: ≠ Enhance the professional development of women faculty in STEM fields. ≠ Assist junior faculty in becoming familiar with university/college culture. ≠ Retain faculty by enhancing work-life balance. ≠ Reduce feelings of isolation for women faculty in STEM fields. ≠ Raise the profile of women faculty in STEM fields.With the above over-arching goals and a structure design created by the senior STEM femalefaculty, it is envisioned that the Mentoring Circles is a successful initiative that will help lead thecampus in a positive direction towards achieving institutional transformation.References1 Yen, J. W., K. Quinn, S. E. Lange, E. A. Riskin, and D. D. Denton, “ADVANCE Mentoring Programs for WomenFaculty in SEM at the
will continueto address what we can do to retain students in engineering, and what we can do to retainthe remaining students in technology. We plan on continuing our data collection, and havebegun giving semester-beginning and semester-ending surveys to the EGR120 students. Ifsuccessful, such a model can be extended to programs and departments offering both engi-neering and technology majors.AcknowledgmentsThe authors thank Janyce Selesky for collecting the student data.References[1] N. L. Fortenberry, J. F. Sullivan, P. N. Jordan, and D. W. Knight, “Engineering education research aids instruction,” Science, vol. 317, pp. 1175–1176, August 2007.[2] C. Triplett and S. Haag, “Freshman engineering retention,” in ASEE Annual Conference and
Materials, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 2002.4. Beer, F. P., Johnston, E. R. and DeWolf, J. T., Mechanics of Materials, Fifth Edition, McGraw Hill, 2008.5. Hibbeler, R.C., Mechanics of Materials, Seventh Edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2007.6. Gere, J. M. and Goodno, B. J., Mechanics of Materials, Seventh Edition, CL-Engineering, 2008.7. Bedford, A. and Liechti, K.M., Mechanics of Materials, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2000.8. Riley, W.F., Sturges, L.D. and Morris, D.H., Mechanics of Materials, Fifth Edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1999.9. Wempner, G., Mechanics of Solids, PWS Publishing Company, Boston, MA, 1995.10. Timoshenko, S. P. and Gere, J. M., Mechanics of Materials, Fourth
how the women fared in this program. Theprogram is being continued with an S-STEM NSF grant.I. BackgroundArizona State University (ASU) is now the largest single university in the United Stateswith over 67,000 students on four campuses and also has the largest single campus, itsTempe campus, with over 53,000 students. Tempe is a neighbor city to Phoenix, thefourth largest city in the United States. The University is set in a valley of high techmanufacturers and over 4 million people. Also set in this valley is one of the nation’s Page 14.172.2largest community college district system, the Maricopa County Community CollegeDistrict (MCCCD) with over
they like the review atthe beginning of class while going over any questions on the material from the preceding class..Sometimes student make a comment about a joke or show a sense of humor which is fun to sharewith the class. In the next sections comments from Minute Managers are given as examples.IV. What is the Most Important Thing That You Learned Today?The first question on the Minute Manager is “What is the most important thing that you learnedtoday?” The answer to this question is usually a very short summary of the main topic(s) of theday. Examples of this include: • Why variance is squared • That we have a table for F, how to use it • That if it’s two-sided you double the p-value • That you can test the significance of
of the final project and feedback for revision and improvement within the design process(Alley, 1961). In an educational setting, models and prototypes have traditionally beenconstructed by hand using a variety of materials in the absence of machining tools and training.This is considered a fundamental aspect of design according to the Standards of TechnologicalLiteracy set by the International Technology Education Association (ITEA, 2002), the NationalAcademy of Engineering (NAE, 2002), and many leading engineering educators (Oaks, 2003). In the 1980’s, the manufacturing industry began developing what has evolved into rapidprototyping and three-dimensional printing technology. This technology has provided the abilityfor designers and
the integrated laboratory resources. We also plan toevaluate how this new integrated laboratory affects teaching and the learning experience. Finally,we will continue to expand the integrated curriculum and laboratory, such as setting up a student-operated Network Operations Center (NOC) for the campus or even the local region and addingwireless cellular communications to the laboratory.Bibliography1. S. Wu, R. Athinarayanan, X. Hou, “Integrated Curriculum and Laboratory Development of an Undergraduate Telecommunications and Computer Networking Program,” Proceeding of ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Pittsburgh, PA 2008.2. http://www.tech.uh.edu/WON/index.php3. Falcon Communications Inc., http
