these constructs; Intrinsic goalorientation, Task value, Expectancy component and Metacognition increased after theyparticipated in the experiment whereas Test Anxiety reduced after the students were taught usingECP (mean = -0.21, test anxiety is expected to continuously decrease due to the intervention). Thisshows that the students are now confident in the biology concept they have learned.As previously mentioned, Table 2's results provide the summary statistics (mean, standarddeviation, and mean difference) as well as the p-values of paired t-tests of students' pre- and post-test scores for each MLSQ domain.Other notable improvements in the domain were in students’ Task value (subdomains: I am veryinterested in the content area of this course
circumstances, such as poor acoustics, room size, temperature, or aglaring blackboard, that could interfere with teaching and learning, are noted. The classobservation is completed before the end of the tenth week of the semester.Post Observation: This meeting is essential to share the observation outcomes. A post-observation form with guiding questions ensures that peer-observers follow a standardizedprocess. Faculty members also ask their own questions to the peer-observer(s). The discussioninvolves sharing notes and comments with the instructor, highlighting the positive aspects of theinstructions, and providing suggestions to further improve the quality of teaching. Either thecommittee member or the instructor may bring up any issue that needs
education a tri-annual publication of the associated schools of construction,” 2000.[3] B. Abbasnejad, G. Aranda-Mena, A. Nasirian, P. S. P. Wong, and A. Ahankoob, “Implementation of integrated BIM-VR into construction management curriculum: Lessons learned and development of a decision support system,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Institute of Physics, 2022. doi: 10.1088/1755- 1315/1101/9/092029.[4] D. Nikolic, S. Jaruhar, and J. I. Messner, “Educational Simulation in Construction: Virtual Construction Simulator,” Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 421–429, Nov. 2011, doi: 10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000098.[5] M. Afzal, M. T. Shafiq, and H
this material are those of the author(s) and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the URECA program. We would like to acknowledge all theresearchers, data collectors, and students who participated in the study.References[1] L. D. Xu, E. L. Xu and L. Li, “Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends,” InternationalJournal of Production Research 56, no. 8, pp. 2941-2962, 2018.[2] R. Jiao, L. Luo, J. Malmqvist and J. Summers, “New Design: Opportunities for EngineeringDesign in an Era of Digital Transformation,” Journal of Engineering Design 33, no. 10, pp. 685-690, 2022.[3] J. M. Wing, “Computational Thinking,” Communications of the ACM 49, no. 3, pp. 33-35,2006.[4] Y. Li, A. H. Schoenfeld, A.A. diSessa, A. C. Graesser, L. C. Benson, L. D
studies could focus on expanding the sample size and exploring different age groups oreducational levels to assess the generalizability of the findings. Moreover, researchers couldinvestigate the long-term effects of using Minecraft on the development and application of theseskills in real-world contexts. Overall, these directions could help identify the most effective waysto utilize Minecraft as a tool for developing these skills in students and support the continuousimprovement of educational practices in the field of construction engineering.References[1] S. A. M. Mohamed, “Safety Climate in Construction Site Environments,” Journal of the Construction Division and Management, vol. 128, no. 5, pp. 375–384, Sep. 2002, doi: 10.1061/(asce
program was grant-funded and provided busing to and from AMSA’s campus fromstudents’ homes for student populations that identified this need, as well as to and from bothinstitutions the second week for all participants. The overall cost of the program broke down to$708 per pupil. The S-STEM survey [14] was used as a pre- and post-intervention measure, aswell as an additional exit survey. The S-STEM survey indicated no statistically significantchanges in interest in or attitudes towards STEM. Program coordinators felt this was probablynot the correct program metric instrument considering the population involved and the brevity ofthe program. The additional exit survey in comparison to the entrance survey saw no differencein students planning to
they view the relationshipbetween the AEC industry and society.References[1] E. A. Cech, "Culture of disengagement in engineering education?," Science, Technology, and Human Values, pp. 42-72, 2014.[2] L. Debs, C. M. Gray and P. A. Asunda, "Students' perceptions and reasoning patterns about ethics of emerging technology," International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 2022.[3] K. G. Bristol, "The Pruitt-Igoe myth," Journal of Architectural Education, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 163-171, 1991.[4] M. Wachs, P. S. Chesney and Y. H. Hwang, "A Century of Fighting Traffic Congestion in Lost Angeles," UCLA Luskin Center for History and Policy, Los Angeles, 2020.[5] C. Martani, S. Eberle and B. T. Adey, "Evaluating highway design
