? Studies in Higher Education, 26(3), 287-298.4. Mottart, A. and Casteleyn. J. (2008). Visual Rhetoric Enhancing Students’ Ability to Communicate Effectively.Int. J. Engng. Ed., 24(6):1130-1138.5. Quintilian, Institutes of Oratory. Retrieved from http://honeyl.public.iastate.edu/quintilian/index.html (Feb. 1,2009)6. Jaeger, B. and Bilen, S. (2006). The One-Minute Engineer: Getting Design Class Out of the Starting Blocks.Proceedings of the ASEE National Conference, Chicago, IL, June, 2006.7. Oberst, B.S., & Jones, R.C. (2004). Canaries in the Mineshaft: Engineers in the Global Workplace, (CD)Proceedings, 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Conference.AcknowledgementsI would like to acknowledge the University Centre for Teaching and
compliance and to verify reductions. While some of theGHG data categories may be relatively easy to document, monitoring individual air travel eventsin the required detail is impractical on a campus wide basis. The method described in this paperblends published statistical data with available campus information to determine campus GHGemissions due to air travel.What is ACUPCC?In summer of 2007, Dr. Jerilynn S. McIntyre, President of Central Washington University(CWU), became a charter signatory to the American College and University Presidents ClimateCommitment1. The basic intent of the climate commitment is an agreement to work toward aclimate-neutral campus by a future target date, reducing greenhouse gas emissions effects tozero. In achieving
comparative energy and pollution outputs associated with landfilling or waste-to-energy incineration of the non-recycled wastes. 7 Reflective Students discuss what they learned from the guest speakers and their Essay current impressions of EVEN, including if they plan to stay in the major and what topics they are particularly interested in.In assignments 1, 5, and 7 students typically indicate which sub-discipline area(s) of EVENinterest them. This evolves over the course of the semester, including students who indicate inassignment 7 that they don’t intend to major in EVEN. Assignments 2, 3, and 6 allowed thestudents to experience how energy
College, Defense Acquisition University Press, January (2001).29. Shishko, Robert., et al., NASA Systems Engineering Handbook, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, SP-6105, (1995).30. Oliver, David W., Timothy P. Kelliher, James G. Keegan, Jr. Engineering Complex Systems with Models and Objects, McGraw-Hill, New York (1997).31. Shigley, Joesph E., Charles R. Mischke, Standard Handbook of Machine Design, 2nd Edition, Mc-Graw Hill, New York, (1996).32. McCabe, Warren L., Julian C. Smith, Peter Harriott, Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering, 7th Edition, McGraw-Hill (2005).33. Merritt, Frederick S., M. Kent Loftin, Jonathan T. Ricketts, Standard Handbook for Civil Engineers, 4th Edition, Mc-Graw Hill, New York (1996
Coast: Fans of Cedar Point, Sandusky, Ohio.” Online: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2204697727 8. S. Shapiro, “Revolution, Facebook-Style.” New York Times Magazine 25 Jan. 2009, Online: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/25/magazine/25bloggers-t.html 9. ABET, “2009-2010 Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs.” Online: http://abet.org/Linked%20Documents-UPDATE/Criteria%20and%20PP/E001%2009- 10%20EAC%20Criteria%2012-01-08.pdf Page 14.358.11
new concept.The second version of the prototype was essentially a proof of the concept and was notyet considered ready for manufacture. Page 14.1234.14 The final prototype was a more streamlined version of the second prototype. Thecontrol circuit was based on a PIC microcontroller, and a custom-printed circuit boardwas manufactured. An updated enclosure and earpiece were also developed. Figure 6: Prototype BeatMinderS-Tap Pumpless Keg Dispenser The S-Tap dispenser was an undergraduate design project to provide a means ofdispensing beverages from a keg without the use of a hand pump, ice, or any power
three parameters they could vary: the amount of clay in the nose, theamount of water used as propellant, and the size and shape of the fins. The project wascompleted in teams of 3-5 but each student wrote an individual, final report on the project. Themodel of design as an alternating series of divergent and convergent steps was covered explicitlyin class, including circulating portions of Dym, et al.’s article. Students were required to identifyactions taken by the team, categorizing them as “divergent” or “convergent” thinking, andproviding a quantitative rationale for final decisions regarding the three parameters. Typically,student characterized brainstorming possible fin configurations as their main divergent task andfinding the optimal
