2015ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2015.[2] S. C. Ritter and S. G. Bilén, “EDSGN 100: A first-year cornerstone engineering designcourse,” in 2019 FYEE Conference, 2019.[3] L. Prendergast and E. Etkina, “Review of a First-Year Engineering Design Course,” in 2014ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2014.[4] R. W. Freeman, K. Gentry, and J. E. Goldberg, “Changing the Advising Model,” in 2016ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2016.[5] S. Santillan, L. TeMiquel-McMillian, J. Ganley, and S. Tantum, “WIP - 360 Coaching toSupport Whole-Student Advising in the First-Year,” in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, 2022.[6] J. K. Brown, N. Stringer, R. K. Anderson, and L. Whisler, “Supporting Student LearningThrough Peer-led Course
where sectionsof the course had teams with: homogeneous, heterogeneous, and random (control) cultural competency. Culturalcompetency was examined using the Miville-Guzman Universality-Diversity Scale short form (M-GUDS-S) whichmeasures a single construct of Universal- diversity orientation (UDO) with three factors. Team dynamics weremeasured using instruments of team effectiveness at the end of the semester. The paper discusses the evidence ofreliability and validity of the self-reported instruments with an analysis of differences in the team dynamics ofsections based on homogeneous, heterogeneous, and control group of M-GUDs score. The study discusses theimplications of assessing the cultural competencies of students in the context of teamwork
. Further studies will seek to continue this work in conjunction with other comics developedby the research team to help provide best suggestions for other instructors on how these tools can be usedto support their students and supplement their instruction.References(1) Yang, G. “Comics In Education”. Retrieved from:http://www.humblecomics.com/comicsedu/history.html Accessed 13 Feb 2023.(2) Sones, W. Journal of Educational Sociology, 1944, 18, 232-240.(3) Dorrell, L.; Curtis, D.; Rampal, K. Journal of Popular Culture 1995, 29, 223-234.(4) Witty, P. Journal of Experimental Education 1941, 10, 100-104.(5) Witty, P. Journal of Experimental Education 1941, 10, 105-109.(6) Gruenberg, S. Journal of Educational Sociology 1944, 18, 204-213.(7) Wertham, F
main stakeholder impacted by the desired outcome? 4. What are the DEI indicators or metrics associated with this desired outcome? 5. What action verbs make this goal specific, measurable, and attainable? 6. What are the accepted definitions of the DEI indicators identified? 7. What aspect of the DEI framework does this outcome relate to?Table 2: DEI Action Plan MatrixGoal Partner Goal / Stakeholder Indicator / Action RECIPES Shared Definition (s) DEI Type Objective Metric Verb (s) CategoryA In Network Increase the Students Power Increase the ability to control
-assessment, such as offering extra credit orincorporating self-assessment results into the overall grading scheme as used in this study.A we continue to work on this topic, the following future works are in the pipeline: 1) investigatehow different teaching approaches affect self-assessment accuracy, 2) investigate the effect of self-assessment on overall performance, and 3) analyze how different groups of students (such as poorand good students) assess themselves.AcknowledgementsThis project is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.DUE 1821023. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the
