to abandonresearch, or theory, or qualitative interviewing in order to have impact. But we do need to ask ourselveswhy we are conducting this specific research, who it is going to benefit, how it will benefit them, andwhether or not it has benefitted them once we are finished. We need more innovation and moreaccountability towards impact in order to truly ‘move the needle’ of broadening participation inengineering.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Awards #2114241and 2114242. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material arethose of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Wediscussed
://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-34508-xZurn-Birkhimer, S., & Serrano, M. (2022, August), Longitudinal Analysis of First-YearEngineering Students' Active Participation in Women in Engineering Program Activitiesand the Relationship to Engineering Persistence Paper presented at 2022 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN. https://peer.asee.org/41485 3Graphic from https://www.wepan.org/fourframesMentoring work falls into Frame 1: Equip the Individual. These particular mentoringprograms teach students to cope within the current academic culture/workplaceculture and navigate the barriers that exist. The emphasis is on the individual level(minimizing
culture, often wound up, whether intentionally or not, reproducing the sameexclusionary behavior, but with women now being excluded.Additionally, the development of male stereotypes for STEM fields, particularly when airedvia mass media venues such as film or TV, contributes as a social factor discouragingwomen from computer science. Such stereotypes, such as "computers are for boys," have aparticularly negative effect in adolescence, when girls and boys develop their socialidentities.Data sources:• https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/there-are-too-few-women-in-computer- science-and-engineering/ 3• Cheryan, S
sustainable • Collect feedback from students in multiple ways to determine what elements are missing in your ecosystem.Presenters will recap connections and opportunities to transfer lessons and strategiesto participants own institutions by highlight key activities and steps at ClemsonUniversity. 30C o N E C D 2 0 2 4What we’re working on next• We are continuing to seek external funding to provide funds to students and support initiatives. NSF INCLUDES, NSF S-STEMs, and non-profit opportunities are all targets. These efforts will target domestic students broadly but include approaches that will ensure BIPOC and women continue to have access
to uncover the co-constructors' experiences with support(or lack of support) within their STEM department's academic culture and in context to theiridentity as a Black student. Example questions from the interview protocol include: How if atall, are your lived experiences in STEM influenced by you being Black? How would you describethe culture of your STEM program for Black doctoral students? and How is the experience ofBlack students in your program different compared to non-Black students? After the interview,we distributed a $50 Amazon e-gift card to the co-constructors.Positionality In alignment with Secules et al.’s (2021) conceptualization of positionality, weconsidered various facets of our team's positionality during this study
must undergo a paradigm shift. It is critical to study why the current paradigmis not producing sufficient URM STEM graduates and to identify the root-level challengeswhich must be ameliorated to sustain long-term change. HBCUs are playing a pivotal rolein increasing diversity in STEM by preparing URMs for graduate studies in Science &Engineering (S&E). By working with HBCUs, Predominantly White Institutions (PWIs)can help change the diversity landscape of STEM graduate education. Our partnershipseeks to demonstrate the strength of a systematic change approach.Systemic Change ApproachThe CEPath (Creating Equitable Pathways to Graduate Education) project laid afoundation to address identified structural barriers inhibiting systemic
Demographic Questions Please indicate your first semester of Open response enrollment as a graduate student in the College of Engineering at Virginia Tech (i.e., Fall 2019, Spring 2022) Please indicate your primary academic Multiple choice department List of academic departments in the college of engineering What degree(s) are you seeking? (check Checkboxes all that apply) ● Master’s (thesis) ● Master’s (non-thesis) ● PhD Which most closely describes your Checkboxes gender? (check all that apply) ● Prefer not
