opportunity to work in the faculty mentor’slaboratory. eight out of twenty two students were successful in securing a research opportunity ina laboratory. Students worked as researcher assistants in laboratories on a variety of projects,such as stem cells, speech recognition, and tissue regeneration. The goal was to expand theirknowledge in the research fields in their departments and train students on professionalcommunication.During the program three guest speakers were invited, experienced scientists and engineers, totalk about their career experience and the variety of opportunities for students once they aregraduated. The guests were; Dr. Charlene Crawley, a chemistry professor at VCU; Mr. TonyMoss, a mathematician at Dahlgren NSWC; and Ms
agency expressing concerns over anupcoming project21. In the letter he refers to himself as an engineer and later a complaint is filedwith the licensing board with respect to is practice of engineering with a license. He agrees thathe is not licensed to practice engineering in any jurisdiction and that he is employed by amanufacturing company and has “engineer” in his job title. The board sanctions him for theunlicensed practice of engineering. He appeals the board’s decision to the courts and claims thathis First Amendment rights to free speech were violated in that he was speaking out about apublic project. The court reasoned that his comments were not sanctioned but his right to makethe comments as an engineer expressing an opinion was being
exercise.The author plans to develop a total of about 35 exercises covering the above topics. Thus far 10such exercises have been completed; the remainder is expected to be done within six months..Each exercise takes anywhere from 60 to 90 minutes from formulating the problem to actuallypublishing it online. The only investment in this project is the faculty time, as there is no othercost involved. The author plans to publish an updated paper (including assessment results) withina year upon completion of development of all the modules. Page 14.823.4Student UsageIt is the intent of the author to incorporate this teaching tool in the junior-level
projects, and oral presentations1. Grading rubricsprovide advantages to both the student as well as the faculty member.From the student’s standpoint, rubrics offer many advantages. Students like the usage ofrubrics as they aid in determining the expectations for an assignment. Students also likerubrics for grading as they allow them to better plan their working, gearing theirdevelopment towards what is expected rather than overachieving on an assignment. Page 14.1338.2Overall, students feel that rubrics result in them delivering a higher quality submission aswell as receiving a fairer grade when the submission is assessed. Students like rubricsbecause
thirty years designing and implementing professional development programs and curricula for K-12 teachers in science and technology. At the college level, he collaborates on projects exploring teaching methodologies and assessment strategies in first-year college courses in the sciences, engineering, and computer science.Angelo Perna, New Jersey Institute of Technology Angelo J Perna is Professor of Chemical and Environmental Engineering and Director of the Ronald E. McNair Program at New Jersey Institute of Technology. He is the recipient of over seventy five recognition awards for service, recognition and research. In addition to having served as President of Omega Chi Epsilon and The
, hydraulic jumps energy, hydraulic jumpsTotal Areas Covered 16 40 Page 14.1198.4Step 3- Development of Laboratory EquipmentThis step required a substantial amount of planning and communications with several experts.Our first concern was to utilize existing laboratory equipment that did not have a major“footprint” since space is a major constraint in our project. Our goal of using older well-chosenequipment was to save resources, both time and money, by only making minor equipmentmodifications but major pedagogical changes. Only after we evaluated our current equipment didwe decide
methods, design appropriateoperations, and analyze operations is predicated on knowledge of appropriate performancemetrics. It is necessary to identify factors influencing operational performance in order to designappropriate operations and to apply approprite improvement methods. Therefore, the threelearning objectives identified were suitable for inclusion in this study.Research MethodologyA total of 15 student participants were recruited from a cross section of constructionmanagement courses: a freshman level construction methods course, a junior level costestimating course, and a senior level project scheduling and controls course. The students: 1) received a brief introduction to the Caterpillar Virtual Training Simulator of a large
