studentsarrive in Karlsruhe between January and March, and start with a research project that has beenformulated by faculty at both institutions. Whenever possible, the US student is paired with aGerman student who will participate in the reciprocal phase of the exchange program. When thesemester begins in Karlsruhe in April, students transition to coursework and either finish theirresearch or decrease their laboratory workload.The engineering students from Karlsruhe, Germany, come to the University of Kentucky inAugust to take regular classes in the fall semester. Karlsruhe’s engineering students, who arerequired to complete a 500-hour research project for their degree, perform some of this researchin the fall semester, while also taking classes, and
afashion that lends itself to a sequential presentation of mathematical concepts that evolveover the 14 week semester.Lab Structure:There are eight laboratory sessions that were set up to achieve two goals: emphasizemathematical concepts, and introduce an aspect or two of the engineering disciplines.These two-hour lab sessions were developed with two constraints in mind; portability andminimal use of computers. Portability is needed because of the desire that anyengineering faculty member should be able to teach this course in any classroom in theengineering building or on campus. The second constraint is to enhance the courseportability, and to limit computer use to outside classroom assignments, and homework.So, even though the course includes
inductance, L1 2 mH Filter inductance, L1 2 mH Load resistance, R 75 ΩExperimental resultThe solar battery charger is developed and tested in the laboratory. Experimental setup is shownin Figure 2. Efficiency of the SEPIC converter is tested with different input voltage from thesolar panel. The efficiency η is determined by (1). Test result of the efficiency is shown in Table3. Pout ϕ? (1
AC 2010-958: AN IMPORTANT EXPERIMENT AND PROJECT IN THE FIRSTMEASUREMENT COURSEBijan Sepahpour, The College of New Jersey Bijan Sepahpour is a Professional Engineer and a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at The College of New Jersey (TCNJ). Currently, he is serving as the chairman of the department and is actively involved in the generation of design-oriented exercises and development of laboratory apparatus and experiments in the areas of mechanics of materials and dynamics of machinery for undergraduate engineering programs. He has served as the Chair of the Division of Experimentation and Laboratory Studies (DELOS) as well as the Mechanical Engineering Division of
AC 2010-511: COMMUNICATION NEEDS IN COLLABORATIVE AUTOMATEDSYSTEM DESIGNSheng-Jen Hsieh, Texas A&M University Dr. Sheng-Jen (“Tony”) Hsieh is an Associate Professor in the Dwight Look College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. He holds a joint appointment with the Department of Engineering Technology and the Department of Mechanical Engineering. His research interests include engineering education, cognitive task analysis, automation, robotics and control, intelligent manufacturing system design, and micro/nano manufacturing. He is also the Director of the Rockwell Automation laboratory at Texas A&M University, a state-of-the-art facility for education and research in
AC 2010-2013: REFLECTIONS AND MEASURES OF STEM TEACHING ANDLEARNING ON K-12 CREATIVE AND PERFORMING ARTS STUDENTSSteven Essinger, Drexel University Steve Essinger is a graduate student at Drexel University in Electrical and Computer Engineering. His research involves applying machine learning techniques to the study of microbial communities. He has designed bioinformatics computer laboratories and improved image processing laboratories for the K-12 classroom.Ryan Coote, Drexel University Ryan Coote graduated from Drexel University in 2009 with a BS in Electrical and Computer Engineering.Pete Konstantopoulos, CAPA High School Pete Konstantopoulos is a mathematics teacher at the Creative
experiments in a disciplined manner (use and connect standard laboratory instruments, electronic devices and equipment), analyze, interpret, troubleshoot and apply experimental results to improve processes using sound engineering principles. (d) An ability to apply creativity in the practical, cost effective and reliable design of systems, components or processes in the areas such as electronics, or electrical power and machinery. (e) An ability to function effectively in laboratory groups and/or on design teams with members and tasks sometimes separated in time and space. (f) An ability to identify, design, test, analyze, and solve technical problems using knowledge gained from a
