%)Teaching course(s) 83 (28.8%) 75 (90.4%) Although this seemingly high number of available opportunities appears to contradict theidea that doctoral students are not getting adequate preparation for teaching careers, it isimportant to note that a very small percentage of grad students participate in such programs.One of the authors of this paper with experience with teaching certificate programs and coursesat three separate universities estimates that less than 5% of the graduate students at anyuniversity participate in such opportunities, suggesting that these programs are a good first stepbut need to become integral to graduate education to really make a difference. In addition, thePFF
, “Mathematics counts,” Tech. Rep., London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, 1993.3. M. S. E. Board and N. R. Council, “Everybody counts: A report to the nation on the future of mathematics education,” Tech. Rep., Washington, DC, 1989.4. Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA, 1989.5. Professional Standards for teaching mathematics, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA, 1991.6. Assessment standards for school mathematics, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA, 1995.7. Principles and Standards for School
(2008). Development for the other 80%: engineering hope, Journal forAustralasian Engineering Education, 14(1): 1-12.[6] Bielefeldt, A.R., B. Amadei and R. Sandekian (2008). Community service attitudes of engineeringstudents engaged in service learning projects, American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE)Conference and Exposition Proceedings, Paper AC 2008-2430.[7] Paterson, K.G., A.R. Bielefeldt, and C.W Swan (2010). Measuring the Impacts of Project-Based ServiceLearning in Engineering Education. Lulu, 80 pp.[8] Gelmon, S.B., B.A. Holland, A. Driscoll, A. Spring, and S. Kerrigan (2001). Assessing service-learningand civic engagement. Campus Compact. 154 pp.[9] Burack, C., J. Duffy, A, Melchior, E. Morgan (2008). Engineering Faculty
for increasing underrepresented groups in thesustainable biomaterials manufacturing engineering program each semester. Based on thefindings of these evaluations each semester, the curricula materials and outreach activities will bemodified to increase the impact and effectiveness this approach. Page 15.724.6Bibliography 1) The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century," National Academy of Engineering. 2004 2) Archel M. A. Ambrosio, Harry R. Allcock, Dhirendra S. Katti, Cato T. Laurencin, Degradable polyphosphazene/poly([alpha]-hydroxyester) blends: degradation studies, Biomaterials, Volume 23, Issue 7
. The physical properties of the accelerometer included sensitivity of102 mv/(m/s^2), a frequency range of 0 to 100 Hz, and a 10 Hz phase response of under 3°1.The accelerometer contains a voltage regulator integrated within its structure. This allows forexternal power to be supplied by any source within the 10 to 30 VDC excitation range. Thechange is capacitance is detected by a capacitance bridge where each arm of the bridge functionsas a capacitance divider. The outputs of the bridge are then amplitude modulated signals that aredirectly proportional to the changes in capacitance. A series of diodes and capacitors within theaccelerometer are used to demodulate the signals which are then summed, amplified, and filteredto provide a voltage
. Alvarado, “Power engineering technology: a new program targeted at the nuclear power industry,” Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 2008.2. L. Parker, M. Holt, “Nuclear Power: Outlook for New U.S. Reactors,” CRS Report for Congress, March 2007.3. R. Mott, Applied Fluid Mechanics, 6th edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 2006.4. Y. Cengel, M. Boles, Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach, 6th edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 2008.5. D. Kaminski, M. K. Jensen, Introduction to Thermal and Fluids Engineering, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2005.6. F. P. Incropera, D. P. DeWitt, T. L. Bergman, A. S. Lavine, Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer, 6th edition, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2007.7
, different norms of junior high, senior high,vocational and college male and female students from 2003 academic year were set up to serveas an objective comparison purpose. The creditability and validity contents of the local studentswere used as the norms, and the creditability were found to be high. The re-test creditability wasbetween 0.78~0.92, and the validity was between 0.64~0.85. The four factors and 15 traits of LAI scale include5: (1) Introversion and extraversion personalities: 1. General activity (G), 2. Ascendancy (A), 3. Page 15.1239.4 Social extraversion (S), 4. Thinking extraversion (T), 5. Rhathymia (R
various branch conditions listed in Table 4. The signal name “NATT” is the acronym for“next address if the test result is true” and serves as the target of a branch action, so that a branchis performed by loading the NATT value into the address counter. Address Microstore Test NATT EnA EnD EnL EnN SelMux SelALU KVal Wr 2 4 1 2 1 1 2 2 8 1 Kval Wr ’0’ I0 S ’1’ I1 Data path control signals Cflag I2 Mux Zflag I3
