the Oregon Institute of Technology Library. Aja earned an MLIS degree from the University of Washington and a Bachelor of Arts and Sciences in French and Community and Regional Development from UC Davis. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Uncovering Information Behavior: AI-assisted Citation Analysis of Mechanical Engineering Technology Senior Capstone ReportsAbstractCitation analysis has been used by librarians and researchers to guide collection developmentdecisions, assess information literacy, and to gain insight into the development of scholarshipwithin a discipline. This project builds on this foundation by using citation
include a semester-long co-curricular program, the strategic inclusion oflibrary services into wellness programming, and an interactive multi-part stakeholder workshop.The focus of the collaborations included experiential learning, project-based learning, andwellness, and all collaborations involved librarians joining with external groups and stakeholdersto broaden impact. In each of the three cases, the initial ask was not for information literacy (IL)instruction – or even for librarian support – but by identifying a point-of-need and havingconversations with campus colleagues, librarians have made themselves a fundamental part ofinteresting partnerships. These experiences demonstrated how librarians are ideal collaborators,and partnerships are
, Pennsylvania State University Sara Kern is an Engineering Librarian at Penn State University. She earned her MA in history from Penn State and her MSLIS at Syracuse University. Her research interests include inclusive library outreach and instruction. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Crafting a Library on Belonging in Engineering: An Initial Review using Textual AnalysisIntroductionWhat does it mean to belong in engineering? Who belongs in engineering? Where do libraries fitinto this conversation? Many scholars have explored the concept of outreach, inclusion,accessibility, and belonging in STEM fields. This project examines a collection of these works,using a library of literature as a corpus
. When initially discussing what questions should be included in the pre-survey, wecame to the conclusion that we wanted to assess how critical a participant was of informationsources. But we also recognized that asking a direct question on this topic could influence theirbehavior during the observational session. As a workaround to this issue, we decided to ask thestudent about their previous engagement with research projects and their previous exposure tolibrary instruction. We feel that these questions will help us parse out students that have moreformal experience with information literacy and source evaluation in the final dataset. Thepost-survey questions are designed to provide both quantitative and qualitative data to betterunderstand
academia. On-the-jobinformation needs move at a more rapid pace and employers provide less specific guidance thanacademic instructors, making it difficult for new university graduates to solve informationproblems [1]. For engineering and technology students, workplace information use involves lessof the sources that are traditionally emphasized in academia (e.g., peer reviewed journal articles,books) and more of the resources heavily relied upon in industry, such as technical standards [2],[3], [4], [5]. Additionally, workplace projects require a high degree of interpersonal informationgathering and communication with colleagues [6], [7].Recent research from American Association of Colleges and Universities (AAC&U) indicatesthat employers view
"Desirable Characteristics of DataRepositories for Federally Funded Research" [1], outlining a set of recommended features andqualities that are considered desirable for data repositories handling research data resulting fromfederally funded research. The document establishes a set of standards and guidelines to ensurethat data resulting from federally funded projects is preserved in repositories that effectivelymanage and disseminate it.On August 25, 2022, Dr. Alondra Nelson, then Acting Director of OSTP, issued a Memorandum[2] recommending that all federal agencies formulate new plans or update existing ones,outlining their approach to ensuring public access to peer-reviewed publications and the researchdata associated with federally funded
modules and activities were introduced in first-year Biology courses [10],a project-based seminar on qualitative research [11], and Psychology courses focused on robustand reproducible research methods [12], [13]. Furthermore, The Collaborative Replications andEducation Project [14] and The Hagen Cumulative Science Project [15] implemented projectsaround replicating existing research in undergraduate education. The increasing effort andawareness around Open Science and reproducible research in undergraduate education inspires anew approach to undergraduate courses that introduce fundamentals of research. This approachintroduces broad research practices while simultaneously addressing Open Science practices andtools that enhance reproducibility
