and explore how each affects an engineering student (both international and domestic)during their graduate education.Exploring the Engineering Graduate Student ExperienceThe following sections detail the four main bodies of literature surrounding international andgraduate education which include: graduate student identity development, enculturation intolearning communities, socialization experiences and future career plans. These are not allinclusive, but represent a wide range of literature which was used to model that graduate studentexperience.Graduate Student Identity DevelopmentEngineering as a profession, like medicine or law, is endowed with a set of professionalknowledge and associated skills that are accepted as a requirement of each
user-client interaction. These real projects came to us initiallythrough two primary clients: The University Office of Facilities Planning and Management(FP&M) and the Regional Emergency All-Climate Training Center (REACT). Each client hasprovided a new project in each of the last several years.Projects have a willing client, clearly defined scope, specific time frame, program and budget.The scope of these projects are consistent with the capabilities of the students and the length ofthe academic semester, yet broad enough to be consistent with the goals, objectives, and desiredlearning outcomes of the course. These projects provide a significant challenge to thecommunication and collaboration skills, creativity, and innovation of the
educationalexperiences that will increase their global awareness, cultural understanding, and culturalsensitivity. For many universities, requiring all students to work or study internationally is notan option due to the high financial cost. Therefore, other methods must be used to engagestudents in international experiences without requiring international travel.In order to inform planning related to non-travel based international experiences, data wascollected from 435 first-year engineering students from all campuses of Penn State University.Survey questions asked students about their perceptions of global awareness, including a self-assessment of their current awareness, their desire to improve their global awareness, and howthey anticipated improving
questionnaires and interviews,suggested revising the event to include a more relevant and challenging assistive robotics theme.There followed a planning effort by a group comprising three members of the ConnecticutCouncil on Developmental Disabilities and the lead author. The group met on several occasionsduring the summer and fall of 2008 to explore possible topics for the contest. Eventually thegroup settled on a theme that represented a real area of concern to Council members—the needfor a person with disabilities to obtain food from a refrigerator during an emergency situationwhen a personal assistant is not able to be present. Thus was born the idea of an autonomousrobot that would serve as a server or waiter and a unique contest, RoboWaiter, the
. Page 15.1184.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Teaching Process for Technological Literacy: The Case of Nanotechnology and Global Open Source PedagogyAbstractIn this paper we propose approaching the concern addressed by the technology literacymovement by using process design rather than product design. Rather than requiring people toknow an impossible amount about technology, we suggest that we can teach process forunderstanding and making decisions about any technology. This process can be applied to newproblems and new contexts that emerge from the continuous innovation and transformation oftechnology markets. Such a process offers a strategy for planning for and abiding the
coursesconsideration evaluation should be carefully planned in the OCW course design process. The syllabus of OCW course must be seen in relation to the basic knowledge acquired by participant about the teaching-learning process and the use of educational resources. The learning objectives have been stated clearly and with measurable outcomes. The course content and assessment methods are designed to measure the stated learning objectives. Learning activities and assessments are clearly connected with
teaching aninterdisciplinary course such as this is that the teaching or mentoring rarely ended with the end ofthe semester or even with an ‘A’ grade. The statistical concepts introduced to the students havemade them realize that in a research study the time to see a statistician is not when the data hasbeen collected but when planning for the data collection. This was found to be the case in a fewcase study observations. Examples of such experiences are: • “John Smith” came to see me this summer when he started planning his study to discuss his research design and its validity and of course the type of data he plans to collect and the appropriate methods to analyze. • “Jane Jones” knew she would need to use regression models