Introductory Microcontroller Course,” Oct. 2019, pp. 1–8. doi: 10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028650.[2] “Theory – selfdeterminationtheory.org.” https://selfdeterminationtheory.org/theory/ (accessed Feb. 07, 2023).[3] A. K. Koch, “It’s About the Gateway Courses: Defining and Contextualizing the Issue,” New Dir. High. Educ., vol. 2017, no. 180, pp. 11–17, 2017, doi: 10.1002/he.20257.[4] T. Weston, E. Seymour, A. Koch, and B. Drake, “Weed-Out Classes and Their Consequences,” 2019, pp. 197–243. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-25304-2_7.[5] W. Bloemer, S. Day, and K. Swan, “Gap Analysis: An Innovative Look at Gateway Courses and Student Retention,” Online Learn. J. OLJ, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 5–15, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.24059/olj.v21i3.1233.[6] R. M
following responses:1) Strongly disagree, 2) Disagree, 3) Neither agree nor disagree, 4) Agree, 5) Strongly agreeQuestion 1: The concepts in the workshop/seminar were interesting to me.Likert ScaleQuestion 2: The workshop/seminar has motivated me to continue learning about PLM topic(s).Likert ScaleQuestion 3: The workshop/seminar was well-organized and clearly explained the digitalconcepts.Likert ScaleQuestion 4: The workshop/seminar clearly established the relevance of the topics to business andindustry.Likert ScaleQuestion 5: The knowledge gained in this workshop/seminar will positively impact my (future)academic studies and/or professional career.Likert ScaleQuestion 6: Which of the following would have the greatest impact in making theworkshop
part of the continued development of the game-based ethical interventions, we are piloting anew assessment tool specific for playful learning in engineering ethics and aimed at measuringstudents ethical reasoning and thought process after they have played the game(s).The past year has provided insight into the potential limitations of the existing methods formeasuring changes in ethical reasoning in students, as well as compared changes between firstyear and senior students. The last year has highlighted the situated or contextual nature of muchof the ethical decision making that students do and incorporated both qualitative and quantitativemethods. Further results from this investigation will provide the engineering education communitywith a
conferences.Wendy CagleDr. Scott Rowe, Western Carolina University Scott Rowe is an Assistant Professor in Western Carolina University’s School of Engineering + Technol- ogy. He joined Western Carolina University in 2021 after studies in concentrated solar power and controls engineering at the University of Colorado Boulder. Scott’s research relates to accessible and inexpensive engineering equipment for laboratory education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Fostering Leaders in Technology Entrepreneurship (FLiTE): Program Goals and First Year ActivitiesThe NSF S-STEM funded program titled Fostering Leaders in Technology Entrepreneurship(FLiTE) at Western Carolina
: The CDIO Approach," J. Malmqvist, S. Östlund, D. R. Brodeur, and K. Edström, Eds., Second edition ed: Cham : Springer, 2014.[3] M. Wisnioski, "What's the Use? History and Engineering Education Research," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 244-251, 2015.[4] D. T. Bourdeau and B. L. Wood, "What Is Humanistic STEM and Why Do We Need It?," Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 205-216, 2019, doi: 10.5642/jhummath.201901.11.[5] J. W. Bequette and M. B. Bequette, "A place for art and design education in the STEM conversation," Art Education, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 40-47, 2012.[6] D. Henriksen, "Full STEAM ahead: Creativity in excellent STEM teaching practices," The STEAM journal, vol. 1, no
, Thong Doan, Oliver Rew, NikoNikolay, and Guanyang He. We also acknowledge the support of projects PID2021-123041OB-I00, funded by MCIN/AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033 and by “ERDF A way of making Europe”,and by the CM under grant S2018/TCS-4423.References[1] RISC-V International: https://riscv.org/. Accessed February 21, 2023.[2] VeeR (SweRV) Cores: https://github.com/chipsalliance/Cores-VeeR-EH1, https://github.com/chipsalliance/Cores-VeeR-EL2, https://github.com/chipsalliance/Cores- VeeR-EH2. Accessed February 21, 2023.[3] Arm Introduction to Computer Architecture: https://www.arm.com/resources/education/education-kits/computer-architecture. Accessed February 21, 2023.[4] S. Harris, D. Harris, D. Chaver, R. Owen, Z. Kakakhel, E
was an importanttransferable skill (11 to 3), whereas for DS the order of career vs. transferable skills was reversed(3 to 7).Post-course survey /HYHORIDJUHHPHQWRXWRI x¯ ± s /HYHORIDJUHHPHQWRXWRI x¯ ± s &RQILGHQFHLQ &RQILGHQFHLQ SURFHVVLQJ
.2006.00170004.[3] “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2022-23,” ABET. https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2023-2024/#GC5 (accessed Mar. 21, 2023).[4] A. J. Dutson, R. H. Todd, S. P. Magleby, and C. D. Sorensen, “A Review of Literature on Teaching Engineering Design Through Project-Oriented Capstone Courses,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 86, pp. 17–28, 1997, doi: 10.1002/j.2168- 9830.1997.tb00260.x.[5] M. C. Paretti, J. D. Ford, S. Howe, D. A. Kotys-Schwartz, and R. Ott, “It’s a Context Gap, Not a Competency Gap: Understanding the Transition from Capstone Design to Industry,” in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, ASEE
