- Conference Session
- Laboratory and Research Skill Development
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico; Madalyn Wilson-Fetrow, University of New Mexico; Stephanie G Wettstein, Montana State University, Bozeman; Catherine Anne Hubka, University of New Mexico; Jennifer R Brown, Montana State University, Bozeman; Eva Chi, University of New Mexico
- Tagged Divisions
-
Chemical Engineering Division (ChED)
high.However, the authors did not find a correlation between self-efficacy and exam grades. While theauthors attributed this to a small sample size, both troubleshooting and the measure of self-efficacy primarily focused on data collection and documentation during experiments (Domain 2).We wonder if high self-efficacy related to Domain 2 might be a weaker correlate of learning thanother domains, in part because students may experience what scholars have named “deceptiveclarity,” a phenomenon in which students underestimate how complex something is based onhaving completed a simplified version of the task [9]. The activities associated with collectingdata and monitoring during the experiment are somewhat more straightforward compared toactivities in
- Conference Session
- Chemical Engineering Division (ChED) Poster Session
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Riley Jackson Fosbre, Washington State University; Bernard J. Van Wie, Washington State University; Prashanta Dutta, Washington State University; David B. Thiessen, Washington State University
- Tagged Divisions
-
Chemical Engineering Division (ChED)
are encouraged to draw out the situation when problemsolving rather than hold all the details mentally or in writing. Additionally, having applied theknowledge students learned during lectures and independent study, their observed self-efficacywill be set appropriately. This refers to an individual’s belief in their ability to learn or perform aspecific task and is an important indicator of motivation. Students with higher self-efficacy aremore willing to engage in learning actively, and thus have a higher chance of success. As for the latter point, according to Bandura’s social cognitive theory, learning happensbest as a social activity where information is more readily retained with other individualspresent.3,4 The reason for this is
- Conference Session
- WIP: Student Success and Sustainability
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Susan P. Gentry, University of California, Davis; Glaucia Prado P.E., University of California, Davis
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Chemical Engineering Division (ChED)
, students’ SB within a university includes their social andacademic belonging. Social belonging relates to positive social interactions with peers, faculty,and campus community, whereas academic belonging relates to academic performance,academic self-efficacy, curriculum motivation, and perceptions of belonging within aprofessional discipline [4, 5]. SB is, therefore, one of the main contributors to students’ academicsuccess, persistence, and overall well-being. The literature reports that the lack of SB isperceived differently by different student groups and is critical for underrepresented students(e.g., first-generation and low socioeconomic status) to persist in college after the first year ofstudy [6]. In engineering, women and
- Conference Session
- Cultivating Community, Wellness, and Character Development
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Stephanie Butler Velegol, Penn State University; Katharine Getz, Penn State University; Mechteld Veltman Hillsley, Penn State University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Chemical Engineering Division (ChED)
achievement in engineering. Journal of Educational Psychology.Zabriskie, C., R. Henderson, and J. Stewart. 2018. “The Importance of Belonging and Self-Efficacy in Engineering Identity.” AERA Open, January. https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10058182-importance- belonging-self-efficacy-engineering-identity. 12Does endorsement of masculine ideals predict sense of belonging and identity over performance and peer interactions?Appendix A:Questions from each of the five instruments used in this paper in the order presented here. Allquestions had a 7-point Likert scale. Strongly Somewhat
- Conference Session
- Laboratory and Research Skill Development
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
George Prpich, University of Virginia; Natasha Smith, University of Virginia; Caroline Elizabeth Crockett, University of Virginia; Anukriti Shrestha, University of Virginia
- Tagged Divisions
-
Chemical Engineering Division (ChED)
, highlighting their value in engineering education.References 1. Feisel, L. D., & Rosa, A. J. (2005). The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2005.tb00833.x 2. Crockett, C., Prpich, G., & Smith, N. (2023, June). Experimental Self-Efficacy and Troubleshooting Ability in a Chemical Engineering Laboratory. In 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 3. Siegmund, B., Perscheid, M., Taeumel, M., & Hirschfeld, R. (2014, November). Studying the advancement in debugging practice of professional software developers. In 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops
- Conference Session
- Cultivating Community, Wellness, and Character Development
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Lorena S. Grundy, Tufts University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Chemical Engineering Division (ChED)
science, students, and teaching,” Science Education, vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 771–795, 2018, doi: 10.1002/sce.21343.[25] J. Watkins, D. Hammer, J. Radoff, L. Z. Jaber, and A. M. Phillips, “Positioning as not- understanding: The value of showing uncertainty for engaging in science,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 573–599, 2018, doi: 10.1002/tea.21431.[26] J. E. Dowd, I. Araujo, and E. Mazur, “Making sense of confusion: Relating performance, confidence, and self-efficacy to expressions of confusion in an introductory physics class,” Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 010107, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.010107.[27] P. K. Lai, A. Portolese, and M. J. Jacobson, “Does