ability to understand and apply foundational quantitative analysis skills and interest in pursuingSTEM studies. Our research plans include a longitudinal study of academic progress that examines thesuccess of students who pursue STEM studies after attending MPCT.Pedagogical Approach Our orientation is that programming techniques in early courses should be chosen to minimize cognitiveload while maximizing pedagogical value. The focusing of MPCT to introductory computation included asignificant reevaluation of the programming interfaces used to support coursework. The originalprogramming interface used the rich object oriented (OO) Java AWT toolbox exposed by the programmingframework of [1]. With this approach, even the design of extremely simple
implement an on-going and schoolwide program to “improving the critical thinking skills of undergraduate students and to moreeffectively prepare them to contribute to society”1. The JB Speed School of Engineering hasdeveloped its plan and made progress towards its implementation. The alignment of criticalthinking improvement with ABET outcomes is also a motivating factor in the school ofengineering’s efforts to comply with the university’s QEP. The recently introduced freshmanexperience course, Introduction to Engineering, is an important component of the plan and itsimplementation. As the required introductory class for incoming engineering students, thecourse is ideally suited to provide students with explicit critical thinking instruction
. Page 15.288.3≠ Successful candidates from initial phone interview are interviewed by phone with several GE Transportation personnel and GE Transportation program coordinator.≠ Based on written feedback from interviewers to Gannon University mentors and GE Transportation program coordinator, final selection is made by GE Transportation program coordinator.≠ On an average 15% of initial applicants are accepted into the program.Implementation Plan≠ The student will be evaluated on an ongoing basis by the faculty and GE Transportation mentors.≠ The student will be evaluated at the completion of each major project (4-6 month time period).≠ In addition to on-going monitoring of student’s activities, the faculty and GE
growth and biofuels experiments attheir home schools. Page 15.1247.10 9After the NIST Summer Institute ends and teachers return to their home schools, plans are madeat NIST to invite the teachers back for Science Afternoons at NIST. All teachers who are pastparticipants in the NIST Summer Institutes are invited so the attendees are a unique new mix ofteachers, all of who can learn from each other. Science Afternoons have evolved to focus on asingle scientific topic, one that may not be of interest to all the teachers but may be of
Dr. Cathy L. Bays is the assessment specialist for the university’s regional reaccreditation Quality Enhancement Plan. In this role she provides leadership across the 8 undergraduate units by demonstrating a broad knowledge of assessment, facilitating unit-specific assessment projects and outcomes, providing faculty development on assessment topics, and supporting the scholarship of assessment. For 15 years she was a faculty member in the School of Nursing at the University of Louisville, serving as Director of the Undergraduate Nursing Program for 5 of those years. Page 15.1022.1© American Society
AC 2010-1648: HOW THE CIVIL ENGINEERING BOK2 COULD BEIMPLEMENTED AT NC STATEGeorge List, North Carolina State University Page 15.653.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 How the Civil Engineering BOK2 Could Be Implemented at North Carolina State University Abstract This paper discusses the way in which the ASCE’s Body of Knowledge, version 2, (BOK2) might be implemented at North Carolina State in its civil engineering curriculum, as perceived by the department head. More specifically, it examines the BOK2 outcomes that relate to the baccalaureate degree, since the plan for achieving the
experiences that mold a freshundergraduate mind into someone called a master of science or a doctor of philosophy.Everyone begins grad school with a game plan, a series of tasks to complete and goals toovercome. However, these expectations often change as rapidly as the student as a results ofnew opportunities, experiences and, sometimes, even a complete paradigm shift of goals andopinions. For instance, I came to graduate school dead set to work for only one faculty member(who I didn't end up working for), graduating in four and a half years (I haven't), and leavingwith at least five publications (I'm getting closer). As I navigated the tortuous path that is myown graduate career, I realize how I have made good choices and bad mistakes, learned
developing new research, development, and applications programs supporting government and private industry in product / process design improvements based on new rapid applications software, enhanced constitutive models using multi-scale concepts, and software verification and validation based on real world applications. 2003-2007: Director, Center for Advanced Vehicular Systems, Extension, Mississippi State University Developed and implemented strategic plan and operational concept for technology transfer of R&D products developed at Mississippi State University to Nissan, Tier-1 suppliers, and small to medium size industries in Mississippi. 2001-2003: R