Paper ID #36920Design Across the Curriculum: Improving Design Instruction in aMechanical Engineering Program.Dr. Sean Tolman, Utah Valley University Sean S. Tolman is an Associate Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Program at Utah Valley Univer- sity in Orem, UT. He earned his BSME degree at Brigham Young University in 2002 and a MSME degree from the University of Utah in 2008 before returning toDr. Matthew J Jensen, Utah Valley University Dr. Matthew J. Jensen received his bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology in 2006. Matthew received his doctorate from Clemson University
part of the continued development of the game-based ethical interventions, we are piloting anew assessment tool specific for playful learning in engineering ethics and aimed at measuringstudents ethical reasoning and thought process after they have played the game(s).The past year has provided insight into the potential limitations of the existing methods formeasuring changes in ethical reasoning in students, as well as compared changes between firstyear and senior students. The last year has highlighted the situated or contextual nature of muchof the ethical decision making that students do and incorporated both qualitative and quantitativemethods. Further results from this investigation will provide the engineering education communitywith a
students would perform during their undergraduate education. Finally, we suggest that anactivity like this should be evaluated as a research question(s) to find out if the intervention canreplace (maybe only partially replace) students’ perception of the “Mythical Engineer”.Understanding how education will help us write ourselves into our futuresOur second piece of how story and narrative are fundamental to diversifying engineering is morerelated to what is the fundamental transformation that begins in undergraduate education, andmore broadly, in higher education. Here, we look at the body of work by Baxter Magolda and herideas on intellectual development. As she has a broad base of research articles and books, we startby recommending some of her
the Psychology Department at Seattle University. Dr. Cook received her doctorate in Social and Personality Psychology from the University of Washington, with a minor in quantitative methods and emphases in cognitiveDr. Gregory Mason, P.E., zyBooks, A Wiley Brand Gregory S. Mason received the B.S.M.E. degree from Gonzaga University in 1983, the M.S.M.E. de- gree in manufacturing automation from Georgia Institute of Technology in 1984 and the Ph.D. degree in mechanical engineering, specializing in multi-rate digitalDr. Teodora Rutar Shuman, Seattle University Professor Teodora Rutar Shuman is the Chair of the Mechanical Engineering Department at Seattle Uni- versity. She is the PI on a NSF-RED grant. Her research
President's National Council for the American Worker. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential- actions/executive-order-establishing-presidents-national-council-american-worker/[4] Fayer, S., Lacey, A., & Watson, A. (2017). STEM occupations: Past, present, and future. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics: Spotlight on Statistics. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/spotlight/2017/science-technology-engineering-and-mathematics-stem- occupations-past-present-and-future[5] Miller, M. H., & Jordan, K. L. (2021, February), Engineering Design Curricula Review Paper presented at 2007 North Midwest Section Meeting, Houghton, MI. 10.18260/1-2-620-36184[6] Sheppard, S. and R. Jenison, "Freshman Engineering Design Experiences
thefinal project. When we compared the control group to the treatment group (grades and creativityscore), there was no evidence that the treatment group’s performance was better than the controlgroup. Based on these results alone, and due to the small sample size, it is unclear if the use of arobotic hand directly impacted student performance. This gives good cause to repeat theexperiment several more times before making a conclusive judgement.References[1] R. Felder, “Engineering Education: a Tale of two paradigms,” 2nd. Int Conf Geotech. Eng. Educ., pp. 9–14, 2012, [Online]. Available: http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/Papers/TwoParadigms.pdf. [Accessed April 28, 2023].[2] C. A. Jara, F. A. Candelas, S
. 100, no. 2, pp. 281–303, Apr. 2011.[5] A. L. Pawley, “Learning from small numbers: Studying ruling relations that gender and race the structure of U.S. engineering education,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 13–31, 2019, doi: 10.1002/jee.20247.[6] G. Ladson-Billings and W. F. Tate, “Toward a Critical Race Theory of Education,” Teachers College Record, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 47–68, Sep. 1995, doi: 10.1177/016146819509700104.[7] R. Delgado and J. Stefancic, Critical Race Theory: An Introduction, 2nd ed. New York: NYU Press, 2001.[8] R. Delgado, “Rodrigo’s Reconsideration: Intersectionality and the Future of Critical Race Theory,” Iowa Law Review, vol. 96, pp. 1247–1288, Jan. 2011.[9] P. H. Collins and S. Bilge