finished product meets contractualspecifications. The fees for these engineering services are typically seven percent of the cost ofthe contract2.This paper describes some of the assessment aspects that have developed in engineeringtechnology departments. Engineering technology departments are considered high costdepartments due to several factors: Laboratories for educational practices, relatively high facultysalaries, and low enrollments that are in most cases limited by the available facilities.Considering this cost environment, it is necessary to implement new activities with detailedconsideration of the full cost of the activity. This is the case for assessment. Assessment isnecessary but its satisfactory implementation also requires
survey are shown in Table 3. Student responses to questions 1-4not only showed that they enjoyed the lab (77%), but also indicated that they found thelab to be an effective component in their learning process. 87% agreed that the labchanged the way they think about motion and forces and 84% reported a betterunderstanding of motion and forces after the laboratory. A smaller majority (58%) alsoagreed that they could transfer what they had learned to new situations. SA A N D SD 1. I enjoyed the elevator lab. 7 17 7 0 0 2. Because of the elevator lab, the way that I think 4 23 4 0 0 about motion and forces
journals and presented at the national and international conferences. Dr. Genis has three U.S. patents. From July 2003 to July 2005, as a team facilitator, he worked on the development of the curriculum for the “Partnership for Innovation in Nanobiotechnology Education” program in collaboration with the University of Pennsylvania and several Community Colleges.William Danley, Drexel University Dr. William Danley, Assistant Clinical Professor of Applied Engineering Technology in the Goodwin College, Drexel University, taught and developed undergraduates courses in thermodynamics, thermal system design, fluid mechanics, thermal, pneumatics and hydraulics laboratories, materials
with homework assignments and in-class demonstrations are thenpresented with discussions of laboratory components. A brief summary concludes the work.Educational TheoryElectrical engineering courses tend to be highly theoretical and require students to placeemphasis on relatively abstract conceptualizations1. Because of this, these courses traditionallyhave been taught using a subject-based learning (SBL) approach which does not require activeparticipation on the part of the student2. In an effort to provide a more student-centeredexperience, one that engages learners in more application-based experiences, a problem-basedlearning approach is proposed for incorporation into power electronics courses.Problem-based learning (PBL) requires the
IncentiveGuest Lectures An engineering faculty member presenting one 65-100 $200- lecture in a liberal arts course, or vice versa. minutes $250Modules One week of material, in the form of class or 3-6 hours $500 laboratory time.Paired Courses Two courses taught in the same term, sharing At least 3 $1000 three or more activities (lectures, labs, field hours trips, speakers, etc) in the same term. Table 1. Summary of Supported InteractionsIncentives were intended for the first offering of an interaction, and for lectures, supported up totwo guests per
learning, Actionbeing more vocational and Self being more cerebral. The traditional engineering curriculumis described by figure 2a where the Knowledge dimension informs both Action and Self. Itcan be argued that in a traditional academic curriculum Action and Self intersect to somedegree in engineering laboratory classes. However many of the laboratory classes involveprepared experimental exercises to confirm theoretical knowledge and require littlereflection. Furthermore the overcrowding at Australian universities combined with theshedding of technical staff and occupational health and safety issues have reduced, what oncewere hand-on laboratory sessions, to group demonstrations and computer simulations.The professional curriculum, shown, in
AC 2010-783: NDEP-SUPPORTED K-12 STEM OUTREACH ACTIVITIES OF THEUS AIR FORCEGerald Mora, New Mexico Tech Gerald Mora is the Director of New Mexico Tech's Technology Transfer Support Group and the State of New Mexico Partnership Intermediary for the Air Force Research Laboratory at the Kirtland Air Force Base. Mr. Mora was awarded the 2001 New Mexico Distinguished Public Service Award for his development Kirtland’s La Luz program. Mr Mora has numerous publications based on his Systems Engineering work and his passion for education outreach.Ricardo Negron, WPAFB RICARDO NEGRON--Ricardo Negron is currently the Chief of the Domestic Partnering Branch at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base (AFRL
Program Director of Electrical Engineering and Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at Milwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE). He received the Ph.D. degree from the University of Missouri in 1990 and has 20 years of experience across the corporate, government, and university sectors. He is a registered Professional Engineer in Wisconsin. He teaches courses in control systems, electronic design, and electromechanics.Owe Petersen, Milwaukee School of Engineering Dr. Petersen is Department Chair and Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at Milwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE). He is a former Member of Technical Staff at AT&T Bell Laboratories and received
