model is that increasing the level ofimmersion in professional scenarios will impact levels of student engagement and behavior. Totest this assumption, in the Spring semester of the 2022-23 academic year we initiated a pilotstudy of a full-immersion in a Tech Startup project. This project integrated curricular credit forcoursework whose core competencies aligned with the tasks of forming a technology startupcompany. Several courses from Ohio University’s Entrepreneurship Certificate Program and theMechanical Engineering Capstone Design (semester 1) and Experimental Design courses wererestructured to allow students to have a full schedule of classes immersed in real project work. Ateam of five students including two business students and three
students easy, perhaps even commonplace, making faculty rethink globalcooperation in higher education [19, 20].The unique nature of capstone engineering courses resulted in additional challenges towardeffective delivery during the pandemic, with one faculty member commenting “lack of in-persondiscussions, team collaboration and time spent in the lab all have negative impacts on the project”[21]. Many adaptations were made during the pandemic to allow students to effectively work onchemical engineering capstone projects as part of a team, such as focusing on design tasks usingsimulation tools (e.g. ASPEN) and managing group meetings through video conferencing software(e.g. Google Meet) [22]. It is possible that knowledge of these practices
the four comparison sections did not complete theintervention.Figure 1. Activities and timeline for critical-narrative interventionProject-Group Discussion AssignmentBoth the study and comparison groups were required to complete the project-group discussionassignment near the end of the semester. Because the primary objective of this research effort isto gain insights on the impact of critical narratives on students’ abilities to identify the broaderimpacts of engineering work and transfer these abilities to their own senior/capstone designprojects, researchers designed the group-discussion exercise to be focused on each groups’senior/capstone design project.The project-group discussion (PGD) was organized in an identical manner to the
students for engineering work after they graduate, especially as they become“innovators (who) seek out new solutions to problems facing our society” [2] many universitiesoffer experiential coursework, such as senior design (a required team-based capstone project),and extracurriculars (e.g., Baja SAE and Design, Build, Fly competition teams). These activitiesand courses provide the collaborative, hands-on, meaningful application of engineering learningthat students need. Explicit instruction in team citizenship, shared leadership, and projectmanagement as well as the other capabilities and knowledge needed by working engineers isusually beyond the scope of these courses and experiences, yet are critical to the completeengineer. To support
, implementation, instrumentation, future work, theeducational experience of an international capstone, and lessons learned are also presented. Keywords: Atmospheric Water Generators, Water Scarcity, psychrometrics, Water, HeatExchangers, Instrumentation, Drinking Water, Irrigation Water, Geothermal Heat Exchanger,Underground Temperature Distribution. International Capstone Projects.1. Introduction The issue of water scarcity is a persistent problem affecting people worldwide despiterevolutionary accomplishments in clean water generation. It is estimated that four billion peopleexperience water scarcity at least one month per year [1]. While a few technologies likedesalination, reverse osmosis, and refrigeration dehumidifiers are used effectively
students would gain more confidence using hand tools. At the end ofthe project, it was reported that all students reported an increase in confidence with using simplehand tools.Future WorkOverall, it is believed that the engine dissection and testing project was successful and only smallchanges should be made in the future relating to clarity and timing throughout the class periodsused to conduct this project. One area for future work is assessing the retention of theengineering design process. At VMI the students complete a design and build project duringtheir sophomore year in Statics and Solid Mechanics, again in their junior year in MechanicalAnalysis, and lastly in their senior year in Mechanical Design and Capstone Design classes. Itwould be
, at that time, the undeveloped four-year SMSCP BS MCET degree program curriculum.The BS MCET curriculum was fashioned with advanced topics from the AAS SMSCP specifiedcourses; additional topics relating to project management and capstone projects [5]; andintegration of the general ET courses already offered. After completing the SMSCP instructortraining needed to teach in the Siemens program, the lead Mechatronics faculty author beganteaching the courses specific to the SMSCP in 2019. Through a strategic rotation of courseofferings, the author could offer the SMSCP-specific courses at least every two years.Additionally, when possible, SMSCP-specific courses in the AAS MCET program were offeredin this schedule. With external transfer pathways