Conference, Denton, TX, March 15-17 2023: American Society for Engineering Education, p. in press.[4] G. D. Kuh, High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities, 2008.[5] S. Ash and P. Clayton, "Generating, deepening, and documenting learning: The power of critical reflection in applied learning," Journal of Applied Learning in Higher Education, vol. 1, pp. 25-48, 2009.[6] H. Chenette and T. Ribera, "Prediction and reflection activities in a chemical engineering course: Fundamentals of heat and mass transfer," presented at the 123rd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, LA, June
, France, July 9-11, 2014, Proceedings, Part II 14, Springer, 2014, pp. 415–422.[3] M. Marschark et al., “Benefits of Sign Language Interpreting and Text Alternatives for Deaf Students’ Classroom Learning,” J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 421–437, Oct. 2006, doi: 10.1093/deafed/enl013.[4] Angrave, L., Lualdi, C., Jawad, M., & Javid, T. “ScribeAR: A New Take on Augmented-Reality Captioning for Inclusive Education Access”. 2021 Illinois-Indiana Regional Conference, 2021. https://peer.asee.org/38276[5] L. Lawrence, S. Shehab, M. Tissenbau, T. Rui, and T. Hixon, “Human-Centered Design Taxonomy: Case Study Application With Novice, Multidisciplinary Designers”. 2020. doi: 10.3102/1690347.[6] N. Dehak, P. J
give rise to the observed phenomenon (p. 175).In summary, Russ et al.’s (2008) framework foregrounds the distinct elements of a mechanisticaccount - what learners say about the phenomenon’s entities and their characteristics and actions,and Krist et al.’s (2019) framework foregrounds scalar levels - how learners describe what ishappening at a scale other than the observed phenomenon. Previously, we conducted a study ofthe mechanistic reasoning expressed spontaneously in elementary students’ discourse whilebuilding and testing prototypes (Authors, in Preperation). In that study, we found that a subset ofRuss et al.’s seven levels and a subset of Krist et al.’s three heuristics fully described the waysthat students used mechanistic reasoning as
Evolutionary Biology. My expertise is in teaching and learning in STEM, peer education, international programs, assessment, and building networks and collaborations.Dr. Lisa Schneider-Bentley, Cornell University Lisa Schneider-Bentley has been the Director of Engineering Learning Initiatives in Cornell Univer- sityˆ C™s College of Engineering since 2002. Learning Initiativesˆ C™ programs enhance the educa- a a tional environment of the College by facilitating opportunitie ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 WIP: Peer led collaborative courses develop a sense of belonging and community for undergraduate
-group interaction-process quality during the murder mystery. Theexperiment ended with informing the participants about the experiment`s background andanswering their questions.3.2. Measures3.2.1. DemographicsThe demographic survey consisted of 17 items to assess the participants’ age, gender, enrolleddegree program, semesters spent in higher education, the degree of familiarity in each small-group, the participants’ personality traits, and the device used during the experiment. Thedemographic variables were used (a) to describe the sample in detail and (b) to ensure theinternal validity [24] of the experimental approach by capturing possible systematic participantrelated differences between the sub-samples of the three experimental conditions
, Practical Synthetic Data Generation. O’Reilly Media, Inc, 2020.[3] N. Gürsakal, S. Çelik, and E. Birişçi, Synthetic Data for Deep Learning. Berkeley, CA: Apress L. P, 2022.[4] N. Patki, R. Wedge, and K. Veeramachaneni, “The Synthetic Data Vault,” in 2016 IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA), 2016, pp. 399–410. doi: 10.1109/DSAA.2016.49.[5] A. Singh, S. Karayev, K. Gutowski, and P. Abbeel, “Gradescope: A fast, flexible, and fair system for scalable assessment of handwritten work,” in L@S 2017 - Proceedings of the 4th (2017) ACM Conference on Learning at Scale, 2017. doi: 10.1145/3051457.3051466.