develop further.Despite these plans, there still is not enough space on campus to fully advance the universitymission. As part of a series of strategic planning exercises, the Dean of Libraries offeredunparalleled access to resources and facilities in the Mitchell Memorial Library. Engineering wasvery interested to foster incubator spaces to support departmental design and capstone courses,interdisciplinary projects between engineering departments, and cross-college collaborations infields such as cross laminated timber (a large industry in the Southeastern United States,involving the College of Architecture, Art and Design; the College of Forest Resources; and theBagley College of Engineering). Broader opportunities beyond experiential learning
: • describe the trends of scholarship in engineering; • demonstrate understanding of the research lifecycle in engineering publications; • critically evaluate data management planning through case study review of an engineering project plan; • compare scientometrics rankings of engineering publications and conferences to quality markers; • contrast and evaluate the methods of evidence synthesis and original research; • compare the implementation of evidence synthesis research methods and standards in engineering scholarship and disciplines; • develop a draft paper publication; o prepare a research pitch or proposal
in the outdoors, and went through an abridged version of the first three steps ofthe design thinking process. By the end of this session, they had defined a problem anddetermined one solution from a structured brainstorming session. The second session wasdedicated to fabrication of their solution using makerspace equipment, with help frommakerspace staff members. During the third session, students received feedback from anothergroup and had the opportunity to revise their designs before they presented the final product atthe summer camp open house at the end of the week.This paper will discuss the collaboration between the College of Engineering and the makerspacelibrarian, as well as detailed information on the goals of the project, the
both legally andless legally. One of the key research projects published on engineering academics’ informationbehaviors from this time was a multi-institution study conducted in 2009 surveying engineeringfaculty members’ perceptions of a range of library services. The authors found a high degree ofvariability in participants’ responses across institutions, but the perceived importance ofelectronic access to current and archived scholarly journals was a consistent theme. Interlibraryloan services and library databases were chosen as the next most important library services, butthese services were selected much less frequently than electronic journals (Engel et al., 2011;Robbins et al., 2011). That study evaluated faculty’s perception of
tounderstand how different types of engineering literature can be used to discover the backgroundand current trends in a topic of choice, learn how to find relevant standards, technical reports,and patents in their field using both library and real-world resources, and how to properly citewhat they find in their own final reports. Students will have already been through the first-yearseminar session and will be expected to already know the topics that were discussed then. Thelesson emphasizes the following aspects of the INCLUSIVE ADDIE framework: • Needs – models and encourages discovery, student led-learning, and communicating findings. • Context – the capstone-level course revolves around completing a project (either in groups
freely available tostudents and practitioners, ensuring the work is shared and adapted freely, and aiming for thebroadest possible audience. Second, multiple authors expressed a desire to maintain some levelof control over their work. This includes concerns about commercial use, wanting properattribution, and retaining creative control. Third, some authors indicated that their license choicewas influenced by recommendations from library staff and university policies or was simply thedefault option provided by the authoring platform they were using.Authoring Support:When asked about authorship teams, over half of responding authors wrote their OER alone, andseveral also mentioned being self-motivated for their projects. A slightly smaller group
in Large Engineering Databases – Tips and Recommendations for Literature ReviewsAbstract:Engineering and STEM librarians and researchers regularly use a number of disciplinarydatabases for finding literature. For evidence synthesis (ES) research projects, knowing databasecapabilities and how to most effectively search each database is critical. The complex, oftencomprehensive search strategies necessary for ES reviews can require use of “advanced” searchoptions and controlled vocabulary/index terms. However, the functionality of search interfacesused to access databases varies widely. Thus, searchers must expend more time and effort totranslate searches consistently, as each database has different features and limitations.This article
. This user experience studywill be used to make decisions around space designs and services offered in the library.Defining of Goals and TermsThe Lichtenberger Engineering Library is a branch library embedded in the University of IowaCollege of Engineering. The College of Engineering consists of six academic departments andover twenty research laboratory sites. Undergraduate enrollment is around 1700, approximately275 graduate students, and 110 faculty members [3]. This project started with the questions of“are we meeting the needs of those we serve?” and “are we using our resources and spaceeffectively?” However, as the conversations progressed there was no straightforward way toanswer those questions and one of the first major hurdles was to