. Journal of social issues, 60(1), 17-34.• Hurtado, S. (2007). Linking diversity with the educational and civic missions of higher education. The review of higher education, 30(2), 185-196.• Milem, J. F. (2003). The educational benefits of diversity: Evidence from multiple sectors. Compelling interest: Examining the evidence on racial dynamics in higher education, 126-169.• Smith, D. G., & Schonfeld, N. B. (2000). The benefits of diversity what the research tells us. About campus, 5(5), 16-23.• Backlash refers to social and economic penalties for counterstereotypical behavior (Rudman, 1998). By penalizing vanguards (atypical role models), backlash reinforces cultural stereotypes as normative rules.• Chapter four - Reactions to
[Accessed 14 Sept 2023][4] C. R. McGeorge and C. Bilen-Green, “Engaging men as allies for gender equity in highereducation: An exploration of an Advocates and Allies Program,” Journal of Women andMinorities in Science and Engineering, vol. 27, no. 2, 2021.[5] A. Call, C. Bilen-Green, and A.L. Burnett, “NDSU ADVANCE FORWARD Advocates & Allies: Thesuccession of a good idea or what’s in a meme?” Studies in Social Justice, vol. 12, no. 1, pp.152-164, 2018.[6] C.L. Anicha, C. Bilen-Green, A. Burnett, K. Froelich, and S. Holbrook, “Institutionaltransformation: Toward a diversity-positive campus culture,” Journal of Women and Minoritiesin Science and Engineering, vol. 23, no. 2, 2017. doi:10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2017017021[7] S.J. Gervais and A.L
devote $100,000 to students Students Field is receive more time to grant from diverse graduate diversified scholarships school backgroundsLet’s walk through what a very simple fleshed-out logic model might look like.Notice the overarching categories that we talked about before.In this case, we provide examples of these overarching categories to show what a logicmodel for a scholarship program might look like.Of course, many scholarship programs (like s-STEMs or NRTs) also have other programcomponents that we would need to include, probably as new rows in this table
challenging yearfor summer programming, the 2021 virtual cohort proved a unique opportunity to pilotDISTINCTION overall, but also to learn of methods that could reach students in future cohortsthat might be limited due to programmatic funding constraints associated with the cost ofresidential summer programs.References[1] London, J. S., Lee, W. C., Watford, B. A., Ash, C. H., Holloman, T., Pee, C. M., &Hampton, C. (2022). Climbing uphill: Toward a common agenda for the advancement of BlackAmericans in engineering. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering,28(3).[2] Understanding and Offsetting Financial Barriers for Black Students in Science,Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.17226/26576.[3] T. K. Holloman
STEM field. The "STEM Identity Scale" developed by Setren et al. is acommonly used instrument that evaluates students' sense of belonging and identification withSTEM disciplines (2019). Additionally, studies have used surveys to assess students'identification with stereotypes and their connection to STEM (Cheryan et al., 2017).Belongingness is typically assessed using self-report measures that gauge students' feelings ofinclusion, social acceptance, and connection within their academic community. The"Belongingness Scale" developed by Good et al. is widely utilized to measure students' sense ofbelonging in STEM fields (2012). Expanding on Good et al.’s work in belongingnessmeasurement, Walton and Cohen have also employed surveys to assess
computing discipline, or uses a Hispanic serving community college as its context. Project Context Rodriguez et al. (2020) Conceptual Framework for Computing Identity developmentFor the theoretical framework, Rodriguez et al. (2020)’s conceptual frameworkfor computing identity development, originally developed for Latinas, which isan expansive framework that focuses on the individual, micro, meso, and eco,and macrosystem levels computing identity development as well as elementsof community cultural wealth, funds of identity, and intersectionality whichconnect the systems across levels. 14 Project
Advances, 2018• Jones, Jeffery M., “LGBT Identification U.S. LGBT Identification Steady at 7.2% Gallup, February 22, 2023• Mertnes, S., m. Herberz, U.J.J. Hahnel, and T. Brosch, “The effectiveness of nudging: A meta-analysis of choice architecture interventions across behavioral domains,” Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, 2021• UCLA School of Law Williams Institute• http:www.ustranssurvey.org 21 21
