and provides a significant reduction in the possibility of misunderstandings arising from poor translations or cultural gaps.6. Are proficient working in or directing a team of ethnic and cultural diversity. Explanation: Much engineering work is conducted in teams. As engineering work becomes more global in nature, engineering teams become more diverse and may include members of various ethnic, cultural and national origins. Developing this attribute relies heavily on developing communication skills across cultures (Dimension 2).7. Can effectively deal with ethical issues arising from cultural or national differences. Explanation: Ethical issues can be magnified when cultural issues come into play. For example, it is common in
engineersdedicated to education. The curriculum follows the modular international engineering educationcurriculum that attends fully the education rules for the university level of formation in thecountry. It is a very dynamic and rich program, developed in modules, followed in severalcountries in the world. It follows the trend of global formation of professionals, mainly to attendthe need of a prepared engineering educator to act in the several different cultural environments,which mobility has imposed as a fact of life for researchers and teachers at graduation level. Newcompetencies of educators are needed such as: evaluation management; developmentcompetencies; communication skills; teamwork; ethics and intercultural competencies. Thisengineering
, and engineering(b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data(c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability(d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams(e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems(f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility(g) an ability to communicate effectively(h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context(i) a recognition of the need for, and an
the higher level educational systems in the developing world. Thispaper will discuss in detail the efforts that have been expended to bring NMAA to thepoint where it is and address the challenges that remain, with special emphasis on theengineering program. The authors will also address the implications of these lessons forthe broader endeavor of educational capacity-building in the developing world. Whileeach country and culture offers its own unique challenges and opportunities, we feelseveral lessons we learned have universal applicability. Among the topics discussed willbe the use of face-to-face and distance mentoring, cultural and ethical challenges, facultydevelopment, providing resources and equipment, and ensuring the continuity
guidelines provided by the U.S. Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology (ABET) and the Institution of Professional Engineers New Zealand(IPENZ). Six professional skills defined by ABET in their accreditation criteria are6 : Page 14.973.2 ≠ an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams; ≠ an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility; ≠ an ability to communicate effectively; ≠ acquire the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context; ≠ recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life
need to become global engineers, but the National Academy ofEngineering2 predicted that, among other attributes, “the engineer of 2020 will have tounderstand how to adapt solutions, in an ethical way, to the constraints of developingcountries.”The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) encourages educationalprograms to develop their own learning outcomes that are consistent with each individualprogram's educational objectives. However eleven outcomes (a-k) 3 are required of all accreditedU.S. engineering programs, including one that says programs must demonstrate that theirstudents attain “the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions
secondday of the program. The project requirements and team collaboration ethics were emphasized.Since the project required the use of CAD software, teams were arranged in such a way that atleast one of team members was familiar with a CAD software package.Each OU ME student was randomly assigned to work on a team with two Chinese students on adesign project as part of their senior design project. Since a full time faculty member was withthe students full time in China, the amount of interaction between the student groups and thesupervising faculty was significant. Informal meetings were held with each student group nearlyeveryday in China. After they returned from China, students continued to work on this project,and finished their design by the
, Mayagüez. His research interests include nonlinear structural mechanics, biomechanics, engineering education, and engineering ethics (with particular interest in appropriate technologies to serve impoverished and developing communities). He is an active member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), and Association for Practical and Professional Ethics (APPE). He holds BS degrees in Civil Engineering and Mathematics from Carnegie Mellon University, and a PhD in Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Cornell University. He was previously a faculty member in the Department of Civil Engineering & Mechanics at the University of
engineering education Focus Possible ImpactsStudent Knowledge Facts, procedures, connections, metacognitionStudent Skills Design (application, invention, creation), communication (speaking, writing, listening, visual), observing, needs assessment, resource assessment, problem definition and analysis, collaboration, interpersonal, intercultural, project management, impact analysis, feasibility, foreign languageStudent Attitudes and Identity Confidence, empowerment, engineer as citizen, ethics
Traffic & Transportation 3 Engg Semester 8CES 4702 Reinforced Concrete 4 Islamic/Christian Culture 2 IVTTE 4004 Transportation Engg 3 Engineering Management 3SUR 4201 Route Geometrics 3 Seminar 3ENV 4514 Water and Wastewater 3 Hydrology 3 Page 14.324.6 Treatment EGN 4034 Ethics 1 R.C. Design II 3
and context of work ≠ An ability to work with complexity ≠ Use of a systems thinking approach ≠ Appreciation and understanding of culture and language ≠ An ability to use collaboration techniques and software ≠ Effective oral and written communication ≠ Knowledge of sustainability practices ≠ An ability to assess environmental and energy impact across diverse engineering projects ≠ A well-developed sense of social responsibility and ethics ≠ Entrepreneurial skills ≠ A preparation to work with varying levels of resources and in various types of ≠ organizations ≠ Strong critical thinking skillsThis paper focuses on the final competency, critical thinking, as a competency that isconsistently