, and D. S. Thomas, “An roi comparison of initiatives designed to attract diverse students to technology careers,” Journal of Information Systems Education, vol. 27, no. 2, p. 105, 2016. [8] M. K. Ponton, J. H. Edmister, L. S. Ukeiley, and J. M. Seiner, “Understanding the role of self-efficacy in engineering education,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 90, no. 2, p. 247, 04 2001, copyright - Copyright American Society for Engineering Education Apr 2001; Last updated - 2023-02-15; CODEN - JEEDEQ. [Online]. Available: https://login.proxy.lib.duke.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/ understanding-role-self-efficacy-engineering/docview/217958437/se-2 [9] C. Pannier, C. Berry, M. Morris, and X
development", Journal of European Industrial Training, Vol.25 No. 1, pp. 5-32. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090590110380614 [Accessed April 10,2023]. [4] Kaya, N., Aydın, S. ve Durgut, S. (2016). Training performance evaluation using the360-degree feedback method. 19th EBES Conference. s. 623-628. [Online] Available:http://acikerisim.maltepe.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/20.500.12415/2875 [Accessed February 28, 2023]. [5] Phuong, T.T., Foster, M.J. and Reio, T.G., Jr (2020), Faculty Development: ASystematic Review of Review Studies. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human ResourceDevelopment, 32: 17-36. https://doi.org/10.1002/nha3.20294 [Accessed February 10, 2023] [6] Draper, L. (2022, August), “Lessons Learned: Boosting Faculty
.[3] Hartman, H., S.Lezotte, R.A. Dusseau, T.R. Forin, and S. Farrell, 2020. Transfer Students inUndergraduate Engineering. ASEE Annual Conference, Paper #29472.[4] Meardon, S, Our Community College Engineering Students are Your Transfer Students.2019. ASEE Southeastern Section Conference.[5] Bloom, N.E., J. Johnson, J.M. Duis, and P. Entin, 2019. Facilitation Transfer Student Successin an Engineering Baccalaureate Program. ASEE Annual Conference, Paper #26328.[6] Laugerman, M., D. Rover, S. Mickelson, and M. Shelley. 2019. The Middle Years inEngineering: An Effective Transfer Partnership Drives Student Success in STEM. Advances inEngineering Education, Fall.,[7] Manteufel, R.D., and A. Karimi. 2023. Analysis of Transfer Credits in
the articles andthe design of the comment template. We believed that the reading assignments have helpedimprove students’ reading comprehension, writing techniques, and critical thinking skills.References1. S. A. Lei, K. A. Bartlett, S. E. Gorney, and T. R. Herschbach, “Resistance to reading compliance among college students: Instructors’ perspectives,” College Student Journal, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 219- 229. 2010.2. D. Pecorari, P. Shaw, A. Irvine, H. Malstrom, and S. Mezek, “Reading in tertiary education: Undergraduate student practices and attitudes,” Quality in Higher Education, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 235- 256, 2012.3. C. M. Burchfield and J. Sappinton, “Compliance with required reading assignments,” Teaching of Psychology, vol. 27
. Someinstitutions (20%) have design courses throughout the curriculum in addition to the capstonedesign sequence, but more programs (40%) have design projects within non-design coursesthroughout the curriculum. The course or courses in the capstone design sequence are primarilyoffered only once a year (78%) with a slight edge to the spring semester/winter quarter (80%)over the fall semester/quarter (72%). Most institutions (78%) include instruction in software orprogramming as part of the course(s). The culminating design project is most often a theoreticaldesign (68%) as opposed to one based on experiments (3%) or resulting in a prototype (7%), andmost institutions do not use the AIChE Design Competition problems (70%). Professional skillsare mainly
of Problem-based Learning,” Interdiscip J Problem-based Learn, vol. 6, no. 1, 2012, doi: 10.7771/1541-5015.1314.[4] K. M. Markham, J. J. Mintzes, and M. G. Jones, “The concept map as a research and evaluation tool: Further evidence of validity,” J Res Sci Teach, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 91–101, 1994, doi: 10.1002/tea.3660310109.[5] L. Hsu and S.-I. Hsieh, “Concept Maps as an Assessment Tool in a Nursing Course,” J Prof Nurs, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 141–149, 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2005.04.006.[6] D. M. Torre, B. Daley, T. Stark-Schweitzer, S. Siddartha, J. Petkova, and M. Ziebert, “A qualitative evaluation of medical student learning with concept maps,” Med Teach, vol. 29, no. 9– 10, pp. 949–955