Engineering and Computer Science, theOffice of Undergraduate Studies at Sacramento State, and by NSF grant (DUE # 2235774).IntroductionEngineering curricula characteristically have long and highly regimented chains of pre-requisitecourses called ‘critical paths’, that span the entire curriculum from students’ freshmen year tosenior-year capstone projects. Critical-path courses can create significant obstacles to graduationas a single DFW (grade of D, F, or withdrawal) grade in any course can impede a student'sability to graduate on time. Reducing course fail rates along the critical path significantly reducesthe students’ time to degree. Furthermore, research shows that students exposed to engineeringdesign [1] and research experiences [2] have a
the modern construction industry's increasing demand fortechnology-related expertise to manage construction projects. Construction companies aremoving towards managing projects through immersive technologies, Artificial Intelligence, anddigital twin technologies. Specifically, after COVID, these technologies helped the industry tohandle projects from different locations. Hence, the new concentration aims to provide a trackfor the students of CM to learn and utilize these technologies in the classroom and environmentand implement their skills during their co-ops and full-time opportunities. The VDCconcentration will include 15 credits of courses, including 2 CM required courses, 2 CMelectives, and 1 Capstone project course.The new
, working on teams, and experiential learning. First year engineering students areexposed to these skills early on through an introductory engineering course, simulating a real-world engineering environment through team projects. These skills are built upon throughout thecurriculum, particularly in required laboratory courses. In MSE, senior students take twosemesters on engineering design as a core major requirement. The first senior capstone designcourse, “Sustainable Materials Design”, has been restructured to focus on the economic,environmental, and social impact of engineering materials and processes through semester-longteam projects. The objectives of the Sustainable Materials Design course are: 1. Identify and compare approaches to
and enhancing the thermophysical properties of synthetic oils. This was the first demonstra- tion of the work ever done in this field and resulted in broad environmental and cost benefits, especially in energy storage and heat transfer applications. She has more than three years of experience teaching ther- mofluidic, mechanical design, and solid and structure courses and supervising senior capstone projects collaborating with industries such as Saint-Gobain, Klein Tools, and Parker. She also has served in lead- ership roles at the Society of Women Engineers and STEM advisory task force to represent diversity and inclusion and improve student success and retention for underrepresented students
in continuous improvements of thecourse. These lessons will also be applied to the instructor’s capstone course projects which oftenfocus on product development. Additional documentation of the work will be also published in theform of “Scholarship and Teaching of Learning (SoTL) in the near future.11.2 MethodsThe student groups were tasked to design a product (possibly a fastener, a light fixture, or aconstruction toy) with 4-6 components based on the idea of biomimicking climbing plants. Thedesign was expected to have an obvious art component via use of industrial design, also includingaesthetics, colors, or movements. Students were to follow the steps of the product developmentprocess with additional assignments being interjected into the
curriculum. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.Fadel, C. (2008). 21st Century Skills: How can you prepare students for the new Global Economy? Paris, FR: OECD. Downloaded from https://www.oecd.org/site/educeri21st/40756908.pdfHotaling, N., Fasse, B., Bost, L., Hermann, C., & Forest, C. (2012). A quantitative analysis of the effects of a multidisciplinary engineering capstone design course. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), 630-656.Larmer, J., Mergendoller, J., & Boss, S. (2015). Setting the standard for project based learning. AlexandriaVA: ASCD.National Academy of Engineering. (2023). Grand Challenges for Engineering. Downloaded from http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/challenges.aspxNebraska
. No face to face or virtual meetings ever took place between theindividual courses participating on this project, which truly did challenge the written/non-verbalcommunication skills of the team overall. The student participation breakdown was as follows: Architectural Technology Wood Frame Construction course: 15 students tasked with developing building shell ideas for the competition. Each student presented ideas to the electrical engineering student team which then selected the entry to move forward with. Interior Design Technology Capstone course: 24 students tasked with leading the evidence-based design approach of the interior layout and functionality of the entire building. Building code and ADA analysis. Space
-Based-Learning (PBL) for skillsdevelopment, motivation, and retention (both in terms of students staying in the major and interms of retaining learned skills) of engineering students. While all students take design coursesleading to their senior capstone projects, they do not all build prototypes of their work. Typically,in naval architecture and marine engineering programs, PBL projects focus on building smallmodels due to time, space, and cost issues with using full-scale vessels. Exceptions to thisapproach are taken at two colleges, where students may take elective courses that feature full-scale construction of 10-15 ft long plywood craft. At the United States Coast Guard Academy(USCGA), the first-year, 1-credit, course introduces