? Investigating relationships between teaching assistants and student outcomes in undergraduate science laboratory classes,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 463–492, Apr. 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21373.[4] C. Kepple and K. Coble, “Investigating potential influences of graduate teaching assistants on students’ sense of belonging in introductory physics labs,” PERC Proc., pp. 282–287, 2019.[5] S. M. Love Stowell et al., “Transforming Graduate Training in STEM Education,” Bull. Ecol. Soc. Am., vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 317–323, Apr. 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9623-96.2.317.[6] N. M. Trautmann and M. E. Krasny, “Integrating Teaching and Research: A New Model for Graduate Education
Experience Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual On line. 10.18260/1-2--34508[2] V. Johnston, Why do First Year Students Fail to Progress to their Second Year? An Academic Staff Perspective, In Proc. Of the 1997 British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Univ. of York, Sep. 1997[3] L.A. Kirby and C.L. Thomas, High-impact Teaching Practices Foster a Greater Sense of Belonging in the College Classroom, Journal of Further and Higher Education, Vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 368-381, Jul. 2021[4] Purzer, S., & Douglas, K. A., & Folkerts, J. A., & Williams, T. V. (2017, June), An Assessment Framework for First-Year Introduction to Engineering Courses Paper presented at 2017 ASEE
, have been themajor driving force of this movement. Correspondingly, we developed industry-like activities andproject scenarios for collaborative student teams, using existing and newly acquired Internet-basedComputer Numerical Control (CNC) machines, industrial robots and quality assurance systemsthat include cutting-edge, production equipment such as high speed computer numerical controlmilling machine(s) and ABB IRB120 6-Axes industrial robot.Renishaw QC20-W (Wireless) Ballbar SystemThe Renishaw QC20-W Ballbar and the software package is used to measure geometric errorspresent in a CNC machine tool and detect inaccuracies induced by its controller and servo drivesystems. Errors are measured by instructing the machine tool to “Perform a
and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of theUnited States Military Academy, Department of the Army, DoD, or U.S. Government.References[1] S. Nicholson, “Creating Engaging Escape Games for the Classroom,” Child. Educ., vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 44–49, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2018.14203.[2] E. Ozcelik, N. E. Cagiltay, and N. S. Ozcelik, “The effect of uncertainty on learning in game-like environments,” Comput. Educ., vol. 67, pp. 12–20, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.009.[3] R. Garris, R. Ahlers, and J. E. Driskell, “Games , motivation , and learning : A research and practice model,” Simul. Gaming, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 441–467, 2002, doi: 10.1177
result of achieving the stated learningobjectives for transportation concepts, ECP has positively impacted transportation engineeringstudents' understanding of transportation concepts. ECP has demonstrated that students betterunderstand the modules' expected learning outcomes.AcknowledgmentThis study is part of the work that was supported by the National Science Foundation Grant #1915615, titled “Adapting an Experiment-centric Teaching Approach to Increase StudentAchievement in Multiple STEM Disciplines”. It should be noted that the opinions, results andconclusion or recommendations expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] S. Zhu, F. Xie, and D. Levinson
Develop possible solution(s) solution(s) Select the best Test and evaluate possible the solution(s) solution(s) Construct a prototype Figure 1. Illustration of the engineering design process model adapted from the Massachusetts DoE [13]Teaching and learning with the engineering design processIdentifying a design process model to use
mentorscounts as mentoring when she shares, “…part of their recommendation as a mentor is that[classroom strategy] increases your [student evaluations] a lot… so, I guess that's a form ofmentorship." She recalls times of receiving help and affirmation, stating, “ [Another] professorjust in passing [said], ‘yeah, I have lab get-togethers,’ and I said, ‘yeah, I do that too.’” Here shecontinues to be uncertain whether these interactions were mentorship when she adds, “I don’tknow if that counts.” Blake seems more confident identifying non-relational forms ofmentorship, saying that she “Google [s] about it a lot, so it’s like the hive mind of mentorship(laughs), and [she goes] to workshops [that are] not really like one-on-one, but kindaprogrammatic
extent to which students be- Self-determination theory (Deci and Ryan, 2000), par- lieve they have meaningful control ticularly the importance of autonomy to intrinsic mo- over their learning. tivation (Reeve and Jang, 2006). (U)sefulness The extent to which students be- Future time perspective theory (Simons et al., 2004) lieve the material will be useful to and the utility value construct of expectancy-value them. theory (Wigfield and Eccles, 2000). (S)uccess The extent to which students be- Ability beliefs, including self-efficacy and com