the research," Review of Educational Research, vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 745-784, 2019.[2] G. Garcia, "Beyond graduation rates: Conceptualizing liberatory educational outcomes for colleges and universities," 2022.[3] M. J. Ratts and A. M. Hutchins, "ACA advocacy competencies: Social justice advocacy at the client/student level," Journal of Counseling & Development, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 269- 275, 2009.[4] S. P. Farruggia, C.-w. Han, L. Watson, T. P. Moss, and B. L. Bottoms, "Noncognitive Factors and College Student Success," Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 308-327, 2018, doi: 10.1177/1521025116666539.[5] C. A. Farrington et al., Teaching Adolescents to
a/ init RCE D N rela oot cau IO r iat NAT ddress ive EVEL oo e ed EMI a to O s r tiv lat DISS tive to ad PME t c to se es itia re
, Eri n A. a nd William R. Rothwell, “LGBTQ Inequality i n Engineering Education,” Journal of Engi neering Education, 2018• Edel man, Jon, “Students Weigh Anti-LGBTQ+ Laws in College Decisions” Diverse Issues i n Hi gher Education, Ma rch 15, 2023, a ccessed May30th• Hughes, Bryce E., “Coming out i n STEM: Factors affecting retention of sexual minority STEM s tudents,” Science Advances, 2018• Jones, Jeffery M., “LGBT Identification U.S. LGBT Identification Steady a t 7.2% Gallup, February 22, 2023• Pl a tt, Adam, “Why Ca mpus Tours Keep College Presidents Up at Night,” Twi n Ci ties Business, a ccessed May 30th, 2023.• ACLU, “Ma pping Attacks on LGBTQ Rights in U.S. State Legislatures” https ://www.aclu.org
theoreticalframeworks in engineering education: An anti-deficit and liberative approach.Education Sciences, 8(4), 158.Revelo, R.A. & Baber, L.D. (2018). Engineering resistors: Engineering Latina/o studentsand emerging resistant capital. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 17(3), 249-269.Rodriguez, S.L. & Stevens, A.R. (2023). Exploring computing identity development forLatinx students at a Hispanic-serving community college. Journal of Diversity in HigherEducation.Rincón, B.E. & Rodriguez, S. (2021). Latinx students charting their own STEMpathways: How community cultural wealth informs their STEM identities. Journal ofHispanic Higher Education, 20(2), 149-163
. González, et al noted that they attempted to “represent households in a way that isrespectful to issues of voice, representation, and authenticity” [4, p. X]. We followed that lead inreceiving and studiously responding to the nuances of markers that participants in our researchstudy shared with us, as they assessed our trustworthiness. With our focus on stewardship, werespectfully received the stories they chose to share with us, recognizing that they contributedvaluable knowledge with each story they shared.Use of markers in qualitative analysisRobert S. Weiss defined a marker, in the context of qualitative interview studies, as “a passingreference made by a respondent to an important event or feeling state.” [2] In an example, hestated that
retention rates. We hope these studies will demonstratethat the 3C program effects lasting change even afterformal participation ends.We believe that by disrupting our computing and STEMdepartment cultures, one cohort at a time, we can drivesystemic change and create a more inclusive and equitablefuture for technical fields. But we recognize that truechange takes time, and we are committed to doing thiswork for the long haul. 20 This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 2118453. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily
topics they would be interested in reviewing. They were able to selectas many as they wanted. The Mines faculty were solicited via a personal email from us. Theywere asked if they would be willing to review course content in their discipline and/or specialtopics page(s) of their choice.15 librarians from various academic institutions completed the form expressing interest inreviewing course content. They volunteered for all nine special topics and 15 of the 16disciplines. Several disciplines were sent to three librarians, including Math, Computer Science,Design Engineering, Civil and Environmental Engineering, and Chemistry. Two pages were onlysent to a single librarian reviewer, Geology and Chemical and Biological Engineering.Additionally, nine
introvert, Kathy enjoys reading WWII historical fiction, listening to podcasts, spending time with her family, exploring the world of craft cocktails, enjoying Finger Lakes wineries, and making a fuss over her Boston Terrier, Gatsby. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 20241234WE@RIT was founded during the early Millennial era in the early 2000’s and itsengagement playbook worked famously right up through the end of the Millennial era(the last class of Millennials graduated in 2018).Millennials were quick to sign up and show up for one-off events and programs.Gen Z is slower to sign-up and far more likely to no-show if they do sign up.Millennials took no issue in being part of programs that addressed