senior year.Students that interested in graduate studies will be prepared to study and do research in abroad range of disciplines such as Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering,Nuclear Engineering, and Physics. Several local employers in a recent industrial advisorymeeting expressed a need for computing. During the meeting, Mr. S. Manir Zaman ofIAV, Inc. expressed an interest in offering co-ops to students with training in computing.As a result, students are also expected to obtain knowledge in computing such as C++ Page 14.94.3and MATLAB. To meet this goal, computing tools will be used in most courses.NeedThe Governor of Michigan has been
student and family visit the College? 3. What effect does peer influence play when a student has academic difficulty and seeks assistance once at college? 4. Is having an engineer in the family a key influence on career path for these students?Research MethodsA peer mentor is operationally defined as an advanced high school, undergraduate or graduatestudent who is age-appropriate (16 – 24 years old), culture-appropriate (Appalachian-born orraised); major-appropriate (engineering or one of the nine NSF-approved STEM majors atWVU); and skill-appropriate (peers who have mastered any academic subject(s) themselves).All were paid volunteers working around their own class schedules, so that fixed mentoringhours were almost
, the scholarship of integration(putting ideas together through the use of multiple lenses, viewing specialties in larger contexts,or connecting across ideas and disciplines), and the scholarship of application. The Scholarshipof Teaching was later changed to be the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SOTL), and thelast category was later broadened by Boyer to include the scholarship of engagement and service(originally outreach) 2. By the mid 1990’s, the National Science Foundation had implemented a“broader impacts” criterion to research grant proposals, requiring that scientists and engineersapplying for research funds think carefully about, and describe, the ways in which their workmight impact society, and that they design education and
the course contributed to the success of thecourse. Students’ responses on the survey indicate that the majority of the students, as a result ofthe course, better understand the advantages and disadvantages of various instructional methodsand appreciate that well-trained teaching assistants can be a benefit to the culture of the college.11As the course continues to evolve, the instructional methods will focus on giving the studentsmore opportunities to present in front of the group. The instructor plans to design and pilot amicroteaching assignment to allow students additional opportunities to practice teaching.Bibliography 1. Prieto, L. R. & Meyers, S. A. (2001). The Teaching Assist and Training Handbook: How to Prepare TAs
Future. Second Edition. American Society of Civil Engineers. www.asce.org5. Anderson, N.R. and M.A. West. 1998. Measuring climate for work group innovation: development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 19, 235-258.6. Armstrong, S.J. 2000. The influence of individual cognitive style on performance in management education. Educational Psychology. 20 (3), 323-339.7. Aritzeta A, Senior B, Swailes S. 2005. Team role preference and cognitive styles - A convergent validity study. Small Group Research. 36 (4), 404-436.8. Aronson, Z.H., R.R. Reilly, and G.S. Lynn. 2006. The impact of leader personality on new product development teamwork and performance: The moderating role of uncertainty
/IEFADataFactSheet.pdf#search=%22data%20american%20i ndian%20students%20graduation%20number%20dropout%22[4] Demmert, W. G., Grissmer, D, & Towner, D. (2006). A Review and Analysis of the Research on Native American Students. Journal of American Indian Education, 45(3),. 5-23[5] White House Press Release (2004). Executive Order: American Indian and Alaska Native Education. Retrieved on September 29, 2006, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2004/04/20040430-10.html[6] Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465-490.[7] Glickman, C. D., Gordon, S. P., & Ross-Gordon, J.M. (2007). SuperVision and instructional
inEngineering Programs: Evolving Best Practices, Association to Institutional Research, Tallahassee, FL, Chapt. 8,2008.5. McCaulley, M. H., “The MBTI and Individual Pathways in Engineering Design,” Engineering Education, 80 (5),537-542 (July/August 1990).6. Wankat, P. C. and F. S. Oreovicz, Teaching Engineering, McGraw-Hill, New York, Chapt. 13, 1993. Availablefree as pdf files on the web at https://engineering.purdue.edu/ChE/AboutUs/Publications/TeachingEng/index.html7. Montgomery, D. C. and G. C. Runger, Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers, Wiley, New York, pp.436-441, 1994.8. Watson, K., “Guest Editor’s Page. Change in Engineering Education: Where Does Research Fit?” J. Engr. Educ.,98 (1), 3-4 (Jan. 2009).Table 1. Concentrations in
