diverse needs of society globally.DEI Statements in Senior Design Projects:The requirement for DEI statements in senior design projects at UIC's Chemical EngineeringDepartment is a significant educational innovation. These statements require students to considerand articulate the societal, cultural, and ethical implications of their engineering solutions. Byintegrating DEI considerations into the capstone projects, students are encouraged to thinkcritically about the broader impact of their work, fostering a mindset that values diversity andinclusivity. This integration ensures that students are not only capable engineers but alsoconscientious contributors to society who understand the importance of their work in variouscultural and societal
Work in Progress: Development of a Medical Devices Course for Sophomore Biomedical Engineering Undergraduate StudentsIntroductionThe biomedical engineering (BME) workforce requires competency in professional and technicalskills. BMEs often use knowledge in design, administration and management, and customerneeds assessment [1]. Typical work activities of a BME include analyzing data or information,organizing and planning work, determining compliance with standards, building teams, anddrafting and specifying technical device parts [1]. The undergraduate BME capstone designcourse is often used as a “catchall” to develop these critical professional skills; however, to buildcompetency, it is recommended that these skills be practiced
require ethics instruction: Principles of Engineering Design, a lowerdivision class, and Engineering Design Project II, an upper division class that is the second halfof the yearlong senior capstone project. Engineering codes of ethics are introduced in Principlesof Engineering Design, and the connection between these codes and the general educationcontent from Core is discussed in detail in the subsequent sections. In Materials Science andEngineering, an upper division elective, students are given assignments to consider the past andfuture impacts of materials development on society and to consider how the production ofmaterials and applications of materials might promote or violate various ethical standards. InStatics, a lower division
Activities for the 27,404 2017 Classroom and Outreach A Comparison of Network Simulation and Emulation 9,760 2016 Virtualization Tools A Taste of Python – Discrete and Fast Fourier Transforms 6,233 2015 Design of a Bluetooth-Enabled Wireless Pulse Oximeter 5,644 2019 Capstone Projects in a Computer Engineering Program Using 5,558 2016 Arduino A Real-time Attendance System Using Deep-learning Face 5,225 2020 Recognition STEM Outreach: Assessing Computational Thinking and 4,288 2017 Problem Solving A Methodology for Automated Facial
educating and developing engineers, teachers (future faculty), and the community at all levels (k12, undergraduate, graduate, post-graduate and internationally). A few of these key areas include engineering identity and mindsets, global competencies, failure culture, first year experiences in engineering, capstone design thinking, integrating service and authentic learning into the engineering classroom, implementing new instructional methodologies, and design optimization using traditional and non-traditional manufacturing. She seeks to identify best practices and develop assessments methods that assist in optimizing computing and engineering learning. Dr. Gurganus was one the inaugural award winners of the Diane M. Lee
to integrate and track conscientious engineering aspects throughout the undergraduate educational experience across the college. His efforts include formally integrating sustainability design requirements into the mechanical engineering capstone projects, introducing non-profit partnerships related to designs for persons with disabilities, and founding the Social/Environmental Design Impact Award. He manages several outreach and diversity efforts including the large-scale Get Out And Learn (GOAL) engineering kit program that reaches thousands of local K-12 students.Dr. Natasha Andrade, University of Maryland, College Park Dr. Natasha Andrade is a Senior Lecturer and the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Studies in
State University. She teaches capstone design courses for mechanical engineering students, and a variety of product design elective courses for engineering students as well as for students of all majors at OSU. Annie’s current scholarship interests are focused on investigating the ways in which students approach open-ended, ill-structured, or ambiguous problems. Previously, Annie taught in Ohio State’s Department of Design and Ohio State’s First-Year Engineering Program, and has past experience working in prototyping labs. She currently serves as the Central-District representative on the IDSA Women in Design Committee, and is a general member of the American Society for Engineering Education
included a foundational course with nopre-requisites, a three-course sequence of classic engineering courses that had some STEM pre-requisites, and a capstone design class that was open to seniors in all majors. While these classesfulfilled general education requirements, they were not specifically required for all engineeringstudents, as they had alternative options.We built on this history by creating two first-year engineering courses that were required for allengineering students, but also fulfilled general education requirements for all students at ourinstitution. With a mix of students in the course, the engineering students will learn to worktogether with liberal arts students on engineering projects, while the liberal arts students
