be administered again at the conclusion of thecourse, to see if spatial skills are improved through other course activities, making the additionaltreatment modules unnecessary for this class. Finally, it is recommended that the study bereplicated with more balance in participant numbers in the treatment and control groups, andmore balance in pretest measured spatial ability between the control and treatment groups. Page 14.868.8 Bibliographic Information1. Sorby, S., Wysocki, A. F., & Baartmans, B. (2003). Introduction to 3D Visualization: An Active Approach. CD- ROM with workbook. Clifton
. Page 14.179.4 S 07 S 08 F 07 F 08 Figure 1. Percentage of students’ experience with AutoCAD prior to this course Test 1 Test 2 Test 3Figure 2. Average drawings per testI. Assessment of Project ApproachThe term project was presented to students at the end of the second phase of the course. At thispoint, the students were well experienced in reproducing any 2-Dimensional shape drawingswith details including text and dimensions. The school
cycle.A “graphic vocabulary wall”, synonymous with a word wall (commonly used in elementaryclassrooms) should be established to support student use of graphics. The facilitation in graphicproduction will further student spatial abilities by eliminating mental road blocks that hindertheir thought processes.AcknowledgementsThis work is supported by NSF (DRL # 0733217) as part of the Discovery Research K-12program. The project team would also like to extend its sincere thanks to our partner elementaryschools, including the administration, staff and teachers.References1. Appleton, K. (2007). Elementary science teaching. In S. Abell & N. Lederman (eds) Handbook of research on science education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
addition, higher levels of retention were seen after pairprogramming was introduced. The instructor intends to continue using pair programming in thiscourse, and will attempt to improve student compliance in alternating roles.Bibliography 1. J. Bevan, L. Werner, C. McDowell, ‘Guidelines For the Use of Pair Programming In a Freshman Programming Class,’ Proceedings of IEEE-CS Conference on Software Engineering and Training, 2002. 2. S. F. Freeman, B. K. Jaeger, J. C. Brougham, ‘Pair Programming: More Learning and Less Anxiety in a First Programming Course,’ Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2003. 3. E. F. Gehringer, ‘Is Pair Programming an Effective Way To Teach Computer Architecture
construction phase can be measured by thephysical construction that results from that phase. Clearly defined visualization(s) thatdepict the expected outcomes from each phase of construction can be generatedbeforehand and these can be embedded into the framework as shown below. For instance,in Figure 4, the two visualizations show the finished stages of construction at two phases.Any lags or setbacks in construction (in the real-time) can be compared with the pre-planned designs and faults and delays can be easily identified. This facilitates a moreconcrete evaluation and hence decision-making rather than relying on abstract or vaguemilestones. Figure 4: Diagram illustrating the integration of CPM/PERT stages with Visualization and the use of OLE
Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.3. Huguet, M. P., Haley, T., Baltaci-Goktalay, S. (2008). From electrons to neutrons – Blended engineering education. Proceedings of the ASEE Zone I Conference, United States Military Academy, West Point, NY, March 28-29, 2008, 1-9.4. Murphy, P. (December, 2002). The hybrid strategy: Blending face-to-face with virtual instruction to improve large lecture courses. Retrieved November 7, 2008, from http://www.ucop.edu/tltc/news/2002/12/feature.php5. Hofmann, J. (2005). Why blended learning hasn’t (yet) fulfilled its promises: Answers to those questions that keep you up at night. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. (pp. 27-40). San
' learning and performance? An experimental test of the match perspective versus self-determination theory. Jounral of Educational Psychology, 387-397.8).6. Bye, D., Pushkar, D., & Conway, M. (2007). Motivation, interest, and positive affect in traditional and nontraditional undergraduate students. Adult Education Quarterly, 57(2). 141-158.7. Pintrich, P.R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research. 31(6), 459-470.8. Yang, N.D. (1999). The relationship between EFL learners' beliefs and learning strategy use. System. 27(4), 515-535.9. Adams, W. K., Perkins, K. K., Podolefsky, N. S., Dubson, M., Finkelstein, N. D., & Wieman, C. E
avenue of research, as well as determining theeffectiveness of the software in other industry areas and applications. Bibliographic Information1. MSNBC (2008, September 4). Almost half of Americans facing knee arthritus. From http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26544498/2. Ibrahim, S. A., & Kwoh, C. K. (2003). Opportunities for Understanding. CHERP Policy Brief . Retrieved from http://www.cherp.org/cherpdocs/issuebriefs/Dec2003web.pdf3. Feudtner, C., Santucci, G., Feinstein, J. A., Snyder, C. R., Rourke, M. T., & Kang, T. I. (2007). Hopeful Thinking and Level of Comfort Regarding Providing Pediatric Palliative Care: A Survey of Hospital Nurses.4. Parekh, S. G., Lim, C. K., Booth, R
February 6, 200910. Tumkor, S. and Pochiraju, K., Rapid Prototyping in the Design Methodology, ASEE Annual ConferenceProceedings, paper 2008-2307.11. Rodriguez, J. et al. Application Of Rapid Prototyping For Engineering Design Projects, ASEE Annual Page 14.1262.7Conference Proceedings, paper 2006-231712. Carlson, L. Rapid Prototyping to Cement CAD Modeling Skills, ASEE Annual Conference, 2005
being beneficial. These results were used to facilitate adiscussion regarding the importance of design intent in modern CAD modeling and productdevelopment environments. Page 14.421.8References1 D. A. Field, "Education and Training for CAD in the Auto Industry," Computer-Aided Design 36 (14), 1431-1437 (2004).2 S. D. Eppinger and A. R. Chitkara, "The New Practice of Global Product Development," MIT Sloan Management Review 47 (4), 22-30 (2006).3 B. Caldwell and G. M. Mocko, "Ttite," in ASME 2008 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conferences
Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. 2003, American Society for Engineering Education: Nashville, Tennessee.7. Welch, M.L., H.S., Teaching sketching and its effect on the solutions produced by novice designers, in IDATER. 1999: Loughborough University.8. Olkun, S., Making Connections: Improving Spatial Abilities with Engineering Drawing Activities. International Journal of Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 2003.9. Gardner, H., Frames of Mind. 1993, London: Fontana Press.10. OECD, Learning Seen from a euroscientific Approach, in Understanding the Brain: Towards a ew Learning Science. 2002: Paris. p. 9.11. Edwards, B., Drawing on the Right Side of the Brian. 1989, New York: Putnam Publishing