AC 2009-717: CHILDREN'S CONCEPTIONS AND CRITICAL ANALYSIS OFTECHNOLOGY BEFORE AND AFTER PARTICIPATING IN AN INFORMALENGINEERING CLUBPamela Lottero-Perdue, Towson State University Dr. Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue is an Assistant Professor of Science Education in the Department of Physics, Astronomy & Geosciences at Towson University. She began her career as process engineer, taught high school physics and pre-engineering, wrote curriculum and was a master teacher for Project Lead the Way, and led two Project FIRST robotics teams. As a science teacher educator, she has added engineering content and pedagogy to her science methods courses for prospective elementary teachers. She teaches engineering to
evaluations were positive. “I was surprised by how much Ilike physics” was an often-repeated student comment. One enthusiastic student remarked, “Ifound this course extremely valuable. I am a very visual learner so the hands-on project andgraphical focus of the course was exactly what I needed. I really think this course wasexcellent.” The Test of Understanding Graphs in Kinematics Test12was administered to arandom sample of students before and after their exposure to the kinematics curriculum. Theaverage possible gain was 43% of the total score. The average gain for the sampled students was Page 14.657.917% of the total score—thus they had achieved
classroom, and how to reduce potential conflicts andconfusion surrounding assignment due dates and classroom activities are often of primaryconcern. Many of these items can be addressed with the development of Past, Present, andFuture (PPF) sheets for the course.PPF sheets contain information regarding past topics relevant to the current class, presentdeliverables, learning objectives, and discussion questions, and future deliverables as well asdiscussion questions for the next class. The sheets are designed to provide a one-stop source fora majority of the important information for the course. Homework assignments are presented inthese sheets, due dates for homework, lab reports, and projects are listed, and reminders for testsand other important
university and its scholars. Building on thework of her predecessor, Jan assisted the Aerospace Engineering department head in submittingmany of his published papers to the UDC. Along the way, she learned about the benefits andpitfalls involved in making published works available to the world through an open institutionalrepository and shared that knowledge with Jon and other librarian colleagues. By helping onefaculty member to create a UDC collection, we have gained a champion who not onlyunderstands the value in having his work more widely—and perpetually—available but also seeshow librarians can facilitate the process.Jan is currently working on another, larger UDC project. It involves moving research reportsfrom a university institute's website
, a growing diversity of the workforce.Demographic projections show the traditional pool that supplies today’s technological workforce isshrinking, while untraditional pools such as under-represented groups are growing proportionally,making them the new majority. If the United States is to remain competitive and continue toflourish in the competitive global marketplace, it must draw on the talents of all the population. Theneed for a highly skilled technical labor force, the new majority, and the aging population areseveral factors that are driving the need for a comprehensive look at changing the culture of scienceand engineering.The underutilization of women and minorities in science and engineering is a problem of nationalpriority [4]. Not
conservation laws.11. Center of mass.12. Rotational motion, including, torque, angular momentum, rotational kinetic energy, and rotational inertia.Table 2. Statics Student Learning OutcomesStudents will be able to:1. Use general principles and problem solving techniques to solve engineering problems.2. Solve operations with vectors such as force or position, resolve them into components, and project them along axes.3. Use Cartesian vectors to solve problems involving the equilibrium of a particle for a concurrent coplanar (two-dimensional)force system and three-dimensional force system.4. Solve for the moment of a force or a couple about a point and determine the resultants of a non-concurrent force system.5. Use scalar methods, vector analysis and
to be split into twohardware/software worlds, (NI world and Matlab world) and concluded that a strength of ourprogram is that we teach them about both worlds. We concluded that we had lots of agreement inour disagreement and our program is “right on the money” in helping our students to be preparedto get the jobs we identified as good ones.Several years ago our Advisory Boards strongly recommended that we add Project Managementto both programs and we did so; review of the jobs helped us understand how good thatrecommendation and decision were.Some jobs had good technical content, but were at the technician level; we are not designing ourprogram for our graduates to take such jobs. Some jobs had specific industry niches and wedecided not to