[1]. Today, manyfirst-year students typically have little hands-on experience related to engineering [2]. Manyhave never used common tools before and do not know how common devices, such as carengines, actually work. Stephen Belkoff, an engineering professor at Johns Hopkins, noted thelack of practical skills for incoming freshmen, “These are all A students, and it took two days tobuild a shelf from Home Depot and get it @$$-backwards” [3]. While they are generally verycomputer savvy, incoming freshmen have little experience with engineered equipment. Studentsdo get experience with equipment in a variety of labs and in their capstone projects during thecourse of their college careers, but neither of these may be with actual equipment used
hands-on projects, laboratorycourses, capstone design projects, internships, participation in student organizations, andstudent-led competitions. Such experiences enable students to actively engage inproblem-solving and critical thinking in an environment approximating their likely role in societyafter completing their degree, enriching their understanding of the field and the value of theesoteric theory they learn in the program. The recent proliferation of Makerspaces and rapidprototyping facilities at educational institutions [43-44] underscores the growing value placed onexperiential learning within engineering education [46-47], indicating a significant shift towardsmore immersive and practical learning methodologies. Consequently, the
were themed to each of the three computing disciplines, informing them about thecoursework and careers before immersing them in the field through hands-on activities. On thefifth and final day, campers applied their knowledge to a Capstone project involving Internet ofThings (IoT) within a home. Appendix A summarizes the SCC daily activities.The research questions for this study include: RQ1: How does participation in a summer computing camp influence students’ understanding of the differences between computing disciplines? RQ2: How does participation in a summer computing camp influence students’ understanding of potential career trajectories in computing disciplines? RQ3: Which elements of the camp curriculum
approach different fields of civiland construction management is overall beneficial for a mixed class of students from bothmajors. Civil engineering students are able to learn about concepts that construction managerswill cover in further depth in their future courses, while construction managers are able toappreciate how civil engineers seek design solutions. While these students will only overlap in afew courses over their undergraduate degree (e.g., Engineering Economics), they are pairedtogether again in their final senior capstone design course. In that course, the students work witha project mentor from a local engineering firm to design a civil engineering system (e.g.,wastewater treatment plant, new transportation corridor, bridge
students design new lab experiments as their Capstone projects for the InternalCombustion Engine course and the Dynamics and Vibration course. The student designed lab andthe equipment was being used for the future students. We intend to explore further this approachto address difficult concepts students experienced in the engineering curriculum.Conclusion and Future ResearchA student designed experiment lab class created an active learning opportunity to the students. Itwas utilized to help the students to learn the concept of Specific Heat in a thermodynamics course.Based on the pre/post quizzes and survey results, the approach improved student learningsignificantly.Besides create an active learning environment to improve students’ learning
-28, 1992.[9] R. M. Marra, K. A. Rodgers, D. Shen, and B. Bogue, "Leaving Engineering: A Multi-Year Single Institution Study," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 6-27, 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00039.x.[10] E. E. Shortlidge and S. L. Eddy, "The trade-off between graduate student research and teaching: A myth?," PloS one, vol. 13, no. 6, p. e0199576, 2018.[11] R. D. Watts and A. O. Brightman, "Crossing the line: When does the involvement of human subjects in testing of engineering capstone design projects require oversight by an IRB?," in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2017.[12] L. R. Lattuca, I. Bergom, and D. B
understand howBME students develop an entrepreneurial mindset (EM). These studies explore curricular EMinterventions designed to encourage development of EM skills such as curiosity about the coursetopics [22], reflective thinking [16], and designing for a certain customer base [17], [42]. In Kinget al.'s study [40], BME students participated in capstone design projects where they worked inteams to design prototypes based on existing patent applications of industry professionals. Thesestudents were able to learn about the engineering design process as well as the business side ofintellectual property development such as patents, customer discovery, budgeting, andcommunication of results [40].In several studies on EM development within a BME context