Kit (right).CurriculumThe H2E3 project curriculum modules are designed for use in existing engineering courses andwill use hydrogen and fuel cell technologies to teach concepts and principles already integral tothe curricula of courses. The goal is to allow teachers to replace existing lessons rather than toadd lectures or activities to already tightly scheduled courses. Draft versions of curriculummodules will be designed for students in the following types of courses: • introduction to engineering • introductory thermodynamics • advanced thermodynamics • manufacturing engineering • upper-division engineering laboratory • energy and societyCurriculum components will consist of course-specific lesson plans, computer
they have questions or concerns. A plan is created for each student tohelp them achieve the goal of entry into an engineering, applied science or other appropriatemajor, and advising sessions provide AOI students with a clearly defined picture of the programand a list of criteria they must meet. Pre-major students relate that this personal guidance isespecially valuable to them, and in addition to being a source of factual information the advisorand undergraduate office are perceived as sources for support and encouragement.First-year students are a focus of the AOI program, as freshmen are vulnerable academically andsocially during the transition to the responsibilities of higher education. Walter, et al. state“Some freshman are clear
near and long term professional plans? If yes, how does he/she know them? If no, why do you think he/she does not know? • Is your career progressing along path you envisioned? • Are you career aspirations aligned with Boeing's strategic goals and vision? Page 15.388.5 • How is success now measured differently at Boeing than when you were in college? Are you aware of how success is measured and how much does it mean to you? • What could have been more effective during your K-12 years to prepare you for college? • What could have been more effective during your college years to prepare you for Boeing? • At
tools necessary to solvenew problems that arise”. Previous studies, on the other hand, reveal the hourly requirement oftransportation-related courses in the civil engineering curriculum offered for undergraduatestudents as decreasing2,3 and entry-level engineers lack significant exposure to transportationengineering methodologies2. In terms of practice, young graduates face a wide range ofincreasingly complicated problems from growing congestion, heightened awareness of trafficsafety and worsening air quality to environmental preservation and social equity concerns4.In a survey4 of 360 participants of transportation engineering and planning courses offered at USuniversities, while assessing the match between the knowledge (topics) and the
provide guidance, help in seeding the new culture, and in developing emerging professionals; ≠ Initiation and maintenance of regular well-planned interaction with industry; and to seek industries’ input, assistance, and feed back; ≠ An engineering “up-front” approach, where engineering is the intellectual centerpiece of the curriculum and to be used from the beginning, i.e., not simply be the traditional introductory and/or survey type course offered as an independent exercise during the first year; ≠ An integration of basic math and science onto themselves, but most importantly, intertwining the theory to serve engineering principles and engineering
engineering design projects in this course.1. Project 1 - Report on Electric Toothbrush: in this project, engineering design teams are assigned to study current electric toothbrushes in the market and prepare a report to the CEO of their company with the ambitious plans of manufacturing a competitive (cost effective, environmentally friendly, high performance etc.) electric toothbrush [5]. The report has to provide detailed information including but not limited to the design, operation, ergonomics, aesthetics, safety, and cost issues related to the current products. The result will be recommendations for product improvements.2. Project 2- Toothpaste and Manufacture: extended from Project 1, the engineering design teams are
generally involves environmental or Earth-systemissues, although it is not exclusively devoted to them. Previous problems have included:developing a plan to provide adequate fresh water for western North America for the nextcentury and beyond; creating a legal, regulatory and scientific framework to preserve theviability of global fisheries; and deciding how (and whether) to rebuild New Orleans in theaftermath of Hurricane Katrina. Students are given broad latitude in structuring their approach tothe problem, and they have great freedom in organizing themselves and their solution to addressthe problem as they see fit.By the spring semester, Terrascope students have thus developed a deep interest, and some levelof expertise, in a specific complex
development of an advanced learning lab equipped with tablet PCsand a SMART interactive learning system. Our goal is to use the educational infrastructure topromote problem-based learning, collaborative learning, and assessment. We present a noveldigital ink based computerized testing system Real Test, which is used to comprehensivelymeasure student class performance. A supplementary virtual reality learning platform is alsodiscussed for enhancing student learning outcomes. Finally, we discuss our phasedimplementation plan which ensures that students benefit from the innovated learning technologythroughout their degree plan.BackgroundTo build solid academic programs, we need not only effective management and highly-qualifiededucators and scholars