on this project will involve exploring additional years of data to detectlonger-term trends along with a second phase involving semi-structured interviews withengineering students to see if their perceived experiences are in sync with the findings of thisstudy.AcknowledgementsI would like to thank Dr. Brooke Coley and graduate students A. Lili Castillo, Ulises TrujilloGarcia, and Himani Sharma in the EESD program at ASU for their expertise, assistance, andfeedback during the coding process for this study. I would also like to thank Deidre Kirmis atASU Library for her help in retrieving the transcripts used for the study.References[1] B. Schembera and J. M. Durán, “Dark data as the new challenge for big data science and the introduction of
had trouble incorporating GL andstandards effectively into their senior capstone projects benefited greatly from a particularpedagogical intervention in their library instruction session [6]. A common theme from thesearticles is that students find it tricky to identify and access GL, and they are eager to learn theseskills. Librarians need to be equipped to help our patrons and therefore need to be well-versed inhow to find and access these resources as well.In 2001, at a moment when the internet was drastically revolutionizing how people produced anddisseminated GL materials, Thompson provided a set of key strategies for finding a number ofdifferent formats of commonly used GL, such as technical reports, standards, militaryspecifications and
rising.Unfortunately, it can take many years for professionals unfamiliar with technical standards tobecome fully proficient when relying on industry to provide such education [2]. Therefore,technical standards education must be deployed in the United States with higher quality andfrequency than in the past. To ensure this happens a deeper understanding of the currentchallenges facing technical standards education is necessary.MethodsThis paper is the second in a project aimed at providing technical standards education toundergraduate engineers. It analyzes the free response data collected from the survey publishedin [7]. Appropriate human subjects' approval was obtained through the [IRB-23-07511-XM].SurveyA Google Forms survey was disseminated: (1) to gauge
over the world face. Knowledge,including sources for materials and techniques, are passed down orally. Additionally, theIndigenous Peoples even though they are oral cultures, they also have what Western Europeanculture calls “trade secrets” or proprietary information. This proprietary knowledge is onlyshared with those designated within the Tribe to know the information. Part of the challengefacing all storage and retrieval sources is to have a way to index proprietary information withpublic terms to make it discoverable and available to those allowed to know.Currently, with efforts to revive ancient knowledge, it is helpful to find what we know has beenwritten about the specific engineering projects of the past. Most of this literature is
sufficient data on the information skill level of transferstudents. Therefore, the librarians chose to study this topic with a survey of incoming transferstudents. Ultimately, Grigg found that a partnership with the Transfer Student Office was a major“win” of the project as that would be necessary to continue to grow library outreach efforts fortransfer students [10]. This paper demonstrates that librarians need to consider transfer studentswhen it comes to information literacy instruction. It also highlights the importance of librarianspartnering with the appropriate groups and people outside of the library to ensure long-termsuccess.Gregor and McBridge also talk about the importance of building relationships with units outsideof the library to
implementations through the Massachusetts Health Information Exchange. At Wentworth, Dr. Feldman is focused on project-based instruction, hands-on simulations, experiential learning approaches, and first year curriculum. Dr. Feldman is one of the lead instructors for Introduction to Engineering courses, with enrollments in the hundreds each fall. His research and teaching interests, in addition to first year engineering, include telemedicine, health informatics, rehabilitation engineering, and medical robotics. Dr. Feldman has collaborated with researchers and engineers from organizations including Tufts School of Veterinary Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Vecnacares, and Restoreskills.Miss Callie Cherry, Wentworth
college's IRB used the contact information on our recruitmentmessage to notify coauthor 2 that we must delete all data from persons at their institution andsubmit our proposal to their IRB for review. This is even though our recruitment methods, sharedwith them, included the IRB project number and the IRB affiliation, with the standard statementsregarding compliance with Human Subjects rules and regulations per the IRB. Coauthor 2responded to each IRB with information about the purpose and details of our study as well asparticipant risk reduction and contact information for the authorizing IRB. Neither collegeresponded to either coauthor after receiving this information.The above IRB inquiry provides evidence of at least one instance of snowball