Ethics, https://www.nspe.org/resources/ethics/code-ethics, accessed 16 January 2023.[2] E.A. Cech, "Culture of disengagement in engineering education?" Sci., Tech. Human Values, vol. 39[1], pp. 42-72, 2014.[3] S. Niles, S. Contreras, S. Roudbari, J. Kaminsky, and J.L. Harrison, “Resisting and assisting engagement with public welfare in engineering education,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 109, pp. 491–507, 2020.[4] K. Litchfield and A. Javernick-Will, "'‘I am an engineer AND': A mixed methods study of socially engaged engineers," J. Eng. Educ., vol. 104, pp. 393-416, 2015.[5] D.S. Schiff, E. Logevall, J. Borenstein, W. Newstetter, C. Potts, and E. Zegura, "Linking personal and professional social responsibility development to
suitable measuring procedure given available devices and fixtures; they thenproceed with measurement basic GD&T features on provided samples (Figs. 2a-e). Each group isfree to choose combination of contact-type metrology device, tool, and fixture for their group.During this stage, the TA only helps to clarify the part requirement and usage of metrologydevice without showing the solutions. After 30-45 minutes, each team takes turn presenting to their classmates how they set upand measure a feature, showing the measured data, and concluding if the part is accepted orrejected. The TA then comments on the approach, selection of tooling and fixture, and maysuggests alternative ways to constrain datum(s). Common mistakes are observed when
; Beddoes, K. (2013). Team effectiveness theory from industrialand organizational psychology applied to engineering student project teams: A research review. Journalof Engineering Education, 102(4), 472-512.Cardador, M. T., & Caza, B. B. (2018). The subtle stressors making women want to leave engineering.Harvard Business Review: https://hbr.org/2018/11/the-subtle-stressors-making-women-want-to-leave-engineering?ab=at_art_art_1x1Campero, S. (2021). Hiring and intra-occupational gender segregation in software engineering. AmericanSociological Review, 86(1), 60-92.Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique ofAntidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory, and Antiracist Politics. University of
or Equivalent on First Attempt. D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 C1 C2/C3 C4 B1 M S M S M S M S M S M S M S M S M S#A 82 48 51 31 63 27 42 31 39 20 32 31 65 30 21 17 27 11 N 246 90 243 88 224 87 208 87 187 87 192 86 262 89 122 85 92 42% 33.3 53.3 21.0 35.2 28.1 31.0 20.2 35.6 20.9 23.0 16.7 36.0 24.8 33.7 17.2 20.0 29.3 26.2Notes: #A = raw number of tests scored with Approved
. Newton, “How to Co-Lead a Team,” Harvard Business Review, 2015. https://hbr.org/2015/07/how-to-co-lead-a-team (accessed Nov. 07, 2022).[13] Q. Wu and K. Cormican, “Shared Leadership and Team Effectiveness: An Investigation of Whether and When in Engineering Design Teams,” Front. Psychol., vol. 11, no. January, pp. 1– 12, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.569198.[14] “Best Biomedical Engineering Programs - Top Engineering Schools - US News,” 2022. https://www.usnews.com/best-graduate-schools/top-engineering-schools/biomedical-rankings (accessed Feb. 22, 2023).[15] Allen, R. H., Acharya, S., Jancuk, C., & Shoukas, A. A. (2013). Sharing best practices in teaching biomedical engineering design. Annals of
some cases, a single essay is all the evidence an institution canaccess to plan DEI interventions and improve academic programming. Our recommendation foraddressing the STEM pipeline leak is to create a system to track students that fall out of formalSTEM pipelines. The system can assist the student to return to the pipeline if the student desires.The system will support the student to secure employment in the engineering discipline.References[1] L. L. Crumpton-Young, S. Etemadi, G. E. Little, and T. D. Carter, “Supportive practices used with underrepre- sented minority graduate students,” in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, no. 10.18260/p.25979. New Orleans, Louisiana: ASEE Conferences, June 2016, https://peer.asee.org
figure to identify the probable mode(s) of heat transfer.During the review period, groups of students work together to come up withpotential exam problems related to the covered content and then identifystrategies, methodologies, and/or relevant equations to obtain solutions. Theprimary role of the instructor during these activities is to ensure that thediscussions are relevant to the upcoming exam’s content or focus. Reviewsessions are typically held the day before the exam, and the preview figures areprovided in advance. The review activity is based on various studies supportingcollaborative learning as study strategies that lead to enhanced academicperformance. The majority of participating students are in the third year of theirdegree
