Conference Session

Fulfilling the CE BOK2 - Case Studies

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kevin Sutterer, Rose Hulman Institute Of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

://www.asce.org/raisethebar).3. ASCE Levels of Achievement Subcommittee of CAP^3. 2005. Levels of Achievement Applicable to the Body of Knowledge Required for Entry Into the Practice of Civil Engineering at the Professional Level, Reston, VA, September. (http://www.asce.org/raisethebar)4. Bloom. B. S., Englehart, M. D., Furst. E. J., Hill, W. H., and Krathwohl, D. 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. David McKay, New York, NY.. Page 15.1212.10 BLOOM’S LEVEL OF ACHIEVEMENT (LOA) OUTCOME

Conference Session

International Initiatives, Partnerships,Teaching Strategies, and Collaborative Networks

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Fanyu Zeng, Indiana Wesleyan University

Tagged Divisions

International

; Bacon. ISBN: 978-0205522590. 6. Paradis, J., Zimmerman, M. (2002). The MIT Guide to Science and Engineering Communication: Second Edition. Boston, MA: The MIT Press. ISBN: 978-0262661270. 7. Beer, D., (2003). Writing and Speaking in the Technology Professions: A Practical Guide: Second Edition. Wiley-IEEE Press. ISBN: 978-0471444732. 8. Schwalbe, K., (2007). An Introduction To Project Management, Second Edition. Course Technology/Cengage Learning. ISBN: 978-1423902201. Page 15.758.14 9. Satzinger, J., Jackson, R., Burd, S., (2009). Systems Analysis & Design In A Changing World, Fifth

Conference Session

Pedagogical Innovations in Laboratory Education

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Glen Archer, Michigan Technological University; Kedmon Hungwe, Michigan Technological University; Luke Mounsey, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

control groups. The feedback will becontinuously incorporated into the course design in order to optimize delivery ofinstruction, and increase options for students on campus as well as those learning atremote sites.References [1] Montana State University computer engineering labs going online as part of pilotprogram. FirstScience News, 17 July 2009.[2] John Watson et al (2004). “On-line laboratories for undergraduate distanceengineering students,” Proceedings of the 34th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in EducationConference, October 20-23, 2004, Savannah, GA.[3] Bourne, J., Harris, D. & Mayadas, F. (2005). Online engineering education: Learninganywhere, anytime. Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 94 No. 1, pp. 131-146[4] Palmer, S., & Hall, W

Conference Session

Creativity and Innovation in Engineering Design

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Niall Seery, University of Limerick; Donal Canty, University of Limerick; Ronan Dunbar, University of Limerick

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

the conversion infrastructure. Figure 2 – Data conversion infrastructureHolistic assessment interfaceThe difficulty with encouraging divergent thinking is theinability of traditional criterion referenced assessment toaccurately measure the process of the activity. Themeasure beyond the artefact or finished product is criticalto ensuring the sustainable value of concept drivencompetency.A web based holistic interface together with the finishedartefacts formed the assessment mechanism. Thisnon-criterion reference formed the blank canvas forstudents to not only present the journey throughdesigning the solution, but also leading the assessortowards what they valued about their solution(s). • Students were given a blank

Conference Session

Sustainable Energy Education

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Faruk Yildiz, Sam Houston State University; Keith Coogler, Sam Houston State University

Tagged Divisions

Energy Conversion and Conservation

, Page 15.405.12http://www.sanjuancollege.edu/pages/4005.asp[4] Missouri Alternative and Renewable Energy Technology Center. Retrieved January 7, 2010,from, http://www.crowder.edu/MARET/[5] Lane Community College in Eugene, Oregon Sustainability Program. Retrieved January 2,2010, from, http://lanecc.edu/sustainability/susprog.html[6] San Juan College, Farmington, New Mexico Renewable Energy Program. Retrieved January6, 2010, from, http://www.sanjuancollege.edu/reng[7] Bronx Community College, Bronx, New York The Center for Sustainable Energy. RetrievedDecember 30, 2009, from,http://www.csebcc.org/main.cfm?actionId=globalShowStaticContent&screenKey=cmpEducation&s=cse[8] Meeroff, D.E., Integrating Green Building Concepts into the