development will be discussed.Overview of Engineering Curriculum DevelopmentsThe quality of engineering education and the ability to recruit a U.S. engineering workforce hasbeen a growing concern among engineers in university and industrial settings. In the 1990’s,ABET, the engineering accreditor of postsecondary degree-granting programs, revamped theprogram outcomes and assessment criteria to improve quality by implementing the EngineeringCriteria 2000 (EC2000).5 Beginning in 2001, all accredited engineering programs were requiredto demonstrate that their graduates possess the following eleven skills (known as a-k): ≠ Ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering; ≠ Ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to
and J. Brooks Zurn, “Evaluation of Tablet PCs for engineering content development and instruction”, Proceedings of the 111th American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, June 20-23, 2004.2. Kuldeep S. Rawat, George B. Riddick, and Lakiesha J. Moore, “Work in Progress – Integrating Mobile Tablet- PC Technology and Classroom Management Software in Undergraduate Electronic Engineering Technology Courses”, 38th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2008.3. Amelito Enriquez, “Developing an Interactive Learning Network Using Tablet PCs in Sophomore-Level Engineering Courses”, Proceedings of the 114th American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual
increasing grit. He then suggeststhat an important element is required, this is, teaching kids that talent takes time to develop andrequires continuous effort.The notion of continuous effort is based on work by the Stanford psychologist, Carol S. Dweck.8In her work, she looks at “growth mindset”, which believes in time and effort, versus a “fixedmindset”, or the belief that achievement results from abilities we are born with. In her studies,children praised for their intelligence quickly became discouraged when given a version of an IQtest, contrasted to children that were praised for their efforts, who improved their final scores.This work, combined with the extensive work at the University of Pennsylvania, helps to set thestage for the search for
Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, June 22 - 25, 2008, Pittsburgh, PA.17. Gustafson, R. J. and B. C. Trott. 2009. Two Minors in Technological Literacy for Non-Engineers, Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, June 15-17, Austin, TX.18. Krupczak, J. J., S. VanderStoep, L. Wessman, N. Makowski, C. Otto, and K. Van Dyk. 2005. “ Work in progress: Case study of a technological literacy and non-majors engineering course,” Proceeding of the 35th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, October 19-22, Indianapolis, IN.19. Pintrich, P. R., D. Smith, T. Garcia, and W. McKeachie. 1991. A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning
Research LLC, http://www.ettus.com/8. GNU Radio—The GNU Software Radio, http://www.gnu.org/software/gnuradio/9. R. M. Felder, R. Brent, “Designing and teaching courses to satisfy the ABET engineering criteria.” Journal of Engineering Education, 92(1), 7-25, 2003.10. B. S. Bloom, D. R. Krathwohl. “Taxonomy of educational objectives, Handbook 1. Cognitive domain.” New York: Addison-Wesley, 1984.11. D. R. Krathwohl, B. S. Bloom, B. B. Massia, “Taxonomy of education objectives, Handbook 2. Affective domain.” New York: Addison-Wesley, 1984.12. R. J. Wlodkowski. “Enhancing adult motivation to learn.” San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1993.13. J. Vella. “Learning to listen, learning to teach.” San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1994.14
, “Nanotechnology: Understanding Small Systems,” CRC Press, 2007.5. P. G. Kosky, M. E. Hagerman and S. Maleki, “Frontiers of Nanotechnology and Nanomaterials,” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2004, Salt Lake City, UT.6. Wendy C. Crone, Arthur B. Ellis, Amy C. Payne, Kenneth W. Lux, Anne K. Bentley, Robert W. Carpick, Donald Stone, George C. Lisensky, S. Michael Condren, “Incorporating Concepts of Nanotechnology into the Materials Science and Engineering Classroom and Laboratory,” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2003, Nashville, TN.7. Aura Gimm, “Introducing Bionanotechnology into Undergraduate Biomedical Engineering,” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June
Ratios on Women and Men: Tokenism, Self-Confidence, and Expectations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(9), 876-884.11. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1998, July/August 1998). Cooperative Learning Returns to College. What Evidence is there that it works? Change, 27-35.12. Murray, S. L., Meinholdt, C., & Bergmann, L. S. (1999). Addressing gender issues in the engineering classroom. Feminist Teacher, 12(3), 169 – 18313 Tonso, K. L. (1996b). Student learning and gender. Journal of Engineering Education, 85(2), 143-150.14. Labrie, A. M., Lemanowski, V.L., Smiley, B.A., Yezerierski, E.J., Baker, D.R., Anderson-Rowland, M.R., “A New Look at Gender Equity Professional Development for Secondary Science
