Collection

2022 ASEE St. Lawrence Section Annual Conference

Authors

Felicity Bilow, Clarkson University; Jan DeWaters P.E., Clarkson University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

, June 2019.[30] G. Rulifson and A. R. Bielefeldt, "Evolution of Students' Varied Conceptualizations About Socially Responsible Engineering: A Four Year Longitudinal Study," Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 25, pp. 939-974, 2019.[31] National Academy of Engineering, Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA, 2005.[32] F. Bilow, J. DeWaters and G. Hoople, "Work-In-Progress: Examining the Impacts of a Sociotechnical Approach to Energy Education on Engineering Students' Sense of Belonging and Attitudes Toward Engineering," in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Virtual Conference, 2021.[33] C. J

Collection

2022 ASEE St. Lawrence Section Annual Conference

Authors

Michael E. Kuhl, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE)

Active Learning Exercises,” Association for Engineering Education - Engineering Library Division Papers, 2019.[4] M.E. Kuhl, “Fostering an Entrepreneurial Mindset in Systems Simulation,” 2020 ASEE St. Lawrence Section Annual Conference Proceedings, Rochester, NY, 2020, pp. 142-148.[5] L. Bosman, N. Duval-Couetil, B. Mayer and P. McNamara, “Using Online Discussions to Develop the Entrepreneurial Mindset in Environmental Engineering Undergraduates: A Case Study,” International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 9(3), pp. 4-19, 2019.[6] F. Bellotti, R. Berta, A. De Gloria, E. Lavagnino, A. Antonaci, F. Dagnino, M. Ott, M. Romero, M. Usart, I.S. Mayer, “Serious Games and the Development of an Entrepreneurial Mindset

Collection

2022 ASEE St. Lawrence Section Annual Conference

Authors

Esther Jose, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York; Matilde Luz Sanchez-Pena, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York

Tagged Topics

Diversity

male-female ratio that isreflective of the local work force), there are laws that prevent such goals from unduly harmingnon-targeted groups, from hiring people who are unqualified for the job, or to have rigid quotasfor any job or position (ACLU of Southern California, 2019). That is, while women might haveit easier in a certain job interview at a certain institution, it is typically to account for biasesthroughout the entire pipeline of their STEM career as indicated in the literature and analysisdone in this paper. Such a provision does not in fact make it easier for women in STEM. Suchsentiments are harmful for women as indicated by many in the survey who feel “unsure ofthemselves”, “drive(n) … to do better to prove (their) worth”, “look(ed

Collection

2022 ASEE St. Lawrence Section Annual Conference

Authors

Peter N. Knox, State University of New York at Binghamton; Sawsan Werfelli, Binghamton University; Amber Simpson, State University of New York at Binghamton

summing and visualization of prominenthabits of mind that emerged across all study participants [43]. The inclusion of child participantperspectives from 15 families provides diverse data for the interpretation of narrow units ofanalysis (i.e., statements, phrases) and aggregation into broader units (i.e., themes, meanings)[44].ContextThis study is part of a larger grant project, began in 2019, working in partnership with familiesand community members to develop, implement, and refine an out-of-school elementaryengineering program. The current study explored the perceptions and demonstrated creativehabits of mind of children who participated in the out-of-school engineering program duringYear 2 and 3 of this project. Children’s families were