steel, quenched steel, acrylic, polycarbonate (PC), polyethylene terephthalate (PET),ABS, nylon, and wood.While the study was limited to these 16 specimens, the design presented may be used tocustomize the visualizations for an educator’s individual requirements. To reduce the cost of thestudy, the materials were all sourced from existing laboratory supplies or on-site additivemanufacturing capabilities. This allowed the students to see the same material samplesthroughout their undergraduate curriculum, beginning with Fundamentals of EngineeringMechanics and Design course (Statics), again during each of their hands-on laboratoryexperiences, and finally during their culminating capstone experience. The authors sought to linkpast in-class
Critical EngagementIn this study, students were invited to participate in a survey to share their experiences using AItools during one semester in four courses. Thirty-five (35) Computer and Electrical Engineering(CEE) students at the University of Wisconsin-Stout responded to the survey describing their useof AI tools such as ChatGPT in their studies. The group included 15 sophomores and 20 seniorsenrolled in 4 different CEE courses titled “CEE-215 Electronics”, “CEE-405 Capstone I:Computer Engineering Design”, “CEE-410 Capstone II: Computer Engineering Design”, and“CEE-355 Applied Electromagnetics”. The survey featured nine questions, seven using a Likertscale to measure students' opinions about AI tools in their education. The Likert scale
. 11, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/story-driven-learning-in-biomedical-engineering-quantifying-empathy-in-the- context-of-prompts-and-perceptions[14] K. L. Morgan, C. L. Bell-Huff, J. Shaffer, and J. M. LeDoux, “Story-Driven Learning: A Pedagogical Approach for Promoting Students’ Self-Awareness and Empathy for Others,” presented at the 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Jul. 2021. Accessed: Oct. 19, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/story-driven-learning-a-pedagogical-approach-for- promoting-students-self-awareness-and-empathy-for-others[15] G. Guanes, L. Wang, D. A. Delaine, and E. Dringenberg, “Empathic approaches in engineering capstone design projects: student
a Professor-Educator in the Chemical Engineering program at the University of Cincinnati (UC). He received his BS in Chemical Engineering from Virginia Tech, and his MS and PhD in Chemical Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin. His past research has focused on membrane science, adsorption, and ion exchange. He currently serves as the Chemical Engineering Undergraduate Program Director at UC and teaches the capstone process design sequence. He is a licensed Professional Engineer in the State of Ohio. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 How We Teach: Chemical Engineering ElectivesAbstractThe AIChE Education Division’s Survey Committee covered elective
coverage is included in programs’ cores, how is the learning operationalized toreinforce it as being integral to engineering leadership practice? Proposals for embedding ethicsinstruction more integrally within engineering coursework have included increasing the emphasison human-centric approaches to design on engineering team projects [10, 17], mitigating orreducing the isolation of ethics instruction from other aspects of courses and projects [8, 13], andincreasing the use of experiential learning approaches for ethics instruction [12, 17 - 20], among 18 19others. As this paper’s central focus, we illustrate how an ethical reasoning challenge can
promote DEI. In addition, he also works on many research-to-practice projects to enhance educational technology usage in engineering classrooms and educational research.Li Shen, University of Pennsylvania Dr. Shen obtained his Ph.D. degree in Computer Science from Dartmouth College. He is a Professor of Informatics and Radiology in the University of Pennsylvania. His research interests include medical image computing, biomedical informatics, machine learning, trustworthy AI, NLP/LLMs, network science, imaging genomics, multi-omics and systems biology, Alzheimer’s disease, and big data science in biomedicine. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Theorizing neuro-induced relationships
Paper ID #42183WIP: AI-based Sentiment Analysis and Grader EnhancementsMr. Bobby F Hodgkinson, University of Colorado Boulder Bobby Hodgkinson is an Associate Teaching Professor in the Smead Aerospace Engineering Sciences Department (AES) and co-manages the educational electronics and instrumentation shop. He assists students and researchers in the department for sensor and data acquisition needs as well as manages several lab courses and experiments. He is a member of the Professional Advisory Board for the senior capstone projects course. Prior to joining Smead Aerospace department in 2012, he was the lab manager at