the1970s were 40 years ago. The Cold War was in full swing. The West and the Soviet Unioneffectively neutralized each other’s plans for large global advances in travel andcommunications. There were no viable business destinations in central and southern Africa, andmost nations banned travel and commercial links with Apartheid-ridden South Africa andRhodesia. The People’s Republic of China was not a leading trade/business destination, and theirown citizens (except for government/Party officials) were not known or allowed to travel, or tohave the means to travel much outside. Plans for the Concorde would have included landing atBombay (Mumbai) as one of two viable business destinations in India (the other being Delhiwhich is deep inland), but
acollaborative multidisciplinary network of university faculty from USA, college students,teachers, and principles.The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. We begin with a review of the conditions ofthe education system in Ytabo and the DR, considering challenges and difficulties that must beovercome to effectively advance engineering and technology education in public K-12classrooms. Next, we describe the components of the emergent MACILE model for Ytabo.Following, we present an analysis of the evolution of the summer program over the pilot phase.Next, we discuss efforts beyond the pilot phase, focusing on the joint collaboration betweenCOSOLA and TEE. Finally, we present future plans for the collaborative efforts.Challenges to Engineering
mentor, connect these to learning (or other) student-derived benefits fromparticipating in the program, discover enjoyable aspects of the program, and identify areas of theprogram that might be improved. Within this paper, informal relational structures relate toactivities that were planned outside of those mandated by the program, and formal relationalstructures are activities that were experienced by all students in the program and were designedby program administrators.MethodsParticipantsParticipants in this study were eleven undergraduate engineering students selected for thesummer 2008 Design, Application, Analysis, and Control of Interfaces (DAACI) ResearchExperiences for Undergraduates program. These students represented seven
ago as an idea has taken on a life of its own. The concept ofbringing old technologies to life and allowing students to touch and examine them has added anew dimension to their learning experience. As the years passed new collections were added.And this trend is expected to continue.Future plans include adding more collections with additional artifacts obtained either throughdonation or recreation. Artifacts for the new collections are currently being made using the toolsand techniques from the past, just as engineers from generations ago did. Donations for other newcollections are also being accepted with the items being added to the collections as well. It is clearthat the project is by no means complete, but rather just in its beginning
curricula. Bioengineering at Saint Louis University(BE@SLU) began with Training Week, which spans topics in from cell and tissue culture tolaboratory etiquette to reading journal articles. After Training Week, students work in thelaboratories of their selected research mentors to complete an 8-week research project. As thestudents are early in their career (students entering their first or second years), the program also Page 15.433.2has a Peer Mentor system, where undergraduates experienced in research are integrated into theprogram to help the participants adjust to laboratories, to plan academic and social activities, tohelp train the
Forms Page 15.1063.8To facilitate grading in a large class, much of the feedback from the projects is obtained by theuse of online forms. Each student is required to fill out an online form as part of their grade.The online forms are used both for students to record their data, as well as to reflect on theirperformance as a team.The first team project that the students accomplish is usually an estimation project (e.g. Paint theJumbotron Orange). The feedback form for this project focuses on the performance as a team.The questions asked are: List all the members of your team. Did your team choose a leader? Did your team make a plan
bebrought into the classroom and aid in the delivery of the course content.To further study the effectiveness of the competition, we intend to interview several focus groupscomprised of students from a variety of different backgrounds. Since the results of our initialsurveys indicate that the competition was an effective study tool, but was only marginallyenjoyable, it is our goal to make the competition more enjoyable by incorporating the feedbackthat we receive from these interviews.In addition, we plan to further refine our survey, such that we can improve the feedback processfrom the entire class instead of relying solely on the focus groups. A final area that we wouldlike to explore is whether or not the students that are presenting score