California and B.S. in Electronics and Communication Engineering from India.Dr. Pramod Abichandani, New Jersey Institute of TechnologyMs. Heydi L. Dominguez, New Jersey Institute of Technology Heydi Dominguez is a fourth-year undergraduate student pursuing her Bachelorˆa C™s Degree in Me- chanical Engineering and minoring in Innovation and Entrepreneurship at the New Jersey Institute of Technology. Heydi is a first generation college student who isCraig IaboniKevin Alexander Nino ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Using the ARCS Model of Motivation to design 9-12 CS CurriculumAbstractThis ongoing project provides an overview on the use of the Attention, Relevance,Confidence
seventies,” Hum. Relat., vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 1179–1204, 1982.[5] S. Assegaff and A. R. C. Hussin, “Review of Knowledge Management Systems As Socio-Technical System,” p. 6.[6] E. Molleman and M. Broekhuis, “Sociotechnical systems: towards an organizational learning approach,” J. Eng. Technol. Manag., vol. 18, no. 3–4, pp. 271–294, Sep. 2001, doi: 10.1016/S0923-4748(01)00038-8.[7] T. Reiman and P. Oedewald, “Assessment of complex sociotechnical systems – Theoretical issues concerning the use of organizational culture and organizational core task concepts,” Saf. Sci., vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 745–768, Aug. 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2006.07.010.[8] S. Winter, N. Berente, J. Howison, and B. Butler, “Beyond the
teachers developed an engineering learning sequence thatconnected to a design opportunity within their local context (see Hammack et al., 2022 foradditional curriculum detail). After developing the lessons, participating teachers enacted thelessons with their elementary students. Participants included 43 4th and 5th grade students dividedinto two groups, those who attended school on a Native American reservation (n=23) and thosewho attended a small town school not located on a reservation (n=20). To measure the impacts ofthe program, students completed the Students Attitudes towards STEM survey ([S-STEM],Friday Institute, 2012) and the Engineering Identity Develop Scale ([EIDS], Capobianco et al.,2017) before and after engaging in the community
established.So far, there has been support from organizational structures and changes in individual coursessupport existing learning outcomes.References[1] K. Haas, “Sankey Diagram Analysis: Undergraduate Program Updates 2017-2019,” 2020.[2] N. Desai and G. Stefanek, “A Literature Review of the Different Approaches That Have Been Implemented to Increase Retention in Engineering Programs Across the United States,” in ASEE Zone II Conference, 2017.[3] Georgia Institute of Technology, “Deliberate Innovation, Lifetime Education: Final Report of the Commission on Creating the Next in Education,” 2018.[4] K. D. Hall, D. G. Linzell, B. S. Minsker, J. F. Hajjar, and C. M. Saviz, “Civil Engineering Education Summit: Mapping
Science, vol. 37, pp. 331-356, 2007.[4] W. Faulkner, "Doing gender in engineering workplace cultures. II. Gender in/authenticity and the in/visibility paradox," Engineering Studies, vol. 1, pp. 169-189, 2009.[5] M. Tremblay, T. Wils, and C. Proulx, "Determinants of career path preferences among Canadian engineers," Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, vol. 19, pp. 1-23, 2002.[6] R. W. Lent, S. D. Brown, and G. Hackett, "Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis," Journal of Counseling Psychology, vol. 47, p. 36, 2000.[7] R. W. Lent, H.-B. Sheu, C. S. Gloster, and G. Wilkins, "Longitudinal test of the social cognitive model of choice in engineering
. She holds a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Minnesota. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Engineering a Transfer Friendly Experience with Alternative Pathways to ExcellenceAbstract:The Alternative Pathways to Excellence (APEX) program is an NSF funded S-STEM Track 2project that seeks to strengthen efforts to recruit and retain STEM transfer students by integratingfinancial, academic, and practical supports.The APEX program provides student support services, formal and informal mentoring, curricularand co-curricular supports, and cohort building activities all formulated to create accessiblepathways into engineering careers for a population