1 Reception areas 4 N/A 1@2. Studio Classrooms and Teaching Laboratories Studio classrooms 4 2050, 2073, 2052, 2073 48 Teaching labs 3 1273, 1285, 1288 24 Computer classrooms 2 1191, 1203 46 Student computer labs 2 742, 744 32 Computer hardware classroom 1 630 16 Hole Montes Lecture Hall 1 1698 84 Classroom
. Page 15.765.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Integrating Hands-On Design Experiences into the CurriculumAbstractIn many Biomedical Engineering (BME) programs, design is a key component throughout thecurriculum. This may involve a combination of design problems on paper, a reverse engineeringproject, education in design methods, and hands-on fabrication experiences. In the BMEprogram at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, our goal is to also provide morehands-on design opportunities in the laboratory and machine shop. We accomplished this bycreating new courses for a “design sequence” and by collaborating with an existing, requiredcourse.The design sequence consists of four courses that span the final
University,but differentiates itself by tying the two introductory courses together.3 The introductory circuitscourse develops the hardware; the “brawn”, while the introductory digital logic course programsthe controller; the “brain”.EE221: Introduction to Electrical Engineering IThe first semester ECE course on circuit analysis fabricated the robot platform and introducedthe students to the basic concepts of engineering design. In total, six hours of class andlaboratory time were specifically dedicated to the project. Three additional laboratory periodswere spent on experiments that were helpful for the project; biasing a light emitting diode (LED),signal processing of sensor data, and a sensor controlled motor operating circuit. For the
. This also brings in the importanceof membrane humidification for charge transport to occur and supporting empirical relations forconductivity. Then concentration losses at high current densities are discussed based on the localdepletion of reactants at the respective electrodes due to diffusion limited mass transfer.In week 2 the first experimental lab on open-circuit voltage is presented and relevant calculationsfor fuel cell experimentation and characterization are introduced, such as, relative humiditybased on humidifier temperature set points and reactant utilization or stoichiometric ratio (basedon Faraday’s laws). In weeks 3 and 4, the laboratory experiments continue with focus onpolarization curves, mirroring the theoretical content
experience,2) curricula and contents, and 3) labs and platforms. For example, the importance of enhancingthe laboratory environment for improving embedded systems education process is shown in [12].This work points to the significant role of using current available technologies and tools such ashard/soft-core processors, IP (Intellectual Property) cores, and the EDK (embedded developmentkit) tool in embedded systems labs. It also shows the importance of transition from using TTL Page 15.1268.2ICs (transistor–transistor-logic integrated circuits) to reconfigurable devices such as FPGA. In[13] a set of experiments are proposed to enable students to
extent to which thestudent population was receptive to different delivery styles. Audiovisual Aids such as PowerPoint Slides were used to study the students’ learning capabilities in the visual mode. Lectureswere also delivered to accommodate the aural mode of learning. Research reports, reading andwriting assignments were included to examine the reading mode of learning. Lastly,laboratory demonstrations, experiments and exercises were set up to encourage students to learnin the kinesthetic mode. Students were later examined on all the topics, quizzes were gradedand tabulated using a rubric based on Washington State University’s critical thinking rubric.The author has provided full details in Appendix A.ConclusionsDr. Hunter R. Boylan, who is
introduction will have a major effect on education system. As the learning resources such as fully stacked libraries and fully equipped computer laboratories are rare in the country, careful planning is required to prioritize the introduction of ICT into the mainstream education including Page 15.1251.3higher education.While the world has changed dramatically in the past few decades and will continue to do so with an accelerating pace, the learning environment, i.e. the classroom has not changed but it will change in the near future. The education system in Afghanistan must follow its international
read, individual article presentations and laboratory activitydiscussions were also included. Over the course of the semester ten round table activitiesoccurred. Half of these were the entire class reading the same journal article or conferenceproceeding, two were students discussing articles they read on a topic of their choice, two were Page 15.502.3wiki activities centered around three separate articles, and one was a discussion focused on 2triaxial laboratory testing. Each discussion was centered on a topic that correlated to the currentlesson topics of the course. Unless otherwise stated