Responsible Assessor Indicated Outcome Assessment Benchmark Status Tool(s) 1 Rubric Evaluation of a Capstone See Rubric Summary Every Course Offering— Instructor reports CIE Project in TEET 4630 E4630-Project-Rubric once per year results to Program (1) Triggered Benchmarks Coordinator 2 TEET 4245 Student Exit Survey See Survey Summary Every Course Offering— Instructor reports CIE Question 15* TEET-4245-Survey once per year results to Program No Triggered Benchmarks
Education B.E. 2552. The Royal Gazette. book no. 126, extra part no. 125, pp. 17-19, dated 31 August 2009.[11] Commission on Higher Education. Practice Guideline for Qualifications Framework for Higher Education B.E. 2552, Commission on Higher Education Notice, 16 August 2009.[12] Chatraphorn, P., Suwonjandee, N. and Asavapibhop, B. Student performances in 1st year Physic courses during the change of university admission system, Thai Journal of Physics, vol. 25, no. 3, 2008, in Thai.[13] Council of Engineering Deans of Thailand, Qualifications Framework for Higher Education: Engineering Programs and Specific Requirements. Report to the Commission on Higher Education, 24 November 2552.[14] Lavansiri, D. and Koontanakulvong, S., Road
Project Prototyping Laboratory forElectrical and Computer Engineering (2006) and An Enhanced Design Project Laboratory forElectrical and Computer Engineering (2008)Bibliography1 Huettel, Lisa, April Brown, Michael Gustafson, Hisham Massoud, Gary Ybarra, and Leslie Collins, Work inProgress: Theme-based Redesign of an Electrical and Computer Engineering Curriculum, 34th ASEE/IEEEFrontiers in Education Conference, Session S2C, Savannah, GA October 20 – 23, 20042 Chu, R. H., D. Dah-Chuan, and S. Sathiakumar, Project-Based Lab Teaching for Power Electronics and Drives,IEEE Transactions on Education, 51(1), 20083 Gerhard, G.C., Teaching Design with Behavior Modification Techniques in a Psuedocorporate Environment, IEEETransactions on Education, 42
in Engineering Education Symposium, July 2009.6. B. Alexander, Web 2.0: A New Wave of Innovation for Teaching and Learning?, EDUCAUSE Review, Vol. 41, No. 2, 2006, p. 36.7. Oomen-Early, J. and S. Burke, Entering the Blogoshere: Blogs as Teaching and Learning Tools in Health Education, International Electronic Journal of Health Education, 10, 2007, pp. 186-196.8. W.J. Lin, H.P. Yueh, Y.L. Liu, M. Murakami, K. Kakusho and M. Minoh, Blog as a tool to develop e-learning experience in an international distance course, Proceedings of the Sixth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT’06).9. J. Hiler, Blogs as disruptive tech: How weblogs are flying under the radar of the content management giants, http
/Senior Clinic as the capstone design experiences in their programs. While theChemical Engineering and Civil and Environmental Engineering departments haveseparate capstone design courses, these departments also recognize Junior/Senior Clinicas a course that well reflects engineering practice. Consequently Junior/Senior Clinicfigures prominently in the assessment efforts of all four programs. As noted in theprevious section, the Junior/Senior Clinic final reports were included in the portfolios ofstudent work that were reviewed at the end of every year. While the department obtainedvaluable data from the portfolio evaluation, an inefficiency in the process was alsoevident: each paper was being read by the project supervisor(s), who assigned a
project is designated and arrangements made for a plantvisit. Typically, a 1-2 hour meeting with the company includes an explanation of their business, ageneral description of the operation(s) to be simulated, and a tour of the plant and specificoperation(s). Data is provided then and upon request, including pictures and videos if available.The team observes the plant operations, discuss the issues and company expectations, gatherrelevant data and information, and begin creation of the simulation. Additional plant visits andcompany communications are the responsibility of the students. A Gantt chart from MicrosoftProject is submitted weekly, and the professor monitors project progress. During the tenth weekof the quarter, the team presents the
91 67 158 Which of the following tests/procedures would allow you to make the most accurate and specific conclusions? A Chi Squared Test B Yates Correction C Subdividing Contingency Tables D A and B E All of the above Author Explanation: A) A chi squared test alone will only tell you the probability of a significant difference between the groups, not specifying which group(s) is(are) different. B) A Yates correction is a fix for chi squared test when you deal with 2 x 2 table (when degrees of freedom equals 1). If a Yates correction is done, it means that a chi squared test is done, therefore Yates correction alone is incorrect. C) A subdividing contigency