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary First Year Programs

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Dinehart, Villanova University; Joseph Yost, Villanova University; Shawn Gross, Villanova University; Aleksandra Radlinska, Villanova University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

). Recent innovations in undergraduate civil engineering curriculums.Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 122:3:123-133.6. Caverly, R., Fulmer, H., Santhanam, S., Singh, P., O’Brien, J., Jones, G., Char, E., Mercede, F., Weinstein, R.,Yost, J. (2010). Project-based freshman engineering experience: The core course. Proceedings of the 2010 ASEEAnnual Conference and Exposition. Louisville, KY, June.7. ASCE (2009). Report card for America’s infrastructure, American Society of Civil Engineers. Page 15.1253.16

Conference Session

Energy Education and Industry Needs

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jai Agrawal, Purdue University, Calumet; Omer Farook, Purdue University, Calumet; Chandra Sekhar, Purdue University, Calumet

Tagged Divisions

Energy Conversion and Conservation

design projects. Critical Review Assignment1: M.Eswaramoorthy and S. Shanmugam, “A Feasibility Study on Solar Thermoelectric Hybrid Power Generation”, Proceedings of International Conference on Energy and Environment, march 19-20, 2009. Read the paper and prepare your critical review the keeping following points in your view: 1. Is the presented material scientifically solid? 2. Did the authors miss any thing, or concept or in error? 3. Do you think, is it feasible? 4. Read one prominent reference and try to support or criticize the authors. Page 15.34.6

Conference Session

Pedagogy and Assessment in ECE

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gordon Skelton, Jackson State University; Wei Zheng, Jackson State University; HuiRu Shih, Jackson State University; Evelyn Leggette, Jackson State University; Tzusheng Pei, Jackson State University

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

10Bibliography1 Zimmerman, B. J., Bonner, S., & Kovach, R., 1996. “Developing self-regulated learners: Beyond achievement toself-efficacy.” Washington, DC: American Psychological Association2 Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). “Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview,” EducationalPsychologist, 25, 3-17.3 Boekaerts, M. (1997). “Self-regulated Learning: A New Concept Embraced by Researchers, Policy Makers,Educators, Teachers and Students”, Learning and Instruction: Current and Future Directions”, Electronic Journal ofResearch of Educational Psychology, 2(1), pp 1-34.4 Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry.American Psychologist, 34, 906-9115 Mayer, R. (1998). 'Cognitive

Conference Session

Electrical and Computer Engineering Laboratories

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yu-Wei Huang, National Changhua University of Education; Jieh-Shian Young, National Changhua University of Education; Chih-Hung Wu, Chienkuo Technology University; Hsing-Jung Li, National Chung Cheng University

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

encourages students to accept responsibility for learning and shows them how tobecome independent learners. However, it is more difficult and time consuming thantraditional courses.ACKNOWLEDGMENTWe wish to acknowledge support for this project NSC 97-2511-S-018 -021 from the NationalScience Council.REFERENCES[1]. King, R.H., T.E. Parker, T.P. Grover, J.P. Gosink, and N.T. Middleton. 1999. A multidisciplinary engineering laboratory course. Journal of Engineering Education 88 (3): 311-16.[2]. Eaton, J.K., "Computer-Based, Self-Guided Instruction in Laboratory-Data Acquisition and Control," Proceedings, 1992 Frontiers in Education Conference, IEEE, 1992.[3]. Ojha, A.K., "Data Acquisition Experiments," IEEE SOUTHEAST-CON Proceedings, 1996

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shane Cotter, Union College

, http://www.pc.ibm.com/us/security/fingerprintreader.html.4. S. Cotter, “CSI Union: understanding forensic and biometric technologies”, NSF CCLI Award DUE-0837458, June 2009.5. Matlab, ver. R2009a, Jan. 2009, www.mathworks.com.6. Fake Name Generator, Corban Works LLC, http://www.fakenamegenerator.com/.7. GoldWave Audio Editor, ver. 5.55, Goldwave Inc., http://www.goldwave.com/.8. J.P. Campbell Jr., “Speaker recognition: a tutorial”, Proc. IEEE, Vol. 85 (9), pp. 1437-1462, Sept. 1997.9. L. Rabiner and B.-H. Juang, Fundamentals of Speech Recognition, Prentice Hall, 1993.10. Matlab Image Processing Toolbox - Getting Started, http://www.mathworks.com/access/helpdesk/help/ toolbox/images/f0-3373.html.11. R. Gonzalez