(3), 188-198. doi: 10.1016/j.iilr.2008.06.0046. Jeffries, S. (2000). The librarian as networker: Setting the standard for higher education. In R. Raspa, & D. Ward (Eds.). The collaborative imperative: Librarians and faculty working together in the information universe (pp. 114-129). Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries.7. Stoddart, R. A.; Bryant, T. W.; Baker, A. L.; Lee, A.; Spencer, B. (2006). PERSPECTIVES ON…Going boldly beyond the reference desk: Practical advice and learning plans for new reference librarians performing liaison work. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(4), 419-427. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2006.03.0098. Beck, D. M., & Callison, R. (2006). Becoming a science librarian: Accident
. Thiswould free up the selection choices of interns and eliminate possible duplication of material.The academic leaders of the Software Engineering Masters’ degree program(s), which theorganization will use in the future for its software engineering interns, should be invited to abriefing with the organization’s management and a small cross section of employees so they canbetter understand the daily functions of the organization. A short panel session withorganizational management followed by an open Q&A session and, perhaps, one-on-onediscussions with a cross section of individual employees could substantially increase theunderstanding faculty would have of the interns’ academic needs.There is a very diverse range of continuing professional
Lake City, UT. 5. Reay, N. W., Li, Pengfei, & Bao, Lei. (2008). Testing a new voting machine methodology. American Journal of Physics, 72(2), 171-178. 6. Winer D. (2003). What makes a weblog a weblog? [Weblogs at Harvard Law Web site] http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/whatMakesAWeblogAWeblog#vignetteAndWikis Accessed January 14, 2009. 7. Vygotskoy, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. In: Cole M, John-Steiner V, Scribner S, Souberman E, trans-eds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 8. Ocker, R.J. & Yaverbaum, G.J. (2001). Collaborative learning environments: Exploring student attitudes and satisfaction in face-to-face and asynchronous computer
implementation of this course. Our thanks andappreciation for their effort and hard work: Mr. Lonn Rodine, Mr. Rob Lotz, Mr. RichardBoschee and Technical Sergeant Jonathon Solomon. Page 14.560.14Bibliography1. Volk, K. S., “Industrial Arts Revisited: An Examination of the Subject’s Continued Strength, Relevance and Value”, Journal of Technology Education, Vol. 8, No. 1, 1996.2. Menicucci, J., Duffy, J., Palmer, B., “Hands-on Introduction to Chemical and Biological Engineering”, Proceedings of the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.3. Farrow, D., “Development of a Manufacturing
. This also presents the greatest challenge for IE educators tomaintain a curricula core for the discipline and profession.End NotesThe views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not reflect the official positionof the Air Force, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government.References1. ALDRICH, J.G., 1912. “The Present State of the Art of Industrial Management,” Trans. of the ASME, Vol. 34, Paper 1378, pp. 1182-11872. BILLINGS, C., J.J. Junguzza, D.F. Poirier, and S. Saeed, 2001. “The Role and Career of the Industrial Engineer in the Modern Organization,” Ch. 1.2, Maynard’s Industrial Engineering Handbook, Ed. K.B. Zandin, Ch. 1.2, pp. 1.21-1.373. EMERSON, H.P. and D.C.E. Naehring, 1988 , Orgins of
C 3 VdLR A B C Discrete, VdL _R Filter _Inv Ts = 5e-005 s. 7 VdL_R (pu
] P. Steif and M. Hansen, Feeding Back Results from a Statics Concept Inventory to improve Instruction, Proceedings of the 2006 ASEE Annual Conference, 2006.[4] R. Edwards, R. Englund and S. Sweeney, Direct Assessment of Mechanics of Materials Learning with Concept Inventory, Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE Annual Conference, 2007. Page 14.1143.12[5] B. Self, P. Cornwell, F. Costanzo, G. Gray, D. Evans and J. Lane, The Dynamics Concept Inventory Assessment Test: A Progress Report and Some Results, Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference, 2005