Paper ID #43012Perceptions of Engineering College Instructors and Their Students TowardsGenerative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) Tools: A Preliminary QualitativeAnalysisMr. Dhruv Gambhir, Nanyang Technological University Dhruv is a senior undergraduate student majoring in Computer Science at Nanyang Technological University (NTU) in Singapore. Actively engaged in Dr. Yeter’s Research Team, he specializes in projects at the intersection of engineering education and artificial intelligence (AI). With a unique perspective as an engineering student focused on AI, Dhruv is dedicated to enhancing engineering education in the
Perspectives for Engineers o Learning theories applied to engineering education. o Curriculum design: Approaches to planning teaching. o Writing and reading as scaffolding for learning and teaching. o Capstone projects in engineering education. • Module 2: Teaching-Learning Methodologies in Engineering. o Problem-based learning and projects. o Collaborative learning and teamwork. o Use of simulations and virtual laboratories. o Integration of emerging technologies in engineering education. • Module 3: Formative Assessment and Feedback o Evaluate versus qualify as foci of learning. o Design of instruments, criteria, and guidelines necessary to accompany
computational lab occurs at the end of a series of labs covering finite elementanalysis (FEA) using COMSOL. Similar to above, this is a capstone project over the last twoweeks of class after a sequence of labs where students are taught to use COMSOL via step-by-step tutorials and related challenge problems.Here, the computational lab is somewhat less open-ended: students are all given the same steelcomposition to use (AISI 1045 steel), and the important physical parameters they need, but thedetailed step-by-step directions for exactly how to perform the simulations required are notprovided. As in the Thermo-Calc lab, the students must design the simulations themselves.This lab brings together much of what was covered throughout the computational labs
Science in Capstone, Internship, Senior Project, physics, biology, chemistry, Context humanities 7 Math and Statistics Calculus, discrete structures, probability theory, elementary statistics, statistics, linear algebra.Step 3: Define Geographic Regions Table 4 below identifies the U.S. Geographical regions used in the earlier study [12], thestates in each region and the representative cities used in the Indeed search to acquire job data forthe present study. Table 4: Regions, States in Regions, and Representative Cities in Regions Regions States from which Degree Program Curriculum Data
evaluating specific characteristics of thementorship experience itself [7]. Other mentorship within engineering programs is designed to support career or industrymentoring, usually for upper-level students. While industry mentors focusing on technical andproject mentorship through capstone projects is sometimes considered mentorship [21,22],mentorship programs with less curricular integration often focus on broader career readiness.Industry mentors are sometimes expected to assist with helping students find internships and jobs[3] or to develop professional skills that aren’t usually taught as a part of the engineeringcurriculum [23]. Evaluation of these programs is often driven by surveys and may explore whichcareer-readiness topics are being
, specifically in Process Control [3], but the implementation of labexperiences in process control courses have been largely constrained in many higher-educationinstitutions by several factors like lack of equipment and technical support [4]. Several initiativeshave been reported to compensate for this deficiency including classroom lab kits [3], remotelabs [4], [5], [6], virtual lab simulators [6], [7], [8], [9], and the use of data from unit operationexperimental modules [10] among others.Our chemical engineering curriculum includes a capstone senior course on Process Control, 5credit units, with a companion laboratory course (1 credit hour). The lab includes six fullyautomated experimental setups, three for liquid level control and three for
University of Texas at Austin. His past research has focused on membrane science, adsorption, and ion exchange. He currently serves as the Chemical Engineering Undergraduate Program Director at UC and teaches the capstone process design sequence. He is a licensed Professional Engineer in the State of Ohio.Dr. Bruce K Vaughen P.E., American Institute of Chemical Engineers Bruce K. Vaughen, Ph.D., P.E., CCPSC, (brucv@aiche.org) is the Lead Process Safety Subject Matter Expert at the Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS), a Technology Alliance in the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE). He has more than two decades of industrial experience, has authored or co-authored five books on Process Safety, co-chaired
difficult transition. To shed light on thechallenges faced by these students, Author 1 proposed the initial framework for this project toAuthor 3, who contributed to the comprehensive conceptualization of this exploratory study.Author 2 joined the team after most data analysis was completed and helped write the findingssection of the paper. Author 2 is a civil engineering undergraduate student and an undergraduateresearcher working under Author 3. All authors identify as white women.FindingsAfter conducting a thematic analysis on the data, we observed recurring themes that wereprevalent among professors with comparable levels of experience. As a result, our findings arestructured according to the experience levels of the participants. Table 2