & Holgaard, 2019). In this project, we iteratively study three highly interactive courses which are
/statistics-and- factsn.com/datasheets/Robotics/DG01D.jpg[5] “Bathroom Faucets,” US EPA, Oct. 20, 2016. https://www.epa.gov/watersense/bathroom-faucets (accessed Apr. 28, 2022).[6] “Population Clock.” https://www.census.gov/popclock/ (accessed Apr. 28, 2022).[7] Maheswaran, B., & Guo, Y., & Hervella, A., & Pavlov, A., & Dinh, M. D. (2019, June), Water Flow Generator: Innovating Water Faucet Use Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2--33545Appendix1: Data Collection using Arduino Software in a Sparkfun RedboardAppendix 2: Water pour raw data
Paper ID #39774Gender Harassment at Work and In School: Seeing It; Solving It (PanelDiscussion)Tamara Floyd Smith, West Virginia University Institute of TechnologyDr. Jennifer J VanAntwerp, Calvin University Jennifer VanAntwerp, Ph.D., is Professor of Chemical Engineering at Calvin University. Her research focuses on gender in engineering, both among students and professionals. Dr. VanAntwerp is the recip- ient of the 2015 Denice D. Denton Best Paper Award from the ASEE Women in Engineering Division. She is co-author of the recent book Sex, Gender, and Engineering: Harassment at Work and In School (Cambridge Scholars
students. The course’sprimary objective is to introduce Mechanical Engineering students to programming and toprepare students for subsequent courses including courses in numerical methods,experimentation and instrumentation, and system modeling. This course also serves as one ofthree courses introducing first-year students to Mechanical Engineering. While the course hasexisted for some time, it began a transition to its current form in Fall 2019. The courseintroduces students to C++ programming on the Arduino platform and programming in theMatlab numeric computing platform. The course focuses on fundamental programming conceptssuch as variables, conditional statements, loops, arrays, and functions and on programmingapplications in mechanical
Computing. 2022. ISSN 1530-8669. 7. Report, “The Internet of Things: An Overview”, released October 2015, Internet Society. 8. “2019 manufacturing trends report”, Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA, Rep. Microsoft Dynamics 365, 2018. 9. Ahn, Jungmo, et. al., “Convolutional Neural Network-based Classification System Design with Compressed Wireless Sensor Network Images”, PIOS one, 13(5), P.e0196251. 10. Minaie, Afsaneh, et al., “Integration of Wireless Sensor Networks in the Computer Science and Engineering Curricula”, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, June 2012. 11. 2. Li, Yingshu, My Thai, and Weili Wu, “Wireless Sensor Networks and Applications”, Springer, 2008. 12. 3. Dargie, Waltenegus, and
. B. Campbell, W. F. Denetclaw, S. Gutierrez, S. Hurado, G. H. John, J. Matsui, R. McGee, C. M. Okpodu, T. J. Robinson, M. F. Summers, M. Werner-Washburne, and M. Zavala, “Improving underrepresented minority student persistence in stem,” CBE—Life Sciences Education, vol. 15, no. 3, p. es5, 2017. [4] M. I. Shuster, J. Curtiss, T. F. Wright, C. Champion, M. Sharifi, and J. Bosland, “Implementing and evaluating a course-based undergraduate research experience (cure) at a hispanic-serving institution,” Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, vol. 13, no. 2, 2019. [5] D. M. Arnold, C. J. Mortensen, A. C. Thoron, E. K. Miller-Cushon, and J. K. Miot, “Contrasting science learning gains and attitudes of
, and directed many interdisciplinary projects related to design. Dr. Pidaparti’s research interests are in the broad areas of multi-disciplinary design, computational mechanics, nanotechnology, and related topics. Dr. Pidaparti has published over 250 technical papers in refereed journals and conference proceedings. Dr. Pidaparti received a Research Initiation Award from the National Science Foundation and the Young Investigator Award from the Whitaker Foundation. He is a member of Tau Beta Pi, Sigma Gamma Tau, and Who’s Who societies. He is a member of professional societies including AIAA (Associate Fellow), AAAS (Fellow), ASME (Fellow), RAeS (Fellow), and ASEE (member). Dr. Pidaparti will move to University of
, gender disparities persist across many engineeringdisciplines and are particularly high in mechanical engineering and electrical engineering, with less than20% of undergraduate degrees being awarded to women (ASEE By the Numbers 2021). K12 roboticsprograms have shown potential in increasing a student’s likelihood of enrolling in a mechanical orelectrical majors. By broadening the applications of robotics to human-centered designs and highlightingsoft and biomaterials used in building robots, the field of soft robotics may be a platform to engage adiversity of students in K12 robotics and later, engineering majors. This paper presents a pilot studyaimed at answering the research question: Can a soft robotics curriculum impact high school
,” in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, 2021.[11] R. G. Abd Ellah, “Water resources in Egypt and their challenges, Lake Nasser case study,” Egypt. J. Aquat. Res., vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 1–12, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ejar.2020.03.001.[12] P. E. Spector, Summated Rating Scale Construction: An Introduction. SAGE, 1992.[13] R. Johnson and L. Christensen, Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches, 5th ed. Washington D.C.: Sage Publisher, 2014.[14] J. F. Hair, W. Black, and B. Babin, Multivariate data analysis, 8th ed. Cengage Learning, 2019.[15] I. Osunbunmi, “A Mixed-Methods Study of College Experiences and Learning and Study Strategies of High-Achieving Engineering Students,” Grad
board in quarterly meetings over two years. The board included national experts inengineering education, STEM education, project evaluation, and the field of engineering. Theengineers represent both individuals from rural communities and historically underrepresentedpopulations (female and African American). Together, the group prepared the integrated content,assessments, and reflections, which led to the design of a 3.5-day NEIR-ED PD workshop.Following the design phase, the PIs identified rural high schools to participate in the workshopthat covers the following: (details and examples will be provided at the ASEE conference)• Knowledge of engineering core ideas;• Practices and pedagogical knowledge and skills to teach engineering design in a
ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, Tampa, Florida, Jun. 2019. doi: 10.18260/1-2--32351.[11] K. Hadley and W. Oyetunji, “Extending the theoretical framework of numeracy to engineers,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 376–399, 2022, doi: 10.1002/jee.20453.[12] R. J. Mislevy, “Evidence and inference in educational assessment,” Psychometrika, vol. 59, no. 4, Art. no. 4, Dec. 1994, doi: 10.1007/BF02294388.[13] M. M. Riconscente, R. J. Mislevy, and S. Corrigan, “Evidence-centered design,” in Handbook of test development, 2nd ed, New York, NY, US: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, 2016, pp. 40–63.[14] Association of American Colleges and Universities, “Quantitative Literacy VALUE Rubric