Education Network. Page 14.757.8Bibliography1. J. Ochs, G. Lennon, T. Watkins, and G. Mitchell, “A Comprehensive Model for Integrating Entrepreneurship Education and Capstone Projects While Exceeding ABET Requirements,” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education National Conference (2006).2. D. Tougaw, J. Will, P. Johnson, M. Hagenberger, and M. Budnik, “Integrating Entrepreneurship into Senior Design Projects,” Proceedings of the National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance Annual Conference (2007).3. P. Rufe, G. Rodak, S. Pollock, and M. Finkel, “Bringing ‘Real World Business’ into the
lecturers Provide field trip for immersion learning at industrial sight Design assessments Page 14.55.4 Timeline for developmentTable 1 shows the template of the team teaching course outline, where the weekly topicsare tabulated. This template can be modified based upon the instructor’s course and typeof project. It is best geared for use in courses beyond the freshman year when the studentshave enough background for more sophisticated team projects.Table 1 Template of Team Teaching Course OutlineWeek First class period Second class period1 Introduction to class with prof(s) Overview of
feedback received from thestudents with an IRB-approved survey instrument will be reported in this paper. This paper willprovide new insights into the strengths and weaknesses of remote access environments for boththe design/manufacturing technology and distance education communities.Background and Participating InstitutionsThe Rapid Prototyping Laboratory was established in Fall 2003 and funded by the NationalScience Foundation (NSF)-Division of Undergraduate Education (DUE) 0311586 grant andTennessee Tech University (TTU) matching support. Since that time, many high school studentsand student(s) studying computer aided design/computer numerical control have practiced withthis technology. In order to further extend a remote access capability to
://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/385/1049Brothers, S. K., (2007). Game-based e-learning: The next level of staff training. Nursing Homes: Long Term CareManagement 56(3) 78-80.Campbell, E. (2001). Let right be done: trying to put ethical standards into practice. Educational Policy 16(5) 359-411.Charalambos, V., Michalinos, Z., & Chamberlain, R. (2004). The design of online learning communities: critical issues. Educational Media International, 41(2), 135-143. Page 14.1056.6Clawson, A. Deen, E. Oxley, Z. (2002). Online discussions across three universities: Student participation andpedagogy. PSOnline http
. Page 14.1194.65. Dollinger S, Matyja A, & Huber J. Which factors best account for academic success: Those which college students can control or those they cannot?. Journal of Research in Personality. August 2008;42(4):872-885.6. Gump S. The Cost of Cutting Class. College Teaching. Winter2005 2005;53(1):21-26.7. Moore R. Attendance and Performance. Journal of College Science Teaching. March 2003;32(6):367.8. Moore R. Attendance: Are Penalties More Effective Than Rewards?. Journal of Developmental Education. Winter2005 2005;29(2):26-32.9. Tiruneh, G. Does Attendance Enhance Political Science Grades? Journal of Political Science Education. 2007;3:265-276.10. Urban-Lurain, M. & Weinshank, D.J. (2000
. Albuquerque, NM., pp. 106-109. 6. Anderson, R., 2008, “The WMSR robotic response: the tale of the “M2” robot,” Conference proceedings of the 2nd international joint topical meeting on emergency preparedness and response and robotic and remote systems conference. Albuquerque, NM., pp. 365-372. 7. Kapoor, C., and Tesar, D., 2006, “Integrated teleoperation and automation for nuclear facility cleanup,” Industrial Robot: An International Journal, 33(6) pp. 469-484. 8. Koenig, N., 2007, “Toward real-time human detection and tracking in diverse environments,” Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Development and Learning, London, UK, pp. 94-98. 9. Gulati, S., Jung, H., and Kapoor, C., 2007
, Que, 2002, pp 10357-10374. 12. G. Parker, M. Agostini, M. Devarakonda, and P. Zenner, “Development of a remote systems and controls laboratory,” In Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, 2004, pp. 3611-3619. 13. W. Hutzel, H. Cooper, and S. Leach, “Evaluating a remotely accessed energy laboratory,” In Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Portland, OR, 2005, pp. 5899-5910. 14. H. Basher, and S. Isa, “On-campus and online virtual laboratory experiments with LabVIEW,” In Proceedings of the IEEE SoutheastCon 2006, Memphis, TN, 2006, pp 325-330. 15. G. Jing, D. Kettler, and M. Al-Dahhan. “An internet-based distributed laboratory for
0 5 10 15 20 Time (s) Time (s) (a) (b)Figure 8. Experimental data collected with force and displacement sensor in different tissues: (a) Joint cavityand (b) Tendon.Being able to prove the concept of indicating needle tip location was what’s required by the client so thatthey can show potential manufactures with data about the feasibility of the invention. Although no large-scale evaluation was conducted for the