, professional and life skills.IntroductionFacilitating professional development and mentoring for STEM (science, technology,engineering and math) students can be a challenge for programs but is important for students’ultimate success and satisfaction with their careers. A National Science Foundation S-STEMgrant allows our Midwestern comprehensive university to award scholarships to cohorts of 23students enrolled in one of the following majors: Mathematics; Computer Science; Biology;Information Technology; Electrical, Mechanical, Civil, and Computer Engineering; andElectronic, Manufacturing, Automotive and Computer Engineering Technology. Scholars canrenew their $5000 scholarships (which provides almost full tuition assistance) for up to a total ofthree
) C8. Determine max stresses at stress concentration C9. Use a stress-cycle (S - N) to predict the fatigue 072S 082S 092SFigure 6 Multi-Year Assessment of Course Objectives Page 15.649.9 MENG 3306 Muti-Year Course Objectives Scale (1-5) 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 C10. Determine stress for a TWPV
the traditional methods.2-12 This method enriches students’ study and setof skills in their determining reactions and deflections of beams, and it provides engineers with ameans to quickly check their solutions obtained using traditional methods.References1. I. C. Jong, “An Alternative Approach to Finding Beam Reactions and Deflections: Method of Model Formulas,” International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 65-74, 2009.2. S. Timoshenko and G. H. MacCullough, Elements of Strength of Materials (3rd Edition), Van Nostrand Compa- ny, Inc., New York, NY, 1949.3. S. H. Crandall, C. D. Norman, and T. J. Lardner, An Introduction to the Mechanics of Solids (2nd Edition), McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1972.4. R
principles, therefore clearly indicatingthat the course learning outcomes were achieved. Similar results were also obtained for 3groups of students who took a similar course by the same author during Summer 2007.Some of the 31 multiple choice questions used in the pre- and post- tests presented inFigs. 2 and 3 were:1. The function of an electronic communication system is:2. How do changes in frequency affect wavelength?3. Modulation is:4. The two ways a radio wave can be modulated are:5. Why modulation is necessary is radio communication?6. Examples of electric signal transmitting media are:7. Which of the following devices is (are) wireless communication device (s)?8. One way to increase the capacity of a cellular wireless network is by:9
AC 2010-134: EXCEED II: ADVANCED TRAINING FOR EVEN BETTERTEACHINGDebra Larson, Northern Arizona University Debra S. Larson is a Professor and Associate Dean for the College of Engineering, Forestry and Natural Sciences at Northern Arizona University in Flagstaff, AZ. She served as department chair for civil and environmental engineering at NAU for four years. Prior to her faculty appointment at NAU, Debra worked as a structural and civil engineer for various companies. She is a registered Professional Engineer in Arizona. Debra received her B.S. and M.S. degrees in Civil Engineering from Michigan Technological University. She received her Ph.D. degree in Civil Engineering from Arizona State
temperature at the given state d) the triple point temperature of water e) the atmospheric temperature at the given stateFor #3-5:Atmospheric air at 25 oC and humidity ratio of 4 g/kg dry air is cooled and dehumidifiedas it flows over the coils of a heat exchanger to 20 oC and a relative humidity of 10%. Ifthe mass flow rate of dry air is 0.7 kg/s, determine the rate at which water is condensingon the heat exchanger for steady conditions.3. The enthalpy per kg of dry air entering the dehumidifier is most nearly:a) 50 kJ/kg dry air b) 25 kJ/kg dry air c) 78.5 kJ/kg dry aird) 35 kJ/kg dry air e) 15 kJ/kg dry air4. The mass flow rate of water condensing in kg/s is:a) 1.1 b) 0.01 c) 0.007 d) 0.44
Without Borders, Engineers for a Sustainable Worldand Engineers for World Health. Research on service-learning in engineering includes a jointstudy conducted at the University of Massachusetts-Lowell and the Massachusetts Institute ofTechnology that showed that students’ participants increased their connection betweenengineering and community needs14.In service-learning, students are paired with a real user in a real community and asked to addressa real need. This user(s) is often different from the students which requires the students to learnabout their user and other stakeholders, the context and the need they are addressing. Thecontext of the projects provides a rich environment for participation from disciplines fromoutside of engineering
Page 15.781.6multiplication and division. The students wrapped these concepts in a flight simulator, whereevery question answered correctly causes the plane to increase its altitude and every incorrectanswer causes the plane to drop in altitude. The objective is to try and reach a safe cruisingaltitude. The students imported a picture of a instrument panel for a plane onto the Front Paneland placed several LabVIEW objects over top of the original image to make the simulationdynamic. Figure 3: Math Flight SimulatorAnother project that aimed to teach basic math concepts used the idea of popular game from thelate 1980’s and early 1990’s as a template. They created a game similar to the educationalOregon Trail video