. However, as a pilot, the sample limited generalizability; thecurrent study addresses this limitation. We used a national cohort that included multipleengineering disciplines (biomedical, mechanical, chemical, electrical, computer, aerospace),types of formal design projects (e.g., first-year, design-spine, senior capstone) and institutiontypes, including private religious; Hispanic-serving; public land-grant; and research flagshipinstitutions (N=449). We report sample characteristics and used confirmatory factor analysis(CFA) to provide validity evidence, reporting the chi-square and standardized root mean squareresidual as estimates of fit. We report Cronbach’s alpha as a measure of internal consistency.We found that overall, the CFA aligned with
Paper ID #40331Challenges in Designing Complex Engineering Problems to Meet ABETOutcome 1Dr. Bijan G Mobasseri, Villanova UniveristyMs. Liesl Klein, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI) Liesl Krause-Klein is a assistant teaching professor at Villanova University in their electrical and computer engineering department. She graduated from Purdue University’s Polytechnic institute in 2022. Her research focused on student well-being. She is currently in charge of curriculum for capstone projects within her department.Mr. Edward Stephen Char Jr., Villanova University BS EE Villanova University 1996 MS EE Villanova
Paper ID #40314Board 52: Engagement in Practice: Role of Community Engagement inDisaster RecoveryDr. Azadeh Bolhari P.E., University of Colorado Boulder Dr. Bolhari is a professor of environmental engineering in the Department of Civil, Environmental and Ar- chitectural Engineering (CEAE) at the University of Colorado Boulder. Her teaching focuses on fate and transport of contaminants, capstone design and aqueous chemistry. Dr. Bolhari is passionate about broad- ening participation in engineering through community-based participatory action research. Her research interests explore the boundaries of engineering and social
realistic medical device design in education and the quality assessment of educational design projects for between-project comparisons.Dylan Lynch, The University of Illinois at Chicago ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 WIP: Development and Implementation of a Makerspace Class for BME Undergraduates to Enhance Skills in Senior DesignIntroduction:The undergraduate curriculum in biomedical engineering at the University of Illinois Chicagoemphasizes problem-based learning with a focus on as much hands-on project work as possible.To that end, our 100-level Introduction to BME course integrates CAD design, 3d printing andmicroprocessors to achieve learning outcomes. A 200-level course
organizational management, this paper discusses how the use of practitioners supports the“leadership” aspect of the fifth ABET student outcome. The seven ABET student outcomes and nineUSAFA institutional outcomes are shown in Figure 1: Figure 1: ABET Student Outcomes and USAFA Institutional OutcomesLiterature Review on Utilization of Practitioners in Education:Academic partnerships with industry provide many learning benefits that include opportunitiesfor field trips (Welch et al. 2018), service-learning experiences (Oakes 2011), and internships(Tener 1996, Saviz et al. 2011, Weatherton 2012, Welch et al. 2018). Partnerships with industryfor realistic projects in capstone courses is quite common (Akili 2010, McGinnis and Welch2010, Aktan et
University-Corpus Christiwere affected during the COVID-19 pandemic and were moved online. As a result. most labshad to be modified to allow students to take them remotely and even today many courses stillhave online sections at Texas A&M University-Kingsville. To support online or off-campuslearning, students would be able to check out an IoT kit. The IoT learning kits provide theopportunity for remotely learning students to engage with hands-on learning. Thus, students gaina better understanding of IoT concepts and technologies and how they might be integrated intotheir capstone projects. The assignments reported in the rest of this paper provide an opportunityfor students to learn how to incorporate IoT and are part of IoT related research
ofengineering scenarios, in particular focusing on participants’ thinking related to socially engagedaspects of engineering. In this study we sought to explore the extent to which our pre/postscenario-based study would enable us to address the following research question: How does whatindividual engineering students attend to vary from prior to receiving SET training to after? Wefocused on analyzing participants’ attention to people and context, two pillars of sociallyengaged design [12], [13].Participants. Participants were recruited from public institution in the Midwest. We advertisedour study to students in a mechanical engineering required capstone course by having instructorsshare our recruitment message with students via the university’s
Engineering Education, 2023 Putting Individual Learning Responsibility Back into the Team Experience – An Application of the Design ExperienceIntroductionFor years engineering programs have focused on the importance of students participating in teamexperiences within subject and capstone classes. This team experience need was emphasized byABET in its Criteria 3 – Student Outcomes, specifically outcome d (for years 2000 to 2019) andoutcome 5 (for years 2019 to present) and emphatically adopted by most engineering programs[1] [2].The need for teamwork is also emphasized by industry. Industry, especially those associated withthe development of new or improved products, benefit from interdisciplinary teams which canrepresent various