system states and territories are given power toregulate by the United States Consitution’s 5th Amendment1 police power through the 14thAmendment2. Also, each of the states govern their citizenry through their respective stateconstitutions3 which virtually mimic the federal constitution. Through their exercise of the policepower they enact legislation to protect the welfare of the public: "The Constitution devotes thedomain to union, to justice, to defense, to welfare, and to liberty.4"One of the ways to protect the public is officially recognize that a profession is distinct from avocation and then regulate the profession through regulatory agencies such as registrationboards. It was not until the early 1990’s that Florida courts distinguished
Van Buren, Martin re 3 Harrison, William co S c ri Tyler, John b u Polk, James R 2 Taylor, Zachary Fillmore, Millard Pierce, Franklin
colleges anduniversities offering engineering or engineering technology programs. It enhances the studentslearning process as well as the public’s perception of how engineers improve people’s livesthrough the products they design.The project will be expanded in the future to include all student designs. As a result, studentswill be exposed to the concepts of Universal Design throughout their engineering curriculum.The goal of this service learning focus is to train engineers that are better prepared to serve theentire population as a whole and not just one segment or another.Bibliography1. Burgstahler, S. (2008). Universal Design of Instruction (UDI): Definition, Principles, and Examples. Retrieved from http://www.washington.edu/doit
AC 2009-1157: MEASURING THE IMPACT OF UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCHPROGRAMS ON ENGINEERING STUDENTS' ATTITUDES TOWARDGRADUATE STUDIESLinda Hirsch, New Jersey Institute of Technology Linda S. Hirsch is the Program Evaluator in the Center for Pre-College programs. She has a doctoral degree in educational psychology with a specialty in psychometrics and a Masters degree in statistics. She has been involved in all aspects of educational and psychological research for 15 years. Dr. Hirsch has extensive experience conducting longitudinal research studies and is proficient in database management, experimental design, instrument development, psychometrics and statistical programming.John Carpinelli, New
Congress. 14. 395.10. Weinberg, J. B., Engel, G. L., Gu, K., Karacal, C. S., Smith, S. R., White, W. W., Yu, X. W. (2001). AMultidisciplinary Model for Using Robotics in Engineering Education. Proceedings of the 2001 ASEE Annual Page 14.428.11Conference & Exposition.11. Ahlgren, D., Verner, I. M. (2008). Building Self-Efficacy in Robotics Education. Proceedings of the 2008 ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition.12. Ciaraldi, M., Cobb, E., Cyganski, D., Gennert, M., Demetriou, M., Looft, F., Michalson, W., Miller, B., Rong,Y., Schachterle, L., Stafford, K., Trygvasson, G., Van de Ven, J. (2008). The New Engineering BS Program at
AC 2009-717: CHILDREN'S CONCEPTIONS AND CRITICAL ANALYSIS OFTECHNOLOGY BEFORE AND AFTER PARTICIPATING IN AN INFORMALENGINEERING CLUBPamela Lottero-Perdue, Towson State University Dr. Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue is an Assistant Professor of Science Education in the Department of Physics, Astronomy & Geosciences at Towson University. She began her career as process engineer, taught high school physics and pre-engineering, wrote curriculum and was a master teacher for Project Lead the Way, and led two Project FIRST robotics teams. As a science teacher educator, she has added engineering content and pedagogy to her science methods courses for prospective elementary teachers. She teaches engineering to
program and provide a means for undergraduate andgraduate multidisciplinary research and senior design projects. In addition, the formative andsummative assessment will continue and be used to provide feedback on areas for programimprovement. An outreach and dissemination component of the program will also beimplemented so that the students can participate in university recruitment efforts and to publicizethe successes of the program.Bibliography1. FIRST: For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology, http://www.usfirst.org/, accessed 3/15/2009.2. Botball Educational Robotics Program, http://www.botball.org/, accessed 3/15/2009.3. Matson, E. and DeLoach, S., “Using Robots to Increase Interest of Technical Disciplines in
Influencing Students Attitudes, Knowledge, and Interest in the Field of Engineering and Recommendations for Improvement: A Study of Inquiry-Based Middle School Engineering Teaching Kits. Curry School of Education, University of Virginia. Charlottesville VA.12. IFT. 2008. Food Science Activity Guide. Institute of Food Technologists. Chicago.13. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T. and Smith, K.A. 2006. Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom. 3rd Ed. Interaction Book Company, Edina MN.14. LeCompte, M. and Schensul, J.J. 1999. Designing and Conducting Ethnographic Research. Ethnographer’s Toolkit. Vol.1. AltaMira Press, Lanham MD.15. Lyon, J., Addison, V. and Thompson, S. 2007. GK-12 Engineering Workshop for Science