design method and the importance of energy inour society.References1. Mid Atlantic Solid Waste Consultants, “Larimer County Two-Season Waste Composition Study”, http://larimer.org/solidwaste/Publications/WasteSort.pdf, visited 3/6/2009.2. Cochran, Soni, “Vermicomposting: Composting with Worms”, http://lancaster.unl.edu/pest/resources/vermicompost107.shtml, visited 3/6/2009.3. Datar, M.T., Rao, M.N., and Reddy, S., “Vermicomposting - A Technological Option for Solid Waste Management”, Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management, v 24, n 2, May, 1997, p 89-93.4. http://www.urbanoptions.org/school.php, visited 3/6/2009.5. Davis, Karen C., Perkey, Megan L., Harth, Nicholas B., and Dees, Nathan, “STEPing into the Classroom: An
Problem-Based Learning (p. 13). New York: St. Martin’sPress.7. Albanese, M.A. & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-Based Learning: A Review of Literature on Its Outcomes andImplementation Issues. Academic Medicine, 68. 52-81.8. Marshall, J. and Marshall, J. (2007). In Search of Teaching Excellence. American Society for EngineeringEducators, June, 2007.9. National Joint Apprenticeship Training Commission (2008), Course 42, International Brotherhood of ElectricalWorkers.10. Michaelsen, L., (1998). Three Keys to Using Learning Groups Effectively. “Essays on Teaching Excellence”.Center for Teaching, University of Southern Maine. Vol. 9, No 5, 1998.11. Price, P.C., (2006). Are You as Good A Teacher as You Think? Thought & Action, Vol. 14, Fall
materials to complement anyPowerpoint slide presentations that we develop. Secondly, the interactive learning materials muststimulate student thinking, rather than gaming. The learning materials may include circuit simulations,20tutorials to reinforce the theory upon which the laboratory exercise is based, general reference material onthe laboratory equipment, and material related to specific exercises21 as well contextual information onapplications of the materials by engineers in industry.At the beginning of each effort to develop a specific learning module, we identify the learning objectivesto be covered, the instructional method(s) that will be used, and techniques to evaluate the learningmodule, and to assess whether the learning objectives
, “An analytic foundation for the Toyota Prius THS-II powertrain with a comparison to a strong parallel hybrid-electric powertrain,” SAE paper 2006-01-0666, 2006.9. N.C. Harris, T.M. Jahns and S. Huang, “Design of an integrated motor/controller drive for an automotive water pump application,” Conference Record of the IEEE Industry Applications, 37th IAS Annual Meeting, vol. 3, pp. 2028-2035, 2002.10. F.L. Luo and H.G. Yeo, “Advanced PM brushless DC motor control and system for electric vehicles,” Industry Applications Conference, IEEE, vol. 2, pp. 1336–1343, 2000.11. P.J. McCleer, “Electric drives for pump, fan, and compressor loads in automotive applications,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Industrial
, Requirements, andProcedures System" in [company]-1-01, Management Policies, will be issued to formally grandfather the Page 14.8.16 15existing system of policies and procedures to ensure that the site continues its exemplary record ofcompliance with statutory requirements and customer commitments.Following the issuance of the interim policy, all company-level policies and procedures, source andcompliance documents and various program-specific procedure manuals will be assessed by their ownersand subject matter experts. [company]'s collection of policies, procedures and manuals will be revised
Page 14.637.13were impressed by the professional quality of the oral presentation skills of the students as wellas their teamwork. % of Teams Passing the Design Review 100 80 60 40 Figure 7 20 Improvement in the number of teams who passed the panel review “without 0 S 07 F 07 S 08 F 08 Class conditions”No formal assessment tools were used to evaluate the success of the capstone design course uponcompletion of the projects at the end of the second semester. However, achievements have beengauged by:a. Client/sponsor
intellectual development in the college years: A scheme. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. In Clarkenburn, H.M., Downie, J.R., Gary, C. and Matthew, R.G.S. (2003). Measuring ethical development in life sciences students: A study using Perry’s developmental model. Studies in Higher Education, 28, 443-456.27. Mill. J. S. (1978). On Liberty. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing. Page 14.60.15
kinematics of the robotic arm. Theexperiment only gives the user control over the angular positions of the servomotors of therobotic arm. Hence, the user computes the forward kinematics and then the inversekinematics for the individual gripper positions necessary to carry out the instructor specifiedtask (for example, a pick and place routine).The resulting angular positions arrived at for each of the positions which the robotic arm isdesired to move through are placed in tabular form. These values are now entered in this VIand the execute button is clicked on. Error checking is first done to ensure that the enteredvalues lie within the specified ranges of motion of each motor. If there is an error in theentered value(s), an error message to that
://www.engr.ncsu.edu/learningstyles/ilsweb.html Accessed 30 Jan 2009.6. ExCEEd Teaching Workshop. http://www.asce.org/exceed Accessed 11 Mar 2009. Page 14.537.17 Appendix 1 Course Outline Prior to Summer of 2006Lsn Class topic Deliverable(s)1 Introduction to engineering profession Undergraduate information sheet, e-mail addresses1L Laboratory: introduction to computer laboratory2 Course outline; laboratory notebooks; laboratory report example2L Continuation of computer laboratory3 Engineering ethics; discuss
, and how it relates to what engineers do toinclude using the Milton F. Lunch ethic topics and case studies to spark discussion.Leadership is thrust upon the freshmen through their laboratory teams. The team make-upis controlled by the faculty to ensure an equal spread of civil, mechanical, and electricalengineering students between teams. There are four graded laboratory experiences and adifferent student is appointed the leader for each laboratory. The civil engineeringstudent(s) are appointed the leaders during the civil engineering laboratory experienceand associated laboratory report preparation, and so on. The students construct a bridgeusing K’Nex that must support an arbitrary load. In the mechanical laboratory, thestudents build a Lego
Level, Reston, VA, September. (http://www.asce.org/raisethebar)4. Bloom. B. S., Englehart, M. D., Furst. E. J., Hill, W. H., and Krathwohl, D. 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. David McKay, New York, NY.5. ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission, 2008. “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs – Effective for Evaluations during the 2009-2010 Accreditation Cycle.” ABET, Inc., December 2008.6. ASCE Accreditation Committee of CAP^3. 2007. Commentary on the ABET Engineering Criteria for Civil and Similarly Named Program In the Context of the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge (Version 3.4), Reston, VA, May. (http://www.asce.org
functionality, students also learn to incorporate VisualBasic Macros toautomate tedious processes and enable finer detail in trade studies. Finally, the Excel add-in 8@Risk, developed by Palisade Corporation, is used to teach students to use Monte Carloanalyses in spacecraft design and performance assessment. Students learn how to perform MonteCarlo analyses and interpret the results through outputs such as probability density functions(PDFs), cumulative distribution functions (CDFs or “s-curves”), and tornado plots.Grades are determined by frequent lab assignments, quizzes, and a final project. There are fivelaboratory assignments and quizzes are given weekly at the beginning of each lab period. Thequizzes
perform significantly better than random learners in computerapplication courses12 and other Science and Math-related courses, while random learners excel inFine Arts courses.13Table 1. Four Learning Style Types Identified by Gregorc Style Delineator. Sequential (S) Random (R) Concrete (C) Abstract (A) Concrete (C) Abstract (A)Concrete-Sequential Abstract-Sequential Concrete-Random Abstract-Random (CS) (AS) (CR) (AR)Motivational Orientations and Learning StrategiesIn addition to learning styles, students’ motivational orientations and learning strategies that theyuse also
). Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation (NSF).14. Citations1. The Information Technology Association of America, Innovation and a Competitive U.S. Economy: TheCase for Doubling the Number of STEM Graduates(http://www.itaa.org/workforce/docs/Innovationwhitepaper.pdf). 2005.2. National Science Board, Science and Engineering Indicators 2006 (Two volumes), National ScienceFoundation. 2006.3. National Science Board, Science and Engineering Indicators 2006 (Two volumes), National ScienceFoundation, table 3-2. 2006.4. Seymour, E.; Hewitt, N. M., Talking about leaving : why