making capabilities. While the top studentstoday would have been top students twenty, thirty, etc. years ago, it seems that the “average”student has seen a decline in their skills. Teaching a course in Materials Testing for twenty years Page 15.1006.2has been a source of great pleasure and searing frustration. The course itself is wonderful in that itreinforces the theoretical background that the students have been taught in the prerequisite courses,while simultaneously exposing the students to hands on testing with real world applications. Thegoal of the class is for the students to take data derived from laboratory tests and put the raw
. 3. Exhibit knowledge and skills consistent with the expectations of a practicing construction manager. 4. Articulate the viability of creative and realistic solutions to defined problems and projects. 5. Recognize the value of diversity and identify ethical and societal issues in business and technical tasks. 6. Solve complex problems utilizing discipline specific expertise: i. Utilize graphical techniques to produce engineering documents. ii. Conduct standardized field and laboratory testing on civil engineering and construction materials. iii. Utilize modern surveying methods for land measurement and/or construction layout. iv. Determine forces and stresses in
thatthese programs should be based in electrical and electronics fundamentals but would need coursecomponents covering the fields of electrical power distribution, modern instrumentation andcontrol, sensors, communications, and networking technology. Hopefully, industry will partnerwith educational institutions to provide direction to these efforts and hopefully this will happensooner than later. To date, the National Science Foundation (NSF) has funded a small Course,Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) project titled “Sensor Network EducationProject”9 that has produced some generic curriculum and laboratory experiments in the sensornetworks area at the two-year college level. This project utilizes a specially configured sensornetwork
vibrations and dynamic systems and control. Professor Orabi has taught courses in both undergraduate and graduate level Mechanical Vibrations and Engineering Analysis, and undergraduate level thermodynamics, Measurement Systems, Capstone Mechanical Engineering, Mechanics and Introduction to Engineering. He has established two Laboratories: the Materials Testing laboratory sponsored by the National Science Foundation, and the Engineering Multimedia Laboratory funded by AT&T. He is a member of ASME and ASEE. Page 15.503.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Enhancement of
1989. He holds an M.S.E.E. and a B.S.E.E. from University of Missouri-Rolla. He is currently a Professor at Missouri University of Science and Technology (formerly the University of Missouri-Rolla) and Director of the Applied Optics Laboratory. His research interests include optical sensing, smart system applications, and engineering education. Page 15.992.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Programming for Pre-college Education using Squeak SmalltalkAbstractCompetence in a programming language can provide a strong basis for logical thinking and anexposure to technology; however, many languages
discusses methods and contentdeveloped to be embedded into an engineering curriculum to teach students effectivecommunication skills and the efficient use of modern communication techniques. The results ofthis research effort, conducted by a multidisciplinary team of faculty from CommunicationStudies, the Arts and Media, English, Information Science, and Engineering are presented in thisarticle. The objective of this activity is the design of efficient and innovative ways to infusecommunication education into engineering courses, lectures, laboratories, projects, and seminarswith adequate assessment methods for a set of well-defined learning outcomes. However, theinfusion of communication skills is useful in nearly any field of study making this
introductory courses are positively correlated with career efficacy. H2. Laboratory-based introductory courses are positively correlated with career efficacy. H3. Increased career efficacy from introductory courses is confounded by demographic factors. H4. Upperclassmen have higher levels of career efficacy than underclassmen. H5. Satisfaction with introductory courses is positively correlated with career efficacy.MethodologyA 48- item online survey was developed for data collection through a survey hosting website.The survey contained four sections: demographics (20 questions), course information (15questions), career efficacy (4 questions), and course evaluation (9 questions). The courseinformation section