when faced with challenging coursework orproject obstacles and having the opportunity to fail and try again (i.e. a mastery-based learningpedagogy). As one first-year student succinctly described, simply “getting bad grades back andbeing able to resubmit for more points” was impactful. For larger projects multiple studentsreported something akin to the following (also from the senior level capstone course): “There was a lot of resilience required in continuing the project to completion. We ran into a lot of obstacles where we could have taken a short cut, but we persevered through to turn in the best possible project we could.” - 4th Year Student.Tables 6: Top 2-3 course experiences related to each intellectual virtue
experiential training' program has beenintroduced that focuses on engineering projects from inception to completion. PBL formatsinclude Engineering design introductory course, Engineering design-based course, Real-lifeproduct design curriculum, Capstone project, Joint engineering-design degree programme, In-school lab practice and External cooperative internship training. The categorization of courses inthe literature has been presented in Fig.4, based on the duration and class setting of the courseproject, which are represented on the coordinates. Fig.4 Course classificationFirst-Year engineering design introductory courseCastles [80]and Al-Qaralleh [81] suggest adopting a series of workshop laboratory sessions
commonly associated with engineering design andproblem solving. At the same time, both skills shortages and skills gaps in engineering graduates arehighlighted.Stakeholdersincludingthegovernment,theindustry,engineeringeducators,andresearchershavebeenclaimingthatengineeringcurriculashouldequipstudentswithskillsrequiredforaddressingcurrentandfuturechallenges(Wuetal.,2017;Lin,2021).Foranyresearch-intensiveuniversitytodeliverengineering education reforms to students, it is accountable strategy rather than only vision wouldcontribute to substantial changes. Traditionally, innovations and changes can be most commonlyidentified in strategies such as the introduction of capstone projects in different learning stages tofacilitating project-based learning
developed and ran for 8 years a faculty-led international program to Brazil focused on Sustainable Energy and Brazilian Culture. This program educates students on the effects of various energy systems and the challenges of social and environmental justice in developing countries. In 2017, Dr. Pfluger moved into the ChE department where she implemented improvements in the Transport 2 Lab and Capstone courses. She assists Capstone students to develop dynamic design projects that ad- dress and help solve real-world, global challenges. Dr. Pfluger has served as the AIChE Student Chapter Faculty Advisor for 10 years and is chair of the AIChE Student Chapter Committee. She is a Math- works Teaching Fellow and has won serval
-firstapproach, they thought a hybrid software-first approach provides greater learning. Most studentsexpressed little frustration in learning the material using either approach. Of those who did expressfrustration, most suggested that using the other approach would have led to increased frustrationin learning the material.KeywordsProgramming, First-year Engineering, Programable Microcontrollers, ArduinoIntroductionAt Northeastern University College of Engineering, all first-year students follow a commoncurriculum, as part of a “Cornerstone to Capstone” educational program adopted in 2014 [1]. Thefirst-year Cornerstone course uses projects to emphasize the ways in which engineering candevelop practical problem-solving applications. In Cornerstone, there
. Theselected pilot course to test this module is MFGE 3131 Design for Manufacturability. It will bethen introduced to capstone design courses in MFGE and other senior design courses in otherengineering majors GaSou.3) Level 3: Advanced level for senior undergraduate students and graduate students (lab projectmodule): It will be designed to provide students with hand-on experience on applying safetystandards when designing a robot system/cell. A group project will be designed within thismodule to allow students to design a robotic workcell which satisfies the requirements in theANSI/RIA R15.06-2012 Robot Safety Standard by using the Robot Simulation SoftwareRoboguide or CoppeliaSim which is free for educational purposes. Upon complement of thismodule
exploited afterthe COVID-19 pandemic, necessitates collaboration. Thus, teamwork skills should be adequatelypracticed in academic programs. The construction industry has been naturally dependent onteamwork as almost all construction work is performed in teams. This dependency is reflected inconstruction curricula through some team-based courses such as capstone, surveying or othercollaborative classes. In addition, project-based courses tend to accommodate team-basedactivities. A similar situation may exist in engineering programs; however, engineering coursesare traditionally defined based on an instructor-learner relationship. Therefore, defining team-based educational activities depends on the instructor’s approach. The current study