Conference Session

Teaching Mechanical Systems: What's New

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ashok Kumar Manoharan, Auburn University; P.K. Raju, Auburn University; Chetan Sankar, Auburn University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

of experience in teaching and research. In addition to consulting for the United Nations and several industries, he has developed an excellent team in the Samuel Ginn College of Engineering that has successfully organized and implemented multi-media case studies in several departments. He has run numerous national conferences and is the Director of Auburn Engineering Technical Assistance Program.In order to promote engineering education research, Dr. Raju also edits and publishes the Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research since 2000 (www.jstem.org).Chetan Sankar, Auburn University Chetan S. Sankar is a Professor of Management at the Auburn University's College of Business

Conference Session

Capstone Design Pedagogy II

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

M. Reza Emami, University of Toronto; Michael G. Helander, University of Toronto

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

,” Proc. ABET Annual Meeting, Pittsburgh, PA, Oct. 2002.6. M. Brereton, “The Role of Hardware in Learning Engineering Fundamentals: An Empirical Study of Engineering Design and Product Analysis Activity,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, 1999.7. M.R. Emami, “Application of Learning Models to the Engineering Design Pedagogy,” 2009 ASEE Annual Conference and Exhibition, Austin, U.S.A., June 14-17, 2009. Page 15.173.128. H.A. Latchman, C. Salzmann, S. Thottapilly, and H. Bouzekri, “Hybrid Asynchronous and Synchronous Learning Networks in Distance Education,” Proc. International Conference on

Conference Session

Outstanding Contributions - Mechanical Engineering Education

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Goodarz Ahmadi, Clarkson University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

specifically with glucose, the concentration of glucose can be measuredindependently of the presence of other sugars that are quite chemically similar. As forindustrial catalysis, practical sensor applications require that enzymes and receptorproteins be immobilized onto a solid surface. The chemical scheme most commonlyemployed on the laboratory scale involves the use of Au-S self-assembly chemistry. Thisallows both direct immobilization of proteins that contain cysteine residues, and indirectattachment of proteins to surfaces through linker chemistries. As will also be discussed,protein immobilization can also be made directly onto Si for integration into MEMS

Conference Session

Online and Web-based Education

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amelito Enriquez, Canada College

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

) your primary reason(s) for taking this class online? Schedule conflict with regular class 12 57.1% Convenience 12 57.1% Commute (I live far from Cañada College) 8 38.1% I prefer online over face-to-face 3 14.3% Other Reasons 6 28.6%Would you have been able to take this course if it were not online? Yes 5 23.8% No

Conference Session

Thermodynamics, Fluids, and Heat Transfer II

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Maixner, United States Air Force Academy; William Parker, Air Force Research Laboratories

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

, Stillwater OK[chapter 5].4 Solar Position Calculator, University of Oregon Solar Radiation Monitoring Laboratory http://solardat.uoregon.edu/SolarPositionCalculator.html Revision dated 6 Mar 2009.5 Palyvos, J.A., 2008, “A Survey of Wind Convection Coeficient Correlations for Building Envelope EnergySystems’ Modeling”, Applied Thermal Engineering, v.28, pp. 801–808.Incropera, F. P., D. P. DeWitt, T. L. Bergman, and A. S. Lavine. 2007. Fundamentals of heat and mass transfer. John6Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ. Page 15.358.13

Conference Session

Measurement Tools

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Adam Carberry, Tufts University; Matthew Ohland, Purdue University; Chris Swan, Tufts University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

physics. American Journal of Physics, 1998. 66(3): p. 212-224.27. Stathopoulou, C. and S. Vosniadou, Exploring the relationship between physics-related epistemological beliefs and physics understanding. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2007. 32(3): p. 255-281.28. White, B., et al., The epistemological beliefs assessment for physical science, in American Education Research Association. 1999: Montreal.29. Vincenti, W.G., What engineers know and how they know it: Analytical studies from aeronautical history. 1990, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.30. Loverde, L., Science & engineering, philosophy and common sense. Ingenierias, 1998. 1(2): p. 24-31.31. Pajares, F., J. Hartley, and G. Valiante, Response format in

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Luis Godoy, University of Puerto Rico; Pedro Covassi, National University of Cordoba (Argentina)

. Page 15.569.10References[1] Ahmed, S., K.M. Wallace and L.T.M. Blessing, “Understanding the differences between how novices andexperienced designers approach design tasks”, J. Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 14(1), pp. 1-11, 2003.[2] Petroski, H., Design Paradigms: Case Histories of Error and Judgment in Engineering, CambridgeUniversity Press, 1994.[3] Delatte, N., Beyond Failure: Forensic case studies for civil engineers, ASCE Press, Reston, VA, 2009.[4] Kolodner, J., Case-based Reasoning, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1993.[5] Gonzalez, A. J. and D. D. Dankel, The Engineering of Knowledge-Based Systems: Theory and practice,Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1993.[6] Godoy, L. A., “Interviews with experts, in which they explain how

Conference Session

Capstone and Senior Design in Engineering Technology: Part I

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vladimir Genis, Drexel University; William Danley, Drexel University; Warren Rosen, Drexel University; Shawn Racz, Lockheed Martin, Inc.

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

isconsistent with ABET accreditation requirements.1 The analysis of the performance resultsgenerated from capstone course sequence is an integral part of the continuous qualityimprovement for the AET Program. This analysis allows AET faculty members to provideevidence of the effectiveness of the developed processes and quality of the program. Thisanalysis justifies necessary changes to keep the program relevant to the university andcommunity.Bibliography 1. 2008 – 2009 Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Technology Programs, ABET Inc., 2008. 2. V. Genis. Senior Design Project in Biomedical Engineering Education. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, pp. 1-9, 2007. 3. William S. Janna and John I. Hochstein. An assessment process for a capstone

Conference Session

Student Learning and Assessment

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nicholas Harlow, Western Kentucky University; Robert Choate, Western Kentucky University; H. Joel Lenoir, Western Kentucky University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

Page 15.570.13 Rating, AMCA and ASHRAE.7. Nagyszalanczy, S., 2002, Woodshop Dust Control, Taunton Press, Newtown, CT.

Conference Session

Critical Issues in IT and IET: Focus Group

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gabriel Harley, IUPUI; Daniel Baldwin, IUPUI; Wanda Worley, IUPUI; Tresler Thurston, IUPUI; Stephen Hundley, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

listing a number of “engagement or involvement factors”developed from their own experiences as well as those gleaned from the National Survey ofStudent Engagement. These factors include obviously classroom-related items such as “Activeand Collaborative Learning” activities, “Time-on-Task,” and “Course-Related Interactions withFaculty.” Less obvious factors, however, are also listed. These include “Out-of-ClassRelationships with Faculty,” “Quality of Campus Relationships,” and even “Use of InformationTechnology.”9 Engagement, then, can be said to be an amalgamation of a number of elements,constituting both the intellectual and social connections students make with course materials aswell as the environment(s) in which the materials are

Conference Session

ADVANCE Grants and Institutional Transformation

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Canan Bilen-Green, North Dakota State University; Elizabeth Birmingham, North Dakota State University; Ann Burnett, North Dakota State University; Roger Green, North Dakota State University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

/web/20080130023006/http://www.president.harvard.edu/speeches/2005/nber.html . (accessed March 19, 2010).13. Collins, P.H. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. New York: Routledge, 2000.14. Britton, D. “The epistemology of the gendered organization.” Gender and Society, 14(2000): 418-434.15. Rosser, S. “Attracting and retaining women in science and engineering,” Academe, 89:4(2003): 24-8.16. American Council on Education (ACE). On Change. Washington D.C.: Author, (1998).17. West, M., & J.W. Curtis. AAUP faculty gender equity indicators 2006. American Association of University Professors, 2006.18. Nelson, D. (2005). “A National Analysis of Diversity in Science and Engineering Faculties

Conference Session

Educational Methods and Technologies

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Marshall, University of Southern Maine; William Marshall, Alief Independent School District

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

Page 15.695.1112, 2000.5. Felder, R., Active Learning with Dr. Richard Felder, downloaded on March 17, 2010 fromwww.youtube.com/watch?v=1J1URbdisYE.6. Dutch, B.J., and Allen, D.E., and White, H.B. (1998). Problem-based Learning: Preparing Students to Succeedin the 21st Century. “Essays on Teaching Excellence”. Center for Teaching, University of Southern Maine. Vol. 9,No 7, 1997 – 1998.7. Bound, D. & Feletti, G. (1991). The Challenge of Problem-Based Learning (p. 13). New York: St. Martin’sPress.8. Albanese, M.A. & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-Based Learning: A Review of Literature on Its Outcomes andImplementation Issues. Academic Medicine, 68. 52-81.9. Marshall, J. and Marshall, J. (2007). In Search of Teaching Excellence. American

Conference Session

Improving Student Entrepreneurial Skills

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel Ferguson, Ohio Northern University; Michele Govekar, Ohio Northern University; Amanda Stype, Ohio Northern University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

examinedthe ratings of software processes for new ISO standards (Jung 2003). It also evolved practically in a university-level evaluation of individual college assessment plans within that author’s experience.Designation and use of a head-judge/s is an intervention that we have used within our events. Each head judgeis assigned a team of judges. Each team of judges is then assigned a set of participants that a certain number ofjudges must rate. For example, a team may consist of three to five judges, be assigned to rate 12 contestants,with each contestant rated by a minimum of three judges. The head judge determines the logistics required tofulfill these conditions. Also, the head judge fields questions about the criteria and the judging process. At

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nathan Klingbeil, Wright State University; Byron Newberry, Oklahoma Christian University of Science and Arts; Anthony Donaldson, California Baptist University; Joan Ozdogan, Chantilly High School Academy

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !"#$%"' ! N)! ! NK! ! NO! ! NM! ! NP! ! NQ! ! ?4.730HR!! +0.--! ! KBLM! CPI! KBLP! CSI! KB*S! CQI! KBLO! CLI! KBQS! C*I! OBP@! CKI!! +0.--! ! KBPQ! CSI! KBPQ! CSI! )B@@! C)I! KBKO! COI! KBLO! CMI! KBSQ! CQI!! D-84./H! ! KBKO! COI! )B*P! CKI! KBSO! CSI! )B*P! CKI! OB@@! C)I! KBMQ! COI!! T29/0.--! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! @! C)I! )B*P! CKI! ?4.730HR!! T29/0.--! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! "#$!%&'!! ()*K(! ! +,-./0-!&1+!23!45-!678.9-!:7

Conference Session

The New ABET CE Criteria - Program Development

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brian Swenty, University of Evansville; Mark Valenzuela, University of Evansville; James Allen, University of Evansville; Immanuel Selvaraj, University of Evansville

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

., Baltimore, MD, 2009.3. How Are We Doing? Assessment Tips With Gloria Rogers, http://www.abet.org/Linked%20Documents- UPDATE/Assessment/Assessment%20Tips8.pdf, ABET, Inc., Baltimore, MD, 2009.4. Assessment Basics, ABET Program Evaluator Training-Pre Work, http://www.abet.org/_TrainingCD/index.htm, ABET, Inc. Baltimore, MD, 2010.5. Peterson, O, Williams, S, and Durant, E., “Understanding ABET Objectives and Outcomes,” Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Austin, TX, 2008.6. The Fact Book 2009-2010, University of Evansville, Evansville IN, 2009.7. Mission Statements, University of Evansville, http://www.evansville.edu/aboutue/mission.cfm, Evansville, IN 2010.8. Gravett, L. and

Conference Session

Frontiers in Engineering Economy

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ted Eschenbach, TGE Consulting

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy

. Lavelle, and Ted G. Eschenbach, “How Do Engineering Managers Teach Engineering Economy?” Proceedings of the 2008 ASEM National Conference, West Point, November 2008, CD.14. Newnan, Donald G., Jerome P. Lavelle, and Ted G. Eschenbach, Engineering Economic Analysis 10th, Oxford University Press, 2009.15. Newnan, Donald G., Ted G. Eschenbach, and Jerome P. Lavelle, Engineering Economic Analysis 11th, Oxford University Press, 2012 (in press).16. Park, Chan S. Contemporary Engineering Economic Analysis, 4th, Prentice Hall, 2007.17. Peterson, William R., “Spreadsheets as the Primary Means of Engineering Economy Education,” Proceedings of the 2009 IERC National Conference, Miami, June 2010, abstract on CD.18. Ross, Stephen A., Randolph W

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Outside the Classroom

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Bowler, Michigan Technological University; Susie Amato-Henderson, Michigan Technological University; Tom Drummer, Michigan Technological University; Joseph Holles, Michigan Technological University; Ted Lockhart, Michigan Technological University; Joanna Schreiber, Michigan Technological University; Debra Charlesworth, Michigan Technological University; Jingfang Ren, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

issueRecognition of possible 0 = No recognition in responseconsequences resulting from the 1 = Recognition of issue in responseaction.Recognition of the perpetrator’s 0 = No recognition in responseresponsibility or accountability for 1 = Recognition of issue in responsethe action.Recognition of the rights of the 0 = No recognition in responsevictim(s) of the action. 1 = Recognition of issue in responseRecognition of the duties and/or 0 = No recognition in responseobligations of the individuals 1 = Recognition of issue in responseinvolved in the action. Total Score Range per ethical 0 to 6 issueInter-Rater Reliability and Agreement AnalysisScores were totaled for each ethical

Conference Session

Issues and Directions in ET Education & Administration: Part II

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kim Nankivell, Purdue University, Calumet; Jana Whittington, Purdue University, Calumet; Joy Colwell, Purdue University, Calumet

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

chairmen in state and land-grant institutions [Electronic version]. Research in Higher Education, 3, 243–259.16. Nakayama, M. & Sutcliffe, N. G. (2007, April). Perspective-driven IT talent acquisition [Electronic version]. Proceedings of the 2007 ACM SIGMIS CPR Conference on Computer Personnel Doctoral Consortium and Research Conference: the Global information Technology Workforce (St. Louis, Missouri). SIGMIS-CPR '07. ACM, New York, NY, 171-178.17. Noll, C.L., & Wilkins, M. (2002). Critical skills of IS professionals: A model for curriculum development [Electronic version]. Journal of Information Technology Education 1 (3), 143-154.18. Ramlall, S. (2004). A review of employee motivation theories and their implications for

Conference Session

Sustainable Construction Practice

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mark Shaurette, College of Technology, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Construction

appropriateshould be part of the curriculum as well.Bibliography1. D’Agostino, B., Mikulis, M., & Bridgers, M. (2007). FMI & CMAA Eighth Annual Survey of Owners. Raleigh,NC: FMI2. National Demolition Association. (2010). 10 Common Misconceptions about the Demolition Industry. Retrievedon January 3, 2010 fromhttp://www.demolitionassociation.com/PUBLICRELATIONS/10CommonMisconceptions/tabid/108/Default.aspx3. Institute of Demolition Engineers. (2008). Trading hard hats for mortar boards. Demolition Engineer. 2007(3),8-9. Page 15.1227.114. Beckman, K., Coulter, N., & Khajenoori, S. (1997). Collaborations: closing the industry-academia

Conference Session

Capstone Design Projects

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

William Michalson, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Stephen Bitar, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Robert Labonté, Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

for the past ten years: ≠ All faculty who advise capstone design projects (MQPs) should have participated in the teaching of ECE 2799 (or at least sat in on the lectures. This would communicate to the faculty the breadth and depth of the design process and would make them better understand the methodology their students are familiar with. ≠ All capstone design projects (MQPs) should follow the design methodologies taught in ECE 2799 and this methodology should be encouraged by the project advisor(s). ≠ Faculty should reaffirm the need for ECE 2799 success as a prerequisite to being accepted on a capstone design project (MQP) team. Current reductions in ECE 2799 class