performance measures, the working group is considering thedevelopment of pre- and post-tests that can be used by instructors to evaluate the extent to whichcourses are achieving the learning outcomes. Page 15.417.11TABLE 3: Preliminary knowledge table for traffic operationsCONCEPTSBlooms: Comprehension (terms + linkage); Uninterrupted flow: Fundamental traffic flowWiggins: Interpretation modeling/relationships • General speed/flow/density model (parameters q, k, and u) • Greenshields realization: linear model
, N., Krmaer, K., Rust, W.J., Stoll, Q., and Uddin, M.S., “Encouraging interest in engineering through embedded system design”, Proceedings of the 2004 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, June 20 – 23, 2004. Page 15.877.1322. Surgenor, B., Firth, K., and Wild, P., “Lessons learned from a mobile robot based mechatronics course”, Proceedings of the 2005 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Portland, OR, June 12 – 15, 2005.23. Walter, W., “A micro-controller based robotics course for ME students
above, in the case for which the university ownsthe IP on which the companies are based, the companies license the IP from the university. Incases for which the inventors and not the university own the IP, the inventors assign the IP to thecompanies.The VA processes are shown in Figure 2. The first process is the selection of companies to enterVA. This is accomplished very carefully and involves four steps: identification of candidateopportunities, due diligence regarding IP, market analysis, and feasibility of assembling humanresources. If these steps provide positive results, a panel of experts in the field of the company isassembled, and after a presentation by the inventor(s) and extensive Q&A, the panel advises VAregarding the
course. Assumptions for a given problem can be introduced into the general equation to obtain the correct specific equation. Do not give students any equations on exams--this will make understanding of the development of the key equations a requirement for success in the course. 2) Sign error Reason - This is the most common mistake in mathematics. The traditional approach for thermodynamics (Q, heat, is in and W, work, is out) does nothing to prevent sign errors. Solution – Provide all of the equations as a balance for the control volume. Property In – Property Out = Change in Property. Have students determine how energy by heat
a common goal (e) an ability to identify, formulate, (p) an ability to identify and (b) An ability to analyze a problem, f. an ability to identify, analyze, and solve and solve engineering problems solve applied science and identify and define the broadly-defined engineering technology problems computing requirements problems appropriate to its solution (f) an understanding of professional (q) an understanding of (e) An understanding of i. an understanding of and a commitment to
Pitch Rate 30 ) g 20 e d( α, 10 ) c e 0 s g/ e d( -10 q ), g -20 e d( iH -30 -40 -50 478.5 479 479.5 480 480.5 481 481.5 482 482.5 483 483.5 Time (sec) Figure 7: Flight Data Segment used for Parameter Identification15A
Challenges in Qualitative Research with Black Women Family Relations, 52(3), 205-215.7. Skloot, R. (2010) The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks. New York, NY: Crown Publishers, 2010.8. Levin, M. & Greenwood, D. (2002) Pragmatic Action Research and the Struggle to Transform Universities into Learning Communities in Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice Reason, P. & Bradbury, H. (Eds.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.9. Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. (2nd ed.), Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.10. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation. (3rd ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
/Activities/Assignments P4: Final Design Project (Customer Driven) 20 3/23 3/24 Lec: AIM & Customer interviews P4 Q&A 21 3/25 3/26 AIM P4 #1 Example FO, SG, & Concepts P4 HW: 3*2 interview transcripts w/ translations 22 3/30 3/31 P4 HW: Needs summary list (submit both assignments by printout + email) 23 4/1 4/2 P4 HW: function
4-30 pt cd cd cv cv cv Q 3-87 - 4-9 pt
Development Initiative, edited by The Brookings Institution.(Washington DC: The Brookings Institution, 2003).9 PA Bureau of Workforce Development, op cit.10 Stephen J. Fonash, “Nanotechnology and economic resiliency,” Nano Today 4 (2009), p.291.11 Qian Q. Zhao, Arthur Boxman, and Uma Chowdhry, “Nanotechnology in the ChemicalIndustry – Opportunities and Challenges,” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 5 (2003): 567-572.12 Fonash 2009, p. 290.13 John Hayes, "The Engineering Unemployment Problem,"http://www.engineering.com/Blogs/tabid/3207/EntryID/165/Default.aspx (accessed January 8, 2010).14 Matthew H. Wisnioski, "Engineers for Change: America's Culture Wars and the Meaning ofTechnology," unpublished manuscript, 2009, p. 3.15 Richard H.P
ratings of importance do not track the rankings precisely, but still demonstrate thatthe students viewed all topics as beneficial. Page 15.753.14 Figure 1: Average student s Likerrt ratings forr identical prre- (pixeled, grey shorterr columns) and apost-courrse (red talleer columns) assessment a q
training of the software used for this purposes(e.g. Microsoft Excel). Within the statistical tools, the emphasis was to review with thecalculation of the mean and standard deviation, as well as traditional statistical hypothesis testing(such as t-test, the use of a p-value and q-tests) in order to evaluate the quality and significanceof the data gathered in each laboratory. Considering that some of the students have covered thismaterial in one of their previous courses, it was very important to emphasize that this is the typeof scenario in which statistical analysis is put to place. The safety review session was offered in order to explain traditional safety rules with respectto the handling of instruments and safety guidelines (which include
additional relevant websites to share forthe second year’s session and compiled a list: Resource Relevant InformationAccessScience Easy to navigate, articles broken down intohttp://www.accessscience.com/ sub-topics, vocabulary suitable for grade levels,(Carnegie Mellon’s subscription database) good Q & A and study center feature.MetaLib Participants may be overwhelmed with number(Carnegie Mellon’s federated search product) of articles in both the General and Engineering & Technology categories when using basic
in eacharea: 1. How well does the pitch/poster articulate a specific problem or unmet need and identify the customer/potential customer? 2. How unique and viable is the proposed solution in addressing the identified need? How well researched is the idea for the profit or non-profit business activity? 3. How effectively and passionately does the presenter articulate the problem, solution and call to action? 4. How effective or accomplished are the speaker’s skills? How well designed and presented is the poster? How well is the Q/A handled?At the competition, posters were displayed for judging during a two hour period. Each team
, Ward12 notes that “[q]ualified women applicants are not given theopportunity to become engineering faculty because it is presumed that women will not have thetime to serve as effective members of the professoriate given their family obligations.” Womenwho do join the faculty ranks experience “bias, lack of professionalism shown toward womenfaculty […], visibility/invisibility, patronization, faculty spouse issues, and other women notacknowledging women engineers.”13 The prevalent cultural norm “assumes a work week of morethan fifty hours a week, which continues to exclude women who have child care obligations,”12further hampering the advancement of women faculty.Over the years, research showing the effects of the institutional culture and
helped me to remember how to find I, Q, etc…. I looked back at it last night.” • “As an individual who had difficulty with Problem Set Zero initially, reworking the problem set really helped cement the ideas.” • “It was helpful. I am glad it was at the start of the semester so I had time to re-work the problems on it.” • “For me I didn’t remember anything from CE300 so it was an excellent review and helps me to better understand the material.” • “Delaying it until we start using the covered material would make sure it is fresh in our minds.” • “Problem Set Zero was so long ago and there was so much material in this block that I don’t think it had an effect at all.”Consideration of both