andtechnological ventures may be determined by the ability/inability to overcome culturaldifferences. In “Cross-Cultural Business Negotiations,” Hendon et al writes: The way onesucceeds in cross-cultural negotiations is by fully understanding others, using that understandingto one’s own advantages to realize what each party wants from the negotiations, and to turn thenegotiations into a win-win situation from both sides.” Kale in “Universal Code of Ethics inIntercultural Communication” describes the ethical communicator as one “who address people ofother cultures with the same respect that they would like to receive” and as one “who encouragespeople of other cultures to express themselves in their uniqueness.” The ideal communicator is inessence one who
outcomesThe second motivation for the effort described in this paper is the new Engineering Criteria 2000(EC2000) of ABET which states that graduates must attain the following criteria (those thatapply directly to this effort are shown with **):a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineeringb) **an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret datac) **an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainabilityd) **an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teamse) **an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering
to finalize the curriculum see Table 1.Laboratories are integrated into the curriculum in various levels of the curriculum and areassociated with the following courses: Tech Drawing I, Physics I and II, Digital Systems,Chemistry I, Strength of Materials, Circuit Analysis, Elements of Machine Design, MechatronicsI and II, and Machinery. Technical Elective courses in Safety Engineering, Renewable Energy,Construction Management, and Quality Control Concepts will be offered.The curriculum includes the core courses of engineering: mathematics, basic sciences andengineering sciences. Although not typically considered humanities/social sciences electives,religion courses include cultural and ethical content. In combination with the history and non
Hybrid Instruction Model for a New Teaching Paradigm,” Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference, session T1F, 1998. 9. Houdeshell, J., and Gilah Pomeranz, “Preliminary Results From a NSF-ATE Funded Distributed Hybrid Instructional Delivery Project,” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, session 1648, 2004. 10. Carpenter, D. “Using a hybrid classroom environment for the instruction of ethics and contemporary civil engineering issues” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2007. 11. Scott, S., “The blended classroom: The best of both worlds?” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference
NUMBER REQUISITE PASS COMPUTERMETHODS IN CIVIL CGN 3421 - 4 C ENGINEERINGEXPERIMENTATION CGN 3710 PHY 2049 3 D TECHNICAL DRAWING AND CGN 2328 - 3 D VISUALIZATION CE MATERIALS CGN 3501 - 4 D PROFESSIONAL - EGN 4034 1 D ETHICS CONSTRUCTIONCE COST ANALYSIS CGN
Structures 4 Advanced Structural DesignTTE 4004 Transportation Engineering 3 II (Steel) 6SUR 4201 Route Geometrics 3 Elective II 4ENV 4514 Water and Wastewater 1 Treatment Major Project 8EGN 4034 Ethics 4 Geo Tech. Engineering II 6Semester 9 All track courses * 15TOTAL 131 239* All track courses are 3
Page 14.152.5improvement process, hard work and ethical conduct in a quality education system.The Future Mr. Viswanathan has and will continue to promote VIT University in the internationalarena as well as the national arena. He has observed4 that universities in the USA receivesubstantial funding from a variety of sources, such as philanthropists, industries, alumni, andbusinesses as well as from government. Universities in Europe and most developing countriesrely predominantly on government funding. He has also observed that in the Americaneducational system parents and students are prepared to pay for a quality higher educationprogram. Privatization is one solution for enhancing the quality of higher education in India.VIT University
. REFERENCES 5Alpert, S., & Grueneberg, K. (2000). Concept Mapping with Multimedia on the Web. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9(4), 131-331.Barker, P. (2005). Knowledge management for e-learning. Innovations in education and teaching international, 42(2), 111-121.Chang, S. N. (2007). Externalizing students’ mental models through concept maps. Journal of Buddhist Ethics, 41(3), 107-112.Chiu, C. H. (2004). Evaluating system-based strategies for managing conflict in collaborative concept mapping. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 20, 124-132Freeman, L.A. (2004). The power and benefits of concept mapping: measuring use, usefulness, ease of use, and
ethics: lessons from the global supply chain.Quality Management and Organizational Development International Conference. Palermo, Italy. ISBN. 88- Page 14.147.9902094-2-97. Wang, J. et al. (2007) Preparing Engineers for the Global Supply Chain: The Case of Automotive Partsin China. ASEE National Conference.8. Bandyopadhyay, J. (2005) The Global Supply Chain Assurance Practices of United States Automakers:A Survey. International Journal of Management. Dec. 2005: 22, 4. pp. 582-585.9. Rajendran, M. and Devadasan, S. (2005) Quality audits: their status, prowess and future focus.Managerial Audit Journal. Vol. 20 No. 4 pp. 364-382.10. Kannan, V
decisions for a sustainable and environmentally compatible development?”This question became the cornerstone of this first Strategic Plan and helped delineate the corevalues of IFEES: • Promoting engineering education excellence globally • Supporting IFEES member excellence • Caring about our communities and our environment • Promoting culture of community building and strong collaboration among members and Page 14.168.2 other appropriate stake holders • Fostering cultural awareness and diversity among its stakeholders • Cultivating integrity, honesty, work ethics, and social responsibility in the engineering
information resources and supporting technologies, with attention to the standards of academic honesty.5. Competency Area: General Studies and Culture ≠ O6: UDLAP graduates will have an understanding of how knowledge is acquired and applied through the intellectual traditions of the arts, humanities, or social sciences; engineering or natural sciences; and business or economic sciences. ≠ O7: UDLAP graduates will have a knowledge of and respect for the inherent diversity of peoples and ideas and for the principles and practices of ethical behaviors and moral values. Page 14.916.4 ≠ O8: UDLAP graduates will demonstrate
of adequacy and ethics often raised by skeptics about qualitativemethods.This was insider research into a case study set in an Engineering College. It was anexploratory study set in the workplace milieux, using qualitative data. The theoryemerging from the literature review on changing universities was relatively immatureand had not yet been tested adequately in universities in Ireland. The various types ofuniversity model, including collegial, bureaucratic, corporate and entrepreneurialwere examined and compared with the cultures, practices and understandings ofstakeholders in this college. A story emerged about the people working and studyingin this college and in that story a change model thought by interviewees as best suitedto the