-module score of 3.7 to apost module score of 4.3 on a 5-point Likert scale. Another approach has been to combine studyof contemporary issues and ethics through case studies.14,15 Authors discussed the challenges ofteaching a truly contemporary ethical case study, where new information became available everyday. Needy introduces students to the impact of contemporary issues on project management byincluding articles from the Wall Street Journal, Business Week, and the local paper as discussiontopics in her engineering management course.16ImplementationPrior to starting the actual meetings each semester, it is necessary to identify a time and locationfor the meetings and to publicize these events. Setting the time for the meeting is
documents.Table 3. Timeline for the Preparation for ABET and SACS visitsSummer of Establish Leadership Team (President, SACS Liaison).2006 Set up the Office of Planning & Assessment Set up SACS Preliminary Budget (SACS Liaison, Leadership Team). Set up SACS Preliminary Calendar (SACS Liaison, Leadership Team) Begin holding Leadership Team meetings (SACS Liaison)Fall 2006 Develop Documentation for campus information on QEP & Self-Study Continue Leadership Team meetings throughout rest of SACS time-table Develop SACS Website (SACS Liaison) Solicit ideas for Quality Enhancement Plan Project from campus Solicit volunteers for both QEP and
AC 2009-2037: INVESTIGATION OF THE SUCCESSFUL EFFORT TO CHANGEEDUCATIONAL CURRICULUM FRAMEWORKS IN MASSACHUSETTS TOINCLUDE ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGYNataliia Perova, Tufts University Nataliia got her M.S. in Mathematics, Science, Technology and Engineering education from Tufts University in 2008 and M.S. in Electrical Engineering in 2005 from Tufts University and B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Suffolk University. Nataliia is currently a research assistant at Harvard Graduate School of Education where she is involved in the research project on mathematics education. She is also doing research on using engineering approaches to teach science to college students.Chris Rogers, Tufts
traditionallecture employing more conventional (“take-home”) homework, which we call TL-THW, iscurrently underway. Active learning opportunities are being incorporated into this trial viaextensive use of CPS student response units (“clickers”).A key, underlying goal of this project was to gain an understanding of how efficiently andeffectively students learn in hybrid course environments relative to those that are moretraditional. This outcome was evaluated by comparing scores on common exams. Another goalwas to accommodate a wider diversity of learning styles by offering students a choice betweenalternate course formats / based on the premise that being required to make a choice forcesstudents to think about how they learn and the environment in which they
Robotics Research Group and teaches in the Mechanical Engineering Department. As a researcher, his efforts have focused on software development for robotic systems. Recent research efforts include human/robot interactions, mobile manipulation, and robotic workcell integration including projects funded by NSF, DARPA, DOE/NNSA, and ONR among others. In the ME Department, he has taught graduate and undergraduate courses in programming, numerical methods, and robotics, as well as co-developed a nuclear automation interdisciplinary graduate program. Additionally, he has received academic development funding to study presence and stability in online PSI courses.Cameron Booth, University of
Page 14.841.8classes in the humanities that fit these criteria, and classes in engineering that do not.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank Microsoft Research for providing partial funding to conduct thisresearch through a 2006 Microsoft Research Tablet-Based Computing Initiative Grant; DyKnowfor their valued partnership and support of the project through additional software licensing andlistening to our feedback; and Jane Prey from Microsoft Research, External Research andPrograms. We would also like to thank the students and faculty who have participated in thisresearch.Bibliography1. Birmingham, W.P., and V.F. DiStasi, Active Learning Across the CS Curriculum.Pittsburgh : ASEE, 2008. ASEEAnnual Conference.2. DyKnow. DyKnow
MeetingArea 1 1Discussions 1 1SpecificAssignment 2 1 1 2 1 7Assignments/Homework 1 1 2Cases/Projects 1 1 2Quizzes/Exams 1 2 3Resources/ Links 1 1 2Course Survey
examines managerial processes as influenced by science, technology, and consumereconomics with consideration of impact on individuals and families Two faculty membersdelivered instruction; however, it should be noted that there is extensive coordination betweenthe two, and the courses are viewed as being more alike than may otherwise be the case whentwo sections of a course are taught by two different instructors. The instructors use exactly thesame assignments, projects, content materials and supporting documents.In general, it was observed that the WEB students seemed to do better than LEC students on“general knowledge” items, while the LEC students appeared to do better than WEB students onitems that were classified as course specific.The
board: will meet annually and provide feedback to The EET IAB met twice during the improve the quality of the program, also evaluate the senior project design academic year, and recommended actions teams. are discussed in the respective IAB meeting. IAB are also part of the assessment team for senior project.PEO4
Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century, February 19.6. Bloom, B.S., M.D. Englehart, E.J. Furst, W.H. Hill, and D. Krathwohl. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. David McKay, New York, NY.7. Duderstadt, J.J., (2008), Engineering for a Changing World, A Roadmap to the Future of Engineering Practice, Research, and Education, The Millennium Project, The University of Michigan.8. Galloway, P.D., (2008), The 21st-Century Engineer, A Proposal for Engineering Education Reform, ASCE Press, Reston, Virginia, USA.9. NAE (National Academy of Engineering). (2004). The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. Washington, D.C., The
EE Seminar Fields and Waves Computer EE Depth EE Depth EE Depth Engineering Math Architecture courses/elective courses/elective courses/electiveCurrently there is a senior level Power Engineering Course in the electrical engineeringcurriculum at the United States Military Academy. This course covers machines, transformers,transmission lines and system analysis. An analog power system emulator is planned to replaceand/or enhance power flow software in the current laboratory structure. In addition, the emulatorcan be used for a small scale power system design project
the total energy, ideal head and calculated head losses.Calculated head losses decrease after the channel throat and in turbulent flow become negative.This is not expected, because the fluid cannot convert kinetic energy into pressure energywithout appreciable positive head losses. Several experiments were then performed along withattempting numerical simulations to investigate and elucidate this phenomenon. Next, theexperiments and their results will be discussed. The process of determining the root of thestrange results and the current status of the project will also be outlined.Initial ExperimentThe first step in this investigation was to run the Bernoulli flow experiment “as-is” and attemptto replicate the results of past students. Figure
Page 14.1173.2parameters. Mixed signal IC tests are very sensitive to structural details and hence tofabrication techniques. The course combines educational elements to produce a uniqueclass environment. These elements include the use of industrially sponsored design andbuild projects, a fabricated design approach and its modification, the integration ofproducts and manufacturing process design, and emphasis on engineering and peopleskills. In this paper, the innovative design and testing parameters, the course teachingprocedures, and some course materials will be discussed. 1. Introduction Currently, mixed-signal IC test and measurement has grown into a highlyspecialized field of electrical
Gathering Storm (Committee onProspering in the Global Economy of the 21st Century, 2007) and Educating The Engineer of2020 (National Academy of Engineering, 2005), publications that pointed us toward revising ourinstitutional outcomes. In a project taken on by our institute-wide committee responsible formaintaining our student learning outcomes process—the Commission on the Assessment ofStudent Outcomes (CASO)—we determined that adding a leadership outcome to our set ofinstitutional outcomes would be a significant revision.The decision to add leadership to the list was reinforced by the development of Rose-Hulman Page 14.458.2president’s
evolution has changed the landscape of the educationalenvironment to an unprecedented level. This rapid change has driven educational institutions toconsistently adapt these new trends and renew their services to their communities.In this project, the IT infrastructures, policies, facility requirements, and management strategiesof some renowned engineering and technology schools and colleges throughout the U.S. werestudied. Through the numerous related parameters in IT, few key parameters were selected asidentifiers that were used to collect the sample data. Examples of these parameters are bandwidthallocation, student laptop programs, software ownership, software deployment, OS platforms,and correlation were carried out in relation to engineering
. Of course, the academic teachers need to be ever vigilant toguard academic integrity without appearing to be constantly suspecting their students.The formulation of assessment tasks has a major significance in encountering plagiarism. It hasbeen variously observed that the students could be driven toward plagiarism if they perceive theirtask to have been reduced to mere compilation of facts, statistics and pretty pictures to satisfy theassessment criteria for a poorly set task. McKenzie8 observes that “it is reckless and irresponsibleto continue requiring topical “go find out about” research projects in this new electronic context.To do so extends an invitation (